臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：歷史觀點的覺察：國中教科書臺灣史之差異敘述
書刊名：教育實踐與研究
作者：宋佩芬 引用關係／古庭瑄
作者(外文)：Sung, Pei-fen／Ku, Ting Shiuan
出版日期：2015
卷期：28:2
頁次：頁59-87
主題關鍵詞：教科書分析；意識形態；歷史觀點；Historical perspectives；Ideology；Textbook analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:372
  • 點閱點閱:137
臺灣民主化使得臺灣史在課程中有獨立地位，由於臺灣意識與中國意識是臺灣歷史教科書的兩種主要意識形態，不同版本教科書的臺灣史敘述是否隱含史觀上之差異，是歷史教師有必要具備判斷力之議題。本研究以國中社會科臺灣史第一冊之「臺灣原住民起源」、「臺灣與中國淵源關係」、及「牡丹社事件」主題為例說明三個不同版本教科書歷史敘述的差異。研究發現，不同版本的教科書，在臺灣史的敘述上有臺灣意識、中國意識及國際意識的差異。然而，這些跟認同的建構有關的意識形態，化身在看起來中性的歷史事實中，容易使所傳達的史觀不被注意，而使公民潛移默化間接受了未經思考的觀點。本文主張教師須教導學生敏感於歷史敘述背後的觀點與詮釋角度，以養成民主社會公民理性思考能力，並對教科書潛移默化影響的認同教育有判斷的能力。
Democratization allowed Taiwanese History to be established independently in the curriculum, and because Taiwanese consciousness and Chinese consciousness are two main historical ideologies in the history curriculum, there is a need for history teachers to have the ability to judge the underlying perspectives in Taiwanese History. This study utilizes three versions of Junior-high school Taiwanese history textbooks and examines three themes-- ＂The Origins of Taiwanese Aboriginals,＂ ＂The Historical Relationship between Taiwan and China,＂ and ＂the Mu-Dan-She Event＂ --to explain the narrative differences in the textbook accounts. We found Taiwanese consciousness, Chinese consciousness and international consciousness in the three different textbooks. However, these identity-related ideologies are embedded in historical facts that appear to be neutral making perspectives in the narratives unheeded. We believe that teachers need to help sensitize students with the underlying perspectives and interpretive frames in historical narratives in order to cultivate citizens’ rational thinking ability and to develop discernment in identifying identity education hidden in textbooks in a democratic society.
期刊論文
1.凌純聲(1955)。東南亞古文化研究發凡。主義與國策，44，1-3。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barton, K. C.、McCully, A. W.(2005)。History, identity, and the school curriculum in Northern Ireland: An empirical study of secondary students' ideas and perspectives。Journal of Curriculum Studies，37(1)，85-116。  new window
3.Fox, C. E.(1947)。Phonetic laws in Melanesian languages。Journal of Polynesian Society，56，58-118。  new window
4.Blust, Robert A.(1988)。The Austronesian Homeland: a Linguistic Perspective。Asian Perspectives，26(1)，45-67。  new window
5.陳盈宏、張建成(20120600)。臺灣小學社會科教科書中國族概念的變動。臺灣教育社會學研究，12(1)，119-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lacity, Mary C.、Janson, Marius A.(1994)。Understanding qualitative data: A framework of text analysis methods。Journal of Management Information Systems，11(2)，137-155。  new window
7.宋佩芬、陳俊傑(20150400)。國中教科書之中國史敘述變動（1952-2008）。教科書研究，8(1)，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Barton, K. C.(2001)。History education and national identity in Northern Ireland and the United States: Differing priorities。Theory into Practice，40(1)，48-54。  new window
9.Janmaat, J. G.、Piattoeva, N.(2007)。Citizenship education in Ukraine and Russia: Reconciling nation-building and active citizenship。Comparative Education，43(4)，527-552。  new window
10.Kern, H. A.(1889)。Linguistic evidence for the determination of the original homeland of the Malayo-Polynesian peoples。Oceanic studies，1，60-81。  new window
11.Lee, P. J.(1983)。History teaching and philosophy of history。History and Theory，22(4)，19-49。  new window
12.Marshall, H.(2009)。Educating the European citizen in the global age: Engaging with the post-national and identifying a research agenda。Journal of Curriculum Studies，41(2)，247-267。  new window
13.Oglesby, E.(2007)。Educating citizens in postwar Guatemala: Historical memory, genocide, and the culture of peace。Radical History Review，2007(97)，77-98。  new window
14.Sleeter, C. E.(2002)。State curriculum standards and the shaping of student consciousness。Social Justice，29(4)，8-25。  new window
15.莊國土(20000600)。海貿與移民互動：十七－十八世紀閩南人移民臺灣原因--兼論漳泉籍移民差異。臺灣文獻，51(2)，11-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Dyen, Isidore(1956)。Language distribution and migration theory。Language，32(4)，611-626。  new window
17.Su, Bing、Jin, L.、Underhill, P.、Martinson, J.、Saha, N.、McGarvey, S. T.、Chakraborty, R.、Deke, R.(2000)。Polynesian origins: Insights from the Y chromosome。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A.，97(15)，8225-8228。  new window
18.張光直(1987)。中國東南海岸考古與南島語族起源問題。南方民族考古，1，1-14。  延伸查詢new window
19.林媽利(20010100)。從DNA的研究看臺灣原住民的來源。語言暨語言學，2(1)，241-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Shutler, Richard Jr.、Marck, Jeffrey C.(1975)。On the Dispersal of the Austronesian Horticulturalists。Archaeology ana Physical Anthropology in Oceania，10(2)，81-113。  new window
21.陳叔倬、許木柱(20010100)。臺灣原鄉論的震憾--族群遺傳基因資料的評析。語言暨語言學，2(1)，231-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林玉茹(20030900)。1945年以來臺灣學者臺灣史研究的回顧--課題與研究趨勢的討論(1945-2000)。臺灣史料研究，21，2-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher，15(2)，4-14。  new window
24.臧振華(20010100)。從「Polynesian Origins：Insights from the Y Chromosome」一文談南島民族的起源和擴散問題。語言暨語言學，2(1)，253-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Bellwood, Peter(1991)。The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages。Scientific American，265(1)，88-93。  new window
26.卯靜儒(20120300)。尋找最大公約數？--高中歷史教科書編寫與審查互動過程分析。當代教育研究，20(1)，83-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Sung, P. F.(2010)。Should national identity be taught? Taiwan's history teachers' stances。The 14th World Congress of Comparative Education Societies。Istanbul。  new window
學位論文
1.Shin, S. H.(2011)。National identity and national history: Role of historical narratives on identity construction(博士論文)。University of Melbourne，Melbourne。  new window
2.陳敏華(2008)。我國國民中學公民類科教科書國家認同內涵之演變(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙志龍(2008)。國民小學教育國家認同建構之研究--以現行國小社會領域教材為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋銘桓(2004)。教科書政治意識型態之比較--以「公民與道德」和「認識台灣」為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳盈宏(2006)。解嚴後國小社會科教科書中國族概念之轉變(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.薛化元、戴寶村、周美里(2005)。臺灣不是中國的--臺灣國民的歷史。新北市淡水：財團法人群策會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Vickers, E.、Jones, A.(2005)。History education and national identity in east Asia。Routledge。  new window
3.翁佳音(2001)。異論臺灣史。臺北板橋：稻鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.林明德(2002)。日本近代史。臺北市：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.南一(2008)。社會--歷史篇。台南：南一。  延伸查詢new window
6.南一(2008)。社會--歷史篇教師手冊。台南：南一。  延伸查詢new window
7.康軒(2008)。社會--歷史篇。台北：康軒。  延伸查詢new window
8.康軒(2008)。社會--歷史篇教師手冊。台北：康軒。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳孔立(1996)。臺灣歷史綱要。北京：九州圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭廷以(1961)。臺灣史事概說。臺北市：正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.湯子炳(1946)。臺灣史綱。臺北市：劉濤。  延伸查詢new window
12.翰林(2008)。社會--歷史篇。台北：翰林。  延伸查詢new window
13.翰林(2008)。社會--歷史篇教師手冊。台北：翰林。  延伸查詢new window
14.Berg, M.、Schaefer, B.(2009)。Historical justice in international perspective: How societies are trying to right the wrongs of the past。Washington, D.C.：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Berger, S.、Lorenz, C.(2010)。Nationalizing the past: Historians as nation builders in modern Europe。New York, NY：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
16.Cajani, L.、Ross, A.(2007)。History teaching, identities, citizenship。Stoke-on-Trent：Trentham Books。  new window
17.Carretero, M.(2011)。Constructing patriotism: Teaching history and memories in global worlds。Charlotte, NC：Information Age Publishing。  new window
18.Richter, S.(2008)。Contested views of a common past。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Rotberg, R. I.(2006)。Israeli and Palestinian narratives of conflict: History's double helix。Bloomington, IN：Indiana University Press。  new window
20.Walsh, W. H.(1960)。Philosophy of history: An introduction。New York, NY：Harper。  new window
21.Carr, Edward Hallett(1990)。What is History?。Penguin Books。  new window
22.Davis, Ozro Luke Jr.、Yeager, Elizabeth Anne、Foster, Stuart J.(2001)。Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies。Lanham, Md。  new window
23.Loewen, J. W.(1995)。Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong。New York：Simon and Schuster。  new window
24.Smith, Anthony D.(1991)。National Identity。University of Nevada Press。  new window
25.Collingwood, Robin George(1994)。The Idea of History: Revised Edition with Lectures 1926-1928。Cambridge：Oxford University Press。  new window
26.彭明輝(20020000)。臺灣史學的中國纏結。臺北：麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Van Dijk, T. A.(1998)。Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach。London：Thousand Oaks, Calif：Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
28.Duara, Prasenjit(1995)。Rescuing History from the Nation-State: Questioning Narratives of Modern China。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
29.Bruner, J. S.(1960)。The process of education。New York, NY：Vintage Books。  new window
30.薛化元(1999)。臺灣開發史。臺北：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.陳碧笙(1993)。臺灣人民歷史。臺北：人間出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.Takaki, Ronald T.(1993)。A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America。New York：Boston：Little, Brown and Company。  new window
33.林呈蓉(2006)。牡丹社事件的真相。博揚文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
34.Levstik, Linda S.、Barton, Keith C.(2001)。Doing History: Investigating With Children in Elementary and Middle Schools。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
35.杜正勝(1998)。臺灣心，臺灣魂。河畔。  延伸查詢new window
36.黃秀政、張勝彥、吳文星(2002)。臺灣史。五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.李壬癸(1997)。臺灣南島民族的族群與遷徙。台北市：常民文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國行政院大陸委員會。電訪民意調查，http://www.mac.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=6332&CtUnit=3932&BaseDSD=7&mp=1。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊雲萍(1980)。鄭成功的歷史地位--開創與恢復。臺灣史論叢。臺北：眾文。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Barton, K. C.(2012)。School history as a resource for constructing identities: Implications of research from the Uniated States, Northern Ireland, and New Zealand。History educaiton and the construction of national identities。Charlotte, NC：Information Age Publishing。  new window
3.Chang, L. C.(2008)。Re-imagining community from different shores: Nationalism, post-colonialism and colonial modernity in Taiwanese historiography。Contested views of a common past。New York, NY：Campus Verlag。  new window
4.López, C.、Carretero, M.(2012)。Commentary: Identity construction and the goals of history education。History education and the construction of national identities。Charlotte, NC：Information Age Publishing。  new window
5.Soysal, Y. N.、Schissler, H.(2005)。Introduction: Teaching beyond the national narrative。The nation, Europe, and the world: Textbooks and curricula in transition。New York：Oxford：Berghahn Books。  new window
6.周婉窈(19991200)。明清文獻中「臺灣非明版圖」例證。鄭欽仁教授榮退紀念論文集。臺北：稻鄉。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：994（臺灣：969，外國：25） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67421097
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上