:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小師資培育生選修綜合活動教材教法動機與學習經驗之初探
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:潘淑琦 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Shi-chi
出版日期:2018
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁1-29
主題關鍵詞:綜合活動學習經驗選課動機期望Integrated activitiesLearning experienceMotivationExpectation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:90
  • 點閱點閱:10
本研究目的在探究師資培育生對此課程的學習經驗以及選修動機與期待,並以南部某國立大學103至105年等3年內選修綜合活動教材教法之84位國小師資培育生為對象,採用期初及期末自編綜合活動教材教法問卷,輔以每年訪談5-6位師資培育生,以提供授課教師對綜合活動教材教法的課程規劃調整,及師資培育機構對綜合活動教材教法課程時間安排之參考。研究結果發現:(一)選修動機-源自學習經驗:(1)國中小時期:綜合課程常被邊緣化、次級化,被挪去主學科趕進度、考試,或被學校的其他活動佔用,故其學習經驗是模糊、陌生的;(2)代課時期:因未能理解課程內涵及教學經驗不足,只能照本宣科,無法勝任;(3)師資培育期間:考量是否衝堂、時間壓力、充實專業能力、教授推薦、生涯規劃等;(4)認為本學科對教學是重要而選修。(二)選修期望-選修後所獲得的專業知能:瞭解綜合活動內涵、教案撰寫能力、教學演示精進、教學專業知能、教學現場分享交流,以及培養人品的基礎課程。
This study aimed to explore the learning experiences of elementary teacher education students, as well as their motivations and expectations for electing an integrated activities course. The participants included 84 elementary teacher education students who took the integrated activities course as an elective course between 2014 and 2016 in a national university located in South Taiwan. In order to provide information for teachers on planning and adjusting their teaching methods, and for the teacher education institution to schedule time slots for the integrated activities course, this study adopted a research self-developed questionnaire to survey participants' opinions about the teaching materials and methods of the integrated activities at the beginning and toward the end of the semester. Besides, supplementary information was obtained by interviewing 5 to 6 teacher education students each year. The results of this study showed that: (1) Motivations for taking the elective course stemmed from the learning experiences: (a) during middle school and primary school periods: since integrated activities courses were often marginalized and considered as secondary, the allotted class-times were often replaced by other school activities, or used by teachers of major subjects to help students catch up, or to take examinations. Participants' learning experiences of integrated activities during these periods were vague and unfamiliar; (b) during the substitute teaching period: because of their lack of a thorough understanding of the curricular contents and their lack of teaching experiences, what the participants could do then was to simply read the textbooks word by word with a feeling of failing to have done a good job; (c) during the teacher education period: factors to be taken into consideration included schedule conflict, time pressure, potential for enriching their professional competence, recommendations from their professors, and career planning; (d) that the participants of this study considered this course to be important for teaching. (2) Expectations for taking the elective course: professional knowledge and skills to be gained from this course included: an understanding of the contents of integrated activities, proficiencies in preparing instructional plans, enhancing the teaching demonstration skills, strengthening the professional knowledge of teaching, on-site sharing and communicating of teaching experiences, and the basic course on cultivating morality and character.
期刊論文
1.丘愛鈴(20060600)。臺灣綜合活動學習領域研究的回顧與展望。高雄師大學報.教育與社會科學類,20,21-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.梁福鎮(20100600)。當前德國師資培育政策與改革方案研究。教育科學期刊,9(1),105-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.周水珍(20041100)。國小綜合活動學習領域的實施困境與改進策略之研究。花蓮師院學報.教育類,19,61-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳易芬(20111200)。職前教師對師資培育課程與教學的看法與建議。彰化師大教育學報,20,21-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳怡靜(2016)。教育強國芬蘭啟動新教改。天下雜誌,598。  延伸查詢new window
6.王為國(20160200)。體驗學習在綜合活動學習領域之運用。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(2),58-63。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱克剛、夏延德(20020900)。由選課記錄推斷課程類別對選課者的重要性。中原學報,30(3),401-410。  延伸查詢new window
8.李蘭(2016)。分析小學思想品德課教學效果的影響因素與解決對策。中外交流,10,215-215。  延伸查詢new window
9.林彩雲、王為國(20131000)。國小教師綜合活動學習領域課程實踐之探究。教育研究月刊,234,121-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.紀乃友(2016)。淺談物理科教材教法。物理教育學刊,17(1),35-42。  延伸查詢new window
11.高麟蒞(2015)。福建省大學網球課的選課動機與教學效果關係分析。考試週刊,10,87-88。  延伸查詢new window
12.張孟莉、張景然(20111100)。國中綜合活動教師在教育情境中的行動選擇研究。輔導與諮商學報. 彰師大,33(2),33-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳易芬(20100600)。師培生職前學習經驗之探究。教育理論與實踐學刊,21,39-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳易芬(20090600)。國小師資培育課程對職前教師關切事項的影響。教育理論與實踐學刊,19,63-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.潘淑琦(20161200)。非臨海特偏小校實施海洋教育之研究。教師專業研究期刊,12,79-105。  延伸查詢new window
16.葉堂林(2011)。大學公選課學生選課動機及其影響因素的研究綜述。商場現代化,22,118-120。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉佳灝、饒瑞佶(20070100)。學生選課組合與學習成效的資料探勘。建國科大學報,26(2),1-18。  延伸查詢new window
18.蔡毓芬、蔡自青(20121200)。學生選修翻譯課程的學習動機探討。淡江外語論叢,20,57-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.王全興(20060800)。體驗學習的理念及其在教育情境的應用。臺灣教育,640,32-36。  延伸查詢new window
20.李宜玫、孫頌賢(20100300)。大學生選課自主性動機與學習投入之關係。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),155-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔣昀璉(2016)。國家對國民教育師資規制之探討--以公立國民小學教師為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶山(1993)。教學原理。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tesch, Renata(1990)。Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools。The Falmer Press。  new window
3.張春興、林清山(1984)。教育心理學。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.李坤崇(2011)。綜合活動學習領域概論。臺北市:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃光雄(1999)。教學原理。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.Apple, M. W.(1989)。Teacher and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
7.歐用生(2004)。課程領導:議題與展望。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.國立屏東大學(2015)。國立屏東大學各師資類科教育學程教育專業課程先修科目對照表,http://www.cte.nptu.edu.tw/files/40-1026-1327-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱,http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。  延伸查詢new window
3.國立臺南大學(2015)。國立臺南大學教育學程修習辦法,http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/rules.htm。  延伸查詢new window
4.國立屏東大學(2016)。國立屏東大學教育學程修習辦法,http://www.cte.nptu.edu.tw/files/14-1026-49963,r1327-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.朱麟華、蔡啟達、黃明分、林明淵、辜明祥、盧建勳(2017)。國小教師實施綜合活動教學兩難困境之研究。第102期國小校長儲訓班專題研究。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE