The purpose of this study is to explore ethical implication of Zhuangzi, and it is based on the critical ethical concept, "subjectivity." French philosopher Emmanuel Lévinas referred the ethical origin to others instead of self-legislation of subjectivity. Such argument derives from his criticism on subjectivism. The critique leads to organic cross-cultural dialogue with Zhuangzi and thus unfolds the contemporary significance of the ethical implication in Zhuangzi. Criticism of Zhuangzi on language, manner and power originates from profound ethical concern, particularly from various different cognitions of human beings. However, the difference from Emmanuel Lévinas is that the regulated origin of Zhuangzi is a "one" from "merging with the Great Pervader." In the Western philosophy or religion, "the one" tends to be completely contradictory to the theory of diverse human cognitions. Nevertheless, "one" in Zhuangzi should not be comprehended by Western ontology; it, instead, must be elaborated by "Tian Jun" model that is proposed by Wang Fuzhi. By "Tian Jun" model of Zhuangzi, this study associates "one" with "many" to illustrate Zhuangzi which, on the one hand, constantly emphasizes unification of all beings, but, on the other hand, continuously opposes the statement of unification. The two opposite statements coexist; they converse with each other and form the ethical features of Zhuangzi