:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響國初中後教育分流的實證分析:性別、省籍、與家庭背景的差異
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:薛承泰 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsueh, Cherng-tay
出版日期:1996
卷期:20
頁次:頁49-84
主題關鍵詞:教育分流功績主義階級複製多重類別邏輯迴歸文憑主義文化複製Class reproductionEducational trackingMeritocracyMulti-nominal logistic regressionCredentialismCultural reproduction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(47) 博士論文(8) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:46
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:266
本研究以「社會變遷」第二期第三、四次調查,共六千兩百位台灣民眾為對象,針對台灣社會的特性,以性別、省籍、和父母親教育,來描述國初中之後升學與教育分流的差異。整體而言,台灣教育水平不斷提昇,而且性別、省籍、與社經背景的差異也有縮減的現象,其中以性別特別明顯。省籍的差異雖然減緩了,外省人在教育的優勢仍然存在,尤其是外省人進入普通高中比例較其它省籍為高;本省閩南與客家教育水平雖不斷提昇,但以進入高職比例的增加最為明顯。此外,具有較高社經背景者,不論年齡群,繼續升學與進入普通高中的比例也一直是偏高的。 經由多變項分析發現,家庭背景因素對教育取得 ( 以年計 ) 的影響力,隨著年輕人口有減弱的情形。然而,除了性別之外,背景因素的影響力對國初中後的升學並沒有減緩;至於分流的選擇,「普通高中」和「職業學校」所吸引的學生,更和家庭背景有相當的關連。此外,在給予不同階級背景 ( 以父母教育程度為指標 ) 的條件下,出生於民國四十五年之前人口群,初中畢業後的升學以及進普通高中的機率均以外省男性最高,非外省女性最低。至於出生於民國四十五年之後人口群,國中畢業後的升學,性別的影響力降低,然外省子女進入普通高中機率仍較非外省為高;無論如何,性別和省籍差異仍不若階級背景明顯。簡單地說,台灣教育的擴充的確縮短了 ( 尤其是性別間 ) 教育機會的不均;然而在分流的教育過程當中,背景因素 ( 按重要性依次為父母教育、省籍 ) 仍然具有相當的作用。
Entering into different educational tracks may affect an individual's future educational attainment, and occupational achievements as well. This research attempts to explore the socioeconomic attributes that help interpret the track (high school, vocatìonal schools, or professional schools) that an individual entered after graduating from junior high. By using data sets (N= 6,200) from "Taiwan Social Change Survey 1992-93 waves", I first describe the educational inequality among males and females, depending upon ethnic groups, social class, and cohort. Indicated by both years of schooling and educational progression, it shows that the educatìonal inequality has generally declined over cohorts, although differenciations still exit with respect to ethnicity and particularly social class. By controlling the effects of gender and ethnicity, the logit models show that individuals of higher class background are more likely to get further education and to enter a high school track. All things being equal, there is an educational convergence between males and females of the younger cohorts born after 1955, who were first affected by the policy of 9-year compulsory education initiated in 1968.
期刊論文
1.薛承泰(19940600)。影響學位取得的家庭因素--中美跨國比較之研究。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,23,217-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Smith, Herbert L.、Cheung, Paul P. L.(1986)。Trends in the Effects of Family Background on Educational Attainment in the Philippines。American Journal of Sociology,91(6),1387-1408。  new window
3.張清溪(19920300)。Historical Trends in the Equality of Educational Opportunity in Taiwan。經濟論文叢刊,20(1),23-50。new window  new window
4.Simkus, A.、Andorka, R.(1982)。Inequality in educational attainment in Hungary。American Sociology Review,47(7),740-751。  new window
5.DiMaggio, Paul J.(1982)。Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students。American Sociological Review,47(2),189-201。  new window
6.Tsai, Shu-Ling、Gates, Hill、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1994)。Schooling Taiwan's Women: Educational Attainment in the Mid-20th Century。Sociology of Education,67(4),243-263。  new window
7.Mare, Robert D.(1981)。Change and stability in educational stratification。American Sociological Review,46(1),72-87。  new window
8.Shavit, Yossi、Kraus, Vered(1990)。Educational Transitions in Israel: A Test of the Industrialization and Credentialism Hypotheses。Sociology of Education,63(2),133-141。  new window
9.林忠正、林鶴玲(1992)。台灣地區各族群的經濟差異。國家政策雙週刊,32,4-5。  延伸查詢new window
10.Carnoy, Martin、Levin, Henry(1986)。Educational Reform and Class Conflict。Journal of Education,168,35-46。  new window
11.Collins, Randall(1977)。Functional and Conflict Theories of Educational Stratifiction。American Sociological Review,36,1002-1019。  new window
12.Mare, Robert D.(1979)。Social Background Composition and Educational Growth。Demography,16,58-71。  new window
13.Gamoran, A.、Mare, Robert D.(1989)。Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality?。American Journal of Sociology,94(5),1146-1183。  new window
14.Davis, Kingsley、Moore, Wilbert E.(1945)。Some principles of stratification。American Sociological Review,10(2),242-249。  new window
15.Mare, Robert D.(1980)。Social Background and School Continuation Decisions。Journal of the American Statistical Association,75(370),295-305。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(1995)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.瞿海源(1992)。台灣地區社會變基本調查計劃--第二期第三次調查執行報吿。中央研究院民族研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.瞿海源(1993)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第四次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 82-0301-H-001-050-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hurn, C. J.(1985)。The Limits and Possibilities of Schooling: An Introduction to the Sociology of Education。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Collins, R.(1979)。The credential society: A historical sociology of education and stratification。New York:Academic Press。  new window
3.Bowles, Samuel、Gintis, Herbert(1976)。Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Hurn, Christopher J.(1993)。The Limits and Possibilities of Schooling: An Introduction to the Sociology of Education。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Rosenbaum, J. E.(1976)。Making Inequality: The Hidden Curriculum of High School Tracking。New York:Wiley。  new window
6.Oakes, Jeannie(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Yale University Press。  new window
7.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
單篇論文
1.Sandefur, G. D.,Hsueh, C. T.,King, J.(1992)。Racial and Ethnic Differences in College Attendance and College Graduation,Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin at Madison。  new window
圖書論文
1.Durkheim, E.(1977)。On Education and Society。Power and Ideology in Education。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Parsons, T.(1970)。Equality and inequality in modern society, or social stratification revisited。Social stratification: Research and theory for the 1970's。Indianapolis, Ind.:Bobbs-Merrill Company。  new window
3.Treiman, Donald J.(1970)。Industrialization and Social Stratification。Social stratification: Research and theory for the 1970s。Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs-Merrill。  new window
4.Bourdieu, Pierre(1977)。Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction。Power and Ideology in Education。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Bell, D.(1977)。On Meritocracy and Equality。Power and Ideology in Education。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.羊憶蓉(1991)。教育與國家發展:『台灣經驗』的反省。光復後台灣地區發展經驗。台北:中研院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.羊憶蓉(1994)。教育的權利與義務。台灣的教育改革。前衛出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張清溪(1994)。教育與人力規畫。台灣的教育改革。前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Tsai, Shu-ling、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1993)。Change in Educational Stratification in Taiwan。Persist Inequality: Changing Educational Stratification in Thirteen Countries。Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE