臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣地區民眾地位取得之因果機制--共變結構分析
書刊名：東吳社會學報
作者：黃毅志 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hwang, Yih-jyh
出版日期：1996
卷期：5
頁次：頁213-247
主題關鍵詞：人力資本；社會資源；文化資本；地位取得；Human capital；Social resouries；Cultrual capital；Status attairment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(43) 博士論文(14) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:40
  • 共同引用共同引用:324
  • 點閱點閱:126
　　　　　地位取得研究往往被批評為只有方法而沒有理論,或者是侷限於微觀個 人層面之分析，而忽略了結構層面之分析。本研究則參考林南,Coleman與Bourdieu 的分析架構，引進結構層面的社會網絡變項,以及深具理論意涵的文化資本論於 地位取得研究，並參考了台灣社會的補習教育，加入這個適合本土特殊狀況的教 育資源變項於教育取得分析。所分析的資料主要是民國81年所蒐集的「台灣地 區社會變遷調查資料」,並針對其中具有國初中以上學歷,且靠人介紹而取得現職 的在台出生者作分析，以共變結構分析(LISREL)探討從背景、教育、到職業整個 地位取得過程。主要的研究發現是:家庭背景對本人現職的影響，主要以本人之 教育年數與初職所代表的求現職時原先地位為中介，亦即透過原先地位之影響達 到代間不平等之再造,此原先地位通常用來代表人力資本。至於原先地位對於現 職之影響，有將近一半的影響是透過對介紹人職業所代表的社會資源之影響，間 接影響現職地位，介紹人職業對現職之影響,比原先地位對現職的直接影響還要 大一些。而家庭背景對原先地位之影響，主要以補習教育與家庭讀書環境所代表 的教育資源為中介；雖然家庭背景對於家庭的文化資本也有很大的影響，然而家 庭文化資本對於原先地位的影響卻不顯著，代間不平等之再造並非以家庭文化資 本之傳遞為中介。
　　　　　Status attainment researches have often been criticized as to be carried out with methods without the basis of theory, or to be restricted in the microscopic analyses on individual aspects without consideration of structural analysis. With reference to the analyzing frameworks devised by Lin Nan, Coleman, and Bourdieu respectively, this study makes use of the social network variables of the structural aspect, and of cultural capital which carries ample implication in theory construction. Also the extra-curricular education which is so prevailed in Taiwan is manipulated as a education resources variable. The data are all taken from "The Social Change Survey in Taiwan" conducted in 1992. The samples must be a Taiwan-born citizen, have finished a junior high school or higher education, and have obtained his or her present job through a benefactor's assistance. Using Covariance Structural Analysis (LISREL) the author examines the whole status attainment process, starting from the subject's backgrounds through his or her education process to the acquisition of his or her occupation. The principle findings of this study are listed as the following. The subject's former status before obtaining his or her present occupation, which is represented by the number of years of education that the subject has received and the subject's first job, is the intervene variable between family backgrounds and the present occupation. In other words, through the influences of family backgrounds on the subject's former status generation inequality can be reproduced; the former status usually represents human resource capital. On examining the subject's former status's influence on the present job, the author finds that the influences on the present occupation which comes from the social resources--that is the contact's occupation--makes up to almost half of all influences. The influences from social resources on the present occupation are greater than the direct influences from the subject's former status. The educational resources represented by extra-curricular education and educational environment the subject's family provides are the intervene variables which function as the influences that family backgrounds impose on former status. Although family backgrounds have strong influences on the family's cultural capital, but family cultural capital's influences on former status are insignificant and the transition of family cultural capital cannot be regarded as an intervene variable in the reproduction of generation inequality.
期刊論文
1.Lai, Gina Wan-Foon、Leung, Shu-Yin、Lin, Nan(1989)。Network Resources, Contact Resources and Status Attainment: Structural and Action Effects of Social Resource。Social Network，20(2)，159-178。  new window
2.Lin, Nan(1995)。Social Resources: A Theory of Social Capital。The Revue Francaise de Sociologie，36(4)，685-704。  new window
3.Hauser, Robert M.、Tsai, Shu-Ling、Sewell, Willian H.(1983)。A model of social stratification with response error in social and psychological variables。Sociology of Education，56，20-46。  new window
4.Carroll, G. R.、Mayer, K. U.(1986)。Job-Shif t Patterns in the Federal Republic of Germany: the Effect of Social Class, Industrial Sector and Organizational Size。American Sociolgy Review，51，323-341。  new window
5.Berk, Richard A.、Beck, E. M.(1983)。An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data。American Sociological Review，48(3)，386-398。  new window
6.Collins, Randall(1981)。On the microfoundations of macrosociology。American Journal of Sociology，86(5)，984-1014。  new window
7.Marsden, Peter、Hurlbert, Jeanne S.(1988)。Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension。Social Forces，66(4)，1038-1059。  new window
8.Matsueda, R. L.、Bielby, W. T.(1986)。Statistical Power in Covariance Structure Models。Sociological Methodology，16，120-158。  new window
9.黃毅志(1992)。地位取得--理論與結構分析。思與言，30(4)，131-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.De Graaf, Paul M.(1986)。The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands。Sociology of Education，59(4)，237-246。  new window
11.Lin, Nan、Ensel, Walter M.、Vaughn, John C.(1981)。Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment。American Sociological Review，46(4)，393-405。  new window
12.Wright, E. O.、Perrone, L.(1977)。Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality。American Sociological Review，42(1)，32-55。  new window
13.Teachman, Jay D.(1987)。Family background, educational resource, and educational attainment。American Sociological Review，52(4)，548-557。  new window
14.Katsillis, John、Rubinson, Richard(1990)。Cultural capital, student Achievement, and educational reproduction: The case of Greece。American Sociological Review，55(2)，270-279。  new window
15.黃毅志(1995)。臺灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷。中國社會學刊，18，243-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Kalleberg, Arne L.(1995)。Sociology and Economics: Crossing the Boundaries。Social Forces，73(4)，1207-1218。  new window
17.Beck, E. M.、Horan, Patrick M.、Tolbert, Charles M. II(1978)。Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination。American Sociological Review，43，704-720。  new window
18.DiMaggio, Paul J.(1982)。Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students。American Sociological Review，47(2)，189-201。  new window
19.Collins, Randall(1971)。Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification。American Sociological Review，36(6)，1002-1019。  new window
20.孫清山、黃毅志(19940700)。社會資源、文化資本與地位取得。東海學報.社會科學學院，35，127-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊，19，95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.DiMaggio, Paul、Mohr, John(1985)。Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection。American Journal of Sociology，90(6)，1231-1261。  new window
23.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology，78(6)，1360-1380。  new window
24.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology，91(3)，481-510。  new window
25.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。  new window
26.Montgomery, James D.(1992)。Job Search and Network Composition: Implications of the Strength-Of-Weak-Ties Hypothesis。American Sociological Review，57(5)，586-596。  new window
會議論文
1.孫清山、黃毅志(1995)。台灣地區經濟教育發展與職業取得之變遷。華人社會社會指標研討會，香港中文大學香港亞太研究所 。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsung, Ray-May、Hwang, Yih-Jih(1992)。Job Mobility in Taiwan: Job Search Methods and Contacts Status。The XII International Sunbelt Social Network Conference，(會議日期: 1992/02/13-02/17)。San Diego, CA.。  new window
3.高宣揚(1995)。論布爾迪厄 (Bourideu) 社會學的象徵論結構。歐洲社會理論學術研討會。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lin, Nan(1990)。Social Resources and the Emergence of Social Structure。The X II World Congress of Sociology，(會議日期: July)。Madrid, Spain。  new window
5.Flap, Hendrich(1989)。Social Capital in the Reproduction of Inequality: a Review。The Meeting of Research Committee 28 on Social Stratification of the International Sociological Association，(會議日期: Utreht April)。Utreht, The Netherlands。  new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1992)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調査計劃，第二期之第三次調查計劃執行報告。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫清山、熊瑞梅(1988)。社會資源與社會流動。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Abrahamson, Mark E.、Mizruchi, Ephraim H.、Hornung, Carlton A.(1976)。Stratification and Mobility。New York：Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc。  new window
2.Granovetter, Mark(1974)。Getting a Job。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Wright, Erik O.(1979)。Class Structure and Income Determination。Academic Press。  new window
4.Bourdieu, Pierre(1977)。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。Beverly Hills, California：Sage。  new window
5.Jöreskog, Karl Gustav、Sörbom, Dag(1988)。LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications。Chicago, IL：SPSS Inc。  new window
6.Hayduk, Leslie A.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
7.Byrne, B. M.(1989)。A Primier of LISRELF。New York：Springer-Verlag, Inc。  new window
8.Collins, Randall(1979)。The Credential Society。New York：Academic Press。  new window
9.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of Social Theory。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
10.許嘉猷(1986)。社會階層化與社會流動。臺北市：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lin, Nan(1986)。Social Resources and Social Mobility: A Structural Theory of Status Attainment。Social Mobility and Social Structure。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Lin, Nan(1982)。Social Resources and Instrumental Action。Social Structure and Network Analysis。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：780（臺灣：649，外國：131） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1166620 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67006558
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上