:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師對教師評鑑制度之態度研究
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:陳聖謨 引用關係
作者(外文):Chcen, Shang-mo
出版日期:1997
卷期:10
頁次:頁417-441
主題關鍵詞:國小教師教師評鑑
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(28) 博士論文(9) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:28
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:62
     本研究旨在探究當前國小教師對教師評鑑項目、實施方式、評鑑結果用途、擔任 評鑑人選的看法及對實施教師評鑑的贊成程度,以作為教育行政機關在規畫教師評鑑制度的 參考。 研究採文獻分析及問卷調查方式進行。共抽取臺南市六所國小 282 教師為施測對象 ,調查工具為「教師評鑑制度意見調查表」。所得資料以百分比、卡方考驗等統計方法處理 。本研究得到以下結論:一、國小教師認為「教師評鑑」的項目,以教師人品道德及教學精 神態度最為重要。二、教師對於評鑑採行的方式,並沒有明顯一致性的觀點。三、教師認為 評鑑的主要用途偏重在於形成性的目的。四、國小教師對擔任「教師評鑑」人選的看法偏向 於「學校考評委員會」及「教師自我評鑑」兩者。五、教師對於應否實施教師評鑑並無明顯 一致的看法。六、教師相當在意評鑑制度是否公平客觀。本研究並根據研究結論提出建議。
     The purpose of this study was to explore the perception of elementary school teachers on teacher evaluation system. The sample were gathered from Tainan City 6 public elementary school 282 teachers. The instrumenst was "The Inventory of teachers' perception on teacher evaluation. Frequency and Chi-square were used to process and analyze the collected data. The findings of the study were as the follow: (1)The evaluation criteria teacher prefered involved morality and ethic. (2) Teachers' perception on technique used to assess teacher performance were not consistent. (3) The primary purpose of teacher evaluation from teachers' perception should be to improve instruction. (4) The evaluators most favorable were Self-evaluation and Team of appraise from the teachers' school (5) Elementary school teachers didn't agree remarkably to operate teacher evaluation system, only if the system was fair. Suggestions based on the findings were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Callender, K. E.、Wren, C. Y.、Ellett, C. D.、Loup, K. S.、Liu, Xia(1996)。Looking backwards with the Personnel Evaluation Standards: An analysis of the development and implementation of a statewide teacher assessment program。Studies in Educational Evaluation,22(1),79-113。  new window
2.張德銳(19960900)。國小教師成績考核系統之研究。教育研究資訊,4(5),89-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.羅嘉珍(19940900)。英國教師考評制度(Teacher Appraisal)的內涵與實施。國立教育資料館館訊,30,3-6。  延伸查詢new window
4.Katims, D. S.、Henderson, R. L.(1990)。Teacher evaluation in special education。NASSP Bulletin,74(524),46-52。  new window
5.Kauchak, D.、Peterson, K.、Driscoll, A.(1985)。An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices。Journal of Research and Development in Education,19(1),32-37。  new window
6.Scriven, M.(1994)。The duties of the teacher。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,8(2),151-184。  new window
7.Scriven, M.(1995)。A unified theory approach to teacher evaluation。Studies in Educational Evaluation,21,111-129。  new window
8.Zelanak, M. J.、Snider, B. C.(1974)。Teacher perceptions of the teacher evaluation process。California Journal of Educational Research,110-134。  new window
學位論文
1.Meyers, K. H.(1994)。An Analysis of a teacher evaluation goal-setting model(碩士論文)。University of Central Florida。  new window
2.Ndeze, L. Z.(1994)。Teachers' perspectives of the evaluation of their professional performance(博士論文)。Syracuse University。  new window
3.Rindler, B. H.(1994)。The Attributes of Teacher Evaluation Systems That Promote teacher Growth as Perceived by Teachers of Intensive English Programs(博士論文)。Boston University。  new window
4.Strickland, T. B.(1994)。The impact of alternative methods of teacher evaluation on teacher perception of organizational climate, teacher instructional practices and teacher self-perception(博士論文)。East Carolina University。  new window
圖書
1.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第一期諮議報告書。臺北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bolton, J. F.(1912)。Selection and evaluation of teachers。Berkley:McCutchen。  new window
3.House, E. R.(1993)。Professional evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Johnson, S. M.(1990)。Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools。New York:Basic Books。  new window
5.McLaughlin, M. W.、Pfeifer, R. S.(1988)。Teacher evaluation: Improvement, accountability and effective learning。Teachers College Press。  new window
6.Shinkfield, A. J.、Stuffebeam, D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
7.Stemnock, S. K.(1969)。Evaluating teacher performance。Washington, DC:NEA。  new window
8.Lortie, Dan C.(1975)。School Teacher: A Sociological Study。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scriven, M.(1973)。The methodology of evaluation。Educational evaluation: Theory and practice。Belmont, California:Wadsworth。  new window
2.Wolf, R.(1973)。How teacher feel toward evaluation。School evaluation: The Politics and process。Berkely, CA:McCutchan。  new window
3.傅木龍(1995)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。教育專業。臺北:師大師苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE