:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學教師教學領導力內涵及其指標
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:溫明麗
作者(外文):Wen, Sophia Ming Lee
出版日期:2013
卷期:108
頁次:頁113-148
主題關鍵詞:臺灣大學教師教學領導力指標TaiwanUniversity teacherTeaching leadershipIndicators
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:362
  • 點閱點閱:103
有鑑於提升大學品質、確保大學學術自主及人文性之本質,本 文透過理論論述與實徵研究,建構臺灣公私立大學教師教學領導力之 內涵、指標及其影響因素,期能提供臺灣公私立大學提升教師教學品 質之評量參照。本文發現,大學教師教學領導力可分為教學專業與教 育奉獻(教學力)及自我反省與專業社群(領導力)構面,而精確決 策乃教學力與領導力共通的構面,且各個向度彼此間均具高相關。再 者,依據統計結果發現,大學所在地區、教師性別、任教年資、所屬 學院別、是否曾獲得教學榮譽等對教學力與領導力之看法有差異;但 最高學歷、職稱、是否兼行政工作或任職公私立大學,卻不影響其對 教學領導力指標之看法。最後,文中並提出大學教師彈性薪資、教育 部卓越教學計畫補助、教師證照均等之判斷可借用本文建構之教學領 導力指標,更呼籲大學教師的教育愛與專業社群均是提升大學教師教 學品質的重要方向。
This article discusses the university teaching leadership in Taiwan. As a result from literature review and empirical researches, the dimension of university teaching leadership can be constructed and its indicators can be highlighted. The literacy of university teaching leadership is divided into five levels: teaching profession, teaching commitment, precisive decision making, self-reflection, and professional community. These are rationally correlated as seen from statistic results. More results from the research on professional position, academic and administrational experiences, public/private universities and institutes, gender and ages of in-service professional career have been also analysed here, there are significant differences in some, but not in all. In the end, the author holds the view that the indicators of university teaching leadership may be applied in a flexible way to define teachers’ salary range, excellent teaching, and even the certificate of teaching profession. In addition, moral commitment and professional community should be improved due to its important impacts on excellent classroom management, organizational skills and pedagogy.
期刊論文
1.郭為藩(19871000)。大學教師的學術自由與社會責任。理論與政策,2(1)=5,20-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Allan, J.、Clarke, K.、Jopling, M.(2009)。Effective teaching in higher education: Perceptions of first year undergraduate students。International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,21(3),262-272。  new window
3.Gordon, M. E.、Palmon, O.(2010)。Spare the rigor, spoil the learning。Academe,96(4)。  new window
4.Lammers, W. J.、Savina, E.、Skotko, D.、Churlyaeva, M.(2010)。Faculty and student perceptions of outstanding university teachers in the USA and Russia。Educational Psychology,30(7),803-815。  new window
5.Lei, S. A.、Cohen, J. L.、Russler, K. M.(2010)。Humor on learning in the college classroom: Evaluating benefits and drawbacks from instructors’ perspectives。Journal of Instructional Psychology,37(4),326-331。  new window
6.Piercy, N. F.(2002)。Research in marketing: Teasing with trivia or risking relevance?。European Journal of Marketing,36(3),350-363。  new window
7.Sizer, J.(1982)。Institutional performance assessment under conditions of changing needs。International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education,6(1),17-28。  new window
8.Walker, R. J.(2008)。12 characteristics of an effective teacher。Educational Horizon,87(1),61-68。  new window
9.Schön, Donald A.(1995)。Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology。Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,27(6),26-34。  new window
10.Tannebaum, R.、Schimidt, W. H.(1973)。How to choose a leadership pattern。Harvard Business Review,164-186。  new window
11.Ramsden, P.(1991)。A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire。Studies in Higher Education,16(2),129-150。  new window
12.Centra, J. A.、Potter, D. A.(1980)。School and teacher effects: An interrelational model。Review of Educational Research,50(2),273-291。  new window
13.張明輝(20050200)。優質學校教育指標--行政管理、領導與學校文化。教師天地,134,9-20。  延伸查詢new window
14.Marsh, H. W.(1991)。Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures。Journal of Educational psychology,83,285-296。  new window
15.Onwuegbuzie, A. J.、Witcher, A. E.、Collins, K. M. T.、Filer, J. D.、Wiedmaier, C. D.、Moore, C. W.(2007)。Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation from using a mixed-methods analysis。American Educational Research Journal,44,113-160。  new window
會議論文
1.Cuttance, P. F.(1990)。Performance indicators and the management of quality in education。3rd National Confer-ence on Indicators in Education。Canberra。  new window
學位論文
1.王英州(2007)。臺東縣國民小學校長課程領導與教師教學校能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張國強(2010)。臺中縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業學習社群互動之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡政明(2003)。國民小學校長課程領導與教師教學效能之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
4.丁文祺(2008)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林家蓉(2005)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學校長教學領導與教師文化之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.毛郁雯(2000)。大學實施「學生評鑑教師教學」之研究--以國立台北師範學院為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳木金(1997)。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王保進(1993)。高等教育表現指標之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.郭明堂(1995)。國小教師任教專長、教學經驗、養成型態與其教學效能之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國立臺灣科技大學(2011)。100全國大專校院校長會議活動手冊。臺北市:國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃乃熒(2011)。全球領導與國際教育。臺北市:學富。  延伸查詢new window
3.Carr, W.、溫明麗(1995)。新教育學。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Frey, N.(2011)。The effective teacher's guide: 50 ways to engage students and promote interactive learning。New York, NY:The Guilford。  new window
5.Green, J.(2011)。Education, professionalism, and the quest for accountability: Hitting the target but missing the point。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
6.Joyce, B.、Calhoun, E.(2010)。Models of professional development: A celebration of education。London, UK:Sage。  new window
7.Krasimir, V.、Abresch, R. J.、Fedyschyn, C. P.、Haltom, M. F.、Smith, M. G.、Spellman, S. I.、Mamadi, C.(1996)。The teaching of leadership: A comparative analysis。Maxwell AFB, Ala.:Air University。  new window
8.McAteer, M.(2010)。Achieving your masters in teaching and learning。Exter:Learning Matters。  new window
9.Menter, I.、Murray, J.(2011)。Introduction: Capacity building in teacher education research。Developing research in teacher education。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
10.Powell, W.、Kusuma-Powell, O.(2010)。Becoming an emotionally intelligent teacher。Thousand Oaks, CA. & London:Sage。  new window
11.Rogers, B.(2002)。Teacher leadership and behavior management。London, UK:Paul Chapman。  new window
12.Robertson, J.(2002)。The boss, the manager and the leader: Approaches to dealing with disruption。Teacher leadership and behaviour management。London, UK:Paul Chapman。  new window
13.Satterthwaite, J.(2011)。Truths and values: Education in a cynical and skeptical society。Truths in education: Truths and values。Sterling, UK:Trentham Books。  new window
14.Cave, M.、Hanney, S.、Kogan, M.(1991)。The use of performance indicators in higher education: a critical analysis of developing practice。London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers。  new window
15.Bain, K.(2004)。What the best college teachers do。Harvard University Press。  new window
16.彭森明(2010)。大學生學習成果評量:理論、實務與應用。臺北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.張進德、楊雪蘭、朱正民(2002)。管理學--新世紀的競爭。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。  延伸查詢new window
18.Pakaluk, Michael(2005)。Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: An Introduction。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2011)。獎勵大學卓越計畫,http://www.csal.fcu.edu.tw/ Edu/program_petition.asp。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒冰凌(2011)。教師教學領導力理論學習讀後感,http://www. unjs.com/zuowen/duhougan/20110307113928_592167.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.Massachusetts Society of Professors(2004)。Evaluation of faculty and librarians,http://faculty.ulm.edu/msp/contract.html, 2009/03/14。  new window
4.Srivastava, K.(2010)。How you sharpen the key result areas to hit key organizational target,http://www.powerhrforum.org/ pdfs/Borchure- Designing _Outcome_Centric_KRAs.pdf。  new window
5.Vijyoti(2011)。Student life education platform for work readiness skills,http://cucai.org/pdf/vijyoti.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃炳煌(1990)。二十一世紀我國高等教育的展望。彩繪二十一世紀的台灣教育。台北:中華徵信。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lupton, R.(2006)。How does place affect education?。Going places: Neighbourhood, ethnicity and social mobility。London:Institute of Public Policy Research。  new window
3.Miliband, D.(2004)。Choice and voice in personalized learning。Schooling for tomorrow publications: Personalising education。Paris:OECD。  new window
4.張德勝(1998)。學生評鑑教師教學:以花蓮師範學院為例。八十六學年度師範教育學術論文集。花蓮市:國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。教育專業。台北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 國民中學校長文化領導、教師心理契約、教師社群互動與學校效能關係之研究
2. 馬來西亞麻坡中化中學專業學習社群建構微觀觀課與宏觀觀學運作作為之行動研究
3. 國民小學校長空間領導及其影響之研究
4. 國民小學校長課程領導、教師創新教學與教師教學效能關係之研究
5. 臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究
6. 新北市國民小學校長轉型領導與交易領導對教師教學效能影響之研究
7. 幼兒園教師文化知覺、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之探究
8. 國民小學校長創新領導、權力運用策略、 教師社群互動與學校效能關係之研究
9. 高雄市國民小學校長家長式領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究
10. 南部地區國小校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究—以教師心理資本、學校翻轉教學為中介變項
11. 南部四縣市國民小學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究-以教師知識管理、組織文化為中介變項
12. 客艙組員知覺工作要求、組織公平、工作熱情與專業實踐相關之研究-以國內某航空公司為例
13. 國中校長課程領導對學校效能之影響-以教師領導為中介變項
14. 國小校長學習領導、學校組織學習與學校效能關係之研究
15. 國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE