:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建國科技大學教師績效評鑑之專案研究
書刊名:建國科大社會人文期刊
作者:楊輝南 引用關係夏太長
作者(外文):Yang, Huei-nanHsia, Tai-chang
出版日期:2013
卷期:32:1
頁次:頁21-39
主題關鍵詞:建國科技大學績效評鑑Chienkuo Technology UniversityCTUPerformance appraisal
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:174
  • 點閱點閱:16
少子化趨勢使學齡人口逐年遞減,也導致技職學校之生存與發展面臨嚴峻考驗。為因應環境的變遷趨勢及維護優良教師之工作權,教育部將「大學教師評鑑」納入大學法,各大學皆應依教師法及大學法第21條教師評鑑規定,明定解聘、停聘、不續聘之規定。建國科技大學(簡稱本校)為遵循教育部政策與提升教學品質,已將「教師績效評鑑」列為校務經營重點,並依據教師法及大學法制訂教師評鑑辦法,做為專任教師升等、續聘、長期聘任、停聘、不續聘及獎勵之重要參考。本校在專業教學型科技大學之定位下,秉持「學力、實力、願力」三力教育理念為基磐,進行擬訂教師評鑑辦法,其目的在協助教師專業成長與生涯發展,促進良善溝通,及改善課程與教學品質。本研究採用文獻探討法,針對本校教師評鑑辦法進行專案研究,並提出管理意涵與建議,做為學校經營者參考;此外,綜觀本校教師績效評鑑辦法之演進歷程可知,本校每年皆審慎檢討,並舉行說明會以促進雙向溝通;若發現評鑑辦法之疏漏處,則提案修訂以臻至善,本校「精益求精」之立法精神,應可做為其他大學院校之學習典範。
The declining birthrate has reduced the amount of students year by year, and it has also become a severe test for the survival and development of technological and vocational schools. In response to the change in social condition and in order to guarantee excellent teachers' right to work, Ministry of Education has included ”college teacher evaluation” in the University Act. All universities should follow Teachers' Act and University Act, Article 21, to designate rules for the severance, suspension, and refusal of reengagement of university teachers.Following MOE's policy, Chienkuo Technology University (CTU) has enforced ”Teacher Performance Appraisal” and instituted teacher review system as important reference for upgrading, reengagement, long term suspension, refusal of reengagement and encouragement of teachers.As a professional teaching Technology University, ”Professional, Competent, and Dedicated” CTU set the goal to assist teachers in professional growth and career development, help the communication between teachers and school, and improve the teaching quality. The present study reviewed relevant literature about teachers, performance appraisal project of Chienkuo Technology University, and concluded by proposing some implications and suggestions about management. In addition, from the amending process of Teacher Performance Appraisal, it's obvious that CTU reviewed the system carefully every year and did its best to improve communication with seminars. Whenever noticing that the system isn't comprehensive enough, CTU amended it. CTU's attitude towards teaching quality, continuous improvement, can be taken as a model for other schools.
期刊論文
1.Rifkin, T.(1995)。Eric review: Faculty evaluation in community college。Community College Review,23(1),63-72。  new window
2.孫志麟(20070300)。大學教師評鑑的三項關鍵要素。評鑑雙月刊,6,36-38。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉春榮(20030700)。教師績效評鑑的教育品質觀點。教育資料與研究,53,13-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.LePine, J. A.、Podsakoff, N. P.、LePine, M. A.(2005)。A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance。Academy of Management Journal,48,764-775。  new window
5.Muse, L. A.、Harris, S. G.、Field, H. S.(2003)。Has the inverted-u theory of stress and job performance had a fair test?。Human Performance,16(4),349-364。  new window
6.林官蓓、林顯輝(20090900)。教育大學教師評鑑指標系統建構之研究--以屏東教育大學為例。屏東教育大學學報. 教育類,33,165-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.何明鏡(20110100)。教師評鑑之理念、實務與分析及系統研製--以建國科技大學為例。建國科大社會人文期刊,30(1),47-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳聖謨(19970600)。國小教師對教師評鑑制度之態度研究。初等教育學報,10,417-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.呂錘卿、林生傳(20010600)。國民小學教師專業成長指標及現況之研究。教育學刊,17,45-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇錦麗(20090900)。「大學校院學生學習成果評估」相關內涵分析。評鑑雙月刊,21,58-62。  延伸查詢new window
11.Motowidlo, Stephan J.、Van Scotter, James R.(1994)。Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance。Journal of Applied Psychology,79(4),475-480。  new window
會議論文
1.黃寶慧、賴芳儀、賴淑芳(2009)。併購後銀行員工期望落差、工作壓力反應、組織承諾與工作績效關係之探討。2009商業現代化學術研討會,中華民國商業現代化學會與國立高雄應用科技大學主辦 347-363。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.彭森明(2006)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究 (計畫編號:94A1004EI)。新竹:國立清華大學高等教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Noe, R. A.、Hollenbeck, J. R.、Gerhart, B.、Wright, P. M.(2004)。Fundamentals of Human Resource Management。New York, NY:MacGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.。  new window
2.Robbins, S. P.(2006)。Organizational Behavior。Upper Saddle River, N. J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Becker, E. B.、Huselid, A. M.、Ulrich, D.(2001)。HR scorecard。Boston:Harvard Business School。  new window
4.李正綱、陳基國、劉敏熙(2010)。人力資源管理理論與實務導向。台北:新陸。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃恆獎、王仕茹、李文瑞(2007)。管理學概論。臺北:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.陸洛、高旭繁(2010)。人力資源管理。臺中:滄海圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cascio, W. F.(2006)。Managing human resource: Productivity, quality of work life。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.Gomez-Mejia, L. R.、Balkin, D. B.、Cardy, R. L.(2007)。Managing human resources。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey。  new window
9.Lewicki, R. J.、Saunders, D. M.、Barry, B.(2005)。Negotiation。McGraw-Hill, Inc.。  new window
10.Quick, J. C.、Quick, J. D.、Nelson, D. L.、Hurell, J. J.(1997)。Preventative stress management in organizations。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
11.Seyle, H.(1975)。Stress without distress。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.張德銳(20000000)。師資培育與教師評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2010)。技職教育再造方案手冊,http://www.edu.tw/FileUpload/1052-14036/Documents/。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國全國教師會(1995)。教師法說帖教師評鑑。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王秀玲(2004)。主要教學方法。教學原理。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃家齊(2010)。員工績效評估與績效管理。人力資源管理。臺北市:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.高強華(1995)。論提昇教師專業成長的「教師評鑑」。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Campbell, John P.(1990)。Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology。Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
5.Borman, Walter C.、Motowidlo, Stephan J.(1993)。Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance。Personnel selection in organizations。Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE