臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：利用教學視導系統提昇教師之教學品質
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：李珀
作者(外文)：Lee, Po
出版日期：1999
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁49-70+140-141
主題關鍵詞：教學視導；Teacher evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:257
  • 點閱點閱:37
　　　　　在臺灣，教學視導系統的理念正在萌芽之中，許多從事教育工作的學者，瞭解其 需求，但視導系統尚未被廣泛的接受與採用。視導系統應使是一種正式的，有系統的，且持 續不斷的過程，其目的在幫助教師改進教學以提高教學品質。為了達到上述的目標，研究者 檢視了當今美國公私立學校之教學視導系統與規準，在經過研究並比較其優缺點後，以其結 論做為基礎，發展出一種適用於臺灣中等學校之教學視導系統及視導規準。 參與的學者、專家、校長與教師們在多次研討會中共同討論並修訂教學視導之工具規準後， 為了確保工具的可信度（信度）和有效性（效度），研究者邀請美國視導系統之專家 Dr.Judith Slater到台灣，利用此一視導系統及規準來評鑑當地英文老師之教學，結果支持 了此一視導系統之可行性及可用性。 教學視導制度及規準在臺北市私立復興中學英文科經過三年的實驗結果顯示，因教學視導制 度之推行，教學在教學法之改變，使得學生聽與說的能力大幅增加，而讀與寫之能力亦從聯 考平均分進步10分左右之成績顯示出來。 為了能夠提昇教學品質，使得每一個受教的學生都能接受良好之教育，採用教學視導系統來 幫助教師改進教學應是教改聲中刻不容緩的工作了。
　　　　　In Taiwan, R.O.C. a formal system for teacher evaluation has not yet been developed. An evaluation system should be systematic, formal, and a continual process that serves as a strategy to refine the quality of education. The purpose of teacher evaluation system is to help teachers improve their teaching in order to increase the quality of education. The researcher examined what elements define an effective teacher and how effectiveness could be assessed and selected existing teacher evaluation systems in use in the United States in order to select those elements that could be applicable to the Taiwan educational system. An evaluation instrument was identified and modified through the systemic use of participant stakeholders at seminars and conferences on effective teaching. Criterion of teacher effectiveness were identified and modified in the development of a teacher evaluation model. To ensure the reliability and validity of the instrument, a trained expert used the instrument in a trial evaluation of an English teacher in Taiwan and the results were compared to local administration. The instrument was modified, based on implementation recommendations. The teacher evaluation system has been in use in the English Department of Fu Hsing Middle School since 1995. The results show that students ability in listening and speaking has been greatly improved due to the changing of teaching strategies. Reading and writing ability also has been improved. This study found that teacher evaluation system can be used in Taiwan in order to improve the quality of teacher effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.Thorson, John R.、Miller, Roger K.、Bellon, Jerry J.(1987)。Instructional Improvement Through Personnel Evaluation。Educational Leadership，44，52-53。  new window
2.Stiggins, Richard J.(1986)。Teacher Evaluation: Accountability and Growth Systems--Different Purpose。N.A.S.S.P. Bulletin，70(490)，51-58。  new window
3.Tesch, Stephanie、Nyland, Larry、Dougkernutt(1987)。Teacher Evaluation--Shared Power Working。Educational Leadership，44，26-28。  new window
4.Block, B.(199210)。The failure of state-mandated teacher appraisal systems。The Clearing House，35-36。  new window
5.李珀(19961000)。如何利用教學視導系統提昇學校品質管理。教師天地，84，32-37。  延伸查詢new window
6.Airasian, P. W.(1993)。Teacher Assessment: Some Issues For Principals。NASSP Bulletin，55-65。  new window
7.Darling-Hammond, Linda(1986)。A proposal for Evaluation in the Teaching Profession。Elementary School Journal，86(4)，531-551。  new window
會議論文
1.丁亞雯(1998)。教學視導實施報告。現代化學校經營行動方案研討會。台北市：台北市教師研習中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rothenberg, L.、Hessling, P. A.(1990)。Applying the APA/AERA/NCME "Standards": Evidence for the validity and reliability of three statewide teaching assessment instruments。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Boston, MA。  new window
3.Tyson, L.、Silverman, S.(1994)。An analysis of statewide teacher appraisal scores across four years。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。  new window
4.Pendergrass, R. A.(1981)。Strengthening Exist Teaching Styles: A Staff Development Model。The Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher。  new window
學位論文
1.Lee, Phoebe(1996)。A teacher evaluation system for teachers in Taiwan based on current models in the United States(博士論文)。Florida International University，Miami, Florida。  new window
2.Neil, Roger(1987)。Toward the Integration of Teacher Development with Teacher Evaluation Aims(博士論文)。University of Alberta。  new window
3.Stipnieks, Anita T.(1981)。A Study of Teacher Evaluation Practices in Selected School Districts in The U.S.(博士論文)。University of Texas at Austin。  new window
圖書
1.Beach, B.、Reinhartz, J.(1988)。Supervision: Focus on instruction。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
2.Texas Education Agency(1988)。Teacher orientation manual 1988-1989。Austin, TX：Texas Education Agency。  new window
3.呂木琳(1998)。教學視導。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐用生(1993)。邁向教師進修教育的新境界--21世紀中小學教育新發展。教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
5.McLaughlin, Milbrey W.、Pfeifer, R. Scott(1988)。Teacher Evaluation: Improvement, Accountability, and Effective Learning。Teacher College Press。  new window
6.Stiggins, Richard J.、Bridgeford, Nancy J.(1984)。Performance Assessment for Teacher Development。Washington, D.C.：N.I.E. Publication。  new window
7.Chang, T. Y.(1994)。The Research of Administration of Education。Wu Nan Publication Inc.。  new window
8.Cheng, T. L.(1994)。How to Increase the Quality of Teacher Performance?。Normal Book Store Inc.。  new window
9.Rogers, Werner(1989)。Georgia Teacher Evaluation Program。Georgia Department of Education。  new window
10.張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。五南圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.McGreal, Thomas L.(1983)。Successful teacher evaluation。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
12.Harris, B. M.、Hill, J.、呂木琳、張德銳(1992)。教師發展評鑑系統。新竹：國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Veir, C.(1991)。A comparison of Teacher Appraisal Systems: The developmental Teacher Evaluation and The Texas Teacher Appraisal System(ED 332 333)。  new window
2.Ellett, C. D.，Garland, J. S.(1986)。Teacher Evaluation Practices in our Largest School Districts: Are They Measuring up to "state-of-the-art" Systems?(ED 294 316)。  new window
3.Rediger, Linda(1988)。Evaluation: A Means of Improving Teacher Performance(ED 299 231)。  new window
4.Alexandrove, D. C.(1989)。Teacher evaluation in an era of school reform(ED 318 081)。  new window
5.Veir, C.(1990)。A comparison of the Teacher Appraisal Systems in Georgia and Texas(ED 328 968)。  new window
其他
1.李珀(19960709)。改進教學品質最有效的方法--教學視導。  延伸查詢new window
2.李珀(19960716)。改進教學品質最有效的方法--教學視導。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Stallings, Jane A.、Freiberg, H. Jerome(1991)。Observation for the Improvement of Teaching。Effective Teaching: Current Research。McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：878（臺灣：875，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67573178
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上