:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:四代評鑑觀論述中小學校務評鑑之發展趨勢--以臺中市國中小校務評鑑為例
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:陳盛賢 引用關係楊思偉 引用關係許筱君
作者(外文):Chen, Sheng-hsienYang, Szu-weiHsu, Hsiao-chun
出版日期:2015
卷期:32
頁次:頁23-41
主題關鍵詞:第四代評鑑校務評鑑評鑑The fourth-generation evaluationSchool evaluationEvaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:410
  • 點閱點閱:210
為落實教育機構承擔績效責任與教育問責之效,校務評鑑已成為中央與地方縣市政府檢視各級各類學校辦學績效之具體做法,我國中小學校務評鑑辦理約半個世紀,多以外部評鑑為主要方式,然卻造成學校現場之壓力與諸多批評與質疑。為檢視當前中小學校務評鑑之問題,並希冀落實教育問責之目的,本研究採以文件分析法及文獻分析法,針對以下四點研究目的進行研究:1.分析校務評鑑理論、模式與發展;2.探討Guba 跟Lincoln 第四代評鑑觀之意涵與實施策略;3.以臺中市103 學年度國中小校務評鑑實施情形進行案例分析;4.分析我國運用第四代評鑑觀推動中小學校務評鑑之發展趨勢;在結論時提出未來中小學辦理校務評鑑之實施建議共五點:1. 形塑兼重證明、改善與實踐的評鑑目標;2. 強調建構性、多元化與動態性的評鑑標準與方法;3. 運用參與式介入及協助改善的評鑑方法;4. 評鑑人員轉化為教學相長的合作者角色;5. 評鑑結果與運用是賦權增能的實踐。
To reinforce the accountability of educational institutions in performance and education, central and local governments have adopted school evaluation to review the performance of various schools. Primary and secondary schools have participated in school evaluation programs for approximately 50 years primarily through external evaluations. However, this approach has generated tension on school sites and prompted doubts and criticisms. To examine current primary and secondary school evaluation and realize the goals of educational accountability, document and literature analyses were adopted in this study to investigate (a) the theory, model, and development of school evaluation; (b) implications and implementation strategies of Guba and Lincoln’s fourth-generation evaluation concept; (c) current situations regarding the implementation of school evaluation in 103 primary and secondary schools in Taichung City, Taiwan; and (d) development trends of applying the fourth-generation evaluation concept to promote primary and secondary school evaluation. In conclusion, the following 5 points present recommendations regarding the implementation of prospective school evaluation in primary and secondary schools: (a) formulate evaluation goals with equal emphasis on verification, improvement, and implementation; (b) emphasize constructive, diversified, and dynamic evaluation standards and methods; (c) apply evaluation methods through participatory intervention and assisted amelioration; (d) transform the role of an evaluator into a peer collaborator; (e) and apply evaluation results to facilitate the practice of empowerment.
期刊論文
1.王麗雲(20111000)。學校課責。教師天地,174,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
2.王麗雲(2013)。評鑑巫婆。評鑑雙月刊,42,32-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.(1971)。The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability。Journal of Research and Development in Education,5(1),19-25。  new window
4.黃嘉雄(20060900)。析論Stake之回應式教育方案評鑑取向。國立臺北教育大學學報. 教育類,19(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王保進(20030100)。國民中小學校務評鑑現況與重要議題之省思。教育資料與研究,50,2-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Stake, R. E.(1967)。The countenance of educational evaluation。Teachers College Record,68(7),523-540。  new window
圖書
1.Kells, H. R.(1988)。Self- study processes: A guide to self-evaluation in higher education。New York:American Council on Education。  new window
2.The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(1994)。The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
3.佐藤學、黃郁倫、鍾啟泉(2012)。學習的革命:從教室出發的改革。臺北市:天下雜誌股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳清山(2000)。學校行政。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。五南圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇錦麗(19970000)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實際。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Worthen, B. R.、Sanders, J. R.(1987)。Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。Longman。  new window
8.謝文全(2004)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
9.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.許筱君(20130108)。國民中小學校務評鑑簡介,http://192.83.167.156/~TEC/e_paper/e_paper_c.php?SID=63。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭森明(2013)。大學自我評鑑系列講座:大學自我評鑑與校務研究的關係,http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15184&ctNode=328&mp=2。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2013)。臺中市中小學校務評鑑--發展亮點學校整體計畫,http://140.128.220.3/tces/index.php/evaluation/plan/2014-10-20-04-22-13。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2014)。第三梯次校務評鑑說明會資料,http://140.128.220.3/tces/index.php/index/news/29-1030219。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄭淑惠(2011)。介入策略導向評鑑的意涵與實施。教育政策與行政新議題。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁一顧(2003)。教育行政評鑑。教育行政學。心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘慧玲(2005)。邁向下一代的教育評鑑:回顧與前瞻。教育評鑑的回顧與展望。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Stufflebeam, D. L.(1983)。The CIPP model for program evaluation。Evaluation models。Boston, MA:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE