:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路學習主體建構暨各國網上學習政策之評析
作者:吳美娟
作者(外文):Mei-Chuan Wu
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:楊深坑
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2002
主題關鍵詞:網路學習主體建構各國網上學習政策The Construction of Internet Learning SubjectE-Learning Policies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:56
中 文 摘 要
本研究探索網路學習主體在「知識」與「認同」二面向建構之途,及以網路科技為媒介,透過「網上學習」形成之知識與認同意涵。探索網路知識構成本質,以理解網路學習主體知識建構基礎。釐清網路主體認同三大面向(自我、社群、超認同),建構網路學習主體認同定位之方向。剖析歐盟、新加坡、美國、台灣「網上學習」國家教育政策,以理解「網上學習」全球實踐之趨勢,並分析各國建構學習主體之教育措施。闡釋各國網上學習政策中,在學習主體建構之知識與認同面之不同關照。以完熟學習主體建構為目標,參酌先進國家「網上學習」之經驗,對台灣「網上學習」實施,及促進教育革新,行未來之建言。本研究採科際整合之概念分析方法,亟求一「整全之理解」。獲致之重要結論包括:
一、 網路學習主體以主體性與主體際性之闡發掌握科技運用終極 目的。
二、 以人類之終極本質,批判模擬論之氾濫。
三、 以人類非預定性、非邏輯式主動創發之認知,批判連結觀點之過度推論。
四、 網路科技之知識論,彰顯「現代性」與「後現代性」交互參混之性質,並對學習型態產生影響。
五、 網路知識之批判性質,突破網路學習實作性知識之桎梏。
六、 網路學習主體對資訊意義以「發現式」認知予以探索。
七、 以流動轉換能力,統整拼湊之網路學習主體自我認同。
八、 彰顯網路學習主體自我認同對現代性之反省。
九、 網路表徵新型態之社會關係與社會聯帶,並形塑虛擬學習社群。
十、 以全球責任倫理規範網路科技全球化形成之政治、經濟、文化超認同。
十一、 建構完熟網路學習主體,以克服資訊科技形成之主體性危機。
十二、 歐盟、新加坡、美國、台灣網上學習政策於學習主體建構各具不同意涵。
十三、 運用網路科技促進學習主體建構之教育改革措施。
實作性知識、判斷力、溝通共識知能、主體流動轉換能力、反省批判力、社群關懷與全球責任倫理之培育,建構完熟之網路學習主體。教育當以培育上述知能為教育宗旨,促進資訊科技基礎建設、課程教學、師資培育、教育行政、產業與教育之合作等面向之革新。針對如何培育完熟網路學習主體,並以「網上學習」促進教育改革,提出十項建言:
一、 教育不當偏重實作性知能培育,偏廢其他知能。
二、 強調網路學習主體非預定式、非邏輯式主動創發之知能培育。
三、 掌握網路之知識論特徵以促進學習。
四、 以資訊管理規範網路實作性知識。
五、 強調學習主體判斷力、反省批判力之培育。
六、 建立理想電子溝通情境以促進網路民主。
七、 注重學習主體自我認同之流動轉換能力與理性規範。
八、 建立網路學習主體之社會關懷與全球資訊責任倫理。
九、 以完熟網路學習主體建構為資訊科技教育宗旨。
十、 參酌各國網上學習之經驗提昇教育品質。
The Construction of Internet Learning Subject and the Critique of E-Learning Policies
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the construction of Internet Learning Subject with regard to the analysis of the knowledge and identity implication of e-Learning policies in Europe, Singapore, United States and Taiwan. Topics discussed include the essence of Internet knowledge, the self identity, virtual community identity, hyperidentity in Barlovian Cyberspace. In the analysis of e-Learning policies of Europe, Singapore, United States and Taiwan, the educational implementation and its implication of construction of Internet Learning Subject are discussed. The concept analysis method was applied to explore interdisciplinary research. According to the results of this study, the conclusions were as follows:
1. The ultimate goal of applying Information Technology to education is to develop the Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity of Internet Learning Subject.
2. To criticize the paramount nature of human beings has been neglected in Simulation Theory.
3. To analyze the undetermined, non-logic, nonlinear cognitive process has been neglected in Connectionism.
4. The characteristics of Modernity and Postmodernity are hybridized in the epistemology of Internet Technology and with significant influence upon learning.
5. The performative and critical characteristics co-exist each other in the knowledge construction of Internet learning process.
6. The Internet Learning Subject applies the heuristics cognitive approach to explore the hyperlinked meanings.
7. To develop Internet Learning Subject’s competence of fluid transformation so the collage subjectivity can be integrated healthfully.
8. The reflexivity of modernity is expressed by the representation of self identity in cyberspace.
9. The social relations and social ties are reshaped by the Information Technology and facilitate the formation of virtual learning communities.
10. To practice the Global Information Ethics in order to regulate the hyperidentity in Barlovian Cyberspace.
11. To construct the well-rounded Internet Learning Subject in order to face the challenge of crisis of subjectivity in Information Technology.
12. The e-Learning policies in Europe, Singapore, United States and Taiwan emphasize different perspectives in the construction of Internet Learning Subject.
13. Applying Information Technology as the medium to improve education and facilitate the construction of well-rounded Internet Learning Subject.
The well-rounded Internet Learning Subject is established upon the foundation of performativity knowledge, judgment, fluid transformation competence, reflexive critical literacy, community concern and the Global Information Ethics. The educational goal in network society is to develop the well-rounded Internet Learning Subject. According to the goal, to execute National Information Infrastructure, to improve the curriculum, teaching and teachers’ education, to digitalize the educational administration, and to facilitate the cooperation between business and education organizations. Based on the conclusions, further suggestions are as follows:
1. The schooling should not over-emphasize the performative knowledge as neglect the development of other competences.
2. The undermined, non-logic, nonlinear cognitive approach is as important as the Algorithms cognitive process in learning environment.
3. To understand the epistemology of Information Technology in order to apply the principles in learning settings.
4. Using information administration principles to regulate the transmission of performative knowledge.
5. To develop Internet Learning Subject’s judgment and reflexive critical literacy.
6. To establish the sound electronic communicative environment in order to facilitate Internet Democracy.
7. To develop Internet Learning Subject’s fluid transformation competence and rational thinking.
8. To help the Internet Learning Subject learning social concern and Global Information Ethics in network society.
9. The National Educational Technology Plan is based on the aim to construct the well-rounded Internet Learning Subject.
10. To borrow the e-Learning experiences of Europe, Singapore, United State in order to improve the quality of education in Taiwan.
.
參 考 文 獻
一、 中文部分:
王小惠、張欣玲(民87):台灣資訊社會因應數位媒體發展之相關政策法規初探研究。1998台灣區網際網路研討會論文。
王宇根譯(民84):詮釋與過度詮釋。 香港:牛津大學出版社。
王佳煌(民89):資訊社會學。台北:學富。
江淑琳譯(民91):從哲學看網際網路。台北:韋伯文化事業。
希貝里等(民91):第一個複製人胚胎。科學人,1,37-44。new window
沈清松(民87):解除世界魔咒。台北:商務印書館。
李奉儒(民85):後現代主義、多元主義與德育研究。教育研究雙月刊,50,30-41。new window
李進寶(民90):E-Learning 的發展趨勢。Retrieved March 20, 2002, from http://www2.edu.tw/moecc/index.htm。
吳美娟(民89)資訊科技中的主體性危機及其在教育上的意涵。國立台中師範學院民教育研究所國民教育研究集刊,民89,159-175。new window
陳伯璋(民77):意識型態與教育。台北:師大書苑。
張春興(民78):張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
梁濃剛(民78):回歸佛洛伊德:拉康的精神分析學。台北:遠流。
馮朝霖(民89):教育哲學專論:主體、情性與創化。台北:元照。
黃厚銘(民90):Heidegger的哲學思想與資訊科技。資訊社會研究,1,1-31。new window
黃豐隆(民80):資料通信與電腦網路:原理、應用與未來發展。台北:格致圖書公司。
董學文、王葵譯(民81):符號學美學。台北:千華。
楊深坑(民86):溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程。台北:師大書苑。
翟本瑞(民89):教育與社會:迎接資訊時代的教育社會學反省。台北:揚志文化。
鄧志松(民89):認同與認同衝突:一個自由主義的解決途徑。「多元文化、身分認同與教育」學術研討會論文。
二、 日文部分:
村上龍(2001):「教育の崩壞」という噓。日本東京:NHK出版。
三、 英文部分:
Apple, M. (1993). Official knowledge. N.Y.: Rrutledge.
Baldwin, T. F., McVoy, D. S. & Steinfield, C. (1996). Convergence: Integrating media, information and communication. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Barlow, J. P. (1995). Is there a There in cyberspace? Unte Reader, March-April: 50-56.
Barlow, J. P. (1996). A Declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://www.eff.org/~barlow/library.html.
Bartelson, J. (2000). Three concepts of globalization. International Sociology, 15(2), 180-196.
Barthes, R. (1968). Element of semiology. (Trans. by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith) New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1964).
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. New York: Hill & Wang. (Trans. by Richard Miller)
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. (Trans. by Stephen Heath). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1977).
Barthes, R. (1986). The rustle of language. (Trans by Richard Howard). U. K.: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1984).
Barthes, R. (1991). The grain of the voice:Interviews 1962-1980. (Trans. by Linda Coverdale ). University of California Press. (Original work published 1981).
Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror of production. MO: St. Louis, Telos Press. (trans. By Mark Poster)
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext. (trans. By Paul Foss, Paul Patton & Philip Beitchman )
Baudrillard, J. (1993). Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.(trans. by Ian Hamilton Grant)
Bauman, R. (1975). Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist, 77, 290-311.
Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication.In S. Jones(ed.). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. 138-163. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Baym, N. K. (1995a). The performance of humour in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1(2). Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/baym.htmlnew window
Baym, N. K. (1998). The emergence of online community. In S. Jones(ed.). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. 35-68. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bell, C. & Newby, H. (1974). The sociology of community. London: Frank Cass & Company, Ltd.
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of Post-Industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Bell, D. (1979). The cultural contradictions of Capitalism. (Second edition). London: Heinemann.
Bernard, J. (1973). The sociology of community. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Blake, N. & Standish, P. (2000). Introduction. In N. Blake & P. Standish(eds.), Enquiries at the interface: Philosophical problems of online education. 1-18. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bormann, E. G. (1972) Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, 396-407.
Bormann, E. G. (1983). Symbolic convergence: Organizational communication and culture. In L. Putnam and M. E. Pacanowsky (eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. 99-122. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bromberg, P. (1994). Speak that I may see you: Some reflection on dissociation, reality and psychoanalytic listening. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4(4), 517-547.
Broughton, J. (1996). The bomb’s─Eye view: smart weapon and military TV. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M.(eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 139-165. N. Y. : Routledge.
Bynum, T. W. (1998). Global information ethics and the information revolution. In Bynum, T. W. & Moor, J. H. (eds.). The digital phoenix: How computer are changing philosophy. 274-291. Oxford: Blackwell.
Calhoun, C. (1991) Indirect relationships and imagined communities: Large-scale social integration and the transformation of everyday life. In P. Bourdieu and J. S. Colemen (eds.), Social theory for a changing society. 95-120. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Carey, J. (1993). Everything that rises must diverge: Notes on communications, technology and the symbolic construction of the social. In Gaunt, P. (ed.). Beyond agendas. 171-184. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Cerulo, K. A. (1997) Reframing social concepts for a brave new (virtual) world. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 48-58.new window
Chayko, M. (1993). What is real in the age of virtual reality? Reframing frame analysis for a technological world. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 171-181.
Constant, D., Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
Correll, S. (1995). The ethnography of an electronic bar: The Lesbian Café. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(3), 270-298.
Cubitt, S. (2001). Simulation and social theory. London: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In n S. Jones(ed.). Doing internet research. 107-125. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Deschamp, J. & Devos, T. (1998). Regarding the relationship between social identity and personal identity. In Worchel, S. etc.(eds.) Social identity. 1-12. London: Sage.
Dijk, J. V. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. SAGE Publications.(Trans. by Leontine Spoorenberg)
Donath, S. J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 29-59. London: Routledge.
Eco, U. (1979). Peirce and the semiotic foundations of openness: Signs and texts and texts as signs. In Eco, U. (ed.), The role of the reader. London: Hutchinson.
Effrat, M. P. (1974). The community: Approaches and applications. New York: Free Press.
Elias, N. (1991). The symbol theory. London: Publication.
Erikson, E. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. N. Y. : W. W. Norton.
Etzioni, A. (1991). The responsive society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Federaro, L. (1995). Seekers of self-help finding it online. The New York Times, March 23.
Fetzer, J. H. (2001). Computers and cognition: Why minds are not machines. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method. New York: Verso.
Fischer, C. S. (1997). Technology and community: Historical complexities. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 113-118.new window
Fox, W. S. (1983). Computerized creation and diffusion of folkloric materials. Folklore Forum, 16, 5-20.
Fox, R. (1995). Newstrack. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 11-12.
Furlong, M. S. (1989). An electronic community for older adults: The SeniorNet network. Journal of Communication, 39, 145-153.
Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace.
Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. London : Macmillan
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity:Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Goldberg, D. T. (1994). Introduction: Multicultural conditions. In Goldberg, D. T.(ed.), Multiculturalism: A critical reader, 1-41. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
Goldhaber, M. (1997). The attention economy and the net. Retrieved November 10, 2001, from http://firstmonday.dk/issues/issues2_4/goldhaber
Gore, A.(1993). Speech at the Superhighway Summit Royce Hall, Jan. 11,1993, UCLA,Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved December 20, 2001, from http://www.eff.org/pub/GII_NII/Govt_docs /gore_shs. speech) .
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Green, A. (1997). Education, globalization and the nation state. London: MacMillan Press.
Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge: Polity.
Grossberg, L. (1996). Identity and cultural studies: Is that all there is? In Stuart Hall and Paul Du Gay (eds.). Questions of cultural identity. 87-107. London: Sage.
Grossberg, L. (1997). Dancing in spite of myself. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication. U. K.: Polity Press.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (ed.). Identity, community, culture, difference. 222-237. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hall, S. (1991). Old and new identities, old and new ethnicities. In Anthony D. King (ed.). Culture, globalization, and the world-system. 41-68. New York: Macmillan.
Haraway, D. (1991). The actor are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: Postscript to cyborgs at large. In C. Penley and A. Ross (eds.). Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haugeland, J. (1981). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (ed.), Mind design. 1-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haywood, T. (1995). Info-Rich-Info-Poor: Access and exchange in the global information society. London: Bowker-Saur.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson Trans.). UK: Basil Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. N. Y. : Harper & Row. (Trans. by W. Lovitt)
Heim, M. (1993). Metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herman, A. & Swiss T. (2000). Introduction: The World Wide Web as magic, metaphor, and power. In Herman, A. & Swiss T. (ed.) The World Wide Web and contemporary cultural theory, 1-4. New York: Routledge.
Hetherington, K. (1998). Expressions of identity. London: Sage.
Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Innis, H. A. (1972). Empire and communications. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
Jensen, J. (1990). Redeeming modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jones, S. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. Jones(ed.). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. 10-35. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jones, S. (1999). Studying the net: Intricacies and issues. In S. Jones(ed.). Doing internet research. 1-27. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the internet. London: Routledge.
Kellner, D. (1995). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the postmodern. London: Routledge.
Kendall, L. (2000). Recontextualizing “cyberspace”: Methodological considerations for on-line research In n S. Jones(ed.). Doing internet research. 57-74. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kitchin, R. (1998). Cyberspace: The world in the wires. Chichester: Wiley.
Kollock, P. & Smith, M. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 3-28. London: Routledge.
Kroker, A. (1996). Virtual capitalism. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M.(eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 167-179. N. Y. : Routledge.
Lankshear, C., Peters, M. & Knobel, M. (2000). Information, knowledge and learning: Some issues facing epistemology and education in a digital age. In N. Blake & P. Standish(eds.), Enquiries at the interface: Philosophical problems of online education. 19-43.Oxford: Blackwell.
Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. N. Y. : W. W. Norton & Company.
Lubbers, R. (1998). Trends in economic and social globalization: Challenges and obstacles. Retrieved January 10, 2002, from http://www.globalize.org
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Trans. by G. Bennington & B. Massumi)
Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes. London: Sage.
Marshall, J. (1998). Performativity: Lyotard, Foucault and Austin. Paper delivered to the American Educational Research Association’s Annual Meeting. 11-17. San Diego.
Martinsons, B. (1996). The possibility of agency for photographic subjects. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M.(eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 231-253. N. Y. : Routledge.
McChesney, R. (2000). So much for the magic of technology and the free market: The World Wide Web and the corporate media system. In Herman, A. & Swiss T. (ed.) The World Wide Web and contemporary cultural theory. 5-34. New York: Routledge.
McCrone, J. (1994). Don’t forget your memory aide. New Scientist, 5, February, 32-36.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The gutenberg galaxy : The making of typographic man. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McLuhan, M. & Fiore, Q. (1968). War and peace in the global village. San Francisco, Ca. : HardWired
McLuhan, M. & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Melle, U. (1998). Responsibilities and the crisis of technological civilization: A Husserlian meditation on Hans Jonas. Human Studies, 21, 329-345.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Menser, M. & Aronowitz, S. (1996). On cultural studies, science and technology. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M. (eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 7-28. N. Y. : Routledge.
Newhagan, J. E. & Rafaeli, S. (1997). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://www.ascuse.org/jcmc/voll/issue4/refaeli.html
Nissenbaum, H. & Walker, D. (1998). Will computer dehumanize education? A grounded approach to values at risk. Technology in Society, 20, 237-273.
Novak, M. (1991). Liquid architecture in cyberspace. In Benedikt, M. (ed.). Cyberspace: First steps. 225-254. Cambridge: MIT Press.
O’Brien, J. (1999). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online interaction. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock(eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 76-104. London: Routledge.
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good places. New York: Paragon House.
Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved March 10, 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.htmlnew window
Patton, P. (1986). Open road. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Piper,D.(1997). Authentic teaching and learning in cyberspace: A Heideggerian perspective, Westminster Studies in Education, 20, 75- 87.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Popkewitz, T. Z. (1998). Knowledge, power and curriculum: Revisiting a TRSE argument. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(1), 83-101.new window
Popkewitz, T. S. (1999). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
Porter, D. (1997). Internet culture. London: Routledge.
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Postmodernism and social context. Oxford: Polity Press.
Poster, M. (1995). The second media age. Cambridge: Polity.
Poster, M. (1999). Theorizing virtual reality: Baudrillard and Derrida. In M. L. Ryan(ed.), Cyberspace textuality: Computer technology and literary theory. 42-60. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Purcell, K. (1997). Towards a communication dialectic: Embedded technology and the enhancement of place. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 101-112.new window
Raymond, E. S. (Ed). (1991). The new hacker''s dictionary. Cambridge, MA.: MIT.
Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations: A blueprint for the future. New
York: Vintage.
Reid, E. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet Relay Chat. Electronic document.
Reid, E. (1995). Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. Jones(ed.). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. 164-183. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 107-133. London: Routledge.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rheingold, H. (1993a). A slice of life in my virtual community. In L. M. Harasim (ed.), Global networks. 57-80. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rice, R. E. (1989). Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication. Communication Yearbook, 12, 436-476.
Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Robertson, R. (1995). Globalization: Time-space and homogeneity-
heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash and R. Robertson
(eds).Global modernity. London: Sage.
Robins, K. & Webster, F. (1989). The technical fix: Education, computer and industry. London: MacMillan Education Ltd.
Robins, K. & Webster, F. (1999). Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. London: Routledge.
Romanyshyn, S. (1989). Technology as symptom and dream. London: Routledge.
Ross, A. (1990). Hacking away at the counterculture. Postmodern Culture, 1(1), 1-43.new window
Ross, A. (1996). Earth to Gore, earth to Gore. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M.(eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 111-121. N. Y. : Routledge.
Roszak, T. (1986). The cult of information: The folklore of computer and the art of thinking. New York: Pantheon.
Ryan, M. L. (1999). Cyberspace, virtuality and the text. In M. L. Ryan(ed.), Cyberspace textuality: Computer technology and literary theory. 78-107. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rust, V. D. (1999). Toward a Taiwanese educational policy: Internalization and indigenization. In 國立台灣師範大學教育系教育部國家講座主編,教育科學的國際化與本土化,29-53.
Saha, A. (1998). Technological innovation and western values. Technology in Society, 20, 499-520.
Schivelbusch, W. (1986). The railway journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Book.
Sennett, R. (1977). Destructive Gemeinschaft. In Birnbaum, N. (ed.). Beyond the crisis. 169-197. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, R. A. (1989). Cultural reconstruction in the post-modern world. Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 255-270.
Slouka, M. (1996). World of the war: The assault on reality. London: Abacus.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 134-166. London: Routledge.
Spring, J. (1999). The United States and the United Kingdom schooling and the free market. Unpublished paper.
Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organization communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
Sproull, L. & Faraj, S. (1995). Atheism, sex and database: The net as a social technology. In Kahin, B. & Keller, J. (eds.), Public access to the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stacey, M. (1974). The myth of community studies. In C. Bell & H. Newby(eds.). The sociology of community. 13-26. London: Frank Cass & Company, Ltd.
Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
Stone, A. R.(1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of mechanical age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sudweeks, F. & Simoff , S. J. (1999). Complementary explorative data analysis: The reconciliation of quantitative and qualitative principles. In Jones, S. (ed.). Doing internet research. 29-55. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Szczypula, J. , Tschang, T. & Vikas, O. (2001). Reforming the educational knowledge base: Course content and skills in the internet age. In Tschang, F. T. & Senta, T. D. (eds.). Access to knowledge: New information technologies and the emergence of the virtual university. 93-126. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Thagard, P. (1997). Internet epistemology : Contributions of new information technologies to scientific research. Retrieved November 20, 2001, from http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Pages/Epistemology.html
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity.
Thomsen, S. R. (1996) @Work in cyberspace: Exploring practitioner use of the PRForum. Public Relations Review, 22 (2), 115-132.
Thomsen, S. R., Straubhaar, J. D. and Bolyard, D. M. (1998). Ethnomethodology and the study of online communities: exploring the cyberstreets. Information Research, 4(1). Retrieved January 10, 2002, from http://www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publicationsnew window
Torres, C. (1998). Democracy, education and multiculturalism: Dilemma of citizenship in a global world. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Turkle, S. (1997). Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of Freudian century. Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 72-84.new window
Vallenilla, E. M. (1998). Higher education and meta-technology: Perplexities and challenges. Technology in Society, 20, 347-355.
Virnoche, M. E. & Marx, G. T. (1997) “Only Connect”--E. M. Forester in an age of electronic communication: Computer-mediated association and community networks. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 85-100.new window
Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics and geoculture : Essays on the changing world-system. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Walther, J. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Rational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.new window
Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186-203.
Webster, F. (1995). Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.
Wellman, B. (1988). The community question re-evaluated. In M. P. Smith (ed.), Power, community and substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Wellman, B., Carrington, P. & Hall, A. (1988). Networks as personal communities. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (eds.), Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D. Garton, L. Gulia, M. & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 211-238.
Wellman B. and Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock(eds.). Communities in cyberspace. 167-194. London: Routledge.
Wilber, K. (1983). Eye to eye: The quest for the new paradigm. N. Y. :Anchor /Doubleday.
Williams, R. (1990). Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Routledge.
Wilson, P. L. (1996). Boundary violations. In S. Aronowitz, S., Martinsona, B. and Menser, M.(eds.). Technoscience and cyberculture. 221-229. N. Y. : Routledge.
Wireman, P. (1984). Urban neighborhoods, networks, and families. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford. Blackwell.
Worchel, S. (1998). A developmental view of the search for group identity. In Worchel, S. etc.(eds.) Social identity, 53-73. London: Sage.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Retrieved January 10, 2002, from http://www.pitt.edu/~ksy/apa.html
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE