:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童英語科學習興趣模式建構與教學效果研究
作者:張映芬
作者(外文):Ying-FenChang
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:程炳林
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:正向情緒個人興趣情境興趣認知-動機變項課室目標結構學習成就classroom goal structurecognition-motivationindividual interestlearning achievementpositive emotionsituational interest
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
本研究的目的有二:(一)整合學習興趣理論與學業情緒理論,建構一個包含情境興趣、正向情緒、認知-動機變項、學習成就及個人興趣的「英語科學習興趣發展歷程模式」,驗證此模式的適配度。(二)操弄情境興趣與課室目標結構,形成不同教學組別,來分析教學組別與測量階段對正向情緒、認知-動機變項、學習成就及個人興趣之效果。
為完成前述目的,本研究共進行二個研究。在研究一中,本研究以中地區955位國小高年級學童為研究樣本。研究工具包含情境興趣、學業情緒、後設認知策略、動機涉入、自我評定、個人興趣量表與英語期中評量,所蒐集的資料將以SEM進行考驗。在研究二中,本研究以台中市一所國小共144位五年級學童為研究樣本,以班級進行實驗操弄,分為情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組、情境興趣教學組、一般教學組三組,以前測、後測、延後測三階段蒐集資料,來分析教學組別與測量階段在正向情緒、認知-動機變項、學習成就與個人興趣上的效果。本研究發現如下:
一、研究一結果顯示「英語科學習興趣發展歷程模式」有良好整體、內在適配度。在控制前測個人興趣後,模式中潛在變項間之關係為:情境興趣皆能正向預測正向情緒與認知-動機變項;正向情緒皆能正向預測認知-動機變項與學習成就;認知-動機變項能正向預測學習成就;學習成就能正向預測後測個人興趣。
二、研究二結果發現如下:
(一)教學組別與測量階段在希望、動機涉入與實現興趣上之二因子交互作用效果達顯著。在前測與延後測時,三組教學組別在希望、動機涉入與實現興趣上無差異。在後測時,情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組在希望、動機涉入與實現興趣的分數顯著高於一般教學組,情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組與情境興趣教學組以及情境興趣教學組與一般教學組在希望、動機涉入與實現興趣的分數並無差異。在一般教學組中,前測、後測至延後測在希望、動機涉入與實現興趣的分數會顯著下降,其餘二組不會有相同情形。
(二)教學組別與測量階段在潛在興趣上之二因子交互作用效果達顯著。在前測時,情境興趣教學組在潛在興趣的分數顯著高於情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組,情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組與一般教學組以及情境興趣教學組與一般教學組在潛在興趣的分數並無差異。在後測與延後測時,三組教學組別在潛在興趣上無差異。在一般教學組中,前測、後測至延後測在潛在興趣的分數會顯著下降,其餘二組不會有相同情形。
(三)教學組別與測量階段在愉悅、後設認知上之二因子交互作用效果未達顯著。在愉悅方面,測量階段的主要效果達顯著,延後測在愉悅的分數顯著高於後測,前測與後測以及前測與延後測在愉悅的分數並無差異。在後設認知方面,教學組別與測量階段的主要效果達顯著,情境興趣教學組在後設認知的分數顯著高於一般教學組,情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組與情境興趣教學組以及情境興趣暨趨向精熟課室目標教學組與一般教學組在後設認知的分數並無差異;前測在後設認知策略的分數顯著高於後測與延後測,後測與延後測在後設認知策略的分數並無差異。
(四)在英語期中評量、英語期末評量方面,教學組別的主要效果未達顯著。在學習適應方面,測量階段與教學組別的交互作用與主要效果皆未達顯著。
本研究依據結果提出建議,以提供國小教學學習輔導與未來研究之參考。
The purposes of the present research were to: (a) integrate learning interest theory and achievement emotion theory to construct an elementary children’s English learning interest model in which situational interest, positive emotion, cognition-motivation, learning achievement, and individual interest are examined with an investigation of empirical model-fitting analysis; (b) analyze the effects of situational interest, classroom goal structure, and measurement stages on positive emotion, cognition-motivation, learning achievement, and individual interest. The results showed that the elementary children’s English learning interest model fitted the empirically observed data well and that the combinative effects of situational interest and mastery-approach classroom goal structure were helpful to develop learning interest.
中文部分
宋秋美、程炳林、周啓葶(2010):課室目標結構對個人目標導向的調節效果。教育心理學報,42(1),99-122。new window
李俊青(2007):學業情緒歷程模式之分析。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林邦傑(1995):中小學生學習及讀書策略量表的修訂。教育部輔導工作六年計劃研究報告。
林易慧、程炳林(2006):課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之影響。教育心理學報,37(3),231-255。new window
林宴瑛、程炳林(2007):個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,39(2),173-194。new window
林宴瑛、程炳林(2012):環境目標結構與控制-價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報,44(1),49-72。new window
吳青蓉、張景媛(2003):國中生英語學習歷程模式之驗證。教育心理學報,35(2),121-140。new window
吳靜吉、程炳林(1992):激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,39,59-78。new window
侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004):國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報,35(3),221-248。new window
施佩君(2012):國文教室好好玩:探究國中國文科興趣發展歷程。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
程炳林(2002):多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類,47(1),36-58。
程炳林(2003):四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48 卷,1期,39-58。
程炳林(2005):個人目標導向、課室目標結構與測量階段對國中生自我調整學習之交互效果。國科會專案研究報告。NSC 94-2413-H-006-006。
程炳林、林清山(1999):國中生學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應之關係。教育心理學報,31(1),1-35。new window
程炳林、林清山(2000):中學生自我調整學習之研究(1/2)。國科會專案研究報告。NSC 89-2413-H-035-001。
程炳林、林清山(2001):中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊,48(1),1-41。
彭淑玲、程炳林(2005):四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報,50(2),69-95。new window
楊淑晴(1997):高中學生英文學習策略與英文性向之相關研究。人文及社會學科教學通訊,45 期,119-140。
簡嘉菱、程炳林(2013):環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報,44(3),713-733。new window
張映芬、程炳林(2011):國中生動機涉入之分類結構及其相關因素探討。教育心理學報,43(2),521-546。new window
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2011):多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用(六版)。臺北市:五南。
黃豊茜(2010):學業情緒歷程模式:探析情緒調整策略的效果。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭依婷(2007):國中生學業情緒與學業成就之相關研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
賴美璇(2006):動機調整策略融入英語科之教學效果。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
謝岱陵(2003):國中生四向度目標導向之中介效果分析。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。

英文部分
Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In P. Schutz (Ed.), Emotion in education (pp. 141-157). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about sciences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.
Ainley, M. D., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1-17.
Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Bagozzi, R. P., &Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, (1), 74-94.
Bandelos, D. L., Yates, K., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 611-623.new window
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87-98.
Boekaerts, M. (2002). The On-line Motivation Questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (Vol. 12, pp.77-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Cohen, J. (1997). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Connelly, D. A. (2011). Applying Silvia’s model of interest to academic text: Is there a third appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 624-628.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions and educational research. Educational Research, 22(2), 14-22.
Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influence, and practices. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.229-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Custodero, L. A. (2005). Obervable indicators of flow experience: A developmental perspective on musical engagement in young children from infancy to school age. Music Education Research, 7(2), 185-209.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Dettmers, S., Trautwein , U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 25-35.
Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 1-17.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
Epstein, J. (1989). Family structures and student motivation: A development perspective. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 259-295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 634-645.
Fisher, P., Dobbs-Oates, J., Doctoroff, G., & Arnold, D. (2012). Early math interest and the development of math skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(3), 673-681.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Dicke, A., & Goetz, T. (2012). Beyond quantitative decline: Conceptual shifts in adolescents’development of interest in mathematics. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1069-1082.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 29-41.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest n learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92-102.
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191-209.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hoffmann, L., & Häussler, P. (1995). Modification of interest by instruction. Paper presented at the AERA Symposium “Interest development and Gender. Annual AERA Meeting in San Francisco, 1995 (polyscript).
Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’learning and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447-465.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Jenkins, H. (2002). Game theory. Technology Review, 29, 1-3.
Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-211.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383-409.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kulik, J. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruccion. In E. Baker & H. O’Neil (Eds.), Technology assesment in education and training. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology,100(1), 15-29.
Lepper, M., & Malone, T. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. En Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitudes, learning and instruction, II: Conative, and affective process analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Association.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
Lerkkanen, M., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 266-279.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647-671.
Lipstein, R., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). “Putting things into words: 12-15-year-old students’ interest for writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Ma, X. (1997). Reciprocal relationships between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 221-229.
Malone, F. (1980). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivation instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-369.
Mayer, R.E. (1987). Educational psychology : a cognitive approach. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A. & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM of the contibution which games can make to the education process. (On line). Available: http://reservoir.cent.uji.es/ canals/octeto/es/440.
Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C., & Spencer, C. A. (1997). Challenge in mathematics classrooms: Students’ motivation and strategies in projectbased learning. Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424- 436.
Mouratidis, A. A.,Vansteenkiste, M., Sideridis, G., & Lens, W. (2011). Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils’ autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 353-366.
Newman, R. S. (1998). Students’ help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 644-658.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242.
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical educatio using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 444-453.
Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behaviors in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 478-491.
Panksepp, J. (2003). At the interface of the affective, behavioral and cognitive neurosciences: Decoding the emotional feelings of the brain. Brain and Cognition, 52, 4-14.
Patall, E. A. (2013). Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 522-534.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learningand achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivtinal mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359-376.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143-163). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Pekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 497-506.
Pekrun, R. Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597.new window
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Emotions in Education: A special Issue of Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T. & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotion in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement setting: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals , multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A.Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249-284). New York, NY: Academic.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Provenzo, E. (1991). Video kids. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reeve, C. L. & Hakel, M. D. (2000). Toward an understanding of adult intellectual development: Investigating within-individual convergence of interest and knowledge profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 897-908.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Renninger, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A.Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.173-195). New York, NY: Academic.
Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2002). Community building with and for teachers: The math forum as a resource for teacher professional development. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 60-95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychology Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education. 27(1), 37-42
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263-281.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299-323.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Reisetter, M. (1998). The role of choice in reader engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 705-714.
Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 603-610.
Silvia, P. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 270-290.
Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2005).What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5(1), 89-102.
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest-the curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57-60.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activities intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1),97-110.
Stevenson, H. W., & Newman, R. S. (1986). Long-term prediction of achievement and attitudes in mathematics and reading. Child Development, 57, 646-659.
Turner, S. A., Jr., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6, 670-674.new window
Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. (1998). Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758–771.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structure and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 3-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 影響國中學生英語學習成就關鍵因素之分析—以TASA資料庫為例
2. 國中寫作教學自我調整策略發展模式之研究
3. 國小教師對學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、自我效能與教學行為調整之關係研究
4. 學業情緒、情緒調整策略、自我調整學習策略對學業成就之關係:條件化間接效果檢驗暨教學方案之成效分析
5. 原住民成人學習者社會支持、自我效能與學習動機關係之研究
6. 國小六年級學生數位資本、資訊自我效能、成就目標與資訊學習成就關係之研究
7. 國中學生知覺數學差異化教學環境、數學知識信念和數學解題自我調整學習之工具編製及相關研究
8. 國小高年級學生數學氣質與CLIA教-學模式之研究
9. 臺灣與大陸都會區大學校院碩士生能力信念、學習衝突與學習動機調整策略之相關研究
10. 在多個學習領域以學生設計實體和數位遊戲之差異化教學培養學生21世紀關鍵能力與學習動機
11. 情境興趣為本的教學促進高一學生生物遺傳學習成就之研究
12. 科技大學英文教師教學風格、師生互動、學生學習投入與學習自我效能關係之研究
13. 寫作自我調整學習策略的發展現象暨寫作自我調整教學效果之研究
14. 國中生學業情緒之認知評估中介歷程:二階調節效果
15. 從人境互動觀點探討目標結構、目標導向、情緒調整對考試情緒與應試策略之效果:條件化間接效果暨調節效果分析
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE