:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:程序正義與分配正義:臺灣企業員工的正義知覺與工作態度
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:賴志超 引用關係黃光國
作者(外文):Lai, Albert Chih-chaoHwang, Kwang-kuo
出版日期:2000
卷期:42:2
頁次:頁171-190
主題關鍵詞:華人的正義觀程序正義分配正義工作態度臺灣企業Chinese notion of justiceProcedural justiceDistributive justiceWork attitudeTaiwan business
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:481
  • 點閱點閱:119
本研究的目的在探討臺灣地區公民營企業員工對程序正義及分配正義的知覺與其工作態度的關係。作者首先以開收性問題探問229位企業員工,請他們說出公司對自己最不公平的事情,結果顯示:員工所報告的不公平事情集中在分配正義方面。再以一份程序正義及分配正義量表測量受試者,因素分析法共抽取五個正義因素,發現員工認知結構中同時有程序正義及分配正義的心理構念,而且各因素有緊密的關聯。以正義的五因素為預測變項,與以工作態度為效標變項作淨相關分析,結果發現:分配正義與員工工作態度的七個面向以有顯著的相關;而程序正義主義和員工對主管的評價和信任及工作滿意有關。上述研究結果符合分配正義理論的預測,但程序正義因素與工作態度的關係則較弱。臺灣企業中員工所重視的程序正義範圍不在於參與建立組織目標或政策,而在於完成工作前一階段的各項協助,例如員工工作遭遇到困難時有管道表示意見。根據本 研究的發現,探討組織正義與工作態度的關係,除了分辨正義的類型,也要考據正義觀念如何反映社會系統的特性,並受到社會中傳統信念的影響。
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between justice perceptions and work attitudes among business employees in Taiwan. The study first used an openended questionnaire to 229 employees to report the most unfair event in the company. The results revealed that their responses focused on various aspects concerning distributive justice. After that, their responses to a questionnaire on procedural and distributive justice were subjected to factor analysis with promax rotation resulting in a five-factor solution. It was found that the procedural and distributive factors were significantly correlated. To examined the relationships between justice and work attitudes, partial correlation analyses showed that distributive fairness was significantly related to all of the seven measures of work attitudes, namely, evaluations of supervisor, trust in supervisor, job satisfaction, intentions to quit, interpersonal conflicts, anxiety, cognitive adaptation. In contrast, participation, a form of procedural justice, was related to evaluations of supervisor, trust in supervisor, and job satisfaction. These findings suggested that as opposed to those of Alexander and Ruderman (1987), distributive justice was more powerful than procedural justice in prediction of work attitudes of employees in businesses of Taiwan. It was also found that the most important measure of procedural justice in predicting work attitude of employees in Taiwan was the expression of their job difficulties. Taken together, these results suggest that cultural norms prevailing in a society should be taken into consideration for comprehensive understanding of the relationships between perceptions of justice and work attitude, as well as how individuals’ perceptions of justice may be influenced by their cultural tradition.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(19951200)。結構以外:歷史的社會學理路初探。二十一世紀,32,39-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Earley, P. C.、Lind, E. A.(1987)。Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(6),1148-1160。  new window
3.林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1994)。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。管理評論,13(2),87-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Alexander, S.、Ruderman, M.(1987)。The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior。Social Justice Research,1(2),177-198。  new window
5.黃光國(19910100)。儒家思想中的正義觀。國家科學委員會研究彙刊‧人文及社會科學,1(1),64-76。  延伸查詢new window
6.Greenberg, Jerald(1990)。Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow。Journal of Management,16(2),399-432。  new window
7.Deutsch, Morton(1975)。Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?。Journal of Social Issues,31(3),137-149。  new window
8.黃光國(1987)。Face and favor: the Chinese power game。American Journal of Sociology,92(4),944-974。  new window
9.黃光國(1990)。Modernization of Chinese family business。International Journal of Psychology,25(5/ 6),593-618。  new window
10.Deutsch, M.(1977)。Recurrent themes in the study of social conflict。Journal of Social Issues,33,222-225。  new window
11.Folger, R.(1987)。Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace。Social Justice Research,1,143-160。  new window
12.Greenberg, J.、Tyler, T. R.(1987)。Why procedural justice in organizations?。Social Justice Research,1,127-142。  new window
13.Leung, K.、Lind, E. A.(1986)。Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50,1134-1140。  new window
14.Tyler, T.、Degoey, P.、Smith, H.(1996)。Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70(5),913-930。  new window
15.Tyler, T. R.(1987)。Procedural justice research。Social Justice Research,1(1),41-66。  new window
學位論文
1.余伯泉(1993)。論世俗的形式主義:心理學、國營企業及軍艦國造及個案研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.程懷琳(1988)。工作類型、工作能力酬賞分配方式對團體中個人表現的影響,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡宏方(1993)。技術人員薪酬滿足及其決定因素之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾銘傳(1987)。主管人員特質、薪酬給付方式及其滿足感之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Redding, S. Gordon、謝婉瑩(2009)。華人資本主義精神。格致出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Weber, Max、Parsons, Talcott、Tawney, R. H.(1958)。The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism。New York:Charles Scribner's Sons。  new window
3.Walster, E.、Walster, G. W.、Berscheid, E. S.(1978)。Equity: Theory and Research。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Homans, George Caspar(1961)。Social behavior: Its elementary forms。Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.。  new window
6.Lind, E. A.、Tyler, T. R.(1988)。The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice。Plenum Press。  new window
7.Thibaut, John W.、Walker, Laurens(1975)。Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.Harman, Harry H.(1976)。Modern Factor Analysis。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Silin, Robert H.(1976)。Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large Scale Taiwanese Enterprises。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.LeVine, R. A.(1984)。Properties of culture: An ethnographic view。Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion。New York, NY。  new window
13.Scheffé, Henry(1959)。The Analysis of Variance。The Analysis of Variance。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Lind, E. A.(1995)。Social conflict and social justice: Lessons from the social psychology of justice judgments,Leiden, Netherlands。  new window
圖書論文
1.Folger, Robert、Greenberg, Jerald(1985)。Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems。Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management。  new window
2.Leventhal, Gerald S.(1980)。What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships。Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research。Plenum Press。  new window
3.鄭伯壎(19910000)。家族主義與領導行為。中國人.中國心:人格與社會篇。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Adams, John Stacey(1965)。Inequity in social exchange。Advances in experimental social psychology。Academic Press。  new window
5.Furby, L.(1986)。Justice: Views from the social sciences。Psychology and justice。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE