臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小自然科教師對科學史融入教學之態度(2)：晤談研究
書刊名：臺中師院學報
作者：許良榮 引用關係／侯志洋
作者(外文)：Hsu, Liung-zong／Hou, Chin-yang
出版日期：2002
卷期：16
頁次：頁551-576
主題關鍵詞：國小教師；科學史；晤談；教學的態度；Elementary school teachers；History of science；Interview；Teaching attitudes
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:177
  • 點閱點閱:16
　　　　　本研究以個別晤談方式深入瞭解國小自然科教師對科學史融入教學之態度，受訪教師由先前研究之樣本中選取高、中、低分組共十四位。主要晤談內容為對於「科學與歷史之相容性」、「過時理論之教學價值」、「科學家不當行為之教學問題」、素樸的觀點，並未能提出具體的或特定的理念，而受訪教師思考的途徑常由教學中出發，考慮教學實際的層面。在教學中使用科學史為教學內容時，其目的主要以引發學生學習興趣為主。另一方面，呼應先應研究調查結果，晤談結果顯示教師們普遍缺乏科學史相關知能，因此如何提升教師的科學史之專業素養，是未來師資培育機構應予謹慎思考的問題之一。最後本研究討論科學史融入教學時應注意的問題並提出建議。
　　　　　The purpose of this study was to explore elementary school science teachers' attitudes toward integrating the history of science (HOS) into science teaching. The method adopted in this study was individual interview. The subjects included forty-five science teachers selected from a previous study by Hou & Hus (2002). The content of interview included: (1)the compatibility between science and history; (2)the teaching value of old theory; (3)the problems of science teaching of scientist' improver behavior; (4)the resources for teaching the history of science and (5)the teaching function of the history of science. The results of this study indicated that teachers had naive perspective toward teaching the HOS and couldn't offer concrete concept. The ways of thinking were usually derived from their classroom teaching and consider the aspect of the reality. The content of teaching is based on the history of science. The main purpose of the teaching is to make it more appealing to students. The findings were consistent to the former study, teachers lack of the knowledge of the HOS. Therefore, the teacher education should pay attention to prepare the teachers' literacy on the HOS. According to the results of the study, some suggestions for teaching the history of science and further study were also offered.
期刊論文
1.Seroglou, F.、Koumaras, P.(2001)。The contribution of the history of physics in physics education: A review。Science and Education，10(1)，153-172。  new window
2.Lederman, N. G.、Wade, P. D.、Bell, R. L.(1998)。Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments?。Science & Education，7(6)，595-615。  new window
3.Lederman, N. G.(1998)。The state of science education: subject matter without context。Electric Journal of Science Education，3(2)，1-11。  new window
4.許良榮(19990400)。科學史與科學教學：一些省思與建議。物理教育，3(1)，93-101。  延伸查詢new window
5.Levine, A. T.(2000)。Which way is up? Tomas S. Kuhn's analog to conceptual development in childhood。Science and Education，9，107-122。  new window
6.Brush, S. G.(1974)。Should the history of science be rated X?。Science，183，1164-1172。  new window
7.侯志洋、許良榮(20020700)。國小自然科教師對科學史融入教學之態度（1）：調查研究。臺中師院學報，16，523-550。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林陳涌(20000600)。九年一貫課程發展模式與內容。科學教育，231，35-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳治光、洪振方(19980600)。從伽利略的思維實驗探討職前教師之科學思考及其教學啟發。科學與教育學報，2，151-179。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ahlgren, A.、Walberg, J.(1973)。Changing attitudes towards science among adolescents。Nature，245，187-190。  new window
11.Brush, S. G.(1989)。History of science & science education。Interchange，20(2)，60-70。  new window
12.Galili, I.、Hazan, A.(2001)。Experts' views on using history and philosophy of science in the practice of physics instruction。Science & Education，10，345-367。  new window
13.Kafai, Y. B.、Gilliland-Swetland, A. J.(2001)。The use of historical materials in elementary science classrooms。Science Education，85，349-367。  new window
14.Siegel, H.(1980)。Comments on Brush on the History of science in science education。Science Education，64(1)，121-122。  new window
15.Song, J.、Cho, S. K.、Chung, B. H.(1997)。Exploring the parallelism between change in students' conceptions and historical change in the concept of inertia。Research in Science Education，27(1)，87-100。  new window
16.Stinner, A.、Williams, H.(1993)。Conceptual change, history, and science stories。Interchange，24(1/2)，87-103。  new window
17.Stuewer, R. H.(1998)。History and physics。Science & Education，7，13-30。  new window
18.Von driel, J. H.、De Vos, W.、Verloop, N.(1998)。Relating students' reasoning to the history of science: The case of chemical equilibrium。Research in Science Education，28(2)，187-198。  new window
19.Welch, W. W.(1973)。Review of the research and evaluation program of Harvard Project Physics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，10，365-378。  new window
20.許良榮(19981200)。科學史課文對於科學理論之閱讀學習的效果。中師數理學報，2(1)，113-144。  延伸查詢new window
21.de Berg, K. C.(1989)。The emergence of quantification in the pressure volume relationship for gases: A textbook analysis。Science Education，73(2)，115-134。  new window
22.Oldroyd, D. R.(1977)。Teaching the History of Chemistry in New South Wales Secondary Schools。The Australia Science Teachers Journal，23(2)，9-22。  new window
23.Schecker, H. P.(1992)。The paradigmatic change in mechanics: Implication of historical processes for physics education。Science and Education，1(1)，71-76。  new window
24.邱美虹(20000300)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊，8(1)，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.洪振方(19970400)。科學史融入科學教學之探討。高雄師大學報，8，233-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.徐光台(19950600)。從科學史的觀點來看通識教育中科學教育與人文教育的會通問題。通識教育，2(2)，1-21。  延伸查詢new window
27.Garrison, J. W.、Lawwill, K. S.(1993)。Democratic science teaching: A role for the history of science。Interchange，24(1/2)，23-39。  new window
28.許良榮、李田英(19950400)。科學史在科學教學的角色與功能。科學教育，179，15-27。  延伸查詢new window
29.Mas, Carlos J. Furio、Perez, Juan Hernandez、Harris, Hal H.(1987)。Parallels between adolescents' conception of gases and the history of chemistry。Journal of Chemical Education，64(7)，616-618。  new window
30.Carey, Susan(1986)。Cognitive science and science education。American Psychologist，41(10)，1123-1130。  new window
31.Kuei, C. H.、Madu, C.、Lin, C.、Chow, W. S.(2002)。Developing supply chain strategies based on the survey of supply chain quality and technology management。International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management，19(7)，889-901。  new window
會議論文
1.許良榮(2001)。科學史導向教材--「地球的形狀與運動」之改進研究。九十學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會。國立台中師範學院。897-929。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sanchez, L.(1989)。On the implicit use of history in science education。The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching: the First International Conference。Tallahassee：Florida State University。306-312。  new window
3.洪木利、陳和玉(1999)。科學史融入高中物理教學方法之研究。1999科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討會暨研習會。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪振方(1999)。從理論與實踐的對話建構科學史融入科學教學的範例。1999科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會。國立高雄師範大學。29-38。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kenealy, P.(1989)。Telling a coherent: A role for the history and philosophy of science in a physical science course。The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching: the First International conference。Tallahassee：Florida State University。209-220。  new window
6.Lochhead, J.、Dufresne. R.(1989)。Helping students understand difficult science concepts through the use of dialogues with history。The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching: the first international conference。Tallahassee：Florida State University。221-229。  new window
學位論文
1.柯俊良(1998)。科學史融入教學的教師專業實踐模式研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Abd-El-Khalick, F.(1998)。The influence of history of science course on students' conceptions of the nature of science(博士論文)。Oregon State University。  new window
3.柯玉婷(2000)。台中地區國小職前與在職教師對科學本質之理解及其教學態度的研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪振方(1994)。從孔恩異例的認知與論證探討科學知識的重建(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張華葆(1994)。社會心理學。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Debus, A. G.、任定成、朱傳方、周雁翎、劉鶴玲(1999)。科學與歷史：一個化學論者的評價。臺北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.林義男(1992)。社會學。台北：巨流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.AAAS(1992)。Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Matthews, M. R.(1994)。The role of history and philosophy of science。N.Y.：Routledge。  new window
6.Mach, E.(1960)。The Science of Mechanics。LaSalle, IL：Open Court Publishing Company。  new window
7.Giroux, H. A.(1994)。Disturbing pleasure: learning popular politics of education。London, UK。  new window
8.Kuhn, Thomas S.(1962)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.周珮儀(19990000)。從社會批判到後現代：季胡課程理論之研究。臺北市：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
11.Tyler, Ralph Winfred(1949)。Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction。University of Chicago Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.McDonald, D.(1989)。Teaching science for understanding: Implications of spontaneous concepts and the history of science(ED314251)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jenkins, E.(1989)。Why the history of science?。Teaching the history of science。Oxford：British Society for the History of Science, Basil Blackwell。  new window
2.Kauffman, G. B.(1991)。History in the chemistry curriculum。History, philosophy, and science teaching: Selected readings。Toronto：OISE Press。  new window
3.Duschl, R. A.(1994)。Research in the history and philosophy of science。Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning。New York：McMillan。  new window
4.傅麗玉(1996)。科學史與台灣中等科學教育之整合--問題與建議。化學教育面面觀。國立臺灣師範大學中等教育輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1143（臺灣：1130，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67878175
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上