:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:動作教育課程介入對國小五年級學童社交技巧及動作技能表現之影響
書刊名:北體學報
作者:周建智 引用關係彭慧君王文宜黃美瑤 引用關係
作者(外文):Chou, Chien-chihPeng, Hui-chunWang, Wen-yiHuang, Mei-yao
出版日期:2005
卷期:13
頁次:頁248-260
主題關鍵詞:動作教育課程動作技能表現社交技巧Movement educationMovement skillSocial skill
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:439
  • 點閱點閱:53
本研究旨在探討動作教育課程介入國小五年級體育課程後,能否提升學童動作技能表現及改善社交技巧。本研究採用準實驗設計,研究對象為台北市內湖區某一所國民小學五年級學童,一班為實驗組,一班為控制組,共兩個班級。動作教育課程共介入十週的時問,每週兩堂課,每堂課40分鍾。於動作教育課程介入前一週進行兒童社交技巧量表填答及動作技能表現檢測之前測,接著進行為期十週的動作教育課程,於課程結束後一週進行後測。主要觀察變項為「動作技能表現」(包括跳躍走、騎馬跑、敏捷跑、立定跳遠、前滾翻、投擲、踢球、擊球等八個項目)以及「兒童社交技巧」(包括合作行為、正向肯定、同理心、負向肯定、自我控制)。本研究所得資料以相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗進行統計分析,並將本研究之統計顯著水準定在.05。其結果如下: 一、動作教育課程介入體育課程對實驗組學童的社交技巧及動作技能表現有顯著效果。 二、動作教育課程介入體育課程後,實驗組學童在合作行為、負向肯定及整體社交技巧之後測成績顯著高於控制組學童成績。 三、動作教育課程介入體育課程後,實驗組與控制組學童在動作技能表現上未達顯著水準。 四、動作教育課程介入體育課程後,實驗組學童在動作技能表現後測成績顯著高於前測成績。由上述的研究結果可得知,動作教育課程介入體育課程有助於增進國小五年級學童的動作技能表現及社交技巧。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of movement education on movement skill and social skill of the fifth grade students in physical education classes. This study was designed by quasi-experiment. From two different classes, the fifth grade elementary school students (n=63) in this study, Taipei. One class was experimental group; another one was comparable group. The experimental group was exposed to a 10-week Movement Skill Curriculum that met for 40 min per session 2-time per week. The pre-test and post-test conducted in the first week and tenth week. The Movement Skill Test was used to assess the student's level of movement skill. It contains three factors: locomotor skill, non-manipulate skill and manipulate skill. The Children's Social Skill Questionnaire was used to assess student's level of social skill in physical education. It contains five factors: cooperation behavior, positive affirm, empathy, negative affirm and self-control. The statistical methods included paired-sampling t-test and independent t-test in this study. The results of this study were as following: 1. There was significantly improved on social skill and movement skill after the Movement Skill Curriculum intervention. 2. The students of the experimental group had significantly higher scores on cooperative behavior, negative feedback, and overall social skill than the students of the control did. 3. There was no significant difference on movement skill between the experimental group and control group in the post-test after the Movement Skill Curriculum intervention. 4. The students of the experimental group in the post-test had significantly higher scores on movement skill than the pre-test. As the result, the results suggested that relevant training of the Movement Skill Curriculum for student in physical education class could improve on social skills and movement skill.
期刊論文
1.李義男(20001000)。探索教育之超越心理功能。公民訓育學報,9,63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Graham, G.(1987)。Motor skill acquisition: An essential goal of physical education program。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,58(7),44-48。  new window
3.張春秀(19980100)。學校本位的體育課程改革。臺灣省學校體育,8(1)=43,12-19。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nichols, G.(1997)。A consideration of why active participation in sport and leisure might reduce criminal behavior。Sport, Education and Society,2(2),181-190。  new window
5.李佩怡(19990200)。人際關係理論。測驗與輔導,152,3152-3156。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃永寬、陳瓊茶(200110)。動作教育模式在幼兒運動遊戲教學之觀察研究。國立體育學院論叢,12(1),99-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖國成(2003)。體育課程發展模式對排球學習效果之影響--以五堵國小為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.王文宜(2005)。教育性體操課程對國小五年級學童動作技能、創造力與兒童社交技巧之影響(碩士論文)。台北市立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.王家福(2004)。健康與體育學習領域課程設計之合作學習研究--以國小四年級短跑訓練為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳信全(2002)。運動遊戲課程對幼兒運動能力影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃慧菁(2004)。動作技能學習計畫介入對學齡前兒童的基本動作技能與運動概念認知之影響(碩士論文)。臺北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡麗芳(1992)。社交技巧訓練策略對國小兒童社交技巧、問題行為及同儕接納之影響效果實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gresham, F. M.、Elliott, S. N.(1990)。The Social Skills Rating System。Circle Pines, MN:American Guidance Service。  new window
2.Gallahue, D. L.(1997)。Developmental physical education for today's children。Dubuque, Iowa:New York:Brown & Benchmark。  new window
3.Graham, G.、Holt-Hole, S. A.、Parker, M.(2004)。Children Moving: Reflective Approach to Teaching Physical Education。McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Arnheim, D. D.、Sinclair, W. A.(1979)。The clumsy child: A program of motor therapy。St. Louis, MO:Mosby。  new window
5.Jewett, A. E.、Bain, L. L.、Ennis, C. D.(1995)。The Curriculum Progress in Physical Education。IA:Wm. C. Brown。  new window
6.許義雄(2002)。兒童發展與身體教育。台北:美商麥格羅希爾國際股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bonnie, P.(1999)。Physical Education Methods for Classroom Teachers。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
8.張春興(2000)。現代心理學--現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北:東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Rink, J. E.(1998)。Teaching physical education for learning。McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Buschner, C.(1994)。Teaching children movement concepts and skills: Becoming a master teacher Champaign。IL。  new window
其他
1.周宏室(2005)。運動教育模式的實施,http://www.naer.edu.tw/study/sport/sportedu/sport/6-l.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2004)。九年一貫基本能力,http://teach.eje.edu.tw/C-leam/C-main-frame.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rubin, K. H.(1985)。Socially withdrawal children : An "at risk" population?。Children’s Peer Relation: Issues in Assessment and Intervention。New York:Spring-Verlag。  new window
2.Herber, M.(1986)。Social skills training with children。Handbook of social skills training。Pergamon press。  new window
3.Hellison, D.(1996)。Teaching personal and social responsibility in physical education。Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE