:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:半年全時實習問題探究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:薛梨真朱潤康
作者(外文):Hsueh, Li-chenChu, Jung-kang
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁209-237
主題關鍵詞:半年全時實習新制實習實習問題實習輔導實習學生Student teachersMentorsSupervisorsStudent teaching supervisionInternship program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:74
教育部於1995年依「師資培育法」公布「高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法」,開啟國內實習教師一年全時實習新頁,一改過去名為實習教師但實為初任教師之形式實習。然「高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法」正式實施後,卻面臨年年修正條文窘境;2002年7月24日所公布之「師資培育法」修正更將一年全時實習改為半年並納入職前課程實施。半年全時實習實施後是否如預期改善實習相關問題值得探究。 本研究為探究半年全時實習相關問題,特利用文件分析法對首屆93學年度上學期十所國小實習的二十三位實習學生所撰寫的週記內容進行分析,所得資料經返校座談、到校輔導三角校正後,獲以下重要結論:(一)具正向意義的問題有四: 1. 學期評量要求教學演示有其必要;2. 八、九月份實習可獲重要經驗; 3.優秀實習輔導人員確能提升實習成效;4.實習學生間團隊學習有其功能;(二)尚有待改善的問題有六:1.代課問題仍未解決;2.實習輔導品質不一問題仍待改善; 3.半年行政實習需另作規劃;4.合理參與研習需再規範;5.額外工作負擔問題仍未解決;6.教檢與教甄壓力確有影響實習品質。最後,本研究尚對教育部及師資培育機構提進一步改善建議。
Since the “Teacher Certification and Intern Rules for Schools under Senior High Schools and Kindergartens” took effect, the amendments of the clauses every year have been a source of every year. The new “Teacher Education Law” published on July 24, 2002, further changed the one-year full-time internship to 6 months and included this practice into pre-service curriculum. How would the 6-month full-time internship develop then? This is an issue of concern. This research probes into problem with the 6-month full time internship, using the content of weekly reports written by 23 student teachers of 10 elementary schools in 2004-2005. Documentary content analysis and triangulation yielded the following, the following conclusions are: (1) There are four positive aspects: 1. Summative assessment requires teaching demonstration; 2. Internships in August and September may receive important experience; 3. Excellent mentors are able to upgrade the internship performance; 4. The learning group among student teachers serve some functions; (2) there are six aspects to be improved: 1. Substitutes for classes remain unresolved; 2. Inconsistency in quality of student teaching supervision requires correction; 3. Administrative internship for 6 months shall be programmed separately; 4. How to take part in seminar reasonably shall be reviewed; 5. Additional workload is still unresolved; 6. The pressure produced by teachers’ examination and teachers’ screening does affect the quality of internship. Finally, there are some concrete suggestions for the Ministry of Education and teacher educational institutions.
期刊論文
1.張芬芬(19880600)。實習教師社會化之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報,19,351-384。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃宗顯(19980600)。從決策的鬆散組合系統特質省察新教育實習制度的困境與改善之道。初等教育學報,11,47-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.薛梨真(20000600)。實習指導小組工作會報的實施內涵及其對實習成效的影響。初等教育學報,13,183-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王素芸、賴光真(20040300)。教育實習的概念分析--論我國教育實習制度及其改革。國立編譯館館刊,32(1),48-59。  延伸查詢new window
5.李雅婷(19991000)。國小實習輔導教師遭遇問題之研究。教育實習輔導,5(2)=19,31-35。  延伸查詢new window
6.洪志成(19980700)。從實習教師眼中看新制輔導教師的專業支持。教育研究資訊,6(4),100-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王家通、郭明堂(19930900)。我國實習教育制度有關研究之探討與評析。教育研究資訊,1(5),84-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊惠琴、吳純萍(19971000)。新制教育實習現況問卷調查分析。教育資料文摘,40(4)=237,142-163。  延伸查詢new window
9.薛梨真(20000600)。從實習指導小組工作會報探討國小實習教師實習輔導問題。臺南師院學報,33,117-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張玉成(1999)。教育實習制度之檢討改進。國教天地,133,6~8。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊惠琴、鄭文芳(1997)。新制教育實習制度之檢討與改進--從一所大教育學程實習生談起。人文及社會學科教育通訊,8(4),128~150。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉清揚(2006)。我國當前教育實習現況與困境及其因應策略。教師之友,47(2),73-79。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭玉疊(2004)。從實習機構看我國當前師資培育實習輔導制度的問題探討。國民教育,45(1),77-87。  延伸查詢new window
14.薛梨真(1991)。國小實習教師實習困擾與輔導策略之研究。高市鐸聲,2﹙1﹚,62~70。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝寶梅(1991)。初任教師的特質與困擾。國教輔導,30﹙5﹚,50~56。  延伸查詢new window
16.School of Education Northern Michigam University Veenman,S.(1984)。Preserviced program of beginning teacher。Review of Educational Research,54(2),143-178。  new window
會議論文
1.丁志權(1998)。我國實習教師輔導制度的問題與改革。國立花蓮師院特約實習學校的實習輔導理論與實務研討會,國立花蓮師院舉辦 。花蓮:國立花蓮師範學院。49-60。  延伸查詢new window
2.林天佑(1998)。實習的困境與突破(一) :師資培育機構的觀點。國小實習教師專業成長研討會,臺北市立師範學院初等教育系舉辦 。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳清山(1998)。教育實習教師行政知能發展之探究。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李宏才(1998)。教育實習機構如何協助實習教師發展行政知能。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.林適湖(2003)。實習輔導學校實習制度之訂定與實習教師之權利、義務探討。台中。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳仕宗(1998)。師資培育機構在新實習制度中應扮演的角色之初步探討。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳順興(1998)。一百一十四位國小實習教師的實習點滴與困惑。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.鍾才元(1998)。實習的困境與突破:師資培育機構的觀念。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.薛梨真、呂美枝(2003)。全時實習的回顧與展望。台中。  延伸查詢new window
10.謝寶梅(1993)。國小初任教師對各項教學能力重要程度之認定對職前教育培養實際工作能力之調查研究。台北。73-93。  延伸查詢new window
11.顏素霞(1992)。屏東師院結業實習生實習困擾及實習現況之調查分析。台北。1~41。  延伸查詢new window
12.顏慶祥、湯維玲、王嬿惠(1998)。台灣地區新制實習輔導教師的現況與問題。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
13.饒見維(1998)。綜論新制教育實習中的「實習輔導教師」。台中。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李保玉、湯振鶴(1988)。教育實習與在職教師輔導策略。國立台東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.康自立、郭秋勳(1993)。中等教育師資培育機構教師擔任大五結業實習輔導工作之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊深坑、歐用生、王秋絨(1991)。我國實習教師制度之規劃研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱兆偉等(1992)。師範學院結業生追縱研究:實習成效與校外資源運用。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊深坑、李奉儒、蘇永明(1998)。英國實習輔導制度研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.薛梨真、朱潤康(2005)。新制半年全時實習可行模式探究。  延伸查詢new window
7.Carlson,R.D,、Gooden,J.S.(1999)。Mentoring pre-service teachers for technology skills acquisition。  new window
8.Giebelhaus,C.R.,、Bowman,C.(2000)。Teaching mentors: Is it worth the effort?。  new window
9.Kataynma,A.D.(2000)。Innovative mentoring program in teaching educational psychology。  new window
學位論文
1.陳淑茹(1999)。國民小學實習教師輔導制度之研究,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gibbs, G. C.(1997)。Supporting beginning teachers: the mentor perspective (California mentor teacher program, elementary school teacher)。  new window
3.Kidd, W. G.(1994)。The lived experience of six beginning teachers。  new window
4.Allen, T.(1994)。The viability of various mentor approaches in supporting beginning teachers。  new window
5.Kutch, L. D.(1994)。Effects of an induction program on the socialization of beginning teachers。  new window
6.賴育民(1995)。中等學校實習教師評估〈實習指導小組〉成效之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.薛梨真(1994)。國民中小學實習教師任教狀況與實習輔導之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.游自達(1987)。國中實習教師工作困擾問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.張芬芬(1991)。師範生教育實習中潛在課程之人種誌研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.游純澤(2003)。台北縣國民小學實習教師教育實習問題之研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.Guerra, M. M.(1994)。The Texas induction year program as viewed by mentor and protege participants in select districts in the Rio Grande Vlley。  new window
12.Jackson, M. N.(1987)。Perceived problem and support of new teachers in the Guam Public School system。  new window
13.King,D(1988)。The effects of mentoring and support training group upon job satisfaction attitudes, needs, performance, and morals of beginning teacher。  new window
圖書
1.Huling-Austin, L., Odell, S.J., Ishler, P., Kay, R.S.、Edelfelt, R. A.(1989)。Assisting the beginning teacher。Reston, VA:Association of Teacher Educators。  new window
2.周水珍(19980000)。國民小學實習輔導之研究 : 以花蓮縣宜蘭縣為例。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊銀興(1993)。師範學院結業實習教師工作及生活困擾問題之研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統整與分析。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王志義(1969)。教育實習之理論與實施。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.李園會(1988)。初任教師研修制度之研究。台北:台灣書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.School of Education Northern Michigam University.(2002)。Northern Michigan University guide to student teaching supervision。  new window
圖書論文
1.林生傳(1990)。實習困擾的分析與化解之道。師範教育政策與問題。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE