:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我的麻吉實習輔導老師:實習輔導教師教學風格與實習教師學習風格關係之研究
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:黃泓霖劉唯玉 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Hong-linLiu, Wei-yu
出版日期:2013
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:國小教育實習實習輔導教師實習教師教學風格學習風格Elementary practicumPracticum mentorStudent-teacherTeaching styleLearning style
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:199
  • 點閱點閱:106
本研究以Grasha 之教學風格與Silver 與Hanson 之學習風格觀點,立意取樣四組教學與學習風格明顯,且為不同配對組合者為研究對象。以訪談法為主,觀察法為輔,試圖瞭解師徒式教育實習中實習輔導老師教學風格與實習教師學習風格之交互關係及其對師徒關係與實習結果的影響。研究發現,麻吉組合為授權型vs.自我表達型,以及促進型vs.注重人際型。不麻吉組合為授權型vs.注重人際型。研究發現麻吉組之實習教師滿意實習輔導教師之指導方式;實習教師的學習動機與學習表現佳;實習輔導教師滿意實習教師之學習行為與表現,肯定個人指導方式並持續提供指導;師徒關係良好發展順利。不麻吉組之實習教師無法獲得所需之指導方式,師徒關係發展不順利,也影響到實習教師之實習過程與實習結果。
Based on Grasha's teaching style and Silver and Hanson's learning style perspectives, this study aims to understand and explore the interactions between mentor's teaching style and student-teacher's learning styles and their influences on the relationships between mentors and student-teachers and student-teachers' internship learning results. The researchers purposefully sampled four different combinations of practicum mentor and student-teacher for interviews and observations. The result shows that the delegator/self-expressive combination, and the facilitator/interpersonal combination lead to a satisfactory practicum. However, the delegator/interpersonal combination produces poor results, even problems, in terms of all three aspects, namely practicum progress, mentorship, and practicum outcome.
期刊論文
1.翁榮源、陳定威、呂榮順(20090500)。Herrmann學習風格理論對大學生有機化學學習成就之研究。科學教育,318,31-47。  延伸查詢new window
2.Felder, R. M.、Henriques, E. R.(1995)。Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education。Foreign Language Annals,28(1),21-31。  new window
3.Kraska, M.、Harris, S.(2007)。Cognitive and teaching style preferences of officers attending the force reserve officer training instructor course。Journal of Industrial Teacher Education,44(1),5-24。  new window
4.Lopus, J.、Hoff, J.(2009)。Is there a disconnect between teaching styles and learning styles in high school economics classes?。The Journal of Private Enterprise,24(2),157-164。  new window
5.McCoy M. R.(2006)。Teaching style and the application of adult learning principles by police instructors。Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,29(1),77-91。  new window
6.McDermott, P. A.、Beitman, B. S.(1984)。Standardization of a scale for the study of children’s learning styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity。Psychology in Schools,21,5-14。  new window
7.Naimie, Z.、Siraj, S.、Piaw, C. Y.、Shagholi, R.、Abuzaid, R. A.(2010)。Do you think your match is made in heaven? Teaching styles/learning style match and mismatch revisited。Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2(2),349-353。  new window
8.Orsak, L.(1990)。Learning style versus the Rip Van Winkle Syndrome。Educational Leadership,48(2),19-21。  new window
9.Razak, N. A.、Ahmad, F.、Mohd S. P.(2007)。Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of English for specific purposes (esp) students。Journal e-Bangi,2(2),1-20。  new window
10.Rush, L. S.、Blair, S. H.、Chapman, D.、Codner, A.、Pearce, B.(2008)。A new look at mentoring proud moments and pitfalls。The Clearing House,81(3),128-132。  new window
11.Schaefer, K. M.、Zygmont, D.(2003)。Analyzing the teaching style of nursing faculty: Does it promote a student-centered or a teacher-centered learning environment?。Nursing Education Perspectives,24(5),238-245。  new window
12.Siebert, C. J.、Clark, A.、Kilbridge, A.、Peterson, H.(2006)。When preservice teachers struggle or fail: Mentor teachers’ perspectives。Education,126(3),409-422。  new window
13.王雅伶、段曉林(20050100)。學習風格理論融入國二理化教學之個案研究。科學教育,14,105-124。  延伸查詢new window
14.Felder, R. M.、Silverman, L. K.(1988)。Learning and teaching styles in engineering education。Engineering Education,78(7),674-681。  new window
15.張景媛(19880600)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。教育心理學報,21,113-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.傅聖國、張英傑(2003)。師徒制輔導數學教學之個案研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。1078-1084。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李翠萍(2005)。不成功的實習輔導關係之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃洲(2007)。雲林縣社區大學成人學習者學習風格與學習成效關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.Welborn, R. B.(1985)。The relationship of learning and teaching style to achievement among nontraditional health professional students(博士論文)。Texas A & M University。  new window
4.何妤珩(2004)。國小實習教師實務知識發展之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,台中。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳獻旗(2008)。國民小學教育實習師徒關係之研究--以彰化縣為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Grasha, A. F.(2002)。Teaching with styles: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles。Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania:Alliance。  new window
2.Heimlich, J. E.、Norland, E.(1994)。Developing teaching style in adult education。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass Higher & Adult Education。  new window
3.Kolb, A. Y.、Kolb, D. A.(2005)。The Kolb learning style inventory - version 3.1 - 2005 technical specifications。Boston, MA:Experience Based Learning Systems。  new window
4.陳嘉彌(2003)。師徒式教育實習之理論與實踐。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Silvernail, D. L.(1986)。Teaching styles as related to student achievement。Washington, DC:National Education Association。  new window
6.Silver, Harvey F.、Strong, Richard W.、Perini, Matthew J.、田耐青(2002)。統整多元智慧與學習風格--把每位學生帶上來。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.周水珍(19980000)。國民小學實習輔導之研究 : 以花蓮縣宜蘭縣為例。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張德銳(1998)。師資分配與教育革新研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林生傳(19880000)。新教學理論與策略:自由開放社會中的個別化教學與後個別化教學。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gregorc, A. F.(1979)。Learning/teaching styles: Their nature and effects。Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs。Reston, Virginia:National。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE