:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:甲組桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究
書刊名:輔仁大學體育學刊
作者:陳建彰 引用關係林柏化
作者(外文):Chen, Chien-changLin, Po-hua
出版日期:2007
卷期:6
頁次:頁150-168
主題關鍵詞:甲組桌球選手教練領導行為團隊凝聚力Table tennis athletes of division ACoach leadership behaviorsTeam cohesion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:1544
  • 點閱點閱:22
本研究目的,即在探討甲組桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之間的關係,及其與各團體不同成績表現的差異性。本研究對象以參加95年全國大專運動會團體桌球賽甲組選手,共239位。共發出問卷239份,回收有效問卷共229份,有效樣本率為95.81%。並將所得資料經描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、雪費法事後比較及皮爾遜積差相關分析,結果發現:一、知覺的教練領導行為量表,性別方面,女選手在「訓練與指導」的知覺程度高於男選手;男選手在「協議行為」的知覺程度高於女選手。選手層級方面,國家級選手在「訓練與指導」、「獎勵行為」上,知覺程度高於全運會與大運會選手;全運會選手在「訓練與指導」、「獎勵行為」與「關懷行為」的知覺程度,又高於大運會選手。二、團隊凝聚力量表,性別方面,男選手在「人際親和」的得分上顯著高於女選手。有無下場比賽方面,在「人際親和」構面上「有」下場比賽的選手在得分上,高於「無」下場比賽的選手。訓練年數方面,「團隊適應」參與訓練年數達「10-12年」的桌球選手,在得分上高於「13-15年」的選手。 三、知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力相關分析教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力在各構面上皆達顯著的相關。
The purpose of the research was to examine the perceived coach leadership behaviors and team cohesion of Division A of Table Tennis Athletes in Taiwan’s universities and colleges, and in order to find the different performances between each team. The study subject was Division A of 239 table tennis athletes from universities and colleges who attending The 2006 National University Sport Game. A total of 239 copies were dispatched, 229 of the questionnaires were effective, 95.81% of the returned questionnaires were valid. Descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe’s method and Pearson Correlations were used to analyze the collected data. The important results and findings can be summarized as follows: 1. Perception of coach leadership behaviors (1) Gender: Female players were much more aware of ‘Training and Instruction’ by coaches than male players; male players were much more aware of ‘Negotiating Behavior’ by coaches than female players. (2) Players’ Level: National level players perceived much more ‘Training and Instruction’ and ‘Encouraging Behavior’ by coaches than the level of National Sport Game and University Sport Game. Especially, players of National Sport Game perceived ‘Training and Instruction’, ‘Encouraging Behavior’, and ‘Concerning Behavior’ higher than players of University Sport Game. 2. Team cohesion (1) Gender: Male players’ performance on ‘Interpersonal congeniality’ was better than female players. (2) Take part in a competition: The performances of players who take part in a competition practically had better ‘Interpersonal Congeniality’ than bench players (without entering the competition). 3. correlations between the coach leadership behavior and team cohesion There were significant differences in each dimension between coach leadership behavior and team cohesion.
期刊論文
1.Robinson, T. T.、Carron, A. V.(1982)。Personal and situational factors associated with dropping out versus maintaining participation in competitive sport。Journal of Sport Psychology,4,364-378。  new window
2.Chelladurai, P.、Saleh, S. D.(1978)。Preferred leadership in sports。Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,3(2),85-92。  new window
3.Weiss, M. R.、Friedrichs, W. D.(1986)。The influence of leader behavior, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams。Journal of Sport Psychology,8(4),332-346。  new window
4.Bird, A. M.(1977)。Development of a model for predicting team performance。Research Quarterly,48(1),24-32。  new window
5.蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙(20010300)。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報,30,195-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Westre, Kirk R.、Weiss, Maureen R.(1991)。The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams。The Sport Psychology,5(1),41-54。  new window
會議論文
1.Salminen, S.、Liukkonen, J.、Telama, R.(1990)。The differences in coach' and athletes' perception of leader behavior of Finnish coach。the Aiesep Congress。Loughborough。  new window
2.楊志顯(1998)。大學運動選手背景特性對教練領導行為重要性認知之影響。中華民國大專院校八十七年度體育學術研討會,指導單位 : 教育部、行政院體育委員會 ; 主辦單位 : 中華民國大專院校體育總會 (會議日期: 民國87年4月23至25日)。臺北市:中華民國大專院校體育總會。325-331。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳慧卿(2001)。大學院校桌球團隊運作實證研究(博士論文)。國立師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張文財(2003)。國小籃球隊知覺教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與成績表現之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.李柳汶(2003)。大學院校跆拳道教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力關係之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林育宗(2004)。國小拔河教練領導行為與選手成績表現之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林金杉(2002)。拔河運動教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.邱旺璋(2002)。足球教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭添財(2004)。國小桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄭志富(1997)。運動教練領導行為研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用設計。臺北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.LeUnes, A. D.、Nation, J. R.(1989)。Sport psychology。Chicago, IL:Nelson-Hall。  new window
4.王文科(1997)。教育研究法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE