臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：生死批判思考能力測驗之初步建構
書刊名：測驗學刊
作者：黃慧莉／尉遲淦／林惠賢 引用關係／鄧秀珍
作者(外文)：Hwang, Huei-li／Ywi, Chi-kan／Lin, Huey-shyan／Teng, Hsiu-chen
出版日期：2007
卷期：54:2
頁次：頁289-304
主題關鍵詞：生死；批判思考能力；Critical thinking about life and death；Life and death studies
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:142
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究的主要目的在嘗試建構一份生死批判思考能力測驗 (TCTS-LDS)。研究者基於相關文獻、生死學內容、並參考華格批判思考測驗 (Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal) 裡的題目設計編擬試題，得測驗題向度包括：辨認假設、辨認關連、歸納、推論、解釋及評鑑等六個分量表。擬題之後邀請具哲學、生死學教學的學者審視測驗題的合適性及可讀性，並作修改題目。續以4位學生針對題目的瞭解性再做修訂，再以168位四技及二技學生做預試，經由測驗題的項目分析刪去2個題目，得到22個題目的生死批判思考能力測驗。再以便利取樣705位專科生、大學生做正式測試，測驗的內在一致性信度KR係數為0.51，折半信度Gutt-man 0.57，ICC 0.40，兩週後的再測信度Pearson相關係數為0.79。除專家內容效度外，由已知團體在得分上的差異顯示此量表具有良好的建構效度，與葉玉珠等人 (2001) 編制的成人批判思考測驗具有顯著相關性，顯示具有某種度的同時效度；另外由參與生死學課程學生的前後測分數的顯著差異，也顯示此測驗具有良好的預測效度。因此可說此測驗具有可接受的信效度。
The purpose of this study was trying to develop the test of critical thinking skills for Life-and-death Study (TCTS-LDS). This test was initially developed by the authors, based on the reference, the contents of life and death study, and the test design of Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). The original test includes 24 items classified into six subtests as relevance, inductions, deductions, interpretations, recognition of assumptions, and evaluation of arguments. Then this test was refined based on the experts’ and students’ suggestion. After the pretest and item analyses with 168 col­lege students, two test items were deleted with 22 items in total. A purposive (convenient) sampling were used, with the sample recruited from seven classes and from three Life-and-death Study classes (n= 705). The examination of reliability of the 22-item test revealed a Kuder-Richardson Coefficient of .51, accepted split-half reliability (Guttman = .57; ICC= .40), and good test-retest reliability (r=.79). A s for the validity of the test, besides expert content validity, the construct validity of this test was addressed by a contrast-groups approach, the concurrent validity of this test with TCS-A was significantly positive correlated (r=.24, p<.00 1), and the predictive validity of this test was proved by a significant difference between pre-and-post test. It was concluded that the resulting test was both reliable and valid.
期刊論文
1.Albert, R.、Radsma, J.(2002)。Relationships among Bilingualism, Critical Thinking Ability, and Critical Thinking Disposition。Journal of Professional Nursing，18(4)，220-229。  new window
2.Williams, B.(1987)。Implementing Thinking Skills Instruction in an Urban District: An Effect to Close the Gap。Educational Leadership，44(6)，50-53。  new window
3.Taube, K. T.(1997)。Critical thinking ability and disposition as factors of performance on a written critical thinking test。The Journal of General Education，46(2)，129-164。  new window
4.葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蓁(20000100)。「中小學批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許文耀、林宜旻(19990600)。自殺危險性發生模式驗證。中華心理學刊，41(1)，87-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉玉珠、陳月梅、謝佳蓁、葉碧玲(20010700)。「成人批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，48(2)，35-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.巫銘昌、李政賢(20020100)。臺灣理性理論與批判教育本土化之初探。科技學刊，11(1)，63-74。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭英耀、王文中、吳靜吉、黃正鵠(19960100)。批判思考量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊，43，213-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.葉玉珠(20020700)。高層次思考教學設計的要素分析。中山通識教育學報，1，75-101。  延伸查詢new window
10.Cicchetti, Domenic V.(1994)。Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology。Psychological Assessment，6(4)，284-290。  new window
11.溫明麗(19971100)。批判性思考即為通識教育。教育研究集刊，39，16-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.McCarthy, P.、Schuster, P.、Zehr, P.、McDougal, D.(1999)。Evaluation of critical thinking in a baccalaureate nursing program。Journal of Nursing Education，38(3)，142-144。  new window
13.Facione, Peter A.、Sánchez, Carol A.、Facione, Noreen C.、Gainen, Joanne(1995)。The disposition toward critical thinking。The Journal of General Education，44(1)，1-25。  new window
14.Elder, L.(1997)。Critical Thinking: The Key to Emotional Intelligence。Journal of Developmental Education，21(1)，40-41。  new window
15.Harris, J. C.、Eleser, C.、Harris, J. V.(1997)。Developmental Critical Thinking: Melding Two Imperatives。Journal of Developmental Education，21(1)，12-19。  new window
16.Larson, B. E.(2000)。Classroom Discussion: A Method of Instruction and a Curriculum Outcome。Teaching and Teacher Education，16(5/ 6)，661-677。  new window
17.陳麗華、李涵鈺、林陳涌(2004)。國內批判思考測驗及其應用之分析。課程與教學，7(2)，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Cotton, C. R.、Range, L, M.(1993)。Suicidality, Hopelessness, and Attitudes toward Life and Death in Children。Death Studies，17，185-191。  new window
19.Maynard, C. A.(1996)。The Relationship of Critical Thinking Ability to Professional Nursing Competence。Journal of Nursing Education，35，12-18。  new window
會議論文
1.Chaffee, J.(1991)。Critical thinking at Laguardia C. C.。The 11th Annual Conferences on Critical thinking and Educational Reform。Sonoma, CA。  new window
學位論文
1.陳荻卿(2000)。批判思考教學策略運用在國小五年級社會科之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉玉珠(1991)。我國中小學學生批判思考及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Waltz, C. F.、Strickland, O.、Lenz, E. R.(1991)。Measurement in nursing。Philadelphia, PA：A. Davis。  new window
2.Halpern, D. F.(1997)。Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge。Mahwash, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers。  new window
3.Siegel, H.(1988)。Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education。New York, NY。  new window
4.Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Carr, W.(1995)。For education: Towards critical educational inquiry。Buckingham。  new window
6.溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考教學：哲學之旅。臺北市：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Ebel, Robert L.、Frisbie, David A.(1991)。Essentials of educational measurement。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
8.Watson, G.、Glasser, E.(1980)。Watson-glasser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Forms A and B Manual。Watson-glasser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Forms A and B Manual。USA。  new window
9.Paul, R. W.(1994)。Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World。Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World。Rohnert Park, CA。  new window
10.葉玉珠(2003)。智能與批判思考。智能與批判思考。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：699（臺灣：699，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67654683
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上