:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大學通識生死教育課程設計之研究--德懷術研究法之應用
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:吳美宜黃松元
作者(外文):Wu, Mei-yiHuang, Song-yuan
出版日期:2006
卷期:25
頁次:頁127-152
主題關鍵詞:大學生死教育課程設計德懷術研究法CollegeLife and death educationCurriculum designDelphi technique
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:285
  • 點閱點閱:45
本研究旨在建構我國大學通識生死教育課程設計的基本構面與內涵。首先根據國內、外相關文獻,探討有關生死教育課程設計原則,同時歸納整理我國二十七所大學通識中心於網路公佈的生死教育課程實施現況後,研擬「我國大學通識生死教育課程設計之基本內涵」德懷術問卷初稿。研究採德懷術研究法,邀請二十八位生死教育專家學者組成的德懷術專家群,完成來回三次之Delphi問卷調查。 根據研究發現,歸納出下列結論:大學通識生死教育課程設計包含七大基本構面,即:開課方式、教學目標、教學內容、教學方法與活動、教學評量、教學資源及師資。其中開課方式應考慮「選修/必修」、「學分數」及「單獨設科/融入式教學」等共有五項層面,教學目標上應涵蓋「知識、資訊分享」、「情意、信念、態度與價值澄清」及「技能、技巧與調適行為」三大層面,共有十四項內涵“教學內容可區分為「死亡的本質及意義」、「對死亡及瀕死態度」、「死亡及瀕死的處理調適」及「特殊問題的討論」等四大層面,共有十八項內涵。教學方法與活動共十五項內涵。教學評量包括「認知層面」、「情意層面」及「技能層面」等三大層面。教學資源方面則分「選擇生死教育教材原則」及「教學資源種類」二大層面。而教學師資方面分「認知」、「情意」、「技能」三大層面,共有二十項內涵。最後根據結論,分別針對大學通識生死教育課程設計及未來研究提出建議。
This research is for the purpose of developing basic dimensions and content of the general education of life and death curriculum designed for college. In order to reach this goal, the researcher first reviewed the literature related life and death education curriculum principle of design, simultaneously reorganized the center of general education of 27 college announced life and death general education curriculum of present situation from network, drawing up the primal Delphi questionnaire for "the basic dimensions of the general education curriculum of life and death designed for college". The research method adopted in this study is Delphi Technique Method. First, a 28 Delphi technique experts group was invited, which the experts composed life and death to educate. After completing three times the Delphi questionnaire survey, they developed the basic dimensions and the content of the life and death general education curriculum designed for college. Finally, the proposal based on the findings was putting forward and offering colleges to set up the general education of life and death curriculum reference. According to the findings, the researcher induced the following conclusions: The design of the general education of life and death curriculum contains seven basic domains, namely, method of setting up a course, the goal of teaching, the content course, the teaching method and activity, evaluation, the teaching resources and the teacher condition. The method of teacher's teaching a course has five items; teaching goal, altogether 14 items; the content, altogether 18 items; the teaching method and the activity, altogether 15 items; teaching resources, altogether 10 items; teacher condition, altogether 20 items. According to the conclusion of this study, there are some suggestions proposed as the following: the suggestion of constructing high quality support system of life and death education, curriculum design, teacher condition, and further research.
期刊論文
1.曾煥棠(1999)。生死學課程對護生某些臨終照護行為影響之探討。中華心理衛生學刊,12(2),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾煥棠(20000600)。生死學在護理學院教學的概況檢討。通識教育,7(2/3),77-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張淑美(19980100)。從美國死亡教育的發展論我國實施死亡教育的準備。學生輔導,54,32-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳庶深、黃禎貞(20011200)。生死取向的生命教育--教學成效之初討。教育資料集刊,26,377-392。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Leviton, D.(1969)。Education for Death。Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation,40,46-47。  new window
6.張淑美(20000500)。生命教育與生死教育實施概況與省思--以臺灣省與高雄市中等學校教師對生命教育或生死教育實施現況之調查研究為例。教育研究資訊,8(3),72-90+a9。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃松元(19791200)。死亡教育--學校衛生教育計畫中一項爭論的課題。中等教育,30(6),12-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.曾煥棠、林綺雲、林慧珍、傅綢妹(19980900)。生死學教學對護理學生生死態度的影響。中華心理衛生學刊,11(3),49-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Lindeman, C. A.(1975)。Delphi survey of priorities in clinical nursing research。Nursing Research,24(6),434-441。  new window
10.Salmond, Susan W.(1994)。Orthopaedic Nursing Research Priorities: A Delphi Study。Orthopaedic Nursing,13(2),31-45。  new window
會議論文
1.張淑美(1999)。中小學生死教育課程之規劃與實施。迎向千禧年:新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.曾煥棠、林綺雲、林慧珍(1997)。死亡教育對護理學院學生死亡態度之研究 (計畫編號:NSC85-2412-H-227-001)。台北:國立台北護理學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Goldsmith, M. Q.(1978)。Future Health Education and Death Education(博士論文)。  new window
2.劉明松(1997)。死亡教育對國中生死亡概念、死亡態度影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇完女(1991)。死亡教育對國小中年級兒童死亡態度的影響(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
4.何英奇(1985)。我國大學生次文化及其相關因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張靜玉、徐有進、徐彬、嚴素卿、黃慧玲、章薇卿、徐慧娟(2004)。死亡教育與輔導。台北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊淑智(2004)。當代生死學。台北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
3.Congdon, H. K.(1977)。The pursuit of death。Nashville:Abingdon。  new window
4.Corr, C. A.、Nabe, C. M.、Corr, D. M.(2003)。Death & Dying: Life & Living。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Pub. Co.。  new window
5.張淑美(1996)。死亡學與死亡教育:國中生之死亡概念、死亡態度、死亡教育態度及其相關因素之研究。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳明清(1991)。教育研究:基本觀念與方法之分析。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.傅偉勳(1993)。死亡的尊嚴與生命的尊嚴--從臨終精神醫學到現代生死學。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Erikson, Erik Homburger(1968)。Identity: Youth and crisis。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Leviton, D.(1977)。Death Education。New Meanings of death。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.Stevenson, R. G.、Stevenson, E. P.(1996)。Adolescents and education aboutdeath, dying and bereavement。Handbook of adolescent death and bereavement。New York:Springer。  new window
3.陳芳玲(2000)。死亡教育。生死學概論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE