:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣課程評鑑研究的回顧與前瞻
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:黃嘉雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chia-hsiung
出版日期:2012
卷期:15:4
頁次:頁25-51
主題關鍵詞:課程評鑑評鑑模式評鑑取向課程評鑑研究Curriculum evaluationEvaluation modelEvaluation approachResearch on curriculum evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:25
本文先發展一能用以對國內課程評鑑研究作品進行量化內容分析的分類架構;接著,以此分類架構針對國內已發表的課程評鑑研究文獻,包括期刊論文、博碩士論文和政府補助案之研究報告,實施內容分析。根據分析結果,本文提出臺灣課程評鑑研究發展的重要現象:1.1990年代已有少量的研究作品,2000年以後則由於九年一貫課程政策之推行而數量大增;2.評鑑議題中比較熱門者,乃評鑑綜論、價值判斷與規準形成、評鑑者角色與素養和評鑑實施程序與技術之主題;3.許多研究評鑑聚焦於CIPP和目標本位評鑑模式,最近則彰權益能評鑑和回應式評鑑漸受重視;4.屬於後期中等教育階段的課程評鑑研究案較稀少。依據這些發現,本文亦提出一些未來臺灣課程評鑑研究發展的前瞻性觀點。
In this article, a conceptual framework of classification is firstly developed for quantitative content analysis of the writings of curriculum evaluation in Taiwan. Then, I analyze and review by the classification framework the Taiwan published writings focused on curriculum evaluation, including journal articles, doctor and master degree thesis, and research reports financed by government.According to the results of the content analysis, the man features of curriculum evaluation research in Taiwan are presented as the follows:1. Most of the researches have been done since 2000, due to the Taiwan grade 1-9 curriculum reform policies. A few of them had been done in 1990's.2. The issues related to evaluation definition and its' importance, developing criterion for judgment and their values foundations, and the processes and methods for implementing evaluation are the popular research topics.3. Lots of the researches are focused on the CIPP and objective-based evaluation models. However, the empowerment evaluation and the responsive evaluation have recently received more attention.4. The researches of post-secondary education curriculum evaluation are quiet few.Based on the findings, some prospective ideas for the development of curriculum evaluation research in Taiwan are provided.
期刊論文
1.游家政(20090100)。學校本位課程評鑑的回顧與展望。課程與教學,12(1),25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳美如(20020600)。臺灣課程評鑑的回顧與展望。教育學刊,18,87-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.馬信行(2000)。教育科學研究法。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1989)。Forth generation evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Worthen, B. R.、Sanders, J. R.、Fitzpatrick, J. L.(1997)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。New York:Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
4.Nevo, D.(1995)。School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement。Pergamon。  new window
5.Gredler, M. E.(1996)。Program evaluation。NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
6.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳美如、郭昭佑(2003)。學校本位課程評鑑--理念舆實踐反省。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃嘉雄(2010)。課程評鑑。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
11.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of schools programs。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。Foundational model for 21st century program evaluation。Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation。Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Scrive, M.(2000)。Evaluation ideologies。Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Lewy, A.(1977)。The nature of curriculum evaluation。Handbook of Curriculum Evaluation。N.Y.:UNESCO。  new window
4.歐用生(2000)。內容分析法。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE