臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中小學教師專業發展評鑑方案之影響評估
書刊名：當代教育研究季刊
作者：潘慧玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Pan, Wendy Hui-ling
出版日期：2014
卷期：22:1
頁次：頁47-86
主題關鍵詞：教師專業發展評鑑；教師評鑑；影響評估；理論導向評鑑；Teacher evaluation for professional development；Teacher evaluation；Impact assessment；Theory-driven evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:69
  • 點閱點閱:44
本研究以中小學教師專業發展評鑑試辦方案為客體，運用統計控制及理論導向評鑑（theory-driven evaluation）進行方案影響評估（impact assessment）。針對全國參與試辦之高中職與國民中小學行政人員與教師進行問卷調查，並以方案要素（支持系統、方案活動）及方案成果進行資料分析。結果顯示，在支持系統與方案活動的介入要素中，宣導溝通落實情形優於教師研討與自評、教師他評與成長、及諮詢輔導，而在方案成果上，以教師教學能力提升之成果最顯著，其次是評鑑認知的增進、及學校生態的改變。此外，為確認方案介入所產生之影響，首以統計控制將支持系統與方案活動依落實程度分為高、中、低三組，結果得到三組之方案成果具顯著差異；次以理論導向評鑑方法進行檢視，發現支持系統與方案活動對於方案成果，皆具顯著之解釋力。總結本研究之實施，一方面呈現了有別於傳統實驗設計的影響評估方法，另一方面則提供了具體數據，指陳需要有效落實以達成教師專業發展評鑑目標的方案要素。
Using the pilot program of teacher evaluation for professional development (TEPD) as an object, this study employed statistical control technique and theory-driven evaluation to assess the program impact. Administrators and teachers in primary and secondary schools attending the program were surveyed. Program components, including program supporting system and program activities, as well as program outcome, were covered in the data analysis. It was found that ”training and communication” was the highly implemented program component, better than the other three components: ”teacher discussions and self-assessment,” ”peer assessment and teacher growth,” and ”consultation and guidance.” And the enhancement of teaching was the most obvious outcome observed, the score of which was higher than the advancement of evaluation cognition and the change of school ecology. In addition, in order to examine the program impact, three groups reflecting different degrees of program implementation were classified firstly using statistical control technique. Significant differences of program outcomes were found among the three groups. Secondly, it was revealed from the theory-driven evaluation analysis that both the supporting system and program activities significantly predicted program effects. In conclusion, this study not only used a new method of impact assessment distinguishing its features from the traditional experimental design but also identified the program components which are essential to effectively achieve the goal of TEPD program.
期刊論文
1.Wu, J.-S.、Chen, S.-Y.(2008)。A survey on the attitudes of elementary school teachers toward teacher evaluation for professional development: Using Taichung area as an example。School Administrators Research，53，211-253。  new window
2.呂仁禮(20090900)。教師專業發展評鑑試辦成效之研究--以一所國民中學為例。學校行政，63，131-153。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯淑惠、林海清、黃寶圓(2009)。臺中縣國民小學教師専業發展評鑑實 施之研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.游象昌、陳俊龍(2010)。教師専業發展評鑑與教師賦權增能關係之研究。學校行政，67，181-203。  延伸查詢new window
5.Chao, C.-Y.、Yang, P.-C.、Cheng, Y.-L.、Huang, C.-F.(2010)。A study of senior high school teachers’ perceptions of teacher evaluation。Educational Policy Forum，13(2)，77-128。  new window
6.Yan, G.-L.(2007)。A study of the opinions of elementary school teachers on the ministry of education trial on "teacher professional development evaluation": An example of Taipei county。School Administrators Research，50，1-26。  new window
7.Cronbach, L. J.、Ambron, S. R.、Dornbusch, S. M.(1980)。Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods and institutional arrangements。  new window
8.Davis, D. R.、Ellett, C. D.(2002)。Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，16，287-301。  new window
9.Day, C.(2007)。Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career。Oxford Reiew of Education，33，423-443。  new window
10.顏國樑、洪劭品(20070700)。國民小學教師對 "教育部試辦教師專業發展評鑑" 意見之研究--以臺北縣為例。學校行政，50，1-26。  延伸查詢new window
11.馮莉雅(20101000)。教師專業發展評鑑的實施與成效：以高雄市國小為例。教育研究學報，44(2)，85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳俊龍(2010)。教師專業發展評鑑下的教師專業成長之研究。學校行政雙月刊，66，188-207。  延伸查詢new window
13.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊，56(3)，29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.張德銳、周麗華、李俊達(20090700)。國小形成性教師評鑑實施歷程與成效之個案研究。課程與教學，12(3)，265-290。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.趙志揚、楊寶琴、鄭郁霖、黃新發(20100500)。高級中學教師對教師評鑑認知之研究。教育政策論壇，13(2)，77-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭淑惠(20110900)。教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究：促進組織學習的觀點。教育研究與發展期刊，7(3)，37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張德銳、李俊達、周麗華(20101200)。國中實施形成性教師評鑑歷程及影響因素之個案研究。教育實踐與研究，23(2)，65-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.吳金香、陳世穎(20080100)。國小教師對試辦教師專業發展評鑑態度之調查研究--以臺中縣市為例。學校行政，53，211-253。  延伸查詢new window
19.周麗華(20101200)。臺北市國小教師專業發展評鑑實施效應之研究。市北教育學刊，37，103-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張德銳(20091000)。中小學教師專業發展評鑑實施問題與解決策略。研習資訊，26(5)，17-24。  延伸查詢new window
21.馮莉雅(20071000)。教師專業發展評鑑系統試驗研究--以高雄市為例。國民教育學報，4(2)，241-277。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫志麟(2007)。理解與回應：教師評鑑試辦政策的實施。「教師評鑑：挑戰、因應與展望」學術研討會，臺灣教育政策與評鑑學會、中華民國教育行政學會、財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會、臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所聯合主辦 。臺北：國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、吳俊憲(2010)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、林純雯(2007)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之方案評鑑。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2006)。教育部補助試辦教師専業發展評鑑實施計畫。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2007)。教育部補助試辦教師専業發展評鑑實施計畫。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2008)。教育部補助試辦教師専業發展評鑑實施計畫。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Pan, H.-L.、Wang, L.-Y.、Chang, S.-C.、Cheng, S.-H.、Wu, C.-H.(2010)。The planning of meta-evaluation on teacher evaluation pilot program for professional development in elementary and secondary schools. Ministry of Education funded report。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
5.Baker, J.(1999)。Evaluating the poverty impact of projects: A handbook of practitioners。Washington, DC：World Bank。  new window
6.Baker, J.(2000)。Evaluating the impact of development projects on proverty: A handbook of practitioners。Washington, DC：World Bank。  new window
7.Bardini, M. D.(2001)。Impact evaluation fram^ work and strategy。Washington, DC：World Bank。  new window
8.Ezemenari, K.、Rudqvist, A.(1999)。Impact evaluation: A note on concepts and methods。Washington, DC：World Bank。  new window
9.Gay, L. R.、Mills, G. E.(2009)。Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th ed。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Pearson。  new window
10.Isore, M.(2009)。Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and literature review. OECD Education Working Paper No. 23。Paris, France：OECD。  new window
11.Owen, J. M.(1999)。Program evaluation: Forms and approaches。London：Sage。  new window
12.教育部(2011)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
13.Chen, Huey-Tsyn(1990)。Theory-Driven Evaluation。Newbury Park, CA：London：Sage Publications。  new window
14.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)。  new window
15.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用設計。臺北市：知城數位科技股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Barbu, A.(2009)。Impact Evaluation The Experience of the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank.，http://lnweb90.worldbank.org/oed/oeddoclib.nsf/DocUNIDViewForJavaSe arch/35BC420995BF58F8852571E00068C6BD/$file/impact_evaluation.pdf。  new window
2.Garbarino, S.(2009)。Quantitative and qualitative methods in impact evaluation and measuring results，http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/EIRS4.pdf， 2009/05/13。  new window
圖書論文
1.Airasian, P. W.(1997)。Teacher self-evaluation. Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practices。Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practices。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
2.Annunziata, J.(1997)。Linking teacher evaluation and professional development. Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice。Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
3.McGreal, T. L.(1988)。Evaluation for enhancing instruction: Linking teacher evaluation and staff development。Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success。Alexandra, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.Duke, D. L.、Stiggins, R. J.(1990)。Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation--Assessing elementary and。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
5.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：781（臺灣：771，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67793325
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上