:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師專業發展評鑑系統試驗研究--以高雄市為例
書刊名:國民教育學報
作者:馮莉雅 引用關係
作者(外文):Feng, Li-yia
出版日期:2007
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁241-277
主題關鍵詞:教師專業發展評鑑評鑑系統專業發展Teacher evaluationEvaluation systemProfessional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:244
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究旨在調查參與95年度教師專業發展評鑑之國小教師對專業發展取向教師評鑑系統的看法。此評鑑系統是以「課程設計與教學」、「班級經營與輔導」、「研究發展與進修」、「敬業精神與態度」為評鑑層面,各校建構學校本位的教師自評以及同儕評鑑之機制,並依據評鑑後結果,提供給教師教學上的肯定與回饋,並對個別教師成長需求,提供適當協助;同時學校對於整體性教師成長需求,則提供校內外在職進修機會。本研究採用訪談與問卷調查的方式蒐集參與評鑑教師對此評鑑系統的反應。研究發現如下:從問卷結果發現,整體而言,教師能接受此一評鑑系統;同時發現教師對評鑑系統的滿意度與教師對下列項目的看法有顯著相關:評鑑過程與結果的公平性、對評鑑指標與系統的了解程度,學歷、教學年資、年齡、學校規模也是影響滿意度的背景變項。而訪談結果發現,教師對評鑑系統有正面的看法,也有負面的看法。大多數教師能認同評鑑指標與評鑑系統的必要性,同時也有一些教師認為評鑑系統會增加教師的工作負擔,時間安排是重要影響因素。
The study is to investigate the perception and opinions of primary school teachers who participated in teacher developmental evaluation in Academic Year 95 about teacher developmental evaluation system. There are four areas in the system, which are curriculum design and instruction, class management, professional development, and professional dedication and attitudes. Each school constructed self evaluation and teacher evaluation. Based on the results of the evaluations, teachers obtained some feedback and assistance to their needs for personal growth. At the same time, it can also help to provide further study opportunities in school and out of school. This study adopted interview and questionnaires to collect data from the subjects. The findings are as follows: 1. Overall, teachers can accept the evaluation system. 2. Teachers' satisfaction to the evaluation system is obviously related to the following items: (1) The fairness for the process and the result for the evaluation; (2) The understanding for the evaluation indicators and system. (3) The educational background, the years they have been teaching, the ages, and the size of the school are also the background variations. 3. From the results of the interviews, teachers have some positive opinions and negative opinions as well. 4. Most of the teachers identify the necessity of evaluation indicators and evaluation system. 5. Some teachers believe that the evaluation system increases the workload of teachers. 6. Time arrangement is an important factor.
期刊論文
1.Marshall, K.(2005)。It's time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation。Phi Delta Kappan,86(10),727-735。  new window
2.Bradshaw, L. K.(2002)。Local District Implementation of State Mandated Teacher Evaluation Policies and Procedures: The North Carolina Case。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,16(2),113-127。  new window
3.Haefele, D.(1993)。Evaluating teachers: a call for change。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,7(21),31。  new window
4.張新仁、馮莉雅、邱上真(20041200)。發展中小學教師評鑑工具之研究。教育資料集刊,29,247-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Boyd, R.(1989)。Improving teacher evaluations。Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation,1(7),1-12。  new window
6.Calabrese, R. L.、Sherwood, I. C.、Fast, J.、Womack, C.(2004)。Teachers' and principles' perceptions of the summative evaluation conference: an examination of Model I theories-in-use。The International Journal of Educational Management,18(2),109-117。  new window
7.Darling-Hammomd, L.(1990)。Instructional policy into practice: the power of the bottom over the top。Educational and Policy Analysis,12,339-347。  new window
8.Ellett, C. D.、Wren, C. W.、Callender, K. E.、Liu, X.(1996)。Looking backward with the personnel evaluation standards: An analysis of development and implementation of a statewide teacher assessment program。Studies in Educational Evaluation,22(1),79-133。  new window
9.Frase, L.、Streshly, W(1994)。Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher education。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,8(1),47-57。  new window
10.Keeping L. M.、Levy, P. E.(2000)。Performance appraisal reactions: measurement, modeling, and method bias。Journal for Applied Psychology,85(5),708-723。  new window
11.Lavely, C.、Berger, N.、Follman, J.(1992)。Actual incidence of incompetent teachers。Educational Research Quarterly,15(2),11-14。  new window
12.Pecheone, R. L.、Pigg, M. J.、Chung, R. R.、Souviney, R.(2005)。Performance assessment and electronic portfolio: Their effect on teacher learning and education。The Clearing House,78(4),164-176。  new window
13.馮莉雅(20020700)。學生評鑑教師教學效能之探討。教育資料與研究,47,86-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.馮莉雅(20040100)。美國麻州教師評鑑制度對我國的啟示。教育資料與研究,56,67-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Milanowski, Anthony T.、Heneman, Herbert G. III(2001)。Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,15(3),193-212。  new window
16.鄭進丁(20070700)。應用方案理論進行評鑑之研究--以高雄市試辦教師專業發展評鑑為例。國民教育研究學報,19,29-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳天方、陳鎮潦、張訓臣(20040200)。二十一世紀高職學生能力指標。技術及職業教育,76,140-143。  延伸查詢new window
18.Ovando, M. N.(2001)。Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,15(3),213-231。  new window
19.陳聖謨(19970600)。國小教師對教師評鑑制度之態度研究。初等教育學報,10,417-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張德銳、丁一顧(20050900)。教學導師臨床視導對新進教師教學效能影響之研究。當代教育研究季刊,13(3),149-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.顏國樑(20031200)。從教師專業發展導向論實施教師評鑑的策略。教育資料集刊,28,259-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳政達(20010300)。教師評鑑方法之探討。教育研究月刊,83,107-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.馮莉雅(20020800)。國中教師教學效能之研究--教師知覺與學生知覺之比較。國民教育研究學報,9,113-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.馮莉雅(20020500)。影響國中教師教學效能相關因素之研究。文藻學報,16,123-142。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.國立新竹教育大學(2007)。95學年度發展評鑑中小學試辦名單。2007教師專業發展評鑑國際學術研討會,國立高雄師範大學主辦 。高雄。69-73。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.曾憲政、張婉菁(2006)。教師專業發展評鑑輔導網絡計畫。新竹:新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾憲政、張新仁、張德銳、許玉齡、馮莉雅、陳順和、劉秀慧(2007)。規劃高級中等以下學校教師專業發展評鑑規準之研究。新竹:國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、蔡濱如(2004)。發展國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許德便(2003)。南部地區國中教師對教師評鑑制度態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃怡華(2006)。私立高級中學實施教師評鑑策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇再添(2006)。臺北市國民小學實施教師評鑑之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.石璧菱(2003)。國民小學實施學校本位教師評鑑之研究--以桃園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳永發(2005)。國民小學教師同儕教學評鑑模式之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳怡君(2003)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹勳林(2005)。臺灣省高職專業類科教師評鑑內涵之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.朱淑雅(1998)。國民小學教師評鑑效標之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.呂錘卿(2000)。國民小學教師專業成長的指標及其規劃模式之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.馮莉雅(20050000)。融入式服務學習課程對職前教師學習成果的影響。高雄:高雄復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Peterson, K. D.(1995)。Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new direction and practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
3.Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(1988)。The personnel evaluation standards。New bury Park, CA:SAGE。  new window
4.McLaughlin, M. W.、Pfeifer, R. S.(1988)。Teacher Evaluation: Improvement, Accountability, and Effective Learning。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)。  new window
6.張德銳、蔡秀媛、許籐繼、江啟昱、李俊達、蔡美錦、李柏佳、陳順和、馮清皇、賴志峰(2000)。發展性教學輔導系統:理論與實務。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2006)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑宣導手冊,臺北市:教育部。,http://140.111.34.34。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.McLaughlin, M.(1990)。Embracing contraries: implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessment elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.吳清山、張素偵(2002)。教育評鑑:理念、挑戰與策略。師資培育的政策與檢討。臺北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅木龍(1995)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE