臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：社會性科學議題新聞的框架分析--以基因改造新聞為例
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：陳映均／李松濤 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Ying-chun／Lee, Sung-tao
出版日期：2017
卷期：25:特刊
頁次：頁439-462
主題關鍵詞：科學新聞；框架分析；框架包裹；基改新聞；新聞框架；Science news；Frame analysis；Frame package；Genetic-modified news；News frames
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:189
  • 點閱點閱:506
本研究探討國內主要新聞媒體在報導社會性科學議題時，所採用的新聞框架類型、論述模式與框架包裹。研究以基因改造(基改)新聞文本為對象，採內容和框架分析途徑，分析聯合報自2012年至2016年的基因改造新聞，共107篇。研究發現：在「新聞框架與子框架」方面，基因改造新聞報導採用「經濟、公共課責、衝突、採取策略、社會發展、科學／科技不確定性、現況、失控的科學和風險」等九種框架類型，且於「經濟、公共課責、衝突、採取策略、社會發展和失控的科學」等六種框架類目之下，都可以細分出二至三項子框架。其中，「公共課責」是基改新聞中最常出現的框架類型，佔總框架數的20.9%。在此框架之下，子框架以「政府」的百分比最高，佔42.0%。在框架出現趨勢方面，「公共課責、採取策略、經濟」框架數量有明顯上升的趨勢，「失控的科學」則呈現下降趨勢，其他框架類別則會因該年發生的重大事件而有不同的趨勢；在論述模式與框架包裹方面，可歸納出10種論述模式，顯示基改新聞在框架的使用上具有結構性與順序性。此外，框架論述模式經整合為核心框架後，再衍伸為「進步、問題解決、危害」等三項框架包裹，其百分比依序為24.3%、60.7%、15.0%。
Based on the premises that Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) are part of the appropriate contexts for scientific literacy presentations and framing is related to the process of scientific information descripted in science news, the purpose of this study is to explore the frames and discourse patterns regarding genetic-modified (GM) science news in Taiwan. The popular local news text in Taiwan, United Daily News (UDN) were selected for investigation and the total number of collected articles by the keyword ＂GM＂ searching during 2012 to 2016 was 107. A qualitative approach was adopted and the literature established frames were used to conduct the content and framing analysis. The results suggest that there are nine frame categories used in Taiwan’s genetically modified news, including ＂economic,＂ ＂public accountability,＂ ＂conflict,＂ ＂strategy,＂ ＂social progress,＂ ＂scientific/ technological uncertainty,＂ ＂commonness,＂ ＂runaway science,＂ ＂risk,＂ and some new sub-frames were inductively constructed. And, ＂public accountability＂ is the most used frame in GM science news (20.87%) in which the government perspective is much higher (42%) than research and enterprise; followed by the frames of economy (15.7%), strategy (15.5%) and conflict (15.29%). In the trend, the number of the frames ＂public accountabilit,＂ ＂strategy,＂ and ＂economic＂ has increased from 2012 to 2016, but the frame ＂runaway science＂ has become lower. In the discussion pattern and the frame package, the results suggest that there are 10 types of discussion pattern in the GM science news. The survey results indicate that within the discourse pattern, there are three frame packages in GM news, including progress (25%), problem solving (52%) and harm (16%).
期刊論文
1.Sadler, T. D.、Chambers, F. W.、Zeidler, D. L.(2004)。Student Conceptualizations of the Nature of Science in Response to a Socioscientific Issue。International Journal of Science Education，26(4)，387-409。  new window
2.Schirrmacher, A.(2012)。Popular science between news and education: A European perspective。Science & Education，21(3)，289-291。  new window
3.徐美苓、楊意菁(20110100)。臺灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知。傳播與社會學刊，15，71-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20080800)。「科學家發明了什麼？！」--解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊，16(4)，415-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Korpan, C. A.、Bisanz, G. L.、Henderson, J. M.、Bisanz, J.(1997)。Assessing Literacy in Science: Evaluation of Scientific News Briefs。Science Education，81(5)，515-532。  new window
6.van Gorp, Baldwin(2007)。The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in。Journal of communication，57(1)，60-78。  new window
7.Sadler, T. D.、Zeidler, D. L.(2005)。Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，42(1)，112-138。  new window
8.van Gorp, B.(2005)。Where is the Frame? Victims and Intruders in the Belgian Press Coverage of the Asylum Issue。European Journal of Communication，20(4)，484-507。  new window
9.張卿卿(20120600)。科學新聞資訊呈現形式及其對閱聽眾資訊接收的影響--以科學知識觀點與認知基模理論來探討。科學教育學刊，20(3)，193-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Dimopoulos, K.、Koulaidis, V.(2002)。The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation。Public Understanding of Science，11(3)，225-241。  new window
11.鄭怡卉(20130700)。新聞中的「偽科學」內容分析研究。新聞學研究，116，47-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Kolstø, Stein D.(2001)。Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues。Science Education，85(3)，291-310。  new window
13.Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education，28(2/3)，235-260。  new window
14.蔡佩穎、張文華、林陳涌、張惠博(20131200)。不同性別七年級學生論證科學新聞之學習效益。科學教育學刊，21(4)，455-481。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Jarman, R.、McClune, B.(2002)。A survey of the use of newspapers in science instruction by secondary teachers in Northern Ireland。International Journal of Science Education，24(10)，997-1020。  new window
16.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.、Korpan, C. A.(2003)。University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty。Public Understanding of Science，12(2)，123-145。  new window
17.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究，45，69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.施琮仁(20150700)。不同媒體平臺對公眾參與科學決策能力之影響：以奈米科技為例。新聞學研究，124，165-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃惠萍(20031000)。媒介框架之預設判準效應與閱聽人的政策評估--以核四案為例。新聞學研究，77，67-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20101000)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃浩榮(20031200)。風險社會下的大眾媒體：公共新聞學作為重構策略。國家發展研究，3(1)，99-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Nisbet, Mathew C.、Lewenstein, Bruce V.(2002)。Biotechnology and the American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999。Science Communication，23(4)，359-391。  new window
23.Pan, Zhongdang、Kosicki, Gerald M.(1993)。Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse。Political Communication，10(1)，55-75。  new window
24.林樹聲(20121000)。在科學課堂中應用爭議性議題教學促進國小六年級學生道德思考。科學教育學刊，20(5)，435-459。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.靳知勤(20150900)。生物科技的風險、利益與信任：高中學生「生物科技覺知量表」的發展研究。科學教育學刊，23(3)，241-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.靳知勤(20071200)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊，15(6)，627-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Nisbet, M. C.(2009)。Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement。Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development，51(2)，12-23。  new window
28.Burns, Terry W.、O'Connor, D. John、Stocklmayer, Susan M.(2003)。Science communication: a contemporary definition。Public Understanding of Science，12(2)，183-202。  new window
29.林筱芸、徐美苓(20150100)。臺灣基因醫學新聞內容特色與品質分析（2001-2011年）。博物館學季刊，29(1)，65-75+77。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.苑舉正(2012)。科學傳播、風險與懷疑論。現代哲學，123(4)，87-92。  延伸查詢new window
31.黃俊儒(20120300)。科學教育的再延伸--歐洲科學傳播學術參訪之紀實、返想與策勵。科學教育，346，12-27。  延伸查詢new window
32.黃俊儒(20150600)。你讀到什麼科學？--科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具發展與評析。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，139-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Brossard, D.、Shanahan, J.(2006)。Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage。Science Communication，28(1)，47-63。  new window
34.Davis, P. R.、Russ, R. S.(2015)。Dynamic framing in the communication of scientific research: Texts and interactions。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，52(2)，221-252。  new window
35.Hibino, Aiko、Nagata, Motohiko(2006)。Biotechnology in the Japanese media: Comparative analysis of newspaper articles on genetic engineering in Japan and Europe。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，9(1)，12-23。  new window
36.Key, S.、Ma, J. K.-C.、Drake, P. M. W.(2008)。Genetically modified plants and human health。Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine，101(6)，290-298。  new window
37.Kolstø, S. D.(2006)。Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socioscientific issue。International Journal of Science Education，28(14)，1689-1716。  new window
38.Lee, H.、Chang, H.、Choi, K.、Kim, S.-W.、Zeidler, D. L.(2012)。Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues。International Journal of Science Education，34(6)，925-953。  new window
39.Levinson, R.(2006)。Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socioscientific issues。International Journal of Science Education，28(10)，1201-1224。  new window
40.Lin, Shu-sheng(20141000)。Science and Non-Science Undergraduate Students' Critical Thinking and Argumentation Performance in Reading a Science News Report。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，12(5)，1023-1046。  new window
41.Lore, T. A.、Imungi, J. K.、Mubuu, K.(2013)。A framing analysis of newspaper coverage of genetically modified crops in Kenya。Journal of Agricultural & Food Information，14(2)，132-150。  new window
42.Nicole, A. S.(2015)。Examining the nexus of science communication and science education: A content analysis of genetics news articles。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，52(3)，397-409。  new window
43.Polman, J. L.、Hope, J. M. G.(2014)。Science news stories as boundary objects affecting engagement with science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，51(3)，315-341。  new window
44.謝君蔚、徐美苓(20111200)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例。中華傳播學刊，20，143-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.楊意菁、徐美苓(20121200)。環境風險的認知與溝通：以全球暖化議題的情境公眾為例。中華傳播學刊，22，169-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.Entman, Robert M.(1993)。Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm。Journal of Communication，43(4)，51-58。  new window
47.Gamson, William A.、Modigliani, Andre(1989)。Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach。American Journal of Sociology，95(1)，1-37。  new window
48.臧國仁(19981200)。新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架理論的觀點。傳播研究集刊，3，0+0_1-0_4+1-102。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Price, J.(2006)。Burgers and broccoli: The framing of food on U.S. news magazine covers, 1994-2003。The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association。Dresden。  new window
2.Tankard, James W.、Hendrickson, Laura、Silberman, Jackie、Bliss, Kriss、Ghanem, Salma I.(1991)。Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement。The Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication，Communication Theory & Methodology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Commun 。  new window
研究報告
1.孫智麗、余祁暐(2012)。國際間基因改造微生物食品之安全性議題及管理體系之研究 (計畫編號：DOH101-FDA-A1007)。臺北市：行政院衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gitlin, T.(1980)。The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left。University of California Press。  new window
2.Bridgstock, M.、Burch, D.、Forge, J.、Laurent, J.、Lowe, I.(1998)。Science, technology and society: An introduction。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Iyengar, S.(1994)。Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues。Chicago, Illinois：University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.王石番(1989)。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。幼獅文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Neuman, W. Russell、Just, Marion R.、Crigler, Ann N.(1992)。Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013)。PISA 2015 draft science framework，https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf。  new window
2.侯俐安(20130718)。吃基改香蕉疫苗，豬不怕藍耳病，http://innoaward.ibmi.org.tw/FaqDetail.php?REFDOCID=Omq491tcahd2bils。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳雨鑫(20150726)。基改論戰／學者：若有問題，19年沒發現？，https://hcalth.udn.com/health/story/6010/1079719。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳麗婷(20140923)。基改爭議多题醫師：孩童盡量少吃，https://health.udn.com/health/story/6037/364831。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20140105)。基因改造大鼠竟然成功了。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Millar, R.(1997)。Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?。Science today: Problem or crisis?。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Brante, T.(1993)。Reasons for studying scientific and science-based controversies。Controversial science from content to contention。Albany, New York：State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Nelkin, D.(1995)。Science controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the United States。Handbook of science and technology studies。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：349（臺灣：344，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67995897
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上