:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師工作價值觀量表的編製
書刊名:人文社會科學研究. 教育類
作者:沈碩彬 引用關係黃文三
作者(外文):Shen, Shuo-pinHuang, Wen-san
出版日期:2018
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁34-53
主題關鍵詞:二階因素模式教師工作價值觀自我實現組織安全身心健康Second-order factor modelTeacher work valuesSelf-realizationOrganizational securityPhysical/mental health
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:187
  • 點閱點閱:22
本研究以高中職教師為例,建構一份具有良好信效度的教師工作價值觀量表,而後再應用量表分析教師工作價值觀現況。基於此,本研究遂採用分層隨機抽樣方式,第一階段取樣235位教師進行項目分析、探索性因素分析與信度分析;第二階段取樣478位教師,並隨機分成兩組獨立樣本,分別進行驗證性因素分析與複核效化。最後,應用此量表進行現況調查與討論。本研究結論如下:(一)教師工作價值觀可分為自我實現、組織安全與身心健康等三種,各分量表的Cronbach α值為.92、.89、.89,總解釋變異量為66.08%,而以二階單因素模式為一最簡效模式;(二)教師工作價值觀現況以自我實現情形最為良好,而以組織安全情形較為弱勢;(三)男性教師比起女性教師有較強的自我實現與身心健康知覺;(四)高中教師比起高職教師有較佳的組織安全知覺;(五)公立學校教師有較理想的組織安全與身心健康知覺。
This study took upper secondary school teachers as an example to construct a reliable and valid scale and to investigate the status of teachers' work values. Through stratified random sampling, a pre-sample data of 235 teachers were examined using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis. A formal sample data of 478 teachers was then randomly divided into two groups to perform confirmatory factor analysis and cross-validation. Finally, the status survey and discussion was conducted using this scale. The results revealed that: (1) teachers' work values composed of self-realization, organizational security, and physical/mental health with Cronbach α of .92, .89, and .89 respectively and a total variance explained of 66.08%. A second-order factor model was the most efficient model; (2) teachers’ work values was most robust in "self-realization", but weakest in "organizational security"; (3) male teachers showed higher perception in "self-realization" and "physical/mental health"; (4) high school teachers showed higher perception in "organizational security" than vocational school teachers; (5) public school teachers showed higher perception in "organizational security" and "physical/mental health".
期刊論文
1.鄭燿男、陳怡靖(20100600)。校長之積德行善與體恤關懷行為及教師工作價值觀對教師工作績效之影響性。華醫學報,32,91-110。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anderson, D. H.、Nelson, J. A. P.、Richardson, M.、Webb, N.、Young, E. L.(2011)。Using dialogue journals to strengthen the student-teacher relationship: A comparative case study。College Student Journal,45(2),269-287。  new window
3.Gebauer, J. E.、Sedikides, C.、Neberich, W.(2012)。Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment。Psychological Science,23(2),158-160。  new window
4.王俊明(20041100)。教練工作價值觀對組織承諾、工作投入及工作滿意度的影響。臺灣運動心理學報,5,59-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張順發、羅希哲(20050300)。國小教師工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究。國民教育研究學報,14,79-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bagozzi, R. P.、Yi, Y.(2012)。Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(1),8-34。  new window
7.Liang, Ting-Peng、Ho, Yi-Ting、Li, Yu-Wen、Turban, Efraim(2011)。What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality。International Journal of Electronic Commerce,16(2),69-90。  new window
8.Becker, G. M.、McClintock, C. G.(1967)。Value: Behavioral decision theory。Annual Review of Psychology,18,239-286。  new window
9.范熾文、蔡家媛(20071100)。國民小學教師工作價值觀與組織公民行為關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報,25,51-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Pryor, R.(1979)。In search of a concept: Work values。The Vocational Guidance Quarterly,27,250-258。  new window
11.Reise, S. P.、Waller, N. G.、Comrey, A. L.(2000)。Factor analysis and scale revision。Psychological Assessment,12(3),287-297。  new window
12.洪瑞斌、劉兆明(20030900)。工作價值觀研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,211-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林正昌、歐陽幸雅、陳李綢(20150600)。國中教師工作調適指數之建構:以生活型態分析為基礎。教育心理學報,46(4),609-629。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Garrick, A.、Mak, A. S.、Cathcart, S.、Winwood, P. C.、Bakker, A. B.、Lushington, K.(2018)。Non-work time activities predicting teachers' work-related fatigue and engagement: An effort-recovery approach。Australian Psychologist,53(3),243-252。  new window
15.Crain, T. L.、Schonert-Reichl, K. A.、Roeser, R. W.(2017)。Cultivating teacher mindfulness: Effects of a randomized controlled trial on work, home, and sleep outcomes。Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,22(2),138-152。  new window
16.Coughlan, R. J.(1969)。The factorial structure of teacher work values。American Educational Research Journal,6(2),169-189。  new window
17.Han, S. W.、Borgonovi, F.、Guerriero, S.(2018)。What motivates high school students to want to be teachers? The role of salary, working conditions, and societal evaluations about occupations in a comparative perspective。American Educational Research Journal,55(1),3-39。  new window
18.Midzid, M. A. E.、Unos, M.、Antok, T. D.、Kadtong, M. L.(2017)。Work Values and Learning Environment Associated with Teaching Efficiency of Mathematics Teachers in Cotabato City Division。Proceedings Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Science Research,4(1),123-127。  new window
19.Nord, W. R.、Brief, A. P.、Atieh, J. M.、Doherty, E. M.(1988)。Work Values and on Job involvement。Psychological Bulletin,84(2),275。  new window
20.Skaalvik, E. M.、Skaalvik, S.(2017)。Still motivated to teach? A study of school context variables, stress and job satisfaction among teachers in senior high school。Social Psychology of Education,20(1),15-37。  new window
21.Skaalvik, E. M.、Skaalvik, S.(2016)。Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession。Creative Education,7(13),1785-1799。  new window
22.Vodanovich, S. J.、Kramer, T. J.(1989)。An examination of the work values of parents and their children。Career Development Quarterly,37(4),365-374。  new window
23.de Vaus, D.、McAllister, I.(1991)。Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe。Work and Occupations,18(1),72-93。  new window
24.吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏(19950100)。工作價值觀量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊,42,227-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃文三、沈碩彬(20121000)。工作價值觀、工作投入與教學效能關係之研究:以高雄市國中教師為例。課程與教學,15(4),161-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Hazer, J. T.、Alvares, K. M.(1981)。Police Work Value during Organization Entry and Assimilation。Journal of Applied Psychology,66(1),12-18。  new window
27.Zytowski, D. G.(1970)。The Concept of Work Values。Vocational Guidance Quarterly,18(3),176-186。  new window
28.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika,39(1),31-36。  new window
29.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423。  new window
30.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,10(4),622-647。  new window
研究報告
1.吳聰賢(1983)。農村青年職業興趣、工作價值觀與職業選擇關係研究。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝佳懿(2013)。高中教師自我效能、工作壓力、教師學習與工作滿意度關係之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐善德(1997)。高職教師工作價值觀、組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭乃禎(2013)。國民小學內部行銷與教師的服務導向組織公民行為之研究--以工作價值觀、領導者與部屬交換關係為中介變項(博士論文)。國立臺南大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Gomez-mejia, L. R.(1981)。Development and empirical testing of a need deprivation and social processing of information model of work values(博士論文)。University of Minnesota,Minnesota。  new window
圖書
1.Miller, C. H.(1974)。Career development theory in perspective。Mifflin Co.。  new window
2.Brown, D.、Brooks, L.(1996)。Career choice & development。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Lincoln, J. R.、Kalleberg, A. L.(1990)。Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and attitudes in the United States and Japan。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
5.Byrne, B. M.(1994)。Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming。Sage。  new window
6.Jöreskog, K. G.、Sörbom, D.(1999)。LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language。Lincolnwood, IL:Scientific Software International。  new window
7.Ginzberg, E.、Ginsburg, S. W.、Axelrad, S.、Herma, J. L.(1951)。Occupational choice。New York:Columbia University。  new window
8.Kline, R. B.(2005)。Principles and practice of structural equation modeling。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
9.Alderfer, C.(1972)。Existence relatedness and growth。New York, NY:Free。  new window
10.Daft, R. L.(2003)。Management。Mason, OH:Thomson South-Western。  new window
11.Herzberg, F.(1966)。Work and the nature of man。World Publishing Company。  new window
12.Super, D.(1957)。Psychology of careers。New York, NY:Harper & Brothers。  new window
13.Robbins, S. P.、Judge, T. A.(2014)。Essentials of organizational behavior。Boston, MA:Pearson Education。  new window
14.Super, D. E.(1970)。Work values inventory manual。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
15.陳秉璋、陳信木(1993)。價值社會學。臺北:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
16.Kinnane, D.、Gaubinger, M.(1963)。The kurd and kurdistan。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
17.黃文三(20030000)。學校本位管理理念建構下:我國中等學校教師角色知覺、工作價值觀與疏離感關係之研究。高雄:高雄復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Dawis, René V.、Lofquist, Lloyd H.(1984)。A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment: An Individual-Differences Model and Its Applications。Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota Press。  new window
19.Holland, John L.(1985)。Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environment。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
20.Robbins, Stephen P.(2005)。Organizational behavior。Prentice-Hall International Inc.。  new window
21.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
22.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2011)。重大教育改革發展歷程,http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=7。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳啟勳,黃昆輝,張德銳(2000)。需求層次論,http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1313554/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Tirri, K.(2010)。Teacher values underlying professional ethics。International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing。London, England:Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 高齡學習者社會資本、自我效能與幸福感關係之研究—以南部地區樂齡學習中心學員為例
2. 教師工作投入與工作滿意、組織承諾之後設分析
3. 嘉義縣市國小教師倫理意識型態、專業倫理、工作投入與工作適應之建構與驗證
4. 技術型高中學校內部行銷與關係行銷對學生關係品質之跨層次影響研究
5. 國民小學組織正義、組織公民行為與競爭優勢關係之研究:以領導者與部屬交換關係為調節效果
6. 技術型高中兼任行政教師工作價值觀、工作壓力及工作滿意度關係之研究-以社會支持為調節變項
7. 組織認同對組織績效與成員行為跨層次分析
8. 知覺組織支持對離職傾向之影響-工作滿足的中介效果與工作投入的調節式中介效果
9. 新北市高級中等學校校長知識領導、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能關係之研究
10. 國小教師專業發展知能、專業發展需求、專業發展困境與專業發展滿意度徑路模式之建構及驗證
11. 國小教師參與專業學習社群態度、心理資本、主觀幸福感與教學效能關係之研究
12. 校長轉型領導雙焦點取向對兼任行政教師組織行為表現之影響
13. 技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究
14. 國民小學內部行銷、教師工作投入 與學校效能關係之研究
15. 高等學校組織內部行銷、知識管理與創新經營關係之研究—以廣東省為例
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE