:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「內事以柔日」--《春秋》經傳內事與柔日統計考論
書刊名:中正漢學研究
作者:黃聖松 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Sheng-sung
出版日期:2018
卷期:2018:1=31
頁次:頁33-57
主題關鍵詞:春秋左傳禮記柔日祭祀Spring and Autumn AnnalsZuo-ZhuangBook of RitesEven daysSacrifices
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:11
《禮記.曲禮上》:「外事以剛日,內事以柔日。」葉國良先生已撰文證實《春秋》經傳與祭祖相關之事多用柔日。本文以《春秋》經傳為範圍,爬梳相關記載,將可能選用柔日事務分為祭祀與政治二類。祭祀事務如喪之告廟、郊祭、雩祭選用柔日比例皆100%。政治事務包括新君即位、冊立與朝宗廟、國君與卿大夫或卿大夫間之盟、國君與卿大夫出奔他國等,其中新君即位、冊立與朝宗廟可合併計算,柔日比例63.64%。一國之內同盟與出奔,選用柔日比例分別達72.73%與82.35%。本文探究「政治」事務偏用柔日之由,乃因新君即位、盟誓、出奔皆與祭奠祖先或神靈關聯。知「內事以柔日」之說不僅可信,且進一步得知選用柔日事務大凡與祭祀相關。
The part one in Quli in the Records of Rites notes that the odd days used for external affairs, and the even ones used for internal affairs. Ye Guoliang verifies that internal affairs recorded in the Spring and Autumn Annals Jingzhuan and ancestor worship used even days often. This study is based on the Spring and Autumn Annals Jingzhuan to clarify the related records and divide the affairs which possibly used the even days into two categories- ancestor worship and politics. Even days are used 100% chance in ancestor-worshipping affairs, such as telling deities of holding mourning ceremony, rural festival, or praying for rain. Political affairs includes new emperor ascending the throne and worshiping at the ancestral shrine, which can be calculated together and the even days they used is 63.64%, the alliance between the emperor and officials or officials and officials, which is calculated as 72.73%, and the emperor and officials absconding to other countries, which is calculated as 82.35%. This study probes into the reasons why political affairs mentioned above used even days often. This research can not only make sure the saying that internal affairs used even days, but also know that using even days was related to sacrifices.
期刊論文
1.許子濱(20071200)。論「昭穆」之命名取義。漢學研究,25(2)=51,329-346。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.孟琢(2012)。論春秋「出奔」現象中的親親之道。社會科學論壇,2012(6)。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉國良(20140600)。論《儀禮》卜筮與求日擇人的幾個問題。中正漢學研究,2014(1)=23,79-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.徐杰令(2000)。論春秋時期的「出奔」。史學集刊,79,76-81。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張榮明(1997)。殷周政治與宗教。五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.焦循(1995)。群經宮室圖。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉伯驥(1977)。春秋會盟政治。臺北:中華叢書編審委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.沈欽韓(1986)。春秋左氏傳補注。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱德修(2013)。尚書覆詁考證。臺北:聖環圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.孔安國、孔穎達(1993)。尚書注疏。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.竹添光鴻(1998)。左傳會箋。臺北:天工書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.萬麗華(2011)。左傳中的先秦喪禮研究。北京:中央民族大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.呂靜(2007)。春秋時期盟誓研究:神靈崇拜下的社會秩序再構建。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.張頷、陶正剛、張守中、山西省文物工作委員會(2006)。侯馬盟書。太原:山西古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.韋昭、左丘明(1974)。國語韋昭注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊伯峻(2000)。春秋左傳注。北京市:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.屈萬里(1994)。尚書集釋。臺北:聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭玄、賈公彥、陸明德(1993)。周禮注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.顧炎武、徐文珊(1979)。原抄本日知錄。臺北:臺灣明倫書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.何晏、邢昺(1993)。論語注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭玄、孔穎達(1993)。禮記注疏。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.鄭玄、賈公彥(1993)。儀禮注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
19.杜預、孔穎達(1993)。春秋左傳注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
20.劉安、何寧(1998)。淮南子集解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.晁福林(2001)。先秦民俗史。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.許慎、段玉裁(1994)。說文解字注。黎明。  延伸查詢new window
23.李振興(1994)。尚書述學。臺北:東大圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳戍國(1991)。中國禮制史.先秦卷。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.王引之(1979)。經義述聞。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.顧德融、朱順龍(2001)。春秋史。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.王玉哲(2000)。中華遠古史。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.平勢隆郎、周潔(2014)。從城市國家到中華:殷周春秋戰國。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.杜正勝(19900000)。編戶齊民:傳統政治社會結構之形成。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.錢玄(1996)。三禮通論。南京師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.顧棟高、吳樹平、李解民(1993)。春秋大事表。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
32.孫希旦、沈嘯寰、戴聖、王星賢(1989)。禮記集解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王國維(1959)。〈周書.顧命〉考。觀堂集林。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.李學勤(1996)。《夏小正》新證。古文獻論叢。上海:上海遠東出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.龐樸(1996)。五行學說的體系化要求。薊門散思。上海:上海文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE