:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:英國督察體制之教師評鑑系統在我國可行性之初探
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:葉郁菁 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Yu-ching
出版日期:1998
卷期:11
頁次:頁365-382
主題關鍵詞:英國督察教師評鑑英國教育標準局EnglandInspectionTeachers appraisalOFSTED
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:168
  • 點閱點閱:62
     英國的教師評鑑是由教育標準局主導,英國的中小學每四年要接受督學視導,視導 的內容包括學校提供的教育品質、學校達到的教育水準、學校統籌運用經費的過程,以及學 生在精神教育、道德教育、社會教育、與文化各方面的發展。 督察體制在英國產生的衝擊與影響有以下幾點: 一、督學的教室觀察造成教師壓力。 二、督學的訪親與評鑑過程未事先知會教師。 三、評鑑的客觀性受到質疑。 四、教師無法從評鑑後的回饋得到幫助。 最後,研究者從英國經驗,探討教師評鑑制度在我國實行的可能性,並提出以下六點建 議: 一、建立教師對評鑑的正確態度。 二、教師評鑑應考量城鄉學校之間的差異。 三、教師評鑑是獨立作業,或者是學校整體評鑑的一部份,則要再審慎規劃。 四、積極培養、訓練評鑑與視導人員。 五、教師評鑑需籌措經費。 六、教師評鑑應搭配進修與輔導計畫。
     In England, teachers' appraisal is one part of the OFSTED inspection. The content for inspections includes: the quality of the education provided by the school; the educational standards achieved in the school; whether the financial resources made available to the school are managed efficiently; and the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils at the school. The impact of OFSTED inspection can be generated: 1. When the inspectors observed teachers' teaching, the teachers confronted pressure in class. 2. Teachers against OFSTED inspection because they thought the inspectors did nor inform them a fixed time before entering their classrooms. 3. The objectivity of OFSTED inspection was challenged by teachers. 4. Teachers did not receive feedback from the inspectors as they expected. Finally, the researcher tried to explore the possibilities of conducting teachers' appraisal in Taiwan and the possible difficulties we may face. The researcher suggests: 1. We have to educate teachers the proper attitude towards teachers' appraisal. 2. Urban and rural differences between schools should be taken into consideration when the teachers' appraisal is conducted. 3. Whether teachers' appraisal will be carried out alone or it will become part of the school inspection needs a well plan beforehand. 4. We have to train the inspectors and the staff who will assist to carry on the teachers' appraisal. 5. Teachers' appraisal needs funding and support from the central government. 6. After appraisal, we have to design the INSET programme for the teachers in order to develop their professional ability in teaching.
期刊論文
1.葉郁菁(19960600)。影響初任教師教學活動之因素:城鄉差異之比較研究。初等教育學報,9,399-428。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張德銳(19951200)。我國實施教師職級制度所面臨的問題與因應策略。初等教育學刊,4,89-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳鐵雄(1997)。他山之石--記英國教育研究學會及英倫訪問。國教之友,49(2)。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉郁菁(1997)。英國教師新評級制度--預期大批不適任教師將被解職。英國文教輯要,2。  延伸查詢new window
5.Brimblecombe, N.、Ormston, M.、Shaw, M.(1995)。Teachers' perceptions of school inspection: a stressful experience。Cambridge Journal of Education,35(1),53-61。  new window
6.Dean, J.(1995)。What teachers and headteachers think about inspection。Cambridge Journal of Education,25(1),45-52。  new window
7.Gipps, C.(1995)。Teacher assessment and teacher development in primary school。Education 3-13,23(1),8-12。  new window
8.Thomas, G.(1996)。The new schools' inspection system: some problems and possible solutions。Educational Management and Administration,24(4),335-369。  new window
9.陳聖謨(19970600)。國小教師對教師評鑑制度之態度研究。初等教育學報,10,417-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kyriacou, C.(1987)。Teacher stress and burnout: an international review。Educational Research,29(2),146-152。  new window
會議論文
1.葉郁菁(1997)。教師評鑑與專業發展:論OFSTED之督察體制及其影響。八十六學年度教育學術研討會。國立花蓮師院。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麗麗、蔡清華(1997)。結合實習教師專業成長與評鑑--「教學檔案」的建構與應用。師資培育的理論與實際國際學術研討會,(會議日期: 5月29日至30日)。屛東縣:國立屛東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.歐陽教、高強華、王秋絨、李春芳、張德銳(1992)。教師評鑑模式之研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.OFSTED(1997)。Corporate Plan 1997: 1997-98 to 1999-2000。London:OFSTED。  new window
2.Guardian(1997)。Crackdown on bad teachers。London:The Guardian。  new window
3.OFSTED(1995)。Guidance on the inspection of secondary schools。London:HMSO。  new window
4.OFSTED(1994)。Primary Matters: A Discussion on Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools。London:OFSTED。  new window
5.高強華(1995)。師資培育問題研究。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Department of Education and Employment(1997)。Excellence in Schools。London:DfEE。  new window
7.Brown, S.(1989)。How Do Teachers Talk About and Evaluate their own Teaching?。Edinburgh:The Scottish Council for Research in Education。  new window
8.OFSTED(1994)。Handbook for the Inspection of Schools。London:OFSTED。  new window
9.Times Educational Supplement(1997)。Face to Face with Critical Inspectors。London:TES。  new window
10.Times Educational Supplement(1997)。Fast Track to the Future。London:TES。  new window
11.Wragg, E. C.、Wikeley, F. J.、Wragg, C. M.、Haynes, G. S.(1996)。Teacher appraisal observed。London:Routledge。  new window
12.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第一期諮議報告書。台北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
13.饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展--理論與實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.自由時報(19971207)。國中小教師敘薪升等採四級制。  延伸查詢new window
2.中國時報(19971207)。教部研議中小學教師分級制衝擊大。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉郁菁(1997)。行政院國科會補助出國參加國際會議報告書(87-2914-I-008-038-A1)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Alexander, R.(1994)。Analysing practice。Thinking through Primary Practice。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE