參 考 文 獻
ㄧ、中文部份
王仁宏 (2004)。後設認知策略教學對國小補校成人學生閱讀理解成效影響之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
王文科 (2000a)。質的研究問題與趨勢。載於中正大學教育研究所主編：質的研究法。高雄市：麗文文化公司。
王文科 (2000b)。教育研究法(增訂新五版)。台北市：五南圖書公司。王靜儀 (2005)。交互教學法增進國中生英文閱讀理解能力及後設認知之效應。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
王明潭 (2007)。運用相互教學法融入動畫設計對國小五年級學生英語閱讀理解及動機之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
王俐玲 (2006)。交互教學法對提昇國中資源班學生閱讀理解成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
全民英檢(GEPT) (2007)。全民英檢學習資源網站。2007年7月28日。取材自：http://www.gept.org.tw
何嘉雯 (2003)。交互教學法對國小閱讀理解困難學生教學成效之研究。國立台南師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。何素玲 (2001)。國小資源班教師實施交互教學法之實務知識探究。國立台北師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
汪榮才（1996）。國小學生之後設認知與科學文章閱讀理解。載於國立台南師範學院主編，國民教育研究所集刊，1，81-139。
李姿德（2003）。交互教學法對增進聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。國立台南師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。李映伶 (2001)。聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解策略之個案研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
邱淑媚 (2005)。圖畫書交互教學法對國小二年級學童閱讀成效之研究。國立台中教育大學特殊教育與輔助科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
邱俊宏 (1998)。後設認知策略訓練對高中生英文閱讀理解及態度的效益研究。
國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林清山譯 (原著Mayer,R.E.) (1990)。教育心理學：認知取向。台北市：遠流。
林生傳 (2003)。教育研究法：全方位的統整與分析。台北市：心理出版社。
林淑珍 (2005)。交互教學法對閱讀障礙生閱讀能力提升之研究---以五年級學生為例。國立新竹教育大學語文教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
林佩璇 (2005)。交互教學法對提昇國小資源班學生閱讀理解表現之行動研究。 國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林佩欣（2003）。交互教學法對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解學習效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
林淑美 (2002)。交互教學法對國小五年級學生在科學性文章閱讀理解之研究。臺中師範學院語文教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
林秉武 (2003)。交互教學策略對不同組型閱讀障礙兒童增進閱讀理解效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文，未出版，彰化市。林思燕 (2006)。交互教學法對台灣國中生閱讀能力與後設認知之效益。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林男勝 (2007)。相互教學法對不同理解能力之國小六年級學童在閱讀策略運用與閱讀理解之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
吳慧珠、李長燦 (2003)。Vygotsky社會認知發展理論與教學應用。載於張新仁主編，學習與教學新趨勢。台北市：心理出版社。
周崇儒（2000）。談建構主義的教學。研習資訊，17(3)，45-47。
周碩貴 (2002)。科技大學學生英文字彙量與閱讀補救教學研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
周 尹 (2007)。教育研究法講座：研究倫理。2007年12月19日。取材自：
http://www.1493.com.tw/upfiles/skill01100853293.pdf
柳雅梅 (2005)。平衡閱讀教學對國小學童英文閱讀能力及閱讀動機之影響。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所博士論文，未出版，台南市。胡夢鯨 (1996)。成人教育現代化與專業化。台北市：師大書苑。
胡夢鯨 (1998)。成人教育學理論與模型：國中補校文科教學的一項質性研究。台北市：師大書苑。胡惠雯 (2004)。淺談~交互教學法及其應用。2007年12月19日。取材自：http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e~j/59/59-22.htm.
胡永崇 (2006)。閱讀的相關因素及學習障礙生之閱讀補救教學。載於屏東師範大學主編，特殊教育月刊,13,29-37。胡幼慧、姚美華 (1999)。一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析？載於質性研究--理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市：巨流圖書公司。
柯華葳 (1994)。語文科的閱讀教學。輯於李詠吟主編：學習輔導︰學習心理學的應用。台北市︰心理出版社。
涂志賢 (1998)。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解後設認知、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
徐昌慧 (2005) 教育部提升技專校院學生英語能力具體措施。載於2005年和春技術學院應用英文系語言能力檢定與教學研討會會議手冊。
郭生玉 (1997)。心理與教育研究法。台北縣：精華書局。
陳定邦 (2004)。鷹架教學概念在成人學習歷程上應用之研究—以空大《統計學》課輔教學為例。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。陳昱宏 (1999)。從社會建構主義觀點看ㄧ個高中生物教室中的合作學習。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳玉貞 (2006)。讀本語言複雜性及文化背景對台灣大學生英文閱讀理解影響之研究。高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳美靜 (2005)。以教科書課文內容為主之相互教學法對輕度智能障礙學生之閱讀理解成效之研究。國立台中教育大學特殊教育與輔助科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
陳明埩 (2005)。以線上新聞閱讀教學提升國中生閱讀理解及後設認知能力之研究。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台東市。
陳明蕾 (2003)。以文章的因果架構對不同年齡成人讀者理解表爭影響之研究。國立中正大學成教系博士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
陳秋蘭 (2005)。九年一貫國中英語閱讀的定位及教學策略。載於張武昌主編，
九年一貫課程：英語教學挑戰與對策。台北市：國立台灣師範大學。
許淑玫（2000）。國小六年級閱讀小組實施交互教學之個案研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
教育部 (1998)。邁向學習社會白皮書。台北市：教育部。
教育部 (2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市：教育部。教育部 (2002)。推廣全民學習外語辦理情形及九十一年度以後開展計畫。2007年7月28日。取材自：http://www.gept.org.tw
教育部 (2004a)。《提升技專校院英語教學品質方案》之專案補助計。2007年7月28日。取材自：http://www.gept.org.tw
教育部 (2004b)。《2004年施政主軸方案》：「提高語文能力方案」。2007年7月28日。取材自：http://www.gept.org.tw
梁瑜芳 (2001)。後設認知閱讀策略訓練對國中英文資源班學生閱讀理解之效益研究。國立高雄師範大學英語系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
張玉梅 (2003)。相互教學法對原住民國小六年級學生閱讀理解之教學成效研究。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
張新仁 (2002)。當代教學統整新趨勢：建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。載於教育學刊，18，43-64。張新仁 (2006)。補救教學面面觀。2007年7月27日。取材自：
http://tw.pksite.com/read.asp? Usernam＝ctl & data＝642AD7EE-05E6
黃瓊儀 (2003)。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。嘉義市。
黃富順 (2002)。成人學習。台北市：五南圖書公司。
黃富順 (2004)。我國大學回流教育的困境與突破。成人及終身教育雙月刊, 2, 2-6。
黃富順 (2005)。終身學習社會對大學的挑戰與因應。成人及終身教育雙月刊, 7,
21-30。
黃志淵 (2004)。相互教學法對國小五年級學童閱讀歷程中自我調整學習與閱讀理解之影響。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
黃杏媚 (2004)。課程改革另一章-相互教學法應用於國小英語故事閱讀之探究。
2007年12月19日。取自：http://www.eserver.nhlue.edu.tw/
黃瑞琴 (1997)。幼兒讀寫萌發。台北市：五南圖書公司。
語言教學與測驗中心 (2004)。全民英檢學習資源網站。2007年7月28日。
取自：http://www.gept.org.tw
曾陳密桃 (1990)。國民中小學的後設認知及其閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。趙士瑩 (2007)。閱讀困難及閱讀策略使用：英語能力及性別之差異性研究。國立中正大學外國語文研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
甄曉蘭、曾志華 (1997)。建構教學理念的興起與運用。國民教育研究學報，3，179-208。楊榮昌 (2002)。相互教學法對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、後設認知及閱讀動機之影響。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
詹文宏（2002）。 後設認知閱讀策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。詹詩韻 (2004)。相互教學法對增進國小資源班學生閱讀理解能力成效之研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台東市。
潘世尊 (2003)。建構主義學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁主編，學習與教學新趨勢。台北市：心理出版社。
蔡佩芳（2004）。相互教學法對國小國語文閱讀教學成效研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
蔡敏玲 (1995)。在文化脈絡中創塑意義：從Vygotsky的理論思考「文化刺激」的議題。教育資料與研究，4，20-24。蔡敏玲、陳正乾(譯)(Michael Cole等主編) (2001)。社會中的心智：高層次心理過程的發展。台北市：心理出版社。
蔡清田 (2006)。教育行動研究。台北市：五南圖書公司。
蔡秀美 (1995)。成人學習評量。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編，有效的成人教學。台北市：師大書苑。
鄧運林（1995）。自我導向學習及其相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
鄭瑞隆 (2000)。符號互動論及其在教育研究上之應用。載於中正大學教育研究所主編，質的研究法。高雄市：麗文文化公司。
歐志華 (2001)。國中補校英語科應用加速學習教學策略對學生學習表現影響之研究。國立中正大學成教系碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
簡茂發 (1988)。教學評量原理與方法。黃光雄主編，教學原理。台北市：師大書苑。盧雅琪 (2004)。交互教學法運用於現代文學閱讀教學之研究。屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
鍾文玲 (2006)。教師運用有聲思考提昇科大學生英文閱讀理解之探討。國立中正大學成教系碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
簡憶茹 (2005)。相互教學法對國中聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解與語句書寫表達成效之研究。慈濟大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。
蘇玉凰 (2004)。高中生英文閱讀理解之後設認知策略使用量表之編製。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
魏惠娟 (1995)。個案研究法在成人教學上的應用。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編，有效的成人教學。台北市：師大書苑。
二、英文部分
Aarnoutse, C. (1997). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to very poor
decoders in a listening situation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406658.)
Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in
fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (2), 309-332.
Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy
instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 41(4), 319-339.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. S. Kamil and P.
Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Anderson, T. H.,& Armbruster, B. B.(1988). On selecting “considerate” content area
textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9 (1), 47-52.
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). The effects of long-term
vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 506-521.
Bender, M. (1994). Learning disabilities: Beyond the school years. In A. J. Capute, P. J. Accardo & B. K. Shapiro(Eds.) Learning disabilities spectrum. ADD, ADHD, LD. Baltimore: York Press.
Berkowitz, S. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1997). The effect of text type and familiarity on the
nature of information recalled by readers. In M. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading:Reading& instruction.Washington, D. C.: National Reading Conference.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An
introduction to theory and methods (3rd edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bos, C. S.,& Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and
behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brown, A. L. (1985). Teaching students to think as they reading: Implication for
curriculum reform. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED273567.)
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other
more mysterious mechanisms. In Franz E. Weinert, & Rainer H. Kluwe (Eds.)
Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., Webber, L. S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Interactive
learning environments: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. R.
Gifford, & M. C. O''Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of
aptitude, achievenment and instruction. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
Brown, A L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension
strategies: a natural history of one program for enhancing learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED257046.)
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual
knowledge acquisition. In L.B.Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction. N.J.: Lawence Erlbaum.
Bruce, M. E.,& Chan, L. K. S. (1991). Reciprocal teaching and transenvironmental programming: A program to facilitate the reading comprehension of students
with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 12(5), 44-54.
Bryan, R.,& Bryan, J. H. (1986). Understanding learning disabilities (3rd ed.). CA:
Mayfield.
Bryant, D. P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies
for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 293-302.
Butler, D.,& Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and selfregulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1986). Cognitive process in reading. In J. Orasanu (Ed.),
Reading comprehension: from research to practice. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54 (1), 1-22.
Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. Amsterdam:
North-Holland.
Cavanaugh, J. C. (1996). Adult development and aging. Pacific Grove, C.A.: Brooks /Cole Publishing Company.
Cavanaugh, J. C., Feldman, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Memory beliefs as social
cognition: A reconceptualization of what memory questionnaires assess. Review
of General Psychology, 2, 48-65.
Chamot, A. U. (1993). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chen, B. C. (1999). Discrepancy of reading strategies for academic purposes between high achievers and low achievers at a junior college in Taiwan. Paper presented at the proceeding of the 8th English international symposium on English reading. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co.
Chi, F. M. (1998). Intertextuality as a constructive reading strategy: Three successful Taiwanese EFL college cases. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 24, 49-62.
Chu, H. J. (2000). Orienting EFL readers toward global strategy use. In English
Teachers’ Association (Ed.), Paper presented at the proceedings of the ninth
international symposium on English teaching. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane
Publishing Co.
Craik, F. I. M.,& Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Cognitive functioning in very old age. In
N.J., Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Eds.), The handbook of aging and
cognition (2nd Ed.). Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind.
American Educator, 22 (1 & 2), 8-15.
Demetriou, Andreas, Doise, W.,& van Lieshoutet, Cornelise F. (1998). Life-span developmental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Dermody, M. (1988). Metacognitive strategies for development of reading
comprehension for younger children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED292070.
Dole, J., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of
Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Doolittle, P. E. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theory
foundation for cooperative learning. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University.
Doolittle, P. E., Hicks, D., Triplett, C. F., Nichols, W. D.,& Young, C. A. (2006).
Reciprocal teaching for reading comprehension in higher education: A strategy
for fostering the deeper understanding of texts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 17(2), 106-118.
Droop,M., & Verhoeven,L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in
First-and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1),78-103.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading
comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to
say about reading instruction (3rd ed.), Newwark, DE: International Reading
Association.
Ehrman, M.,& Oxford, R. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and
psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language
Journal, 73, 1-13.
Elias,P.K.,Elias,M.F.,Robbins,M.A.,&Gorge,P.(1987). Acquisition of word-processing skills by younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychology and aging, 2, 340-348.
Eskey, D. (1997). Models of reading and the ESOL student. Focus on Basics, 1(B), 9-11.
Foster, E.,& Rotoloni, R. (2005). Reciprocal teaching: General overview of theories. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspective on learning, teaching, and technology.
Retrieved December 5, 2008 from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/.
Frances,S.,& Eckart,J.A. (1992). The effects of reciprocal teaching on comprehension. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED350572.
Gagn’e, E. D. (1985). The Cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Gagné, E.D.,Yekovich, C. W, & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Glenberg, J., & Mina, C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate
decoders/poor comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 772-782.
Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R.,& Bruning, R. H. (1990). Cognitive psychology for teachers. NY: Macmillan pub.
Goodman, K. (1970). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer, & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Neward, DE：
International Reading Association.
Gough, P. (1972). One second of reading. In J. Kavanaugh, & I. Mattingly (Eds.),
Language by ear and by eye：Theoretical models and processes of reading. Cambridge, MA：MIT Press.
Graesser, A.,Golding, J. M.,& Long, D. L. (1991). Narrative representation and
comprehension. In R. Barr, M.L.Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research, 2, 174-204. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
Hacker, D. J.,& Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 94 (4), 699-718.
Hashey, J. M., & Conners, D. (2003). Learn from our journey: Reciprocal teaching action research. The Reading Teacher, 57 (3), 224-233.
Hattie, J., Briggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
Havighurst, R. J. (1974). Developmental tasks and education. New York: Mckay.
Hayes, B. L. (1991). The effective strategies for teaching reading. Heedham Heights, MA: Allyan and Bacon.
Hertzog, C.,& Hultsch, D. F. (2000). Metacognition in adulthood and old age. In The
handbook of aging and cognition. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hiebert, E. H., Englert, C. S., & Brennan, S. (1983). Awareness if text structure in recognition and production of expository discourse. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 63-79.
Hilawani, A., & Yasser, A. (1993). Implementing reciprocal teaching:Was it effective? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 63614.)
Hodge,E.,Palmer,B., & Scott, D. (1992). Metacognitive training in cooperative groups on the reading comprehension and vocabulary of atrisk college students. College Student Journal, 26, 440-448.
Hogan,K.,& Pressley,M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley(Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional Approaches,74-107. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Horn, J. L. (1982). The Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence in Relation to Concepts of Cognitive Psychology and Aging in Adulthood. In F.I.M. Craik and S.Trenub (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Communication Affect. New York:
Plenum Press.
Horn, J. L. (1985). Remdeling old models of intelligence. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications. New York: Wiley.
Huang, T. L. (1993). Cultural background and English reading instruction. In M.C. Yang (Ed.), A collection of papers presented in the ninth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane
Publishing Co.
Huang, C. C. (2004). High school and university students'' vocabulary knowledge, content knowledge and differential reading comprehension. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co.
Kelly, M., Moore, D. W., & Tuck, B. F. (1994). Reciprocal teaching in a regular
primary school classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 88(1), 53-61.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension
strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second
language. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275-293.
Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: The Gulf
Publishing Com..
Lantolf, J. P.(Ed.) (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Language Teaching and Testing Center (LTTC) (2004). The GEPT report for students’
English proficiency of technical universities and colleges. Retrieved April 20,
2007 from http://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/research.
Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among
Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading. 6 (2), 177-190.
Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 91-107.
LeCompte, M.D. (Ed.) (1993). The handbook of qualitative research in Education. N.Y.: Academic Press.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies
(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lijeron, J. T. (1993). Reciprocal teaching of metacognitive strategies to strengthen
reading comprehension of high school students in Spanish: A criptive case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron.
Lin, S. J., & Su, S. C. (2003). Do ESP college students still need English remedial
instruction? Students in English Language and Literature, 12, Aug. 2003.
Lincoln,Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Linda, K. (1993). Uncovering cognitive process in reading. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the national reading conference. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Services No.364842)
Long, M. H., & Richards, J. C. (1987). Methodology in TESOL. Singapore: Haper
and Row.
Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M.,& Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves
standardized reading comprehension performance in poor comprehenders. The Elementary School Journal, 90 (5), 469-484.
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard
Educational Review, 62(3), 279-299.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Maxfield, M. G.,& Babbie, E. (1998). Research methods for criminal justice and
criminology. (2nd Ed.). New York: West/Wadsworth.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
McCormick, C. (1995). Instructing students who have literacy problem (2nd Ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella Rosemary S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A
comprehension guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Meyer, B. J.,& Rice, E. (1984). The structure of text. In P.D. Person (Ed.), Handbook
of reading research. New York: Longman.
Meyer, B. J. F.,& Talbot, P. (1998). Adult age differences in reading and remembering text and using this information to make decisions in everyday life. In Mahwah, N. J.: Lawence Erlbaum Associates (Eds.), Adult Learning and Development. Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A.,& Florencio, D. (1995). Reading rate and prose retention. Unpublished technical report, Pennsyllvania State University, University Park.
Meyer,B.J.,Young, C.J.,& Barlett,B.J. (1989). Memory improved reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Miller, C. D., Miller, L. F.,& Rosen, L. A. (1988). Modified reciprocal teaching in a regular classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 183-186.
Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Reading and Syntatic Analysis. In J. R. Beech & A. M. Colley (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Reading. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
Mokhtari, K.,& Richard, R. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
Oczkus, L. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading
Comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD). (2008). Reading literacy: A framework for PISA 2009. Retrived January 16, 2010, From:
http://mypisa. Acer. Edu.au/
O’shea, D. J. (1994). Teacher Effectiveness Research into Reading Practice. In K. D. Wood & B. Algozzine (Eds.) Teaching Reading to High-risk Learners. M.A.: Simon & Schuster.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every reader should know. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Improving the reading comprehension of junior high students through the reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring strategies.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign.
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction.
Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
Palincsar,A. S. (1987).Collaborating for collaborative learning of text comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED285123.)
Palincsar,A.S.(1988).Reciprocal teaching instructional materials packet. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
Palincsar,A. S.,& Brown,A.L (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117- 175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent
learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771-77.
Palincsar, A. S.,& Brown,A. L. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Structured dialogues among communities of first-grade learners. In. E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Palincsar, A. S., David, Y., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Reciprocal Teaching: A manual prepared to assist with staff development for educators interested in reciprocal teaching. Unpublished manual. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Palincsar, A. S.,& Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (4), 211-225.
Palincsar, A. S.,& Perry, N. E. (1995). Development, cognitive and sociocultural
perspectives on assessing and instructing reading. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 331-344.
Palmer, D., & Goetz, E. (1988). Selection and use of study strategies: The role of the studier’s beliefs about self and strategies. In C. Weinstein, E. Gotez, & P.
Alexander (Eds.),Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evalution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development,55, 2083-2093.
Pereira-Laird,J.A.,& Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self- report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 18, 185-235.
Randolph, P., & Lewis, J..(2008). Summer 2008: Reciprocal Teaching. Retrieved
December 5, 2008 from http://red6747.pbwiki.com/Reciprocal＋Teaching/.
Richek, M. A., Caldwell, J. S., Jennings, J. H., & Lerner, J. W. (2002). Reading
problems: Assessment and teaching strategies (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social
context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenshine, B.,& Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C.,& Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66,181-221.
Ross, J. A., Maxwell, K. T., & Luebker, A. (1989). Psychophysics of reading VII: Comprehension in normal and low vision. Clinical Vision Science, 4, 51-60.
Royse, D. (2001). Teaching tips for college and university instructors: A practical guide. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Rumelhart, D. (1977). Schemata: The building blocks of language. In R.J. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W.Brewer (Eds.). The theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognititive psychology, linguistics, artficial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Samules, S. J.,& Kamil, M. J. (1984). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mesenthal (Eds.). Handbook of reading research. Newward, DE: International Reading Association.
Schumm, J., Mangrum, C., Gordon, J., & Doucette, M. (1992). The Effect on Topic Knowledge on the Predicted Test Questions of Developmental College Readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 11-23.
Shieh, Y. L. (1992). Reading English exposition for gist by Chinese EFL learners:
Comprehension, recall, and instruction. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Taiwan: National Normal University.
Smith, M. C., & Pourchot, T. (1998). What does educational psychology know about adult learning and development? In Mahwah, N. J.: Lawence Erlbaum Associates (Eds.). Adult Learning and Development. Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook
of qualitative research(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Swaby, B. E. R. (1989). Diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students’ academic
performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. ReadingPsychology, 21, 283-308.
Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the
intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(1), 39-48.
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehension during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den
Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle
grade. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
van Duzer, C. (1999). Reading and the adult language learner. ERIC Digest.
Washington D.C.: National Center for ESL Literacy Education.
van Meter, P., Yokoi, L.,& Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of notetaking derived from their perceptions of notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.
Westera, J.,& Moore, D. W. (1995). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension in
a New Zealand high school. Psychology on the Schools, 32, 225-231.
Whitbourne, S. K. (2005). Adult development and aging: Biopsychosocial
perspective. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Williamon, R. A. (1989). The effect of reciprocal teaching on student performance gains in third grade based reading instruction. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. Texas A & M University.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S.,& Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Wood, D.,& Middleton, D. (1984). A study of assisted problem solving. Journal of Psychology, 66, 181-191.
Yang,N.D. (1993). Understanding Chinese students’ language beliefs and learning strategy use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of international teachers of English to speakers of other languages, Atlanta,GA.
Yelon, S. L. (1999). Powerful principles of instruction. White Plains,N.Y.: Longman Publishers.
三、選用教科書
Broukal,Milada (2005). Weaving it together: Connecting reading and writing. Book I. Canada: Thomson Heinle.
Cassriel,Betsy, & Reynolds (2006). Stories worth reading 1: Skills worth learning. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Howard, Lori (2000). Read all about it,Book I. New York: Oxford.
Lougheed,Lin (2005). People,places and things,Book I. New York:Oxford.
Malarcher,Casey & Janzen,Andrea (2005). Reading challenge: Book I,II. New York: Compass Publishing.
Mare,Nancy Nici (2004). Reading on 1. New York: McGraw Hill
Methold, Ken (2001). Short stories(A). Honkong: Longman Asia ELT.
Smith,Lorraine C,& Mare, Nancy Nici(1996). Themes for Today: A beginning reading skills text,Book I. Boston,MA: Heinle & Heinle.