:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科技大學應用英語系教師與業師專業發展活動、接受創新、教師協同與課程設計滿意度關係之研究
作者:廖瑗玲
作者(外文):LIAO, YUAN-LING
校院名稱:國立臺中教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:任慶儀
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:教師協同創新態度教師專業發展階層線性分析課程設計teacher collaborationattitude of innovationsteacher professional developmenthierarchical linear modelcurriculum design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
本研究旨在探討科技大學應用英語系教師與業師專業發展活動、接受創新
與教師協同對課程設計滿意度之關係。研究方法為問卷調查法,以中部地區公私立科技大學應用英語系教師與業師為其研究對象,回收業師問卷計56份問卷,教師問卷計52份,共計108份問卷。本研究採用描述性統計、Pearson積差相關分析、二因子變異數分析、徑路分析、以及階層線性模式分析,其研究結果如下:
一、教師與業師參與專業發展活動和接受創新之程度彼此間相互影響課程設計滿意度;最常參加高
度互動性的專業發展活動與中度接受創新程度的教師和業師對課程設計滿意度的平均數最高,
最常參加中程度互動的專業發展活動與中度接受創新的教師與業師對課程設計滿意度的平均數
最低。
二、教師協同與接受創新態度呈現顯著正相關。
三、教師與業師總體層次脈絡變項顯著影響課程設計滿意度。
四、教師和業師接受創新跨層次影響課程設計滿意度。
五、中部地區科技大學應用英語系教師最常參加的專業發展活動以中度互動性的
活動最多;業師最常參加的專業發展活動以低度互動性的活動最多。
六、教師在接受創新的程度上為低度接受創新者;業師在接受創新上為高度接受
創新者。
七、教師與業師協同互動類別為協調類型。
八、教師與業師課程設計滿意度為中高程度。
This study aims to examine the relationship among teacher professional development activities, adopting innovations, teacher collaborative, and curriculum design satisfaction between teachers and industry experts. A questionnaire was measured on 52 teachers and 56 industry experts in Department of Applied English of Universities of Science and Technology in central Taiwan. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, path analysis, and hierarchical linear model.
Our findings implied that: 1) there is the interaction effect on teacher professional development activities and teachers adopting innovations; teachers and industry experts are most frequently participated teacher professional development activities with high level of interactive and middle-end of adopting innovations, had highest mean values of curriculum design satisfaction scores, teachers and industry experts are most frequently participated teacher professional development activities with middle-end level of interactive and middle-end of adopting innovations, had lowest mean values of curriculum design satisfaction scores, 2) a significantly positive correlation existed between teachers collaboration and teachers adopting innovations, 3) a significantly effect existed contextual variables of macro level on curriculum design satisfaction, 4) a significantly cross-level interaction effect existed between teachers and industry experts on adopting innovation, 5) teachers are most frequently participated teacher professional development activities with medium level of interactive; industry experts are most frequently participated teacher professional development activities with low level of interactive, 6) teachers' level of adopting innovations is low and industry experts are with high, 7) the kind of teacher collaboration is coordination, and 8) curriculum design satisfaction on teacher and industry experts is upper-intermediate.
參考文獻
中文文獻
王文君(2016)。科技校院業界專家教學信念、知覺學校支持與教學效能之關係研究(未出版之碩
士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
王令宜(2004)。大學教師教學專業發展理論與實務。教育研究月刊,126,60-72。
石進祥(2007)。結合創新擴散理論與UTAUT模式以探究影響教師採用數位學習平臺因素之研究
(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化市。
多益(2012)。2012年臺灣地區 TOEIC成績統計報告摘要。取自
http://www.toe-ic.com.tw/file/13343053.pdf
多益(2015)。2015臺灣大型企業人才國際化及外語職能管理調查報告摘要。取自
http://www.toeic.com.tw/report_2015_01.jsp
任慶儀(1997)。國小教師使用媒體教學之行為模式研究:羅傑斯的革新理論之應用。行政院國家
科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號NSC85-2413-H142002),未出版。
任慶儀(2013)。教學設計理論與實務。臺北:五南。
行政院主計處(2013)。人力資源調查。取自
https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=18844&ctNode=4944
李如蕙(2007)。以創新擴散觀點探索影響教師採用數位典藏資源融入教學的因素(未出版之碩士論文)。實踐大學,臺北市
李淑如(2015)。高職實用技能學程美髮技術科業師協同教學之相關研究-以S學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東縣。
李敏智、施浚龍、阮鵬宇(2015)。英語相關活動對學生提升英文能力之調查研究-以中部某科技大學學生為例。東海大學圖書館管訊,168,118-142。
林天祐(1996)。認識研究倫理,教育資料與研究,12,57-63。
林澄億(2013)。從職場需求檢驗臺灣大學商用英語課程(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林靜憶 (2008)。技職院校應外系學生英語學習困難之研究-從工具性動機談起。大仁學報,32,153-168。
吳文舜(2005)。在“你好嗎?”之後呢-對臺灣在英語教學法的省思。教育暨國語文學報,2,71-81。doi: 10.6372/JEFLL.200512.0071
吳明隆(2013)。多層次模式的實務應用。臺北:五南。
徐昌慧、馮莉雅、 江敏慧 、蘇雅慧(2016)。餐旅教育的業師協同教學成效和相關因素之研究。人文社會科學研究教育類,10(1),30-59。
翁守德、黎瓊麗、陳芳華(2015)。觀光英語教學主題之職場實用性調查研究。旅遊健康學刊,14(1),77-96。
許美華(2011)。科技大學應用外(英)語系外語教育組之課程規畫。嘉南學報,37,441-455。
教育部(2000)。技職教育白皮書。取自
http://history.moe. gov.tw/important.asp?id=38
教育部(2004)。教學卓越計畫。取自https://www.edu.tw/news_Content. aspx?n
=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=24F4D4633B94C7D0
教育部(2005)。獎勵大學教學卓越計畫。取自https://www.edu.tw/news_Content. aspx?n =9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=24F4D4633B94C7D0
教育部(2010)。第一期技職再造計畫。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2300
教育部 (2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。取自https://www.edu.tw/news_Content
aspx?n =9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=24F4D4633B94C7D0
教育部 (2018)。106學年度大專院校一覽表。取自https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/
莊淇銘(2005)。未來學能教你的事。臺北市:天下文化。
陳志緯(2013)。高中職餐旅群業界專家協同教學實施成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄餐旅大學,高雄市。
陳芸萍(2015)。高職餐飲管理科學生參與業界專家協同教學之課程滿意度與學習成效(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東縣。
陳海泓(2014)。教師和圖書教師協作量表之編制與協作模式之初探。教育資料與圖書館學,51(3),411-444。doi: 10.6120/ JoEMLS.2014.513/0603.RS.AM
陳海泓(2016)。社會領域教師和圖書教師高層次協作教學對國民小學六年級
學生主題探究學習的影響以及學生的回應。圖書資訊學研究,10(2),87-132。
陳琦媛、蘇錦麗(2013)。大學教師教學專業發展策略之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,9(4),149-176。
陳碧祥(2001)。我國大學教師升等制度與教師專業成長及學校發展定位關係之探究。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,163-208。
陳嘉彌(1996)。中等教師接受創新程度之分析。教育研究資訊,4(3),86-103。
張玉櫻(2011)。從臺灣企業界之外語人才需求看應用外語系的課程規劃。英語教學期刊,35(2),139-183。
張武昌(2007)。提升臺灣大學生英語文能力的政策與策略,教育資料與研究,79,157-174。
張春興(1998)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
張喬雯(2010)。創新擴散模式在國民小學學校行政應用之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
張媛甯(2012)。大學教師教學專業發展之個案研究-以N科技大學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,5(1),49-73。
張媛甯、郭重明(2011)。大學教師教學專業發展之初探。學校行政,71,194 -213。
張國保、李寶琳(2014)。我國技職人才培育的問題與前瞻。教育資料與研究,112,53-76。
張國保、袁宇熙、林清南、李寶琳(2013)。縮短學用落差-技專學生專業英語文能力之建立,臺灣教育評論月刊,12,137-143。
游家政(2015)。大學教師教學專業發展的困境與突破。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(4),98-101。
郭碧娜(2014)。高中職家政群業界專家協同教學學生學習動機與學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
曾俐文(2016)。我國大學教師專業發展現況與實施成效之探究-以大臺中地區大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
黃光雄(2004)。教學原理。臺北市:師大書苑。
黃政傑(1997)。教學原理。臺北市:師大書苑。
葉蕙蘭(1999)。淡江大學教師教育專業成長之需求評估研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
蔡宜瑾(2012)。我國大學提升教師教學專業發展策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
蔡雅文(2009)。私立大學院校實施教師專業發展機制之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。
鄭有成(2015)。業界專家協同教學影響高中職電機與電子群學生學習態度與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
鄭逸容(2016)。影響臺中市國民小學教師採用翻轉教學意願之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。
鄭暖萍(2010)。科技大學實施雙師制度之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
鄭博真(2012)。我國大學教師專業發展之現況、困境與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,8(1),61-92。
鄭博真(2013)。大學教師教學專業發展理論與研究:以技職校院為例。臺北:華藤。
劉東遠(2008)。技職院校學生的英文能力探究與省思。臺東大學人文學報,1(2),223-252。
廖年淼(2004)。教師教學專業發展之研究。臺北市。秀威資訊科技。
廖瑗玲(2015)。從國際化人才觀點看科技大學大一英文課程。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(11),146-151。
歐伃珊(2011)。以Rogers創新擴散理論探討臺灣英文線上寫作系統之使用(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
謝俊義(2015)。多層次分析—理論、方法、與實務。臺北市:鼎茂。
戴維揚(2007)。科技大學英語文教與學的新策略。人文社會電子學報,3(1),20-32。
饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
Naisbitt. J. & Aburdene. P.(1990)。2000年大趨勢。(尹萍譯)。臺北市:天下文化。
Rogers, E. M.(2006)。創新的擴散。(唐錦超譯)。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版於1995)










外文文獻
Adams, p. (2009). The role of scholarship of teaching in faculty development: exploring an inquiry-based model. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-22.
Alshehry, A. T. (2018). Case study of science teachers’ professional development Saudi Arabia: Challenges and improvements. International Education Studies,11(3), 70-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n3p70
Amundsen, C., Abrami, P., McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Krbavac, M., Mundy, A., & Wilson, M. (2005, April). The what and why of faculty development in higher education: An in-depth review of the literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher
education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N. J: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Camblin, L. D. & Steger, J. A. (2000). Rethinking faculty development. Higher Education, 39(1), 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003827925543
Carpenter, D. M., Crawford, L. & Walden. R. (2007). Testing the efficacy of team teaching. Learning Environments Research, 10, 53-65
Chang,L-C. & Lee, G. C. (2010). A team-teaching model for practicing project-based learning in high school: Collaboration between computer and subject teachers. Computers & Education, 55(3), 961-969.
Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A., & Grainger, P. (2015). Putting transformativelearning theory into practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55, 9-30.
Corder, Nicholas. (2002). Learning to teach adults: An introduction, London:
Routledge Falmer.
Devlin-Scherer, R., & Sardone, N. (2013). Collaboration as a form of professional development: Improving learning for faculty and students. College Teaching,61(1), 30-37.
Doll, R. G. (1986). Curriculum improvement, decision making and process (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon : Boston.
Dugan, K. & Letterman, M. (2008). Student appraisals of collaborative teaching, College Teaching, 56(1), 11-15.
Egger, P.H. & Andrea, L. (2012). The language effect in international trade: A
meta-analysis. Economics Letters, 116, 221-224.
Feng, L-Y., Chiang, M. H., Su Y., & Yang C. C. (2015). Making sense of
academia industry cooperative teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 16, 43-47.
Feng, L-Y., Su, Y-H.,Yang, C. C., & Hsu, C-H. (2012). University hospitality teachers’ industry experiences and their influences on university teaching practices in the classroom. International Journal of Asian Tourism Management, 3(2), 111-122.
Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher Development and education change.
London: The Falmer Press.
Gallo-Fox, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2016). Coteaching as professional development for cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.007
George, M. & Davis-Wiley, P. (2000). Team teaching a graduate course: Case Study. College Teaching, 48(2), 75-84.
Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S.A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003).
Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction. American
Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731-767.
Gorozidis, G. & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1-11.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hanusch, F., Obijiofor, L. & Volcic, Z. (2009). Theoretical and practical issues in team-teaching a large undergraduate class. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 21, 66-74.
Helms, M. M., Alvis, J. M., & Willis, M. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for
Business, 81(1), 29-34.
Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development:
Individualizing technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239-264.
Johannes, L. (2011). Do language barriers affect trade? Economics Letters, 110, 159-162.
Jwaifell, M., & Gasaymeh, A. (2013). Using the diffusion of innovation theory to explain the degree of English teachers’ adoption of interactive whiteboards in the modern systems school in Jordan : A case study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 138.
Kang, S. K., Wu, C. E., & Gould, R. (2005). An exploratory study: Students’
perceptions of academic faculty and industry practitioner instructions. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 4(2), 44-53.
Keeley, R. G. (2015). Measurements of student and teacher perceptions of co-teaching models. The journal of special education apprenticeship, 4(1), 1-15.
Ken-Maduako, I., & Oyatogun, A. T. (2015). Application of team teaching in the
English language class. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(29), 178-181.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F. & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: Thedefinitive classic in adult education and human resource development(6th ed.).CA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Leite, F. C. T., Baggett, C.D. & Radhakrishna, R. B. (2004). Educational reform as Innovation: A qualitative study on the perceptions of Brazilian agricultural school teachers, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 10(4),171-179, doi: 10.1080/13892240485300191a
Lock, J., Clancy, T.L., Lisella, R., Rosenau, P., Ferreira, C., & Rainsbury, J. (2016). The lived experiences of instructors co-teaching in higher education. Brock Education Journal, 26(1), 22-35.
Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Umarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education , 58(2), 808-817. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ jcompedu.2011.10.005
Marshall, W. & Plaxton-Moore, S. (2017). Faculty development for advancing
community engagement in higher education: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(2),
131-165.
Mezirow, J. D. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mohr, S. & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty
professional development: a Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123-143.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1273
Montiel-Overall, P. & Hernandez, A. C. R. (2012). The effect of professional
development on teacher and librarian collaboration: preliminary findings using a revised instrument, TLC-III. School Library Research, 15, 1-25.
Oliva, P. F. (2009 ). Developing the curriculum. New York: Pearson.
Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (1988). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Oxford Economics. (2012). Global Talent 2021: How the new geography of talent

will transform human resource strategies. Retrieved June 23, 2015, from
http://ceo.usc. edu/n ews/global_talent_2021_1.html
Persellin, D. & Goodrick, T. (2010). Faculty development in higher education:
Long-term impact of a summer teaching and learning workshop. Journal of the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, l(10), 1-13.
Phelan, K. V., Mejia,C., & Hertzman,J. ( 2013 ). The industry experience gap:
Hospitality faculty perceptions of the importance of faculty industry experience. Journal of Hospitality & TourismEducation, 25(3), 123-130.
Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Correa, V. I. (2011). A historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform: Making good on the promise of teaching all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 183-200.
Rich, J. M. (1981). Innovations in education: Reformers and their critic. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Rogers, E. M. (2006). Diffusion of Innovations. NY: Free Press.
Ruhanen, L. (2005). Bridging the divide between theory and practice: Experiential learning approaches for tourism and hospitality management education. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 5(4), 33-51.
Rytivaaraa, A., & Kershner, R. (2012). Co-teaching as a context for teachers’
professional learning and joint knowledge construction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 999-1008.
Sahin, I., & Thompson, A. (2006). Using Rogers’ theory to interpret instructional computer use by COE faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 81-95.
Saroyan, A., & Trigwell, K. (2015). Higher education teachers’ professional learning: Process and outcome. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 92-101.
Selmier II, W. T., & Oh, C. H. (2012). International business complexity and the internationalization of languages. Business horizons, 55, 189-200.
doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.006
Smith, P. H., & Murillo, L. A. (2012). Repositioning biliteracy as capital for learning: lessons from teacher preparation at the US- Mexico border. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 301-323.
Stes, A., Min-Leliveld, M., Gijbels, D., & Petegem, V. P. (2010). The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 25-49. doi: https: //doi.org/
10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.001
Tasdemir, H., & Yıldırım, T. (2017). Collaborative teaching from English language instructors‟ perspectives. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 632-642.
Taylor, K. L., & Bedard, D. (2010). Faculty development in Canadian universities. In A. Saroyan & M. Frenay (Eds.), Building teaching capacities in higher education: A comprehensive international model (pp. 23-42). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Tessema, M., Ready, k., & Yu, W. (2012). Factors affecting college students' satisfaction with major curriculum: evidence from nine years of data. International Journal of humanities and social science, 2 (2), 34-44.
Todd, R. J. (2005). Report of Phase Two of Delaware School Library Survey: Student learning through Delaware school libraries, Part 1 Background, theoretical framework, methodology and findings. Delaware, MD: CiSSL.
Todd, R. J. (2013). The power of (in) the (im) possible principles of the possible. Teacher Librarian, 41(2), 8-15.
Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2011). A new ICT curriculum for primary education in Flanders: Defining and predicting teachers' perceptions of innovation attributes. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (2), 124-135.
Wang, D. (2010). Team Teaching and the Application in the Course English
Teaching Methodology by CET and NSET in China. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 87-91.
Welch, M., & Plaxton-Moore, S. (2017). Faculty development for advancing
community engagement in higher education : Current trends and future
directions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 21(2), 131-165.
White, C. S., Henley, J. A. & Brabston, M. E. (1998). To team teach or not to team teach–that is the question: A faculty perspective, Marketing Education Review, 8(3), 13-23.
Yanamandram, V & Noble, G. (2006). Student Experiences and perceptions of
team-teaching in a Large undergraduate class. Journal of University Teaching &
Learning Practice, 3(1), 49-66.
Yuksel, I. (2015). Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Model in Action: Individual
Innovativeness profiles of pre-service teachers in Turkey, Croatian Journal of
Education, 17, 507-534.
Zhou, H. (2016). Empirical Study on University Curriculum Satisfaction of
University Graduates. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 132-137.















































附錄
附錄一
英文請託函
Dear teachers,
My name is Yuan-Ling Liao and I am a Ph. D. student. I am studying in the National Taichung University of Education.
This questionnaire is part of my research. The purpose of the study was to examine the correlations among professional development, innovativeness, collaborative curriculum design, and course satisfaction.
Your response will contribute greatly to the research. I would really appreciate it if you could help me with my research. Thank you for your understanding.
I really appreciate your help in your response and reply within 7 days.
Please take a few minutes to visit

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1TFPExiviq38WMK4lMHcSLqPyaqnkCf2eXRwWjZNUQXQ/edit


All the best,
Yuan-Ling




 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE