臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：現代幼兒母親的教養信念--以大學教育程度者為例
書刊名：新竹師院學報
作者：劉慈惠 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liou, Tsyr-huey
出版日期：2001
卷期：14
頁次：頁355-405
主題關鍵詞：教養；深度訪談；質化研究；Child-rearing；In-depth interviews；Qualitative study
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(26) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:22
  • 共同引用共同引用:195
  • 點閱點閱:108
　　　　　透過深度訪談，本文探討新竹地區大學教育程度之幼兒母親的教養信念。研究結果發現，受訪者的教養信念反映中國傳統文化及西方文化的雙重影響。重新概念化(reconceptualize)何謂「理想教育」的現象，可以很明顯地從受訪者身上觀察到。意即，中國傳統文化雖然對幼兒母親的教養觀仍然有所影響，可是它已不再位居主導的地位，而且有些傳統的教養信念已經被重新界定及賦予新的意義。大部分受訪者呈現偏向「以幼兒為中心」的現代教養觀；她們看重聆聽孩子的想法與滿足其心理與情緒的需求。在情感的表達上，她們不再像上一代父母那般內斂而含蓄；反之，她們不吝於以讚美、親吻與擁抱來表達對孩子的愛。在管教上，她們傾向以說理偶有溝通來解決孩子行為上的問題。不過，受到傳統文化的影響，許多受訪者感受到與幼兒說理的有限與挫折。在某些情況下，許多受訪者仍然認為「打」是具有正面管教意義的最下之策。雖然受訪者在持守傳統信念和接受西方教養觀上的程度有所不同，可是為了讓自己的孩子得到最佳發展利益，她們都一樣經歷了在理想與現實之間求取平衡的掙扎與矛盾。本研究建議：教養是非常個人情境化的事（contextualized），理想的教養方式並沒有一定的標準藍圖，一個人的教養信念或偏向傳統或偏向現代，與其現代化的程度沒有一定的關係，也沒有絕對的優與劣。學者有必要要從文化生態觀的基礎上更多去探討父母的教養，親職教育工作者在未深入了解當事者的教養情境之前，宜避免對父母所持特定的教養方式加上主觀合宜與不合宜的評價。
　　　　　This qualitative study explored child-rearing ideas of college-educated mothers in Hsinchu. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews. Findings indicate that participants' ideas are mixture of traditional Chinese and modern parenting approaches. Reconceptualization in childrearing has taken place among participants. While some traditional values are still highly reserved, some have been redefined. Most participants have become more child-centered in child-rearing. They expressed concern about heeding children's voices and psychological needs. They no longer curb their demonstration of parental affection as Chinese parents in the past did. They give high priority to the use of reasoning in regulating children's behavior. However, most of them also experienced frustration and limitation when attempting to reason with young children. Many still perceive spanking positively as last resort in some disciplinary situation. Participants vary in their allegiance to traditional values and their openness to modern values, yet they all reported struggle in their quests for a balance between the ideal and the reality. It is suggested that child-rearing is highly contextualized. A person's acceptance of new parenting ideas or maintance of traditional has nothing to do with her modernity. Parenting needs to be understood from a cultural-ecological perspective. Educators need to take caution in conveying what is desirable or undesirable childrearing to parents.
期刊論文
1.劉慈惠(19990200)。幼兒母親對中國傳統教養與現代教養的認知。新竹師院學報，12，311-345。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kroes, W. H.、Kriger, S. F.(1972)。Child-rearing attitudes of Chinese, Jewish, and Protestant mothers。The Journal of Social Psychology，86，205-210。  new window
3.Luster, T.、Rhoade, K.、Haas, B.(1989)。The relation between parental values and parenting Behavior: A test of the Kohn Hypothesis。Journal of Marriage and the Family，51，139-147。  new window
4.Goodnow, J. J.(1988)。Parents' ideas, actions, and feelings: Models and methods from developmental and social psychology。Child Development，59，286-320。  new window
5.Ho, D.(1989)。Continuity and variation in Chinese patterns of socialization。Journal of Marriage and the Family，51，149-163。  new window
6.Darling, N.、Steinberg, L.(1993)。Parenting style as context: An integrative model。Psychological Bulletin，113(3)，487-496。  new window
7.Ogbu, J. U.(1981)。Origins of Human Competence: A Cultural-Ecological Perspective。Child Development，52(2)，413-429。  new window
8.Super, C. M.、Harkness, S.(1986)。The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture。International Journal of Behavioral Development，9(4)，545-569。  new window
9.余德慧、顧瑜君(20000600)。父母眼中的離合處境與現代倫理意涵。應用心理研究，6，173-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林惠雅(19990600)。母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(1)：內涵意義之探討。應用心理研究，2，143-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林文瑛、王震武(19950200)。中國父母的教養觀：嚴教觀或打罵觀？。本土心理學研究，3，2-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉慈惠(20000200)。社經地位與教養相關文獻的評析與再思。新竹師院學報，13，359-374。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Goodnow, J. J.(1984)。Parents' Ideas about Parenting and Development: A Review of Issues and Recent Work。Advances in Developmental Psychology，3。  new window
14.Graue, M. E.(1993)。Social networks and home-school relations。Educational Policy，7(4)，466-490。  new window
15.Hoffman, L. W.(1987)。The value of children to parents and child rearing patterns。Social Behaviour，2，123-141。  new window
16.Inkeles, A.(1955)。Social change and social character: The role of parental mediation。Journal of Social Issues，11(1)，12-23。  new window
17.Olsen, N. J.(1975)。Social class and rural-urban patterning of socialization in Taiwan。Journal of Asian Studies，34，659-674。  new window
18.馬信行(1997)。一九九０年人口普查中教育與職業資料之分析。國立政治大學學報，75(上)，29-66。  延伸查詢new window
19.Triandis, H. C.、Brislin, R. W.(1984)。Cross-cultural psychology。American Psychologist，39(9)，1006-1016。  new window
20.Lawton, J. T.、Coleman, M.(1983)。Parents' perceptions of parenting。Infant Mental Health Journal，4(4)，352-361。  new window
21.Bell, R. Q.(1979)。Parent, child, and reciprocal influence。American Psychologist，34，821-826。  new window
22.Ekblad, S.(1986)。Relationship between child-rearing practices and primary school children functional adjustment in the People's Republic of China。Scandinavian Journal of Psychology，27，220-230。  new window
23.Whiting, B. B.(1980)。Culture and social behavior: A model for the development of social behavior。Ethos，8，95-116。  new window
會議論文
1.Chao, R. K.(1993)。Clarification of the authoritarian style and parental control: Cultural concepts of Chinese child-rearing。Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development。  new window
研究報告
1.高敬文(1994)。臺灣地區幼兒社會化之研究。沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王珮玲(1992)。兒童氣質、父母教養方式與兒童社會能力關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Liou, T. H.(1997)。Ideas of college-educated mothers in contemporary Taiwan about rearing young children，0。  new window
圖書
1.Spradley, James P.(1979)。The Ethnographic Interview。New York：Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.。  new window
2.Kohn, Melvin L.(1969)。Class and Conformity: A Study in Values。Homewood, IL：Dorsey Press。  new window
3.余德慧(1987)。中國人的父母經--黏結與親情。臺北：張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lareau, A.(1989)。Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education。Falmer Press。  new window
5.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Laosa, L. M.(1981)。Maternal behavior: Sociocultural diversity in modes of family interaction。Parent-child interaction-theory, research, and prospects。New York, NY。  new window
7.Stevenson, H. W.、Chen, C.、Lee, S.(1992)。Chinese family。Parent-child socialization in diverse cultures。New Jersey。  new window
8.Wolf, Margery(1978)。Child Training and the Chinese Family。Studies in Chinese Society。CA。  new window
9.Youniss, J.(1994)。Rearing Children for Society。Beliefs about Parenting。San Francisco, CA。  new window
10.Yi, Y. Y.(1985)。Social change, religious movements, and personality adjustment: An anthropological view。Chinese Culture and Mental Health。FL。  new window
11.Gecas, V.(1979)。The influence of social class on socialization。Contemporary theories about the family。NY。  new window
12.Hess, R. D.(1970)。Social class and ethnic influences upon socialization。Carmichael's manual of child psychology。New York, NY。  new window
13.Lerner, J. V.(1993)。The influence of child developmental characteristics on parental behaviors。Parenting: An ecological perspective。New Jersey。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schaefer, E.(1985)。Parent and child correlates of parental modernity。Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
2.Harkness, S.、Super, C. M.、Keeier, C. H.(1992)。Learning to be an American parent: How cultural models gain directive force。Human motives and cultural model。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Sigel, I. E.(1985)。A conceptual analysis of beliefs。Parental belief system: The psychological consequences for children。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Ho, D. Y. F.(1986)。Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review。The psychology of the Chinese people。Hong Kong：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.King, A.、Bond, M.(1985)。The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view。Chinese cultural and mental health。New York, NY：Academic Press, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：968（臺灣：956，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1408417 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67218392
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上