:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:紈絝子弟與流氓教授:臺灣的教育與階級流動
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:莊奕琦 引用關係陳晏羚
作者(外文):Chuang, Yih-chyiChen, Yeng-ling
出版日期:2011
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁61-91
主題關鍵詞:教育成就社會階級代間階級流動相對勝算比Educational attainmentSocial statusSocial mobilityRelative odds ratio
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:365
  • 點閱點閱:133
本文採眉「華人家建動態資料庫J 研究父代與子代間階級流動的情況,並 探討教育成就是否為促進代間階級流動的重要管道。實證結果發現父代為上層 階級的子代接受高等教育相對最具有優勢,拍較於勞工階級與農民階級子代, 中產階級的子代也有較高的機會接受高等教育。另一方面,教育成就對社會階 級亦有著顯著的影響,愈高的教育成就進入主層階級的相對勝算比也愈高,尤 其具大學以上教育成就更有高度的優勢。特別是相對於國小以下教育程度,受 專科教育為子代進入上層階級帶來了優勢,而這樣的優勢效果在來自非上層階 級的子代又比來自上層階級的子代為大。即先天上家庭環境的不足仍可藉由後 天教育成就的提升而改善階級壟斷!而高中與專科教育程度可造就出最有機會 進入中產階級的優勢,惟教育成就高低對進入上層措級的相對勝算比不會因為 不闊的世代而有所不同。整體而言,教育的普及與避免教育壟斷的確有助於社 會階級代間的向上流動,故教育政策的首要呂標應該避免產生階級壟斷教育的 現象,唯有人人教育機會均等的環境,才能真正達到階級的有效流動,讓窮人 有真正翻身的機會。
Using Taiwan's Panel Study of Family Dynamics data, this paper investigates intergenerational social mobility and analyzes whether edu凶 cation can be an effective means for fostering social mobility. Empirical results find that father's social status affects an individual's educational attainment. Offspring whose father is in the upper class have a better chance of receiving higher education than those whose father is not. Moreover, education has a profound influence on social status. The higher the educational attainment 峙, especially for university and above, the greater the chance one will be in the upper-class. The education advantage confers for entry into the upper class does not vary among different cohorts. This implies that the upper-class may dominate education to preserve their social status. However, other things being equal, those with junior col1ege education but whose fathers are not in the upper-class tend to have a greater chance to be in the upper-class than those whose father is in the upper-class. Hence, education can still be an effective means to compensate for the disadvantage in one's father's social status. We also find that senior high school and junior college education confer the greatest chance to be in the middle class, which is conducive to social stability. Our results confirm that popularization of education is beneficial to intergenerational social mobility. Thus, equal opportunity to attain education and prevention of monopoly in education by the upper c1ass should be the u1timate goal of a government's educational policy,as it not only enhances one's earning capabi1ity but also fosters social mobi1ity.
期刊論文
1.Platt, L.(2007)。Making Education Count: the Effects of Ethnicity and Qualifications on Intergenerational Social Class Mobility。The Sociological Review,55(3),485-508。  new window
2.莊奕琦、賴偉文(20080300)。影響教育成就的因素及九年國民義務教育政策效果評析:臺灣實證。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),25-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃芳銘(19980600)。社會階級在家庭教育中控制結構與資源分配差異的探究。社會文化學報,6,43-73。  延伸查詢new window
4.駱明慶(20041200)。升學機會與家庭背景。經濟論文叢刊,32(4),417-445。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許嘉猷、黃毅志、陸先恆(20020600)。跨越階級界限?:兼論「黑手變頭家」的實證研究結果及與歐美社會之一些比較。臺灣社會學刊,27,1-59+61-71+73-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊,29(2),117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.謝雨生、余淑(女宣)(19901200)。臺灣的社會階級結構及其流動。中國社會學刊,14,31-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡淑鈴、瞿海源(19920100)。臺灣教育階層化的變遷。國家科學委員會研究彙刊(人文及社會科學),2(1),98-118。  延伸查詢new window
9.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳乃德(19971200)。檳榔和拖鞋,西裝及皮鞋:臺灣階級流動的族群差異及原因。臺灣社會學研究,1,137-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳婉琪(20051200)。族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異。臺灣社會學,10,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Morgan, Philip S.、Teachman, Jay D.(1988)。Logistic Regression: Descriptions, Examples, and Comparisons。Journal of Marriage and the Family,50,929-936。  new window
13.Tasiran, Ali、Tezic, Kerem.(2006)。Parental Income and Continuing Education of Second Generation Immigrants in Sweden。International Review of Applied Economics,20(4),491-514。  new window
會議論文
1.宋玫玫(2005)。公私立大專院校學生背景之差異。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳正昌(2005)。社會階層背景與大學入學機會。屛東。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Heath, Anthony、McMahon, Dorren.(1999)。Ethnic Differences in the Labour Market: The Role of Education and Social Class Origins。Glasgow, UK。  new window
2.Iannelli, Cristina、Paterson, Lindsay.(2005)。Education and Social Mobility in Scotland in the Twentieth Century。Edinburgh, UK。  new window
3.Heath, Anthony、Payne, Clive.(1999)。Twentieth Century Trend in Social Mobility in Britain。Glasgow, UK。  new window
圖書
1.Greene, William H.(2003)。Econometric analysis。Prentice Education。  new window
2.Goldthorpe, John H.(1987)。Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Feinberg, Stephen.(2007)。The Analysis of Cross-classified Categorical Data。New York:Springer。  new window
5.Weber, Max、Guenther Roth、Claus Wittich .(1968)。Economy and Society。Berkeley。  new window
其他
1.華人家庭硏究計畫(1999)。華人家庭動態資料庫,台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kunze, Astrid,Troske, Kenneth R.(2007)。Comparative Advantage or Discrimination? Studying Male-Female Wage Differentials Using Displaced Workers,Bonn: IZA。  new window
3.Raffe, David,Croxford, Linda,Iannelli, Cristina,Shapira, Marina,Howieson, Cathy.(2006)。Social-Class Inequalities in Education in England and Scotland,Edinburgh, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE