臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學生同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：趙梅如 引用關係／王世億
作者(外文)：Chao, Mei-ru／Wang, Shyh-yih
出版日期：2013
卷期：44:4
頁次：頁829-850+852
主題關鍵詞：友誼品質；同性友誼；性別差異；Friendship quality；Gender difference；Same-sex friendship
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:439
  • 點閱點閱:125
友誼是社會關係中很受重視的人際關係。若依據Erikson的觀點，個體生命的發展任務直到青年期，真正進入與人建立關係的「親密對疏離」，就目前的年齡而言，大學生正是這個時期的發展個體。如果友誼在個體的生命實現中如此重要，那麼，在台灣地區的大學生會有怎樣的友誼品質？友誼有性別差異嗎？大部分的研究顯示女生的社會情感興趣高於男生，重視彼此的親密分享與感受；男生則著重於社會工具性，對於從事具體活動較為活躍。本研究旨在探討同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析，並以台灣地區463位大學生為研究對象。本研究結果發現如下：1.同性友誼品質之內涵為交心、義氣、默契、扶持；2.除了義氣顯現無差異外，其餘交心、默契與扶持之同性友誼品質，女生皆高於男生；3.對於同性友誼品質之重視，男生依序為交心、扶持、義氣、默契，女生依序為扶持、交心、義氣、默契；不論男生或女生，交心與扶持皆為最被重視的同性友誼品質，而默契皆為四項同性友誼品質中之最後者。從研究結果發現台灣地區大學生的同性友誼與國外的發現有著相異的趣味。
Friendship is the most respectful relationship among social relations. According to Erikson's conceptual theory, an individual's life mission develops until the adolescent age. University students are at the stage of constructing the relationships among people's ”intimacy vs. isolation”. If friendships are such important aspects of one's life, what are the friendship qualities for Taiwanese university students? Are there gender differences in friendships? Most of the studies have shown that girls are interested in the social situations and respect each other's intimate sharing and feelings more than boys and; boys focus more on social tools and are more actively engaged in specific activities. The goal of this study is to confirm the connotation of same-sex friendship quality and analyze gender differences based on 463 university students in Taiwan. The results indicated: (1) The connotation of same-sex friendship quality includes genuineness, personal loyalty, tacit understanding, and support. (2) Except personal loyalty, female students show higher agreement on the connotation of the same-sex friendship quality, such as genuineness, tacit understanding, and support, than male students. (3) In terms of the importance of these same-sex friendship qualities, for male students, the order is as follows: genuineness, support, personal loyalty, and tacit understanding. For female students, the order is support, genuineness, personal loyalty, and tacit understanding. Across both genders, genuineness and support are the most emphasized same-sex friendship qualities, and tacit understanding is the least emphasized one among the four same-sex friendship qualities. Based on the research results, Taiwanese university students' same-sex friendship values have interesting differences compared with studies from other countries.
期刊論文
1.趙梅如(200808)。圖畫情境式親子互動關係型態的內涵建構與量表編製--爸爸版與媽媽版。測驗學刊，55(2)，213-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭婉珠、Schneider,Barry H.(200106)。兒童友誼建立的因素及其穩定性的探討：臺灣社會及加拿大社會的比較研究。文教新潮，6(2)，9-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.Afifi, T. D.、Steuber, K.(2010)。The cycle of concealment model。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，27(8)，1019-1034。  new window
4.Austin, M. C.、Thompson, G. G.(1948)。Children’s friendship: A study of the base on which children select and reject their best friends。Journal of Educational Psychology，39(2)，101-116。  new window
5.Bandalos, D. L.(2008)。Is parcelling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parcelling and categorical variable methodology。Structural Equation Modeling，15(2)，211-240。  new window
6.Bell, R. A.、Daly, J. A.(1984)。The affinity-seeking function of communication。Communication Monographs，51(2)，91-115。  new window
7.Bemdt, T. J.、Perry, T. B.(1986)。Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships。Developmental Psychology，22(5)，640-648。  new window
8.Bigelow, B. J.(1977)。Children’s friendship expectations: A cognitive-developmental study。Child Development，48，246-253。  new window
9.Chao, M. R.(2011)。The verification of the structure of family interaction relation types and the differences of parent-child interactions。Social Behavior and Personality，39(7)，897-914。  new window
10.Chapman, J. W.、Tunmer, W. E.(1995)。Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement。Journal of Educational Psychology，87(1)，154-167。  new window
11.Chu, J. Y.(2005)。Adolescent boy’s friendships and peer group culture。New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development，107，7-22。  new window
12.De Goede, I. H. A.、Branje, S. J. T.、Meeus, W. H. J.(2009)。Developmental changes and gender differences in adolescents, perceptions of friendships。Journal of Adolescence，32，1105-1123。  new window
13.Furman, W.、Bierman, K. L.(1983)。Developmental changes in young children's conceptions of friendship。Child Development，54，549-556。  new window
14.Furman, W.、Buhrmester, D.(1985)。Children’s perceptions of the personal relationship in their social networks。Developmental Psychology，21，1016-1024。  new window
15.Hays, R. B.(1984)。The development and maintenance of friendship。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，1，75-98。  new window
16.Honeycutt, J. M.、Patterson, J.(1997)。Affinity strategies in relationships: The role of gender and imagined interactions in maintaining liking among college roommates。Personal Relationships，4，35-46。  new window
17.Jenkins, S. R.、Goodness, K.、Buhrmester, D.(2002)。Gender differences in early adolescents' relationship qualities, self-efficacy, and depression symptoms。Journal of Early Adolescence，22(3)，277-309。  new window
18.Johnson, H. D.(2004)。Gender, grade, and relationship differences in emotional closeness within adolescent friendships。Adolescence，59(154)，243-255。  new window
19.Lempers, J. D.、Clark-Lempers, D. S.(1992)。Young, middle, and late adolescents’ comparison of the functional importance of five important relationships。Journal of Youth and Adolescence，2，53-96。  new window
20.Locraft, C.、Teglasi, H.(1997)。Teacher rated empathic behaviors and children’s TAT stories。Journal of School Psychology，35(2)，217-237。  new window
21.Matsunaga, M.(2008)。Item parceling in Structural Equation Modeling: A primer。Communication Methods and Measures，2(4)，260-293。  new window
22.Nasser, F.、Takahashi, T.(2003)。The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason’s Reactions to Tests。Applied Measurement in Education，16，75-97。  new window
23.Oswald, D. L.、Clark, E. M.、Kelly, C. M.(2004)。Friendship maintenance: An analysis of individual and dyad behaviors。Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology，23(3)，413-441。  new window
24.Rose, A. J.、Asher, S. R.(1999)。Children’s goals and strategies in response of conflicts within a friendship。Developmental Psychology，35(1)，69-79。  new window
25.Rose, S.、Serafica, F.(1986)。Keeping and ending casual, close and best friendships。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，3，275-288。  new window
26.Rushton, J. P.、Brainerd, C. J.、Pressley, M.(1983)。Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation。Psychological Bulletin，94，18-38。  new window
27.Tam, B. K. Y.、Bond, M. H.(2002)。Interpersonal behaviors and friendship in a Chinese culture。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，5(1)，63-74。  new window
28.Tsui, A. S.、Farh, J. L.(1997)。Where guanxi matters: relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context。Work and Occupations，24，56-79。  new window
29.Windle, M.(1994)。A study of friendship characteristics and problem behaviors among middle adolescents。Child Development，65(6)，1764-1777。  new window
30.Wong, S. C. H.、Bond, M. H.(1999)。Personality, self-disclosure and friendship between Chinese university roommates。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，2(2)，201-214。  new window
31.趙梅如、鍾思嘉(20040300)。觀點取替故事同理心量表的發展。中華輔導學報，15，39-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.李美枝(20011200)。手足與朋友關係的內涵與功能--從猩種與人種的表現看演化的藍圖與文化的加工。本土心理學研究，16，135-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.林建良、黃台珠、吳裕益(20081200)。促進知識整合的網路學習環境量表發展。科學教育學刊，16(6)，605-626。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Maccoby, E. E.(1990)。Gender and Relationship: A Developmental Account。American Psychologist，45(4)，513-520。  new window
35.陳李綢(20090900)。「中學生人際關係量表」之發展。測驗學刊，56(3)，343-368。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳密桃、李新民、黃秀霜(20071200)。臺灣地區國民小學教師實用智能、情緒智能與專業表現之相關研究。教育心理學報，39(2)，295-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Meade, A. W.、Kroustalis, C. M.(2006)。Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance。Organizational Research Methods，9(3)，369-403。  new window
38.楊宜音(20000600)。「自己人」：一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。本土心理學研究，13，277-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.林慧姿、程景琳(20061200)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報，38(2)，177-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.李美枝(19980600)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例。本土心理學研究，9，3-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Rubio, Doris McGartland、Berg-Weger, Maria、Tebb, Susan S.(2001)。Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，8(4)，613-626。  new window
42.葉光輝、鄭欣佩、楊永瑞(20050600)。母親的後設情緒理念對國小子女依附傾向的影響。中華心理學刊，47(2)，181-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.楊中芳(19991200)。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。本土心理學研究，12，105-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Little, Todd D.、Cunningham, William A.、Shahar, Golan、Widaman, Keith F.(2002)。To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，9(2)，151-173。  new window
45.莊耀嘉、楊國樞(19970600)。角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究，7，282-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，10(4)，622-647。  new window
47.李美枝、鍾秋玉(19961200)。性別與性別角色析論。本土心理學研究，6，260-299。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.彭泗清、楊中芳(19991200)。人際交往關係的影響因素與發展過程。本土心理學研究，12，289+291-312。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.Bukowski, W. M.、Hoza, B.、Boivin, M.(1994)。Measuring Friendship Quality during Pre-and Early Adolescence: The Development and Psychometric Properties of the Friendship Quality Scale。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，11，471-484。  new window
會議論文
1.La Gaipa, J.、Wood, H.(1973)。The perception of friendship by socially accepted and rejected children。The meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association。Washington, D. C。  new window
學位論文
1.羅品欣(2004)。國小學童的家庭結構、親子互動關係、情緒智力與同儕互動關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王慶福(1995)。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bukowski, W. M.、Hoza, B.(1989)。Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcomes。Peer relationships in child development。New York, NY：John Wiley。  new window
2.Galambos, N. L.(2004)。Gender and gender role development in adolescence。Handbook of adolescent psychology。New York, NY：John Wiley。  new window
3.Selman, R. L.(1980)。The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analysis。New York：Academic Press。  new window
4.Fehr, Berverley(1996)。Friendship Processes。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
5.Stearns, Peter N.(1990)。Be a man! Males in modern society。New York：Holmes & Meier。  new window
6.Shaffer, D. R.(2000)。Social and Personality Development。Belmont, C.A.：Wadsworth。  new window
7.Erikson, E. H.(1964)。Insight and Responsibility。New York：Norton & Company。  new window
8.費孝通(1991)。鄉土中國．鄉土重建。上海：香港：上海書店：三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
10.陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.Teglasi, H.(2001)。Essentials of TAT and Other Storytelling Techniques Assessment。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
12.Kindlon, D.、Thompson, M.(1999)。Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys。New York：Ballantine Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bandalos, D. L.、Finney, S. J.(2001)。Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling。New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling。Lawrence Erlbanm Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：531（臺灣：530，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67227795
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上