美國多層次補救教學鑑定模式之評析__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	美國多層次補救教學鑑定模式之評析
書刊名：	當代教育研究季刊
作者：	呂偉白
作者(外文)：	Lu, Wei-pai
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	22:1
頁次：	頁87-126
主題關鍵詞：	學習障礙；多層次補救教學鑑定模式；介入反應；特殊教育；Learning disabilities；Multi-tiered instructional model；Response-to-intervention；RTI；Special education
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:88 點閱:220

多層次補救教學的鑑定模式（Response-To-Intervention, RTI）近年來在美國教育界廣受討論。美國於2004年開始正式立法將RTI列為特殊教育評估的一部份，以協助決定學生是否符合學習障礙的分類標準。RTI之所以受到重視，主要是因為學習障礙的鑑定一直存在著很大的爭議。傳統以「智商－成就」之間的差距來學習障礙鑑定模式受到批評，因為這種模式無法將學習障礙學生從一般低成就學生中區分出來；此外，這樣的模式也讓無法達到鑑定標準的低成就學生坐等失敗。在RTI的鑑定模式中，普通教育教師與特殊教育教師攜手合作，使用研究證實有效的教學法來定期監督學生的進步情形；如果學生經過多個階段還是無法達到預定目標的，則認定其為需要特殊教育服務的學習障礙學生。然而RTI是否真的解決了所有傳統學習障礙鑑定模式的舊問題，答案仍然十分模糊，學者之間對於RTI模式的成效也有不同看法，有些學者認為應該審慎的且全面性的評估不同RTI模式的成效。本文回顧有關RTI出現的歷史背景、不同模式間的異同以及其在學習障礙鑑定上所扮演的角色和所產生的一些新的問題，希冀能經由美國的他山之石，對於我國未來實施RTI的可能性，提供更深入、更多元的省思。

以文找文

In 2004, the United States revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, allowing schools to use a new educational model, Response to Intervention (RTI), to identify students with learning disabilities eligible for special education. Since then, there has been much discussion in the American educational field about this model.The RTI model requires general education teachers and special education teachers to cooperate with each other and to deliver evidence-based instruction to students while systematically monitoring students' progress. Only those students who cannot meet particular goals can receive special education services.Many see the RTI model as a response to long-lasting controversy regarding the identification of learning disabilities; it is viewed as an improvement over the previous model, the discrepancy model. One group of researchers has argued that the discrepancy model is not capable of distinguishing students with learning disabilities from those with low achievement. The discrepancy model has also been criticized as a ”wait-to-fail” model because schools must wait until students' performances are low enough before they can provide intervention.The introduction of RTI has led to significant changes in the American educational system. For example, it requires all educators to focus on students' performance. The model has potential to provide every child the opportunity to successfully learn in school. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that it can solve all problems related to the identification of learning disabilities.This article first reviews the fundamentals of RTI, then goes on to evaluate various effects of the model, and finally discusses potential challenges in RTI implementation. It is hoped that this article can help educators in Taiwan to use the experiences in the United States to rethink the Taiwanese model of identification and remediation for students with learning disabilities.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	O'Connor, R.(2000)。Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade。Learning Disabilities Research & Practice，15(1)，43-54。
2.	Fuchs, D.、Fuchs, L. S.(2006)。Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?。Reading Research Quarterly，41(1)，93-99。
3.	吳姍錞(20091100)。早期療育暨幼兒教育的探討--以RTI模式為例。新生學報，5，91-104。延伸查詢
4.	Wu, S.-C.(2009)。The approaches of early intervention and preschool education-Example of RTI model。Journal of Hsin Sheng，5，91-104。
5.	林葙葙(2010)。dRTI向下延伸之新趨勢--介入反應模式在幼兒階段之應用。特教論壇，8，1-14。延伸查詢
6.	Chen, S.-L.、Zeng, S.-J.、Hung, L.-Y.(2006)。The effectiveness of a remedial reading program for underachieving aboriginal students in Taiwan。Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education，51(2)，1-27。
7.	黃瑋苓(20081200)。介入反應模式在鑑定學習障礙方面的運用。特教論壇，5，頁27-42。延伸查詢
8.	蔡元隆、侯相如(20090600)。提升弱勢族群教育機會均等的教育政策分析：以課業輔導夜光天使點燈專案計畫為例。研習資訊，26:3，頁47-54。延伸查詢
9.	鄭麗雪(2010)。教學反應（RTI)--學習障礙鑑定的新趨勢。國小特殊教育，49，99-106。延伸查詢
10.	蕭偉智(20091200)。普教與特教的接軌--談攜手計畫與介入反應模式(RTI)。中等教育，60(4)，134-147。延伸查詢
11.	Ardoin, S. P.、Witt, J. C.、Connell, J. E.(2005)。Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services.Journal of。Psychoeducational Assessment，23，362-380。
12.	Badian, N. A.(1994)。Do dyslexic and other poor readers differ in reading- related cognitive skills。Reading and Writing，6(1)，45-63。
13.	Compton, D. L.、Fuchs, D.、Fuchs, L. S.、Bryant, J. D.(2006)。Selecting at- risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures。Journal of Educational Psychology，98，394-409。
14.	Conway, S. J.(1998)。A model for statewide special education reform: Pennsylvanias instructional support teams。.International Journal of Educational Reform,，7，345-351。
15.	Felton, R. H.(1992)。Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education，12，212-229。
16.	Foorman, B. R.(2001)。Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，16，203-212。
17.	Fuchs, D.、Compton, D. L.、Fuchs, L. S.(2008)。Making "secondary intervention" work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study at the National Research Center on learning disabilities。Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal，21，413-436。
18.	Fuchs, D.、Fuchs, L. S.、Harris, A. H.(1996)。Bridging the research-to practice gap with mainstream assistance teams: A cautionary tale。School Psychology Quarterly，11，244-266。
19.	Fuchs, L. S.、Compton, D. L.、Fuchs, D.、Paulsen, K.、Bryant, J. D.、Hamlett, C. L.(2005)。The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty。Journal of Educational Psychology，97(3)，493-513。
20.	Gersten, R.(2006)。RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties。Reading Research Quarterly，41，99-108。
21.	Hallahan, D. P.(2008)。Many students with learning disabilities are not receiving special education。Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal，15，3-10。
22.	Hollenbeck, A. F.(2006)。From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，22(2)，137-146。
23.	Hosp, J. L.、Reschly, D. J.(2003)。Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences。Journal of Special Education，37(2)，67-80。
24.	Hungerford, R. H.(1950)。On Locusts。American Journal of Mental Deficiency，54，415-418。
25.	Kauffman, J. M.。Appearances, stigma, and prevention。Remedial and Special Education，24，195-198。
26.	McCardle, P.、Scarborough, H. S.。preventing childrens reading difficulties。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，16，230-239。
27.	Mellard, D. F.、Tollefson, J. M.(2004)。Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to- intervention sites。Learning Disability Quarterly，27，243-256。
28.	Ofiesh, N.(2006)。Response to intervention and the identification of specific learning disabilities: Why we need comprehensive evaluations as part of the process。Psychology in the Schools，43，883-888。
29.	Reschly, D. J.(2005)。Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what。Journal of Learning Disabilities，38，510-515。
30.	Smith, A.(2005)。Witnessing Brown: Pursuit of an equity agenda in American education。Remedial and Special Education，26，270-280。
31.	Speece, D. L.、Case, L. P.(2001)。Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability。Journal of Educational Psychology，93，735-749。
32.	Speece, D. L.(2002)。How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，17，118-123。
33.	Torgesen, J. K.、Wagner, R. K.(1997)。Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind.Scientific。Studies of Reading，1，217-234。
34.	胡永崇(200511)。以教學反應(RTI)作為學習障礙學生鑑定標準之探討。屏師特殊教育，11，1-9。延伸查詢
35.	National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities(2005)。Committee on Learning Disabilities. Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities。Learning Disability Quarterly，28，249-260。
36.	Marston, D.、Muyskens, P.、Lau, M.、Canter, A.(2003)。Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience。Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice，18(3)，187-200。
37.	Vaughn, S.、Fuchs, L. S.(2003)。Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems。Learning Disabilities Research & Practice，18(3)，137-146。
38.	Dunn, L. M.(1968)。Special Education for the Mildly Retarded: Is Much of It Justifiable?。Exceptional Children，35(1)，5-24。
39.	Vellutino, F. R.、Scanlon, D. M.、Sipay, E. R.、Small, S. G.、Pratt, A.、Chen, R.、Denckla, M. B.(1996)。Cognitive Profiles of Difficult-to-remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers: Early Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing between Cognitive and Experiential Deficits as Basic Causes of Specific Reading Disability。Journal of Educational Psychology，88(4)，601-638。
40.	Speece, D. L.、Case, L. P.、Molloy, D. E.(2003)。Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification。Learning Disabilities Research & Practice，18(3)，147-156。
41.	Kavale, K. A.、Holdnack, J. A.、Mostert, M. P.(2005)。Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal。Learning Disabilities Quarterly，28(1)，2-16。
42.	Vaughn, S.、Linan-Thompson, S.、Hickman, P.(2003)。Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities。Exceptional Children，69(4)，391-409。
43.	Mercer, C. D.、Jordan, L.、Allsopp, D. H.、Mercer, A. R.(1996)。Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments。Learning Disability Quarterly，19(4)，217-232。
44.	洪儷瑜、何淑玫(20100600)。「介入反應」在特殊教育的意義與應用。特殊教育季刊，115，1-13。延伸查詢
45.	Juel, Connie(1988)。Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades。Journal of Educational Psychology，80(4)，437-447。
46.	Scruggs, T. E.、Mastropieri, M. A.(2002)。On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities。Learning Disability Quarterly，25(3)，155-168。
47.	Torgesen, J. K.、Alexander, A. W.、Wagner, R. K.、Rashotte, C. A.、Voeller, K. K.、Conway, T.(2001)。Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches。Journal of Learning Disabilities，34(1)，33-58。
48.	陳淑麗、洪儷瑜、曾世杰(20070600)。轉介前介入在學障鑑定之可行性研究：以原住民低成就國小學童為例。特殊教育研究學刊，32(2)，47-66。延伸查詢
49.	Deno, Evelyn N.(1970)。Special Education as Developmental Capital。Exceptional Children，37(3)，229-237。
50.	陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(20061000)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報. 教育類，51(2)，147-171。延伸查詢
51.	Francis, D. J.、Shaywitz, S. E.、Stuebing, K. K.、Shaywitz, B. A.、Fletcher, J. M.(1996)。Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis。Journal of Educational Psychology，88，3-17。
52.	Fuchs, D.、Mock, D.、Morgan, P. L.、Young, C. L.(2003)。Responsiveness to Intervention: Definition, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct。Learning disabilities Research & Practice，18，157-171。

會議論文
1.	Gerber, M. M.(2003)。Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies of identifying children with learning disabilities.。National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium。Kansas, MO。
2.	Gloeckler, L. C.(2003)。The feasibility and consequences of implementing RtI: A discussion of paper presented by Reschly and Gerber. Paper presented at。National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to- Intervention Symposium。
3.	Tilly, D.(2003)。How many tiers are needed for successful prevention and early intervention: Heartland area education agencyâs evolution from four to three tiers.。National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium,。Kansas, MO。
4.	Vellutino, F. R.、Scanlon, D. M.、Small, S.(2003)。Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention.。National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium Kansas, MO.。

圖書
1.	Bradley, R.、Danielson, L.(2002)。Identification of learning disabilities。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
2.	Compton, D.(2003)。RTI: Itâs all about the nudge. Paper presented at National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium。Kansas, MO。
3.	Flesch, Rudolf(1955)。Why Johnny can't read: And what you can do about it。New York：Harper and Row。
4.	Foorman, B. R.(2003)。Preventing and remediating reading difficulties。Baltimore, MD：York Press。
5.	McMaster, K. L.、Fuchs, D.(2003)。Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. paper presented at National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium。Kansas, MO。
6.	Sternberg, R. J.(1999)。Our labeled children: Whatery parent and teacher needs to know about learning disabilities。Cambridge, MA：Perseus。
7.	Torgesen, J. K.(2003)。Operationalizing the response to intervention model to identify children with learning disabilities: Specific issues with older children.。
8.	National Institute of Child Health and Human Development(2000)。Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction。Washington, DC：National Institute of Child Health and Human Development。
9.	Hallahan, D. P.、Lloyd, J. W.、Kauffman, J. M.、Weiss, M. P.、Martinez, E. A.(2005)。Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching。Allyn & Bacon。

其他
1.	Jose, L. M.。Legal implications of response to intervention and special education identification.，http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/legal-implications-of-response-to-intervention-and-special-education-identification。
2.	Silverman, J.(2008)。Catching problems early, schools try to avoid special ed，http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-04-21-special- ed_n.htm。
3.	Tomsho, B.(2007)。Is an early-help program shortchanging kids?，http:// online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB118721849477198989。

圖書論文
1.	Chalfant, J. C.(1989)。Diagnostic criteria for entry and exit from service: A national problem.。The assessment of learning disabilities: Preschool through adulthood。Boston, MA：College-Hill。
2.	Fletcher, J. M.、Barnes, M.、Stuebing, K. K.、Francis, D. J.、Olson, R. K.(2002)。Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence- based evaluation. Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associations。
3.	Hallahan, D. P.(2002)。Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice。Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice。Mahwah, NJ：Erlbaum。
4.	Keogh, B. K.(2002)。Foreword.。Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associations。
5.	McCardle, P.(2004)。Next steps in the study of genetics and language disorders. Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies。Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associations。
6.	Reschly, D. J.(1999)。Reform trends and system design alternatives.。Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming。Longmont, CO：Sopris West。
7.	Scarborough, H. S.(1998)。Early Identification of Children at Risk for Reading Disabilities: Phonological Awareness and Some Other Promising Predictors。Specific Reading Disability: A View of the Spectrum。Timonium, MD：York Press。
8.	Stainback, S.、Stainback, W.(1996)。Schools as inclusive communities. Controversial issues confronting special education divergent perspectives。Controversial issues confronting special education divergent perspectives。Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	知識結構的電腦化適性診斷測驗數位平臺應用於國小數學補救教學成效之研究
2.	課中補救教學對學生數學學習動機的動態影響
3.	重思學習障礙之定義與鑑定：一個特殊教育社會學的觀點
4.	「我」對「他們」：都會弱勢國中生公民素養之研究
5.	課文本位閱讀策略教學對原住民國小學童閱讀理解與詞彙理解的影響
6.	國小自閉症資優生多階層校本方案運作模式之探究
7.	以漫畫提升二年級語文低成就兒童的中文閱讀理解
8.	以同儕輔助學習策略之次級介入提升國小學生語文能力：試探性研究
9.	補救或補償--輔助科技介入前決策與判斷之思辨以自閉症手寫問題之個案為例
10.	蒙特梭利語文教育對部落與非部落原住民幼兒語文能力影響之研究
11.	國語文補救教學長期介入對低年級低成就學生的影響
12.	同儕輔助學習策略對提升國小三年級學生語文能力表現之研究：差異化教學之本土實踐
13.	原住民族國中學生學習態度及學校歸屬感影響因素之探究
14.	學習障礙、情緒行為障礙及自閉症學生轉介與篩選現況調查研究--以新北市為例
15.	新北市國民中小學教育階段融合教育政策評估之研究

1.	讀者劇場應用於國中英語低成就學生之方案評鑑-----包容性評鑑取向之運用
2.	成功專案推動歷程之研究：民國103至104年
3.	國民教育階段融合教育政策評估指標之建構及其應用
4.	教學反應模式在國中閱讀障礙鑑定系統之建構
5.	同儕教導卡通閱讀教學在小一學童識字能力及錯誤類型之研究
6.	學習障礙學生之智力組型與基本學業表現暨影響學障研判決策因素之探討
7.	國小四年級兒童的學業語言與語言學習經驗之個案研究
8.	弱勢家庭學前兒童啟蒙服務政策之執行與評估研究
9.	國小一年級閱讀障礙高危險群學童三種介入模式之成效探究
10.	應用教學反應模式對國小學習障礙學生鑑定之研究
11.	國民中小學情緒行為障礙學生多元介入團隊模式之研究

1.	學習障礙與補救教學 : 教師及家長實用手冊
2.	弱勢學童讀寫希望工程 : 課輔現場的瞭解與改造
3.	數學學習障礙
4.	網路ECBM系統對國小學障兒童學習診斷與教學之研究
5.	阿挺的語言蛻變：學障數理資優學生輔導實例
6.	閱讀障礙研究之歷史與發展趨勢
7.	快速唸名與閱讀障礙

無相關著作

1.	透過詞彙教學方案增加低成就學童閱讀能力
2.	城鄉學生學習落差現況、成因及政策建議
3.	歐盟與臺灣補救教學政策之比較研究：以中輟為例
4.	臺灣新移民女性母職角色之探討--家庭生命週期觀點的分析
5.	新移民子女國小國語文學習成就大型評量調查研究
6.	影響國中經濟弱勢學生之學業表現與中輟傾向之因素：以「脈絡-自我-行動-結果」之動機發展自我系統模式為取向
7.	臺灣新移民與本國籍子女隨年級的學習成果差異
8.	從一位新住民青少年之傑出表現瞭解其母親的教養態度
9.	華語流行曲歌詞介入讀寫障礙學生語文學習之初探與實務分享
10.	教育的本質：從教育的目的、功用與歷程探析之
11.	東南亞裔新移民女性之子女的學業成就真的比較差嗎？與本地對照組比較之三年追蹤探究
12.	應用決策樹探討中學生學習成就的相關因素
13.	與八年級課程同步實施的數學補救教學：成效與反思
14.	臺北地區大學生離婚態度研究
15.	家長社經背景對子女教養行為的影響--以個人價值觀與教育目的認知為中介變項

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫