:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:你怕變老嗎?--年輕族群對老化的概念、意向與成因
書刊名:社會發展研究學刊
作者:王怡分
作者(外文):Wang, Yi Fen
出版日期:2014
卷期:15
頁次:頁48-71
主題關鍵詞:老化老化概念老化意向AgingAging conceptAging image
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:180
  • 點閱點閱:106
隨著我國老人人口數與國民平均壽命的增加,民眾將要面對的是漫長的高齡長壽生活。然而人們是否害怕「變老」呢?對於「老化」到底存在著怎樣的概念和看法?相關研究指出,越是年輕的族群,越是具有老年恐慌的現象,但隨著年齡的增長,越是認為老化是人生必經的歷程。因此,本研究採取質性研究的取向,訪談10位20歲至40歲的年輕族群,主要研究結果包括:一、年輕族群對於老化的生理層面,持有較負面的概念;二、年輕族群對於老化的心理層面,其概念呈現出兩極化的差異;三、年輕族群對於老化的社會層面,傾向較正面的概念;四、形成老化概念與意向的原因,最主要與家人的影響有關;五、年輕族群大多還未開始為老年生活做規劃與準備。
With the increasing of aging people and longer lifespan and aging, we face a problem: How do we deal with the seeming long life in the old age? This phenomenon tells us the coming of an aging world. Obviously, people present and future seem to enjoy a longer life than any generation in the past. However, how do people live the long-lasting life? Aging is a phase with the decline and loss of physical functions and poor health. Moreover, young generations may have a bias against aging, regarding old people as a weak, old-fashioned, and non-negotiable. Based on this phenomenon, this study aims at exploring the concept and image of aging from the perspective of young adults. This study adopts semi-structured interview of qualitative study as the study method, and interviews with 10 various participants aged between 20 and 40 in the manner of purposive sampling. This study finds that: (A) Young generations tend to have a rather negative concept of physical aging; (B) Young generations hold polarized attitudes towards the concept of psychological aging; (C) Young generations seem to hold a rather positive attitude towards the concept of social aging; (D) The causes of aging image is influenced by family; (E) Most young adults haven’t prepared for their aging life.
期刊論文
1.Aday, R. H.、Sims, C. R.、Evans, E.(1991)。Youth’s attitudes toward the elderly: The impact of intergenerational partners。Journal of Gerontology,10,372-384。  new window
2.Ausherman, J. A.、White, D. M.、Chenier, T. C.(1991)。Junior high health teachers' knowledge and attitudes about aging and implementation of aging education。Educational Gerontology,17(4),391-401。  new window
3.黃錦山(20090600)。不同年齡層民眾對高齡者印象之比較研究。成人及終身教育學刊,12,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Iverson, T. N.、Larsen, L.、Solem, P. E.(2009)。A conceptual analysis of ageism。Nordic Psychology,61(3),4-22。  new window
5.李宗派(20040400)。老化理論與老人保健。身心障礙研究,2(2),77-94。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊桂鳳、劉銀隆、于漱(20041000)。老年人的形象:世代間的比較。醫護科技學刊,6(4),371-384。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃台珠(19840100)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育,66,44-56。  延伸查詢new window
8.李宗派(20071200)。老化概念(1):生物科學之老化理論。臺灣老人保健學刊,3(2),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊,20(5),548-570。  延伸查詢new window
10.林美珍(19930900)。大學生對老人態度之研究。教育與心理研究,16,349-383。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陸洛、陳欣宏(20020600)。臺灣變遷社會中老人的家庭角色調適及代間關係之初探。應用心理研究,14,221-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭祥益(1996)。中年期成人發展任務之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳榮彬(2009)。老化認知教學對國小學童老人意象影響之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳美雯(2009)。青少年之老人歧視研究--以中興新村地區為例(碩士論文)。南開科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉雪芬(2009)。不同世代成人對老人歧視之比較研究--以桃竹苗社區大學為例(碩士論文)。玄奘大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Davis, N. C.(2006)。The relationship of ageism and life satisfaction in a large intergenerational group of adults(博士論文)。The University of West Florida。  new window
6.黃郁芬(2007)。老化教育課程對高職女生老化知識與對老人態度影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝廣全(2009)。技職院校學生老化知識、對老人態度與服務老人意願關係之研究(博士論文)。高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蔡文輝(2008)。老年社會學。臺北市:三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.McTavish, D. G.(1971)。Retirement marriage。Storrs, CT:University of Connecticut Press。  new window
3.Thomas, T.、Hallebone, E.(1996)。Adolescents’ attitudes towards older people and their relationships with grandparents。Melbourne:Australian Research Council, Key Centre in Gerontology, La Trobe University。  new window
4.Palmore, Erdman B.(1999)。Ageism: Negative and Positive。New York:Springer Publishing Company。  new window
5.Blackburn, J. L.、Dulmus, C. N.(2007)。Handbook of Gerontology: Evidence-based approaches to theory, practice and policy。NJ, Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
6.Cavanaugh, J. C.、Whitboume, S. K.(1999)。Gerontology: An interdisciplinary perspective。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Erber, J. T.(2010)。Aging and old adulthood。Malden, MA:Wiley Blackwell。  new window
8.Louis Harris & Associates(1975)。The Myth and Reality of Aging in America。Washington, D. C.:The National Council on the Aging, Inc。  new window
9.邱天助(1993)。教育老年學。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.王文科(2002)。教育研究法--教育研究的理論與實際。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃振隆(1994)。終生教育新論。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱天助(20020000)。老年符號與建構:老人研究的社會文化轉折。臺北市:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃富順(20120000)。高齡心理學。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃富順、陳如山、黃慈(20060000)。成人發展與適應。臺北:國立空中大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.葉重新(2004)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
16.徐麗君、蔡文輝(1985)。老年社會學:理論與實務。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃富順、楊國德(2011)。高齡學。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
18.經建會(2006)。中華民國台灣民國95年至140年人口推計。台北:行政院經建會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部(2012)。簡易生命表及平均餘命查詢,http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Life/List.html, 2013/01/04。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部戶政司(2012)。中華民國102年台閩重要人口指標,http://www.ris.gov.tw/ch4/static/st27-1.html, 2013/01/04。  延伸查詢new window
3.World Health Organization(2002)。Active ageing: Apolicy framework,http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf, 2012/10/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cuddy, A. J. C.、Norton, M. I.、Fiske, S. T.(2002)。Doddering but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of older persons。Ageism: Steretyping and prejudice against older persons。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Levy, B. R.、Banaji, M. R.(2002)。Implicit ageism。Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
3.Palmore, E. B.(2005)。Response to ageism。Encyclopedia of ageism。New York:Haworth Reference。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE