:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生命教育合奏曲--大學與中學教師合作規劃與實施師資培育生命教育課程之行動研究
書刊名:生命教育研究
作者:王秀槐 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Hsiou-huai
出版日期:2016
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁75-112
主題關鍵詞:師資培育生命教育協同教學行動研究Teacher educationLife educationTeam teachingAction research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:116
  • 點閱點閱:38
研究者於一所綜合大學師資培育中心開設生命教育課程,邀請中學生命教育教師進行合作規劃、協同教學,並透過參與觀察、訪談、作業分析等方法,進行行動研究。本研究針對此一合作歷程,以合唱交響曲為喻進行闡述,包括下列六階段:一、前奏曲(合作契機):敘述雙方在合作前各自的發展脈絡與沿革,並說明教學合作理念;二、協奏曲(課程規劃):雙方共同規劃課程之歷程;三、大合唱(教學實施):雙方各司其職、相互配合,帶領師資生學習生命教育理論與實務教學技巧;四、掌聲響起(學習成果):師資生獲得自我生命反思成長、生命教育實務教學啟發,以及整合理論與實務的能力;五、迴旋曲(行動反思):研究者回顧課程規劃與實施,進行反思;六、繞梁之音:對未來的建議與展望。本研究透過開創協同教學模式,成功連結理論與實務,在生命教育師資培育上具有重要的實務價值。
This action research presented the process of collaboration between a university instructor and a group of high school teachers on a life education course offered to preservice students in a college teacher education program. The entire process was described as an analogy of orchestrated symphony with six phases: 1. Prologue: prior development and initiation of collaboration on both sides; 2. Concerto: actual collaboration on course planning; 3. Chorus: course implementation and actual instruction; 4. Bravo: pre-service students demonstrated the ability to integrate theory and practice of life education through selfreflection and lessen plan design; 5. Rondo: the instructor's reflection on the collaboration; 6. Epilogue: suggestions for future actions. This research established a new collaborative teaching model for life education in teacher education and successfully integrated theory and practice, thereby making unique contribution to the field.
期刊論文
1.Lewis, C.(2009)。What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study?。Educational Action Research,17(1),95-110。  new window
2.丁一顧(20111200)。大學與中學夥伴協作實施歷程與成效之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,4(2),45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Nuthall, G.(2004)。Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap。Harvard Educational Review,74(3),273-307。  new window
4.孫志麟(20091200)。大學與中小學夥伴關係發展的評析。教育實踐與研究,22(2),151-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王秀槐(20131200)。在「人生三問」中「為人」與「為師」:大學師資培育生命教育課程之規劃與實踐。生命教育研究,5(2),67-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳玉蘭(20030600)。論協同教學的實施與師資培育因應之道。教育科學期刊,3(1),57-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.謝曉雯、廖昭銘、林琬馨、蔡沛婕(20010500)。選擇--大四畢業生生涯選擇之心路歷程。國立空中大學社會科學學報,9,153-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王秀槐(20141200)。師生在生命困頓中相遇--師資培育生命教育課程的主題規劃與實踐行動研究。生命教育研究,6(2),63-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陶道毓、陳淑媛(20100300)。生命教育在校園。中等教育,61(1),20-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Coles, M.(2000)。The national SCITT: Teachers teaching teachers in training schools。Education 3-13,28(1),55-59。  new window
11.Korthagen, F. A. J.(2010)。Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning。Teaching and Teacher Education,26(1),98-106。  new window
12.Johnson, R. H.、Lobb, M. D.(1959)。Jefferson country, Colorado completes three-year study of staffing, changing class-size, programming and scheduling。National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin,43,57-78。  new window
13.孫效智(20090700)。臺灣生命教育的挑戰與願景。課程與教學,12(3),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Carr, W.(1980)。The gap between theory and practice。Journal of further and higher education,4(1),60-69。  new window
15.陳立言(20040900)。生命教育在臺灣之發展概況。哲學與文化,31(9)=364,21-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃源河(20101200)。熔合斷裂:搭起師資培育理論與實務鴻溝的橋樑。當代教育研究,18(4),1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫效智(2012)。大學生命教育的挑戰、理念與策略。「自主、靈性與大學生命教育」學術研討會,國立臺灣大學生命教育研發育成中心舉辦 。臺北。15-43。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.國立臺灣師範大學數學系(2008)。臺灣數學教師培育跨國研究報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫效智(2014)。生命教育融入十二年國民基本教育課程之研究子計畫四--高中階段生命教育課程的現況檢視、政策檢討與未來規劃之研究 (計畫編號:NAER-102-10-A-1-01-04-2-07)。臺北:國立臺灣大學生命教育研發育成中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hsieh, F. J.、Wang, T.-Y.、Hsieh, C.-J.、Tang, S.-J.、Chao, G.(2010)。A milestone of an international study in Taiwan teacher education: An international comparison of Taiwan mathematics teacher preparation (計畫編號:Taiwan TEDS-M 2008)。  new window
學位論文
1.朱亞琍(2010)。一位國小教師施行生命教育主題課程之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.傅佩榮(1980)。尋找生命的重心。臺北:洪建全教育文化基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Levine, M.(1992)。Professionalizing practice schools: Linking teacher education and school reform。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.郭靜晃(2007)。社會行為研究法。台北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nunan, David(1992)。Research methods in language learning。New York。  new window
5.Colburn, A.(1993)。Creating professional development schools。Bloomington, IN:Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation。  new window
6.Korthagen, F. A. J.、Kessels, J.、Koster, B.、Lagerwerf, B.、Wubbels, T.(2001)。Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
7.Mertler, C.(2008)。Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
8.Miller, William L.、Crabtree, Benjamin F.(1999)。Doing Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Maxwell, J. A.(1996)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage。  new window
其他
1.Sarkar Arani, M.,Fukaya, T.(2009)。Learning beyond boundaries: Japanese teachers leaning to reflect and reflecting to learn,http://www.childresearch.net/papers/school/2009_05.html。  new window
2.Riel, M.(2007)。Understanding action research,http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.王秀槐(2009)。多元入學管道下大學生科系選擇的確定度與滿意度。台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE