:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生學習投入對學習成就之影響:以閱讀投入為調節效果
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:蔡碩倉 引用關係吳聰能
作者(外文):Tsai, Shuo-changWu, Trong-neng
出版日期:2019
卷期:22:1=69
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:調節效果閱讀投入學習成就學習投入Moderating effectReading engagementAcademic achievementStudent engagement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:6
臺灣私校大學生常須面臨學貸壓力,甚至須自力負擔生活費用,故在求學期間需同時耗費打工時間已成為學習限制條件,而學生為了打工而翹課造成的學習投入減少,勢必影響在校學習成就。本研究以閱讀投入是否會對學習投入影響學習成就產生調節效果為主要研究目的,並以亞洲大學為研究對象,蒐集4,495位學生在學期間之缺曠課情形、圖書借閱及學習成績等資料,以階層迴歸方法進行實證分析。本研究獲得下列結論:一、大學生曠課次數愈多會導致班排名成績愈差,故應正視大學生低學習投入之存在問題,並擬定如何改善或補強學生學習投入的策略。二、曾有圖書借閱者之學業成績進入班排名前50%之勝算為不曾借閱圖書者之2.3倍,故教學設計應強化提升學生閱讀量之教學策略。三、高缺曠課族群輔以閱讀投入改善學業成績,會比低缺曠課族群來得有效,故針對低曠課族群學生,仍應嚴格要求學生提高到課率;對高曠課族群學生,則應輔以增加閱讀投入之學習補救措施。
Private university students in Taiwan often face the pressure of student loans and high cost of living, so they tend to work part-time while going to school. Skipping classes in order to work part-time might lead a student to decrease student engagement, which, in turn, affects academic achievement. The purpose of this study is to test whether reading engagement has a moderating effect on student engagement and academic achievement. We collected data from 4,495 Asia University students’ absenteeism rate, book borrowing records and academic performance, and then conducted empirical analysis using hierarchical regression methods. Research findings are as follows: 1. The higher the number of absenteeism, the worse the class ranking results. Therefore, we should face up to the problem of low student engagement of Taiwan’s college students and formulate strategies to improve student engagement. 2. Those who have borrowed books are 2.3 times more likely to be ranked the top half in their class than those who have not borrowed books. Therefore, strategies for improving reading engagement should be devised and integrated into teaching. 3. The method of using reading engagement to improve academic performance is more effective with high absenteeism rate students than with low absenteeism rate students. Therefore, low absenteeism rate students should be strictly required to increase their attendance rate and high absenteeism rate students should be assisted with more reading engagement.
期刊論文
1.Entwisle, D. R.、Alexander, K. L.、Olson, L. S.(2000)。Early Work histories of Urban Youth。American Sociological Review,65(2),279-297。  new window
2.Wigfield, A.、Guthrie, J. T.、Perencevich, K. C.、Taboada, A.、Klauda, S. L.、McRae, A.、Barbosa, P.(2008)。Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes。Psychology in the Schools,45(5),432-445。  new window
3.Goldsmith, P. A.(2004)。Schools' racial mix, students' optimism, and the Black-White and Latino-White achievement gaps。Sociology of Education,77(2),121-147。  new window
4.Guthrie, J. T.、Van Meter, P.、McCann, A. D.、Wigfield, A.、Bennett, L.、Poundstone, C. C.、Rice, M. E.、Fabishch, F. M.、Hunt, B.、Mitchell, A. M.(1996)。Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction。Reading Research Quarterly,31,306-332。  new window
5.Ainsworth, James W.(2002)。Why Does It Take a Village? The Mediation of Neighborhood Effects on Educational Achievement。Social Forces,81(1),117-152。  new window
6.Reeve, J.、Tseng, C.-M.(2011)。Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities。Contemporary Educational Psychology,36(4),257-267。  new window
7.Astin, A. W.(1984)。Student involvement: A development theory for higher education。Journal of College Student Development,40(5),518-529。  new window
8.Skinner, E. A.、Wellborn, J. G.、Connell, J. P.(1990)。What It Takes to Do Well in School and Whether I've Got It: A Process Model of Perceived Control and Children's Engagement and Achievement in School。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),22-32。  new window
9.Fredricks, Jennifer A.、Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.、Paris, Alison H.(2004)。School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence。Review of Educational Research,74(1),59-109。  new window
10.Skinner, E. A.、Kindermann, T. A.、Furrer, C. J.(2009)。A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children's Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom。Educational and Psychological Measurement,69(3),493-525。  new window
11.Sedaghat, M.、Abedin, A.、Hejazi, E.、Hassanabadi, H.(2011)。Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement。Procedia--Social and Behavioral Sciences,15,2406-2410。  new window
12.余民寧(20061200)。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究,73,11-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Centra, J. A.、Potter, D. A.(1980)。School and teacher effects: An interrelational model。Review of Educational Research,50(2),273-291。  new window
14.Kuh, G. D.(2003)。What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE。Change,35(2),24-32。  new window
15.Kuh, George D.(2009)。The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations。New Directions for Institutional Research,2009(141),5-20。  new window
16.Guthrie, J. T.、Alao, S.、Rinehart, J. M.(1997)。Literacy issues in focus: engagement in reading for young adolescents。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,40(6),438-446。  new window
17.Hallinan, M. T.(2001)。Sociological perspectives on black-white inequalities in American schooling。Sociology of Education,74,50-70。  new window
18.Connell, J. P.、Spencer, M. B.、Aber, J. L.(1994)。Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school。Child Development,65(2),493-506。  new window
19.詹孟儒(2018)。TWAEA 2018大學新生學習適應調查:「大學校院」、「技專校院」大不同。評鑑雙月刊,74,57-58。  延伸查詢new window
20.Kumar, S. S.、Shastry, P. M. M.(2018)。Analysis of student engagement and course completion in massive open online courses。Integrated Intelligent Computing, Communication and Security,771,447-458。  new window
21.Logan, J. R.、Minca, E.、Adar, S.(2012)。The geography of inequality: Why separate means unequal in American public schools。Sociology of Education,85(3),287-301。  new window
22.Manlove, J.(1998)。The influence of high school dropout and school disengagement on the risk of school-age pregnancy。Journal of Research on Adolescence,8(2),187-220。  new window
23.Marchand, G. C.、Furrer, C. J.(2014)。Formative, informative, and summative assessment: The relationship among curriculum-based measurement of reading, classroom engagement, and reading performance。Psychology in the Schools,51(7),659-676。  new window
24.Pulkka, A.-T.、Niemivirta, M.(2013)。In the eye of the beholder: Do adult students' achievement goal orientation profiles predict their perceptions of instruction and studying?。Studies in Educational Evaluation,39,133-143。  new window
25.Taggart, A.(2018)。Latina/o students in K-12 schools: A synthesis of empirical research on factors influencing academic achievement。Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,40(4),448-471。  new window
26.Tongsilp, A.(2013)。A path analysis of relationships between factors with achievement motivation of students of private universities in Bangkok, Thailand。Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,88,229-238。  new window
27.Valenzuela, J. P.、Gómez Vera, G.、Sotomayor, C.(2015)。The role of reading engagement in improving national achievement: An analysis of Chile's 2000-2009 PISA results。International Journal of Educational Development,40,28-39。  new window
28.Ward, A.、Stoker, H. W.、Murray-Ward, M.(1996)。Achievement and ability tests: Definition of the domain。Educational Measurement,2,2-5。  new window
29.Greene, Thomas G.、Marti, C. Nathan、McClenney, Kay(2008)。The effort-outcome gap: differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement。Journal of Higher Education,79(5),513-539。  new window
30.Walker, C. O.、Greene, B. A.(2009)。The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school。Journal of Educational Research,102(6),463-472。  new window
31.Williams, T.、Williams, K.、Kastberg, D.、Jocelyn, L.(2005)。Achievement and affect in OECD nations。Oxford Review of Education,31(4),517-545。  new window
32.Kahu, E. R.(2013)。Framing student engagement in higher education。Studies in Higher Education,38(5),758-773。  new window
33.Brozo, W. G.、Shiel, G.、Topping, K.(2008)。Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,51(4),304-315。  new window
會議論文
1.楊瑩(2014)。我國高等教育受教機會公平性之探討。教改20年:回顧與前瞻國際學術研討會,(會議日期: 2014, November)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2018)。就學貸款統計。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Coleman, James S.、Campbell, Ernest Q.、Hobson, Carol J.、McPartland, James、Mood, Alexander M.、Weinfeld, Frederic D.、York, Robert L.(1966)。Equality of educational opportunity。U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
單篇論文
1.Chapman, E.(2003)。Assessing student engagement rates,ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation。,https://flles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482269.pdf,(ED482269)。  new window
其他
1.OECD(2010)。PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science,http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf, 。  new window
2.財團法人草根影響力文教基金會調查研究中心(2015)。教育M型化調查報告,http://grinews.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/20150630。  延伸查詢new window
3.Guthrie, J. T.(2001)。Contexts for engagement and motivation in reading,http://www.readingonline.org/articles/artindex.asp?HREF=/articles/handbook/uthrie/index.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Connell, J. P.、Wellborn, J. G.(1991)。Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes。The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Self processes and development。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Guthrie, J. T.、Wigfield, A.(2000)。Engagement and motivation in reading。Handbook of reading research。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
3.Reardon, S. F.(2011)。The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: new evidence and possible explanations。Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children's Life Chances。New York:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE