參考文獻
一、中文部份
Matthews, C.（民90）。為智障童創造奇蹟。讀者文摘，2001年，12月號，頁98-105。
王保進（民91）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究第二版。台北：心理出版社。
王曼娜（民86）。臺灣原住民國小學童學習潛能之釐測－運用動態評量模式。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
王錦如（民89）。國小學童學習困難的診斷與輔導 ── 運用動態評量模式。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
江淑卿（民90）。兒童類比推理能力的學習潛能評估研究。教育心理學報，33卷，1期，頁47-64。
吳武典、蔡崇建、胡致芬、王振德、林幸台、郭靜姿（民88）。托尼非語文智力測驗──指導手冊。台北：心理出版社。
李坤崇（民91）。多元化教學評量。台北：心理出版社。
周天賜（民87）。動態評量：發展與改進兒童學習潛能的媒介式學習。台北：心理出版社。
林美珍（民85）。兒童認知發展。台北：心理。林敏慧（民81）。國小輕度智障兒童學習潛能評量之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。林寶貴和杞昭安（民86）。兒童認知發展測驗。台北：國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
俞筱鈞（民88）。瑞文氏圖形推理測驗系列指導手冊。台北：中國行為科學社。
張玉成（民84）。思考技巧與教學。台北：心理出版社。
張春興（民84）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張紹勲、張紹評和林秀娟（民89）。SPSS For Windows統計分析：初等統計與高等統計（上冊）。台北：松崗電腦圖書資料有限公司。
張瓊文（民93）。台灣教師對專科生英文學習之中介作用之調查研究。國立新竹師範學報，18期，頁97-135。
張蘭畹（民85）。兒童學習潛能的發展。載於中正大學認知科學研究中心和心理系：「認知與學習」專題研究計畫成果與學術研討會專案報告，頁1-10。
張蘭畹（民96a）。A study on enhancing thinking skills in aboriginal students in Taiwan.民96年5月14日摘自 http://webhome.ydu.edu.tw/teach/1.asp。
張蘭畹（民96b）。增進幼兒認知發展的輔導方案之評析。民96年5月14日摘自http://webhome.ydu.edu.tw/teach/1.asp
教育部（民89a）。特殊教育學校高中職教育階段智能障礙類課程綱要。台北：教育部。
教育部（民89b）。特殊教育學校（班）國民教育階段智能障礙類課程綱要。台北：教育部。
教育部（民91）。身心障礙學生及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北：教育部。
許天威（民92）。個案實驗研究法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
郭靜姿、張蘭畹、林秋妹、王曼娜和盧冠每（民88）。文化殊異學生之學習特質研究。特殊教育研究學刊，17期， 頁325-344。郭靜姿、張蘭畹、林秋妹、王曼娜和盧冠每（民89）。文化殊異學生學習潛能評估之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，19期， 頁253-278。陳淑美（民78）。智力的定義與理論（一）。諮商與輔導，45期，頁28~31。
陳榮華（民86）。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版（中文版）指導手冊。台北：中國行為科學社。
鄭昭明（民83）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。台北：桂冠圖書公司。謝靚怡（民95）。課程本位動態評量對國小數學學習困難學生協助效益之探討。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
二、英文部份
Arbitman-Smith, R., & Haywood, H. C. (1980). Cognitive education for learning disabled adolescents. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 8, 51-64.
Arbitmam-Smith, R., Haywood, H. C., & Bransford, J. D. (1984). Assessing cognitive change. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds). Learning and cognition in mentally retarded. (pp433-471). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baumeister, A. A. (1984). Some methodological and conceptual issues in the study of cognitive processes with retarded people. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 1-38). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Belmont, J. M. (1966). Long-term memory in mental retardation. In N. R. Eills (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 1, pp.219~255).New York: Academic.
Berlinghof, M. M. (1987). Instrumental enrichment with parent mediation: the effects of home-based cognitive training on EMR secondary students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
Bodinger, A. H. (2000). The effect of Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment program on perceived control in retarded performers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York, NY.
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment ( pp.52-81). New York: Guilford.
Burden, R. L. (1998). Assessing children’s perceptions of themselves as learners and problem-solvers. School psychology international, 19(4), 291-306.
Burns, S. (1991). Comparison of two types of dynamic assessment with young children. The International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 2, 29–42.
Cattell, R. B. (1973). Measuring intelligence with culture fair test. Champaign. IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Chinn, P. A. (1995). The long-term effects of Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment on the reasoning, intelligence, high school graduation rate, and post-school adjustment of 12 to 15 years old students with educable mentally handicapping and learning-disabled diagnoses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, .University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Connis, R. T. (1979). The effects of sequential pictorial cues, self-recording and praise on the job-task sequencing of retarded adults. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 12, 355-361.
Denny, M. R. (1964). Research in learning and performance. In H. A. Stevens & R. Heber (Eds.). Mental retardation : A review of research (pp.100-142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edfeldt, A. W. (1954). The reversal test. Manual for administrations. Sweden: university of Stockholm.Ellis, N. R. (1963). The stimulus trace and behavioral inadequacy. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.). Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Falik, L. H. (2003). Changing children’s behavior: Focusing on the “E” in mediated learning experience. http://www.icelp.org/PreviewsOfPapers/ChangingChildren’SBehavior.html
Feuerstein, R. (2003). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability & mediated learning experience. In The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential (Ed.), Feuerstein’s theory & applied systems: a reader (pp.17-50). Jerusalem: The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: the learning propensity assessment device: theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP.
Feuerstein R., & Hoffman M. (1995). Teacher’s guide to organization of dots. ArlingtonHeights, IL: SkyLight,
Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M. B., Rand, Y., Jensen, M. R., Tzuriel, D., & Hoffman, D. B. (1986). Learning to learn: mediated learning experiences and instrumental enrichment. Special services in the schools, 3(1-2), 49-82.
Feuerstein R., Louis H. F., & Feuerstein R. (2003). The learning potential assessment device. In The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential (Ed.), Feuerstein’s theory & applied systems: a reader (pp.51-97). Jerusalem: The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Miller, R., Rand, Y., & Jensen, M. R. (1981). Can evolving techniques better measure cognitive change? The journal of special education, 15(2), 201-219.
Feuerstein, R., Mintzker, Y. & Feuerstein, R. (2001). Mediated learning experience: Guidelines for parents. Jeruslem: ICELP
Feuerstein, R., & Rand, Y. (1977). Studies in cognitive modifiability: redevelopment of cognitive functions of retarded early adolescents. Instrumental enrichment. Jerusalem: ICELP.
Feuerstein, R., & Rand, Y. (1997). Don’t accept me as I am: helping retarded performers excel (Revised Edition). Arlington Heights, IL: SkyLight.
Feuerstein R., Rand Y., Haywood H. C., Kyram L., & Hoffman M.(1995). Revised learning propensity assessment device manual. Jerusalem: The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand Y., Hoffman M. B., Egozi M. & Shachar-Segev, N. B. (2003). The instrumental enrichment program. In The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential (Ed.), Feuerstein’s theory & applied systems: a reader (pp.99-128). Jerusalem: The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1977). Cognitive modifiability in retarded adolescents: effects of instrumental enrichment. American journal of mental deficiency, 83(6), 539-550.
Feuerstein, R., Rand Y., Hoffman M. B., & Miller R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: an intervention program for cognition modifiability. Baltimore,MD: University Park.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am: helping “retarded” people to excel. New York, NY: Plenum.
Feuerstein R., & Richelle M. (1963). Children of the mellah. Jerusalem: H. Szold Institute press.
Finch, F. (1953). Kuhlman-Finch intelligence test manual. Philadelphia: Educational Testing Bureau.Fisher, M. A., & Zeaman, D. (1973). An attention-retention theory of retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), The international review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press.
Freimark, N. (1992). Effects of instrumental enrichment as a mediated learning on cognitive impulsivity, impulsive behaviors, scholastic achievement and friendship ratings of emotionally disturbed boys. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbla University.
Frisby, C. (1999). Straight talk about cognitive assessment and diversity. School psychology quarterly, 14(3), 195-207.
Frisby, C. L., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Feuerstein’s dynamic assessment approach: a semantic, logical, and empirical critique. The journal of special education, 26(3), 281-301.
Glanz, Y. (1989). The three dimensional of thinking. Ramat-Gan:Reches.
Glazier, B. A. (1986). A profile of mediated learning in low SES pre-school mother-child dyads. Unpublished masters thesis, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA.
Glazier-Robinson, B. A. (1990). Improving the ability of low SES mothers to provide Mediated Learning Experience for their four year old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA.
Gough, H. C., & Domino, G. (1963). The D-48 test as a measure of general ability among grade school children. Journal of consulting psychology, 27, 344-349.Gunn, D. M., & Jarrold, C. (2004). Raven’s matrices performance in Down syndrome: evidence of unusual errors. Research in developmental disabilities, 25, 443-457.
Haberman, S. J.(1978). Analysis of qualitative data. New York: Academic Press.
Halpern, A. S. (1990). A methodological review of follow-up and follow-along studies tracking school leavers from special education. Career development for exceptional individuals, 13(1), 13-27.
Haywood, H. C. (1986). Test of verbal abstraction. Baltimore: University Press.
Haywood, H. C., Arbitman-Smith, R., Bransford, J. D., Delclos, V. R., Towery, J. R., Hannel, I. L., & Hannel, M. V. (1982). Cognitive education with adolescents: Evaluation of instrumental enrichment. Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, Toronto, Canada.
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.) (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer- Verlag.
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and Challenges in Dynamic Assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 40-63.
Haywood, H .C., Tzuriel, D., & Vanught, S. (1992). Psychoeducational assessment from a transactional perspective. In H. C. Haywood, & D. Tzuriel (Eds) , Interactive assessment(pp.38-63). New York: Springer Verlag.
Haywood, H. C. & Wingenfeld, S. A. (1992). Interactive assessment as a research tool, Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 253-268.
Head, G., & O’Neill, W. (1999). Introducing Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment in a school for children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties, Support for learning, 14(3), 122-128.
Herrnstein, R. J., Nickerson, R. S., Sanchez, M., & Swets, J. A. (1986). Teaching thinking skills. American psychologist, 41, 1279-1289.
Hobbs, N. (1978). The futures of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huberty, T. J., & Cross, R. W. (1988). Feuerstein’s representational stencil design test: a comparison of two scoring methods. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 6, 207-214.Jensen, A (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard educational review, 39, 1-123.
Jensen, M. R. (1990). Change models and some evidence for phase and their plasticity in cognitive structures. International journal of cognitive education & mediated learning, 1(1),5-16.
Kail, R. (1992). General slowing of information-processing by persons with mental retardation. American journal on mental retardation, 3, 333-341.
Kang, Y. S. & Tan, O. S. (2003). Improving the cognitive performance of children with disabilities: a case of mediation. In A. S. H. Seng, L. K. H. Pou & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Mediated learning experience with children(pp.143-158). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Kaufman, R., & Burden, R. (2004). Peer tutoring between young adults with severe and complex learning difficulties: the effects of mediation training with Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment programme. European journal of psychology of education, 19(1), 107-117.
Kazdin, A. E., (1978). Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In M. Hersen & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (pp.265-316). New York: Pergamon Press.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research design: methods for clinical and applied setting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, C. H. (2004). Recent innovations in single-case designs. Journal of behavioral education, 13(4), 209-211.
Klein, P. S. (1988). Stability and change in interaction of Israeli mothers and infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 55-70.
Klein, P. S. (1991). Improving the quality of parental interaction with very low birth weight children: A longitudinal study using a mediated learning experience model. Infant Mental Health, 12, 321-337.
Klein, P. S. (Ed.). (1996). Early intervention: Cross-cultural experiences with a mediational approach. New York: Garland.
Klein, P. S., & Alony, S. (1993). Immediate and sustained effects of maternal mediating behaviors on young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 1-17.
Klein, P. S., Raziel, P., Brish, M., & Birnbaum, E. (1987). Cognitive performance of 3-year olds born at very low birth weight. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 117-129.
Klein, P. S., Wieder, S., & Greenspan, S. I. (1987). A theoretical overview and empirical study of mediated learning experience: Prediction of preschool performance from mother-infant interaction patterns. Infant Mental Health Journal, 8, 110-129.
Kounin, J. S. (1941a). Experimental studies of regetity.Ⅰ. The measurement of regetity and normal and feeble-minded persons. Character and personality, 9, 251-272.
Kounin, J. S. (1941b). Experimental studies of regetity.Ⅱ.The explanatory power of the concept of regetity as applied to feeble mindedness. Character and personality, 9, 273-282.
Kozulin, A. (1994). Cognitive revolution in learning: Piaget and ygotsky. In J. N. angieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 269-287).
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozulin, A., & Rand, Y. (2000). Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kugelmas, S., & Lieblich, I. (1968). Relation between ethnic origins and GSR reactivity in psychological detection. Journal of applied psychology, 52, 159-162.
Lebeer, J., & Rijke, R. (2003). Ecology of development in children with brain impairment. Child: care, health & development, 29(2), 131-140.
Lewin, K. A. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lidz, C. S. (1987). Historical perspective. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.) Dynamic assessment (pp. 3-32). New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early childhood assessment. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lidz, C. S., Bond, L., & Dissinger, L. (1990). Consistency of mother-child interaction using the Mediated Learning Experience(MLE) Scale. Special services in the schools, 6, 145-165.
Lifshitz, H. (1998). Instrumental enrichment: A tool for enhancement of cognitive ability in adult and elderly people with mental retardation. Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities, 33(1), 34-41.
Lifshitz, H., & Tzuriel, D. (2003). Durability of Effects of Instrumental Enrichment in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of cognitive education & psychology, 3(3), 297-322.
Lipman, M. (1976). Lisa. Montclair, NJ: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.
Lorge, I., & Thorndike, L. (1959). The Lorge-Thorndike intelligence test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.McDaniel, A. (1982). Learning potential assessment in educable mentally retarded students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George State University. Georgia, Atlanta.
Messerer, J., Hunt, E., Meyers, G., & Lerner, J. (1984). Feuerstein’s instrumental enrichment: a new approach for activating intellectual potential in learning disabled youth. Journal of learning disabilities, 17(6), 322-325.
Narrol, H., Silverman, H., & Waksman, M. (1982). Developing cognitive potential in vocational high school students. Journal of educational research, 76(2), 107-112.
Nickerson, R. (1988). On improving thinking through instruction. Review of research in education, 15, 3-57.
Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1985). The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ortar, G. R. (1966). MILTA intelligence test. Jerusalem: Hebrew University School of Education.Paour, J.-L. (1992). Induction of logic structures in the mentally retarded: An assessment and intervention instrument. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 119–166). New York: Springer.
Paour, J.-L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 419–442). New York: Springer.
Pena, E. (1993). Dynamic assessment: a nonbiased approach for assessing the language of young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Austin, TX.
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget. J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piers, H. V. & Harris, D. B. (1969). Self concept scale. Counselor Recording and Tests, Nashville, Tenn.
Pintner, R. (1945). Pintner general ability tests-non language series. NK: World.
Pou, L. K. H., Tan, O. S., & Seng, A. S. H. (2003). Development a peer-mediated learning experience model for culturally deprived children. In A. S. H. Seng, L. K. H. Pou & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Mediated learning experience with children(pp.49-65). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Ramey C., & MacPhee D. (1981). A new paradigm in intellectual assessment. Contemporary psychology, 26(7) ,507-509.
Rand, Y. (1982). LPAD tests: VAR. Ⅰ and VAR. Ⅱ ─ Reliability data for group testing and discrimination power. Paper presented at the IASSMD Conference, Toronto.
Rand, Y. (1983). LPAD tests: VAR. Ⅰ and VAR. Ⅱ ─ Differential levels of learning and reliability. Unpublished manuscript, Hadassah- WIZO- Canada Research Institute, Jerusalem.
Rand, Y., & Ben-Schachar, N. (1979). Differential effects of LPAD learning and static measures. Unpublished manuscript, Hadassah- WIZO- Canada Research Institute, Jerusalem.Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987a). Group administration of the LPAD. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 196-214). New York: The Guilford Press.
Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987a). Group administration of the LPAD. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 196-214). New York: The Guilford Press.
Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987b). Learning potential assessment device: Static measures and achievement test: A factor analysis. Jerusalem: Hadassah- WIZO- Canada Research Institute.Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Manual for Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxfords Psychologists Press.
Richards, S. B., & Taylor, R. L. (1999). Single subject research: application in educational and clinical settings. Singapore: Thomson Learning.
Roman, J. M., & Gallego, S. (1994). Escalas de estrategias de aprendizafe [ Learning Strategies Scales]. Madrid: TEA.
Ruiz, C. J. (1985). Modificabilidad cognoscitive y irreversibilidad: Un estudio sobre el efecto a mediano plazo del programa enriquecimiento instrumental (Publicacion No.4).[ Cognitive modifiability and irreversibility: A study of the midterm effect of the instrumental enrichment program (Publication No.4)]. Ciudad de Guayana, Venezuela: Universidad de Guayana.
Ruiz, C. J., & Castaneda, E. (1983). Efectos del programa enriqueimiento sobre los factores cognoscitivas y no-cognoscitivas in sujetos de diferentes estratos socioeconomicos. [Effects of the instrumental enrichment program on cognitive and non-cognitive factors in subjects of different socioeconomic strata]. Ciudad de Guayana, Venezuela: Universidad de Guayana.
Rusling, E. G. (1984). An exploration of the initial effects of the first two instruments of instrumental enrichment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Samuels, M., Tzuriel, D., & Malloy-Miller, T. (1989). Dynamic assessment of children with learning difficulties. In R. T. Brown & M. Chazan (Eds.). Learning difficulties and emotional problems (pp. 145-166). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig Enterprises.
Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L., & Iriarte, M. D. (2001). Enrichment of cognitive functioning and self-regulation of learning in adolescents. The Spanish journal of psychology, 4(1), 55-64.
Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L., Ugarte, M. D., Iriarte, M. D., & Sanz de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. (2003). Immediate and long-term effects of a cognitive intervention on intelligence, self-regulation, and academic achievement. European journal of psychology of education, 18(1), 59-74.
Savell, J. M., Twohig, P. T., & Rachford, D. L. (1986). Empirical status of Feuerstein’s “instrumental enrichment”(FIE) technique as a method of teaching thinking skills. Review of educational research, 56(4), 381-409.
Seisdedos, N. (1994). Test de flexibilidad cognitiva [Cognitive Flexibility Test]. Madrid: TEA.
Seng, A. S. H., Pou, L. K. H., & Tan, O. S. (2003). Mediated learning experience with children. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Shochet, I. M. (1992). A dynamic assessment for undergraduate admission: the inverse relationship between modifiability and predictability. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.). Interactive assessment(pp.332-355). New York: Springer Verlag.
Spitz, H. H. (1979). Beyond field theory in the study of mental deficiency. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.). Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stephen, W. E. (1972). Equivalence formation by retarded and nonretarded children at different mental age. American journal of mental deficiency, 77,311-313.
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral & brain sciences, 7(2), 269-315.
Tan, O. S., Seng, A. S. H., & Pou, L. K. H. (2003). Mediated learning and the meeting of minds: things old and new. In A. S. H. Seng, L. K. H. Pou & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Mediated learning experience with children(pp.2-19). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Tawney, J., & Gast, D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Terman, R. (1942). Non-language multi-mental test. Bureau of Publications, Trachers College, Columbia University.The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential (ICELP). (2004). Who are we: Reuven Feuerstein: Ph.D - Chairman . http://www.icelp.org/asp/Professional_Team.shtm#
The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential (2003). Feuerstein’s theory & applied systems: a reader. Jerusalem: The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.
Thurstone, T. G. (1965). Primary mental abilities. Rev 1962 technique report. Chicago IL: Science research assoc.
Tribus, M. (2003).Brain research and cognitive modifiability. Paper presented at the meeting of The twenty-fourth international workshops of The International Center for Enhancement of Learning Potential(ICELP), Guildford, UK.
Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 15,423-29.
Tzuriel, D. (1989). Inferential cognitive modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. International journal of dynamic assessment and instruction, 1, 65-80.
Tzuriel, D. (1992). The dynamic assessment approach: a reply to Frisby and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 302-324.
Tzuriel, D. (1999). Parent—child mediated learning interaction as determinants of cognitive modifiability: recent research and future directions. Genetic , social & general psychology monographs, 125(2), 109-157.
Tzurie, D. (2003). Foundations of dynamic assessment of young children. In A. S. Seng, L. K. Pou & O. Tan (Eds.), Mediated learning experience with children(pp.173-188). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Tzuriel, D., & Eran, Z. (1990). Inferential cognitive modifiability of Kibbutz young children as a function of mother-child mediated learning experience (MLE) interactions. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 103-117.
Tzuriel, D., & Ernst, D. (1990). Cognitive modifiability of young children and mother-child mediated learning experience (MLE) interaction in low, medium, and high SES. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 119-135.
Tzuriel, D. & Feuerstein, R. (1992). Dynamic group assessment for prescriptive teaching: differential effects of treatment. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp.187-206). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. A. (1987). Assessing the young child: children’s analogical thinking modifiability. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 268-287). New York: The Guilford Press.
Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Zeliger, M., Friedman, A., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Effects of the Bright Start program in kindergarten on teacher’s use of mediation and children’s cognitive modifiability. Early child development and care, 143, 1-20.
Tzurie, D., & Rand, Y. (1983). LPAD testing as an intervention: Differential learning conditions and levels of performance on Raven’s standard progressive matrices (RSPM). Jerusalem: Hadassah- WIZO- Canada Research Institute.
Tzuriel, D., & Weiss, S. (1998a). Cognitive modifiability as a function of mother-child mediated learning strategies, mother’s acceptance-rejection, and children’s personality. Early Development and Parenting, 7(2), 79-99.
Tzuriel, D., & Weiss, S. (1998b). Prediction of children's cognitive modifiability by specific mediated learning strategies in mother-child interactions. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
Ukrainetz, A. T., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C.（2000）. A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 31（2）,142-154.
Vaught, S. R., & Haywood, H. C. (1990). Inter-judge agreement in dynamic assessment: Two instruments from the Learning Potential Assessment Device. The thinking teacher, 5(2), 1-6, 11-13.
Verster, J. M. (1973). Test administrators manual for deductive reasoning test. Johannesburg, South Africa: National Institute for Personnel Research.Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press( Original work published 1934).
Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature of nurture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler intellectual scale for children manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Weinblatt, A. S. (1993). Maternal style and mediational practices under varying mother-child interactive conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, New York.
Wingenfeld, S. A. (1988). Dynamic assessment: A comparison of major approaches. Unpublished manuscript.
Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of personality, 19, 1-15.
Wrightsman, L. S., Nelson, R. & Taranto, M. (1968). The construction and validation of a scale to measure children’s school morale. Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Zambrana-Ortiz, N. J., & Lidz, C. S. (1995). The relationship between Puerto Rican mothers’ and fathers’ mediated learning experience and the competence of their preschool children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 4, 17-32.
Zazzo, R. (1964). Le test de deux barrages. Neuchatal, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestle.