:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:解嚴後小學民族認同教學的轉變
作者:田俊龍
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:張建成
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:民族主義民族認同教學再脈絡化
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:60
本研究以民族主義理論的觀點,探討台灣解嚴後國小社會課程民族認同轉變的背景脈絡,以及不同認同背景的師生如何詮釋現在社會領域課程的民族認同內容,這包括教師的認同立場如何再脈絡化課程的內容?學生可能受到課程與教師的哪些影響?
針對上述研究問題,本研究主要採取文獻分析法以及質性的研究方法。研究者選取北部一所小學五年級,教師認同立場完全不一樣的兩個班作為研究對象,進行為期一年的觀察及訪談研究,收集資料的範圍包括五年級社會領域的台灣史、政治制度及六年級的台灣文化以及台灣與世界的互動等上課單元。
根據資料的分析,本研究所獲得的結論如下:
壹、追求世界民族國家體制下的名份與內部政治與民族單位的一致,是解嚴後民族認同課程變動的主因。
貳、教師民族課程意識主導民族認同內容的教學實踐。
參、民族認同在教學機制的實踐中,課程制度是形塑學生認同的關鍵力量,但教師與學生仍有再脈絡化的空間:
一、教師教學實踐影響學生民族認同的建構,但有其限制或支持。
二、學生觀點的再脈絡化,讓民族認同的建構產生許多意外的結果。
三、課程制度仍是主導學生民族認同建構的關鍵力量。
根據本研究的結論,研究者提出下列建議:
壹、課程編制方面
一、修正同心圓原則,將課程的認同內容建立在台灣現狀與歷史事實的脈絡上。
二、在台灣歷史、文化的陳述上,可加入更多族群的觀點與互動關係。
三、課程可以增加台灣的新象徵與新意義。
貳、教師教學部份
一、教師應提升對民族認同教育批判的課程意識。
二、建立多元、溝通互動的教學平台。
參、未來研究建議
一、延伸民族認同研究於國中的社會領域課程、教師與學生。
二、以質性研究探討家庭教養脈絡與學生民族認同的關係。
There are four purposes in this study. First, the researcher tried to understand the reasons why the content of national identity in the national curriculum changed after the martial law ended in Taiwan; second, the researcher discussed the teaching practice of national identity between two teachers whose national identity are different from each other; third , the researcher also wanted to understand how the students constructed their identity after their teachers taught the content of national identity in social science. Finally, the researcher would make suggestions for teachers and designers of curriculum according to the conclusion of this study.
The researcher applied the qualitative method in the study and chose two classes in which the teachers’ standpoints of national identity are totally different as the objects of the study. The researcher would observe the teaching practice of the national identity in the two classes and interview with teachers and students to understand their viewpoints of national identity .
According to the analysis of the study, the researcher make conclusion as follows:
1. There were two reasons why the content of national identity in the national curriculum changed; first, people in Taiwan wanted the position and proper name in the national –states institution of world system; second, the government tried to make the border of political unit and that of national unit congruent.
2 The teachers’ curriculum consciousness of national identity guided the teaching practice of content of national identity in the social science.
3. The curriculum institutions are critical force for constructing students’ national identity; however, there some unexpected results during the process. Teachers’ recontextualization of teaching in national identity can influence construction of students’ national identities; however, teachers or students had rooms for their recontexualizing the content of national identity in curriculum.
(1) Teachers’ practice can iflunence the the construction of students’ national identity; however, there are some limitations or supports during the teaching practice.
(2)Students’ recontextualization of national identity in the social science produce some unexpected results, as far as the official teaching objects of natinal identity are concerned.
(3) The curriculum institutions are critical force for constructing students’ national identity.
According to the conclusions of the study, there are suggestions as follows:
For curriculum designers:
1. The curriculum designers should avoid the grand narrative to introduce national history and culuture; they should adopt the content of national identity based on the historical context and real suitation in Taiwan
2. The curriculum designers may adopt more pointviews and relationships from enthic groups in Taiwan.
3. The curriculum designers may adopt the new symbol and meaning for representing Taiwan.
For teachers:
1. Teachers should promote their curriculum consciousness about the teaching of
national identity.
2. When doing teaching of national identity, teachers should build the open field in the classroom for all students to communicate with each other and respect and tolerate others’ opinions.
For the future studies:
1. The researchers may extend the study to juinor high school to investigate the teenages’ construction of national identity.
2. The researchers may explore the recontextualization of students’ national identification in the families; how parents influce their children’s acquring the national indentity?
中文部份
方孝謙(2001)。殖民地台灣的認同摸索──從善書到小說的敘事分析,1895-1945。台北:巨流。
王甫昌(2003)。當代台灣社會的族群想像。台北:群學。new window
王育德(2002)。台灣民族論-台灣獨立的歷史波動。台北:前衛。
王明珂(1997a)。華夏邊緣──歷史記憶與族群認同。台北:允晨。new window
王明珂(1997b)。台灣青少年的社會歷史記憶。國立台灣師範大學歷史學報,25期,頁149-181。new window
王前龍(2000)。國民中學「認識台灣(社會篇)教科書中的國家認同論述— 從自由主義與民族主義的觀點來解析,教育研究集刊,頁139-172。new window
王前龍(2001)。國小道德實驗課程 "愛國" 德目教材中國家認同內涵之分析。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,博士論文。 new window
王淑芬等(2005)。國民小學社會5下教學指引。台南:翰林出版社。
王晴佳(2002)。台灣史學50年──1950-2000 傳承、方法、趨勢。台北:麥田。
王曉波(2002)。交鋒:統獨論戰三十年。臺北:海峽學術。
史明(1990)。台灣人四百年史。San Jose, CA:蓬島文化。
石之瑜(2003)。「復興基地」論述的再詮釋:一項國家認同參考指標的流失,載於遠景基金會季刊第四卷第四期,頁37-66。
朱浤源(1994)。民國以來華人國家觀念的演化,載於中央研究院近代史研究主編,認同與國家:近代中西歷史的比較。台北:中研院近史所。
江玉貞(2004)。資訊全球化下國家認同之研究──以台灣地區高中生為例。未出版之碩士論文,中興大學國際政治研究所,台北。
江宜樺(2000)。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。台北:揚智。new window
江宜樺(2001)。新國家運動下的台灣認同。林佳龍等主編,民族主義與兩岸關係-哈佛大學東西方學者的對話,頁181-216。台北:新自然主義。new window
吳乃德(1993)。省籍意識、政治認同和國家認同──台灣族群政治理論的初探,張茂桂等著,族群關係與國家認同,頁27-52。台北:業強。new window
吳乃德(1999)。家庭社會化和意識型態:台灣選民政黨認同的世代差異,台灣社會學研究第三期,頁53-85。new window
吳叡人(1995)。命運共同體的想像:自救宣言與戰後的台灣公民民族主義,載於彭明敏文教基金會編,台灣自由主義的傳統與傳承。台北:彭明敏文教基金會。
吳叡人(2001)。台灣非為台灣人的台灣不可~反殖民鬥爭與台灣人民民族國家的論述1919-1931,載於林佳龍等主編,民族主義與兩岸關係-哈佛大學東西方學者的對話,頁43-111。台北:新自然主義。
宋冬陽(陳芳明)(1988)。現階段臺灣文學本土化的問題。載於施敏輝編,台灣意識論戰選集—台灣結與中國結的總決算,頁207-249。台北:前衛。
宋芳鈺(2007)。北高兩市國小中高年級學童個人屬性、我群他群態度與國家認同感關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,碩士論文,未出版。
李國祈(1978)。清代台灣社會的轉型。中華學報,5:3,頁131-159。
李國祈(1986)。甲午戰後至抗戰以前我國民族主義的發展,1895-1936,載於中國近現代史論集,第十八編下冊頁839-872。台北:商務
李登輝(1999)。台灣的主張。臺北市 : 遠流。new window
李筱峰(2006)。與馬英九論台灣史。台北:玉山社。
杜正勝(1998)。台灣心、台灣魂。台北:河畔:
杜正勝(2000)。走過關鍵十年──文化關懷。台北:麥田。
汪宏倫(2001)。台灣為何要「自找麻煩」?──全球化趨勢與台灣的國格需求。載於林佳龍等主編,民族主義與兩岸關係-哈佛大學東西方學者的對話,頁267-302。台北:新自然主義公司。
周育仁(1997)。認識政治。台北:台灣書店。
周孟玲譯(1997)。為什麼學習歷史。清華歷史教學。8期,頁1-25。
周鳳美(1998)。小學社會科課程的民主化:台灣史教學與國家認同教育。發表於國立花蓮師範學院、台灣教育社會學學會主辦:第四屆教育社會學論壇「多元文化、身分認同與教育」學術研討會。
林水波(1974)。家庭在政治社會化中的角色。思與言,第11卷 2期。new window
林佳龍 (2001)。台灣民主化與國族的形成。林佳龍等主編,民族主義與兩岸關係-哈佛大學東西方學者的對話,頁217-266。台北:新自然主義
林國章(2004)。民族主義與台灣抗日運動1895-1945。台北:海峽學術。new window
林媽利(2001)。從組織抗原推論閩南人及客家人,所謂「台灣人」的來源。共和國,19期,頁10-16。new window
林慈淑(1999)。歷史與歷史教育之目的――試析倫敦大學兩位學者之爭議。東吳歷史學報,五期,頁179-204。new window
林瑞榮(1994)。我國國民小學學生政治社會化研究-社會科內涵與小學生態度的分析與比較。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。new window
林濁水 (2007)。共同體-世界圖像下的台灣。台北:左岸文化
施正鋒(2001)。台灣人的國家認同。台灣歷史學會編,國家認同論文集,頁14-80台北:稻香出版社。
施正鋒(2003)。台灣民族主義。台北:前衛。new window
施正鋒(2004)。台灣在「李登輝時代」的民主轉型。http://mail.tku.edu.tw/cfshih/seminar/20030924/20030924.htm (2004/12/8)new window
洪裴璞(2005)。2005年台北市國三學生國家認同與相關因素之分析。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所在職進修班,碩士論文。
胡佛(1983)。政治文化與青年的國家認同(訪問稿),中國論壇,15卷12期,頁16-19。
徐崇嵐(2004)。「鄉土」如何論戰?一個場域與權力的分析。國立清華大學社會學研究碩士論文(未出版)。

曾健民(1999)。「台灣意識」辨析。載於夏潮基金會編,中國意識與台灣意識,頁648-667。台北:海峽學術出版社。
國立編譯館主編(1997a)。國民中學認識台灣──社會篇。台北:編者。
國立編譯館主編(1997b)。國民中學認識台灣──歷史篇。台北:編者。
張炎憲(2001)。美麗島事件與台灣民主運動的轉折。載於張炎憲主編,邁向21世紀的台灣民族與國家論文集,頁191-212。吳三連台灣史料基金會出版
張炎憲,吳密察(1993)。 建立台灣的國民國家,台北:前衛出版社。
張建成(2002)。批判的教育社會學研究。台北:學富文化。
張茂桂(1993)。省籍問題與民族主義,載於族群關係與國家認同,頁233-278.。台北:業強出版社。new window
張茂桂(1997)。台灣的政治轉型與政治的「族群化」過程,載於施政鋒編,族群政治與政策,頁37-71。台北:前衛。
張茂桂(2002)。多元主義、多元文化論述在台灣的形成與難題。發表於2002年3月2日「台灣的未來學術研討會」,國立成功大學社會科學研究院。
張茂桂、吳忻怡(2001)。關於民族主義論述中的認同與情緒—尊重與承認的問題。載於林佳龍、鄭永年主編,民族主義與兩岸關係,頁147-180。台北:新自然主義公司。
張茂桂(2004)。多元文化論述在台灣——張茂桂老師專訪。教育研究月刊,117期,頁101-106。
張益仁等(2005)。國民小學社會六上教學指引。台南:翰林出版社。
張益仁等(2006)。國民小學社會六下教學指引。台南:翰林出版社。
張雪君(1996)。國小學生政治態度之研究。國立台中師範學院,社會科教育研究,第一期,頁133-162。
教育部(1993)。國民小學課程標準。台北市:台捷。
教育部新聞稿(2001),http:// www.edu.tw/secretary/importance/901015-2.htm/ (2004/10/22)
教育部國民教育司(2003)。92年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要—社會學習領域。http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0056/social.doc
莫那能(2004)。解構認識台灣社會篇-以土地與原住民族觀點重新認識台灣。原住民族月刊電子報,5。[Online] Available: http://web.my8d.net/m5a07/volem005/education2.htm
郭正亮(1999)。台灣主體性辯證。載於夏潮基金會編,中國意識與台灣意識,頁628-645。台北:海峽學術出版社。
郭俊次(2001)。「文化台獨」與「台獨文化」:一個政治的觀點」。在於海峽兩岸關係研究中心編,中華文化與兩岸關係論文集。北京:海峽兩岸關係研究中心。
陳其南(1998)。傳統制度與社會意識的結構──歷史與人類學的探索。台北:允晨文化。new window
陳芳明(1986)。傷痕書。台灣文藝,99,3。
陳芳明(1996)。危樓夜讀。台北:聯合文學。
陳芳明(2002)。後殖民台灣:文學史論及其周邊。台北:麥田。
陳信義(2003)。台灣青少年國家認同之研究-以台北縣三重市國中生為例。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所,碩士論文。
陳映真(1995)。台獨批判的若干理論問題─讀陳昭瑛『論台灣的本土化運動。中外文學,23卷12期,頁110至119。
陳昭男(2002)。屏東縣國小教師國家認同觀及其國家認同議題教學態度之相關研究,屏東師範學院社會科碩士論文。
陳昭瑛(1998)。臺灣文學與本土化運動。台北:正中。new window
陳韋碩(2001)。政治社會化與國家認同態度--以八十九學年度宜蘭地區高中三年級學生為例。東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。
陳敏華(1994)國中公民課程中政治意識型態傳遞之研究:一個教室的實地觀察。國立台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文。
陳淑美(1998)。國中公民與道德科教師之德行觀點及其教學分析。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)new window
陳盈宏(2005)。解嚴後國小社會科教科書中國族概念之轉變。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳慧萍(2005)。台灣地區高中學生國家認同之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,碩士論文。
陳麗華主編(2003)。九年一貫社會學習領域課程本土化之研究總報告書。國立編譯館。
傅曉芬(2002)。台灣地區國小學童政治社會化之研究:家庭與學童的政治學習。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
彭懷恩(1997)。台灣政治文化的剖析,台北市:風雲論壇。
游勝冠 (1996)。台灣文學本土論的興起與發展。台北:前衛。new window
黃光國(1986)。臺灣結與中國結: 對抗與出路。中國論壇, 289, 1- 19。
黃俊傑(2000)。台灣意識與台灣文化。台北:正中。
黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
黃政傑(1999)。課程改革。台北市:漢文。
黃鴻文&湯仁燕(2005)。學生如何詮釋學校課程?教育研究集刊第五十一輯第二期頁99-131。new window
黃繼仁(2003)。課程慎思應用於教室層級課程實施之研究--以小學低年級教師的語文課程實踐為例。台灣師範大學教育研究所,博士論文。new window
葉石濤(1978)。臺灣鄉土文學史導論。載於尉天聰主編,鄉土文學討論集,頁69-92。台北:遠景出版社。new window
廖褚彬(2003)。多階層殖民下台灣文化實體之考察。國立台灣大學政治學研究所
碩士論文。
劉文斌(2004)。台灣國家認同變遷下的兩岸關係。國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所,博士論文。new window
劉俊斐(1995)。族群政治與民族主義──國家認同的分裂與轉化。國際人文年刊,4, pp215-234。
劉憶琪(2006)。台灣未來主人翁國家認同之研究-─以台北市國小六年級學童為例。臺北市立教育大學社會科教育學系碩士論文。
歐用生(1994)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄:復文圖書。
歐陽聖恩(1986)。無黨籍人士所辦政論雜誌在我國政治環境中角色功能之研究。中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔡佩蓉(2004)。國小教師國家認同教學之研究,臺南師範學院教師在職進修社會碩士學位班,碩士論文。
蔡璧煌(1994)。學校與學生政治社會化-高中職學生政治社會化的教育社會學分析,台北:師大書苑。
鄭明杉(1997)。「黃祖耀傳」,香港:名流出版社。
鄭欽仁(1983)。台灣史研究與歷史意識的檢討。台灣文藝,第84 期,頁7-17)。
鄧建邦(1995)。歷史、身份建構、與台灣民族主義—以宜蘭縣及高雄鄉土歷史教材為主的分析。台灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
盧建榮(1999)。分裂的國族認同(1975~1997)。台北:麥田。
蕭阿勤(1999)。1980年代以來臺灣文化民族主義的發展:以「台灣(民族)文學」為主的分析。台灣社會學研究 3,頁1-15。new window
蕭揚基(2002)。臺灣地區高中學生國家認同及其相關因素。公民訓育學報,第11卷,p.67-107。new window
戴正德(2001)。大學本土化教育與社會發展。發表於長榮管理學院新世紀新文化研討會
戴寶村(2001)。台灣文化協會年代的生活革新運動。載於張炎憲主編,20世紀台灣新文化運動與國家建構論文集。吳三連台灣史料基金會出版。new window
譚光鼎(2000)。國家霸權與政治社會化之探討──以「認識台灣課程」為例。教育研究集刊,45輯, 頁113-137。new window
簡良平(2005)。國小教師課程意識與教學反省之個案研究—以語文教師為例。初等教育學刊,第20期,pp.1-20。new window
甄曉蘭(2002)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。台北:元照/高等教育。new window
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務──解構與重建。台北:高等教育。

英文部份
Ahonen, S. (1992) Clio Sans Uniform: A Study of Post-Marxist Transformation of the History Curricula in East Germany and Estonia, 1986–1991. Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ B: 264 Helsinki, Finland: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Ahonen, Sirkka (2001). Politics of identity through history curriculum: narratives of the past for social exclusion - or inclusion? In Journal of Curriculum Studies; Mar/Apr2001, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p179-194.
Anderson, Benedict(1991). Imaged communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Revised edition. London & New York: Verso.
Anyon, Jean(1979) . Ideology and United States History Textbooks. Harvard Edcuational Review. Vol.49 August.
Apple, Michael W. (1995). Education and Power, 2d ed. New York: Routledge.
Apple, Michael W. (2000). Official Knowledge, 2d ed. New York: Routledge
Apple, Michael W. (2001). Educating the “Right” Way New York: Routledge.
Bainbridge, Joyce & Thistlston-Martin, Judy(2001). Children’s Liturerature: Vehicle for the Transmission of National Culture and Identity or the Victim of Massmarket Globalization? Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the Australian Assocation for Research in Edcuation (Fremantle, Australia, December, 2-6, 2001)
Barrett, M. (2001). The development of national identity: a conceptual analysis and some data from Western European studies. In M. Barrett, T. Riazanova, & M. Volovikova (Eds.), Development of National, Ethnolinguistic and Religious Identities in Children and Adolescents (pp. 16-58). Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IPRAS).
Barrett, M.,Wilson H. & Lyons, E.(1999)Self-categorization theory and the development of national identity in English children. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Barth, F.(1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. In Barth, F.(ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference (Boston: Little, Brown).
Barton, K.C. (2001). "You'd be wanting to know about the past": Social contexts of children's historical understanding in Northern Ireland and the United States. Comparative Education, 37, 89-106.
Beck, John(1996). Nation, curriculum and identity in conservative Cultural analysis: a critical commentary. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 26, Issue 2. 171-198
Bellah, R.(1970). Civil Religion in America. In Bellah, R.(ed.), Beyond Belief (New York: Harper and Row)
Benjamin K.P. Leung(1996). Perspectives on Hong Kong Society. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press .
Berlin, I. (1991). Joseph De Maistre and the Origins of Fascism. In The Crooked Timber of Humanity London: Fontana.
Bernard, Luk(1998). Chinese Culture in the Hong Kong Curriculum: Heritage and Colonialism. In Philip Stimpson and Paul Morris(ed.), Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong, pp. 51-74. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. 2nd. London: Taylor & Francise.
Bernstein, B.(1986). On Pedagogic Discourse. In J. Richardson(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education, p. 205–40 New York: Greenwood.
Bigelow, B., & Peterson, B.(1998). Rethinking Columbus: The next 500 years. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Billig, M.(1995). Banal Nationism. (London: Sage).
Brass, P.(1991) Ethnicity and nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi:Sage.
Breuilly, J. (1996). Approaches to Nationalism. In Balakrishnan, G.(ed.), Mapping the Nation. London: Routledge
Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and Learning history in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Carrington, Bruce & Georffrey Short (1995) What makes a person British? Children 's concepnons of their national culture and identity. Educational Studie., 21 , pp. 217--238.
Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action.Philadelphia: The Falmer press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: MacMillan
Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1980). The hidden world of teaching: Implications of research on teacher planning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191844).
Dentich, B.(1994). Dismembering Yugoslavia – Nationalist Ideologies and the Symbolic Revival of Genocide. American Ethnologist, 21, 2.
Dickmeyer, N. (1989). Metaphor, model, and theory in education research. In Teachers College Record, 91 (2), 151-60.
DiMaggio, Paul J. & Walter W. Powell (eds)(1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). European identity in the young and Dutch students' images of Germany and the Germans. Comparative Education, 34(1), 27-40
Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G.S. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education, 76, 493-506.
Dunn, R. (1998). Identity Crises: a social critique of postmodernity Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York :Nichols.
Elson, Ruth(1964). Guardians of Tradition: American Schoolbook of the Nineteenth Century. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Eriksen, T.(1993). Ethnicity and nationalism (London: Pluto Press).
Evans, M.(1996). Languages of Racism Within Contemporary Europe. In Jenkins, B. and Sofos, S.(eds), Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe. Rouledge: London.
Finlayson, A.(1998). Psychology, Psychoanalysis, and Theories of Nationalism, Nations and Nationalism, 4, 2.
Fitzgerzld, T. (1993). Metaphors of Identity . Albany, State University of New York Press.
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power and liberation. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.
Gellner, Ernest(1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Giddens, A. (1985) The Nation State and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Giddens, A.(1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Giddens, A.(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gill, J., & Howard, S. (2000). Still calling Australia home? Children's constructions of place and identity. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Sydney.
Goalen, Paul (1997). History and national identity in the classroom. History Today, Jun 47, 6; Academic Research Library.
Gramsci, A.(1971). The Study of Philsophy. In Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G.(eds), Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lodon:Lawrence and Wishart.
Green, Andy (1994). Education and State Formation Revisited. History of Education Review ,23, no. 3, pp.1–17.
Greene, M.(1975). Curriculum and Consciousness. In W. Pinar(Ed.) Curriculum theorizing: The reconceputalists. Berkley, CA:McCutchan.
Greenstein, F. I. Ed. (1967). Children and politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gundem, Bjorg B. and Berit Karseth (1998). Norwegian National Identity in Recent Curriculum Documents. In Annual Meeting of American Ecuational Research Association. San Diego, CA, April 13-17, 1998.
Hahn, c., & Hughes, M. (1998). The lEA Civic Education Project, Phase I in the United States: Overview to the project and teaching and learning about democracy, political institutions, citizenship and national identity. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
Hall, S.(1990) . Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In J. Rutherford(ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hartman, J. (1995) The significance of youth mobility and travel in Western Europe: the case of Sweden. In Cycrce (Ed.) The Puzzle of Integration. European yearbook on youth, policy and research, Vol. 1. pp. 63-74 (Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter).
Hobsbawn, E. and Ranger, T.(1983) The invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobsbawn, E.J.(1992). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: programme, myth, reality. Cambridge University Press.
Honess, T. (1992). The development of self. In J. COLEMAN (Ed.) The School Years, 2nd edn. London, Routledge.
Hsiau, A-chin(蕭阿勤)(2000). Contemoprary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism. London:Rouledge
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Dezin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Japperson, Ronald L.(1991). Institutions. Institutional Effects, and Instituionalism. In Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jeremy, P (1989). History in the secondary schools of Wales: a centenary review. Welsh Journal of Education, 1 (1989), 11.
Jones B. & I. Lewis(1995). A Curriculum Cymreig. Welsh Journal of Education, 22-35.
Jones B. & M. Williams(1994). Tensions between restoration and nation building in the nationalized Welsh School curriculum. Paper presented at the European Curriculum Researchers’ Network Conference, Enschede, The Netherlands, August/September, 1994
Jones, B. and I. Lewis(1995). A Curriculum Cymreig, In Welsh Journal of Education, (1995), p22-35.
Judah, T.(1996) The Serbs – History, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kedourie, E.(1993). Nationalism, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press.
Lambert, W.E. & Klineberg, O.(1967). Children’s Views of Foreign People:A Cross-National Study. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lampert, M. (1985). Understanding, doing, and teaching multiplication. Institute for Reaching on Teaching, Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI.
Mann, M.(1996). The Emergeince of Modern European Nationalism. In Hall, J. and Jarvie, I.(eds) The Social philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Amsterdam:Rodopi
Matthew, Turner(1995). 60's/90's: Dissolving the People in Hong Kong's Cultural Identity . Hong Kong: Hong Kong Arts Centre.
McClintock, A.(1996). ‘No Longer in a Future Heaven’ :Nationalism, Gender and Race In Eley, G. and Suny, R.(eds), Becoming National. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Mellor, Roy (1989). Nation, State and territory: a political geography methods. In N. K. Dezin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative.
Meyer, J. W. (1980), Level of the Education System and Schools Effects. In C. E. Bidwell and D.M. Wyndham ed. The Analysis of Educational Productivity, Vol.2, pp15-63. Cambridge, MA:Ballinge
Meyer, John W. & David H. Kamens & Aaron Benavot, eds.(1992) School Knowledge for the Masses. London: Falmer, .
Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. (1997) World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103:144-81
Minogue, K.(1967). Nationalsim . Lodnon: Batsford.
Morris, Paul, Flora Kan. and Esther Morris(2000). Education Civic Participation and Identity: Continuity and Change in Hong Kong In Cambridge Journal of Education 30. no. 2 (2000): 243-62.
Morris, Paul, Gerry McClelland, and Wong Ping Man (1997). Explaining Curriculum Change: Social Studies in Hong Kong. In Comparative Education Review (February 1997): 27-43.
O’Sullivan, N.(1976). Conservatism. London: Dent.
Ozkirimli , Umut (2000). Theories of Nationalism --A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Parmenter, Lynne (1999). Constructing National Identity in a Changing World-- Perspectives in Japanese Education. In British Journal Sociology of Education Vol. 20,No. 4, 1999
Parmenter, Lynne(2000). Locating Self in the World: elementary school children in Japan, Macau and Hong Kong. A Journal of Comparative Education; Jun2000, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p133.
Paul Morris, Gerry McClelland, and Wong Ping Man (1997). Explaining Curriculum Change: Social Studies in Hong Kong. In Comparative Education Review, (February 1997): 27-43.
Phillips R. (1998). History Teaching, Nationhood and the State: A Study in Educational Politics. London: Cassell.
Phillips, M. (1996) . All Must Have Prizes (London, Little, Brown).
Phillips, R. & Paul Goalen & Allan Mcully & Sydney Wood(1999). Four Histories, One nation? History Teaching, Natinhood and a British Identity. In Compare, Vol.29 No. 2, 1999.
Phillips, Robert (1999). History teaching, nationhood and politics in England and Wales in the late twentieth century: a historical comparison. History of Education, 1999, Vol. 28, No. 3, 351± 363.
Piaget, J. & Weil, A.(1951). The development in children of the idea of the homeland and of relations with other countries. International Social Science Bulletin, 3, 561-578.
Pokewitz, Thomas S.(1992). A Political Sociology of Edcuation Reform. New York:Teacher College.
Reid, W. A. (1999) The voice of the practical: Schwab as correspondent. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31 (4)
Reid, William A.(1997). Principle and pragmatism in English Curricum Making 1868-1918. Journal of Curriculum Studies. Vol. 29 no.6:667-682.
Reid, William A.(2000). Curriculum as an Expression of National Identity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 15 (Winter): 113-122.
Reid, William A.(2003). Curriculum as Institutionalized Learning: Implications for Theory and Research. Jounral of Curriculum and Supervision, Fall 2003 Vol.19 No. 1, 29-43.
Renan, E.(1996). What is a Nation? In Woolf, S.(eds), Nationalism in Europe-1815 to the Present. London:Routledge
Reynolds, John C.( 2001). Textbook: Gardians of nationalism. Edcation Vol. 102 No.1
Rippberger, Susan and Kathleen Staudt(2003). Pledging Allegiance: Learning Nationalism at the El Paso-Juarez Border.
Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry 13(3), 239-265.
Sharpe, Keith, Patricia Broadfoot, Marilyn Osborn, Claire Planel(2000). Promoting Quality in Learning- Does England Have the Answer? New York: Continuum International Publishing Group
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Shulman, Stephen (2002) Nationalist Sentiments and Globalization Preferences in Five Great Powers. Global Society, Vol.16 No1 pp.47-68.
Slater, J. (1989). The politiies of Teaching: a humantiliy dehumanized. Special Professional Lecture. London Institute of Education, University of London.
Smith A.(1998). Nationalism and Modernism. London: Routledge
Smith, A.(1991). National Indentity. Reno Nevada: Univesity of Nevada Press.
Smith, A.(1999). Myths and Memories of the Nation Oxford: Oxford University Press
Solid, Karen (1976). Noah Webster: American Language for Americans. Perspectives on Curriculum Development—1776-1976. Washington,D.C.: ASCD Yearbook.
Spencer, Philip & Howard Wollman (2002) Nationalism: A Critical Introduction London:Sage
Spyrou, Spyros(2002). Images of ‘the Other’: ‘the Turk’ in Greek Cypriot children’s imaginations. Race Ethnicity and Education, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2002.
Stanley, T.J. (2002). Nationalist Histories and Multiethnic Classrooms. Education Canada 42, 3: 12-15.
Sternberg, R. J., & Caruso, D. R. (1985). Practical modes of knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing: 84th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 133-158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Tate, N. (1994) . Off the fence on common culture. Times Educational Supplement, 29 July.
Tronvoll, K.(1999). Borders of Violence – Boundaries of Identity: Demarcating the Eritrean Nation-State. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22,6.
VanSledright, B.A., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. Elementary School Journal, 98, 239-265.
Vickers, Edward (2003). In Search of An Identity: The Politics of History as a School Subject in Hong Kong. London and New York: Routledge.
Vickers, Edward and Flora Kan (2003). The reeducation of Hong-Kong: Identity, Politics, Education in Postcolonial HongKong. In American Asian Review, pp.179-228,Vol. XXI, No.4.
Waters, M.(2001) Globalization London: Rouledge.
Welsh Office(1989). National Curriculum History Committee for Wales Preliminary Advice to the Secretary of State for Wales (Cardi : HMSO, 1989).
Wong, Ting-Hong & Michael Apple (2002). Rethinking the Education/State Formation Connection: Pedagogic Reform in Singapore, 1945–1965. Comparative Education Review, vol. 46, no. 2., p182-210
Yin, R. K. (1988). Case study research : Design and methods. Newbury Park,
Zevin, Jack.(2003) Perceptions of National Identity: How Adolescents in the United States and Noway View Their Own and Other Countries. The Social Studies; Sep/Oct 2003; 94, 5
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE