:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生如何詮釋學校課程?
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:黃鴻文 引用關係湯仁燕 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Horng-wenTang, Ren-yen
出版日期:2005
卷期:51:2
頁次:頁99-131
主題關鍵詞:學生文化學校課程經驗課程Student interpretationsSchool curriculaExperiential curricula
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:293
  • 點閱點閱:82
學生對學校課程的詮釋,對課程實施的成效有很大的影響。過去的課程研究與實務,很少考慮學生的觀點。本文選擇幾個學生文化的民族誌,由其豐富的民族誌資料中,描述不同類型學生對學校課程的詮釋。歸納與整理這些學生的詮釋後,本文發現學生會自行判斷課程的價值,將課程分類、定義,以自己認為合適的方式進行學習,以自己認定的標準,評量自己的表現。這種學生的文化創造,提供課程與教育實務工作者新的研究與思考方向。
This article presents students’ interpretations of school curricula as found in past ethnographic research. According to this research, students are learners with an active ability to interpret, instead of just passively following the curricula provided by educators. These students do what every curriculum designer will do: they assess the value of the curriculum, classify it into different categories, decide what they want/don’t want to learn, decide the learning sequence and evaluation criteria. Yet most students interpret school curricula in a different, even an opposite way from that of educators do. According to past research we see that (1) English white boys defined the school curriculum as being “feminine”; (2) American black students viewed it as being a product of white culture; (3) American Punjabi students perceived it as a tool to help them accommodate American society; (4) Advanced math and science were thought to be worthless for Punjabi girls; (5) Math and English were thought to be useless for older Taiwanese adult students; (6) Kansas’s medical students in the US studied what professors wanted them to know; (7) Students in a Taiwanese junior high school only studied specific subject content which they thought they had to perform well or get punished by teachers. This article then discusses the students’ interpretation(s) of their curricula in terms of Willis’ notion of cultural production, and presents some implications for educational practice.
期刊論文
1.Becker, H. S.(1993)。How I learned what a crock was?。Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,22,28-35。  new window
2.甄曉蘭(20030300)。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,49(1),63-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Goodlad, J. I.(1969)。Curriculum: The state of the field。Review of Educational Research,39(3),367-375。  new window
4.Schwab, Joseph J.(1983)。The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors to Do。Curriculum Inquiry,13(3),239-265。  new window
5.Ogbu, John U.、Fordham, Signithia(1986)。Black Students' School Success: Coping with the "Burden of 'Acting White'"。The Urban Review,18(3),176-206。  new window
6.Morgan-Fleming, B.、Doyle, W.(1997)。Children's Interpretations of Curriculum Events。Teaching and Teacher Education,13(5),499-511。  new window
7.Rogers, V.(1989)。Assessing the curriculum experienced by children。Phi Delta Kappan,70(9),714-717。  new window
8.Schwab, J. J.(1969)。The Practical: A Language for Curriculum。School Review,78(1),1-23。  new window
學位論文
1.湯仁燕(2004)。Paulo Freire對話教學理念與實踐之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.武曉梅(2004)。成人學生的補校教育觀--一個國小補校班級的民族誌研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Becker, Howard S.、Geer, B.、Hughes, E. C.、Strauss, A. L.(1961)。Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School。New Brunswick, New Jersey:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。臺北市:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Holland, Dorothy C.、Eisenhart, Margaret A.(1990)。Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Ogbu, J. U.(1974)。The Next Generation: An Ethnography of Education in an Urban Neighberhood。New York:Academic Press。  new window
6.Willis, Paul E.(1977)。Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
7.李子建、黃顯華(1996)。課程 : 範式、取向和設計。台北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Freire, P.、Faundez, A.(1989)。Learning to Question: A Pedagogy of Liberation。New York, NY:Continuum。  new window
9.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York:Seabury Press。  new window
10.黃政傑(1999)。課程改革。漢文。  延伸查詢new window
11.Pollard, A.、Thiessen, D.、Filer, A.(1997)。Children and Their Curriculum: The Perspectives of Primary and Elementary School Children。Children and Their Curriculum: The Perspectives of Primary and Elementary School Children。London, UK。  new window
12.Ogbu, John U.(1991)。Low School Performance As an Adaptation: The Case of Blacks in Stockton, California。Minority Status and Schooling: A Comparative Study of Immigrant and Involuntary Minorities。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gibson, M. A.(1987)。Punjabi immigrants in an American high school。Interpretive ethnography of education at home and abroad。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Gibson, M.、Bhachu, P. K.(1991)。The dynamics of educational decision Making: A comparative study of Sikhs in Britain and the United States。Minority status and schooling: A comparative study of immigrant and involuntary minorities。New York:Garland。  new window
3.Goodlad, J. I.(1979)。The scope of curriculum field。Curriculum Inquiry: the Study of Curriculum Practice。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
4.Erickson, K. R.、Shultz, J.(1992)。Students' experience of the curriculum。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York:Macmillan。  new window
5.Klein, M. Frances(1991)。A Conceptual Framework for Curriculum Decision Making。The Politics of Curriculum Decision-making: Issues in Centralizing the Curriculum。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
6.黃政傑(20050000)。課程理論。課程思想。臺北:冠學文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE