參考文獻
王聰智 (2000)。科技倫理與功利主義的反思。哲學與文化,27(4),382-407。
何慧卿 (2007)。性別平等教育法下的校園性騷擾暨性侵害調查之程序正義:受害人保護及行為人權益之兼顧。台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文。汪明生 (2002)。集體決策中社會權重、妥協與個體偏好之研究-資訊整合理論之應用。國科會專題計畫報告書。
余致力 (2002)。民意與公共政策:理論探討與實證研究。台北:五南。
汪明生、陳正料 (2003)。企業型文官績效公平衡量之資訊整合研究。收錄於第四屆兩岸公共事務與跨世紀發展研討會論文輯,25-36。
汪明生、陳碧珍 (2005)。風險資訊整合模式與風險知覺之研究-以石化業為例。管理學報,20(2) ,251-287。汪明生、馬群傑 (2007)。地區行銷理論與實證:公共事務管理觀點。台北:巨流圖書。汪明生 (2008)。公共事務管理架構。取自http://www.pam.org.tw/files/15-1000-267,c90-1.php
汪明生 (2008)。跨域分析。取自http://www.pam.org.tw/files/15-1000-269,c90-1.php
紀駿傑 (1998)。我們沒有共同的未來:西方主流環保關懷的政治經濟學。台灣社會研究季刊,31,141-168。施啟揚 (1998)。建立廉能公正的司法。法令月刊,49 (10),3-5。
林萬億 (1994)。福利國家-歷史比較分析。台北:巨流。林俊杰 (2003)。公務人員資績與陞遷關係之研究:以彰化縣政府為例。東海大學公共事務碩士學程班碩士論文。
邱炳乾 (2001)。影響預算參與之因素與效能的結構關係。中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。張清讚 (1996)。論股利收入比照免稅銷售額之公平正義性。稅務,1603,13-16。
張寧 (2004)。社會判斷理論之集體決策程序對互動管理成果之驗證—兼論政策分析中集體決策方法之比較。中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
許立一 (2003)。慎思熟慮的民主行政。台北:韋伯。許立一 (2004)。地方治理與公民參與的實踐:政治後現代性危機的反思與解決。公共行政學報,10,63-94陳建民 (2000)。維護社會公平正義、邁向新世紀。智庫研究報告,2000年8-9月號,37-41。
陳碧珍 (2001)。決策與判斷分析領域簡介。公共事務評論,2(1),171-182,陳正料 (2004)。民眾與政府對政策公平衡量多元認知之資訊整合研究:以登革熱防治為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC92 -2414-H-110-004)。陳敦源 (2004)。人民、專家、與公共政策:民主理論下的「參與式知識管理」。國家政策季刊,3(1),99-134。
陳正料 (2006)。多元社會下政策績效之公平衡量:登革熱防治的資訊整合研究。中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。陳建寧 (2006)。多元社會下北高兩市公民文化之比較研究:價值觀、道德認知與社會資本。中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
陳建寧、馬群傑、汪明生 (2008)。台灣北高兩市民眾對公平與關懷道德認知之研究。師大學報,53(2),43-68。黃才容 (2005)。商務仲裁的公正性 -探討仲裁參與者之正義知覺及其文化價值觀的干擾效果。台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。黃于恬 (2008)。南北發展差距下之高雄市政策資源配置與支持。97年統計學術研討會-公共事務管理與統計的對話,台灣高雄市政府主計處。
郭建志、張適年 (2011)。組織任用面談的結構特徵:程序正義知覺與應徵者反應之研究。中華心理學刊,53(1) ,97-114。彭懷恩 (2000)。台灣政治發展的反思。台北:風雲論壇。
詹立煒(2005)。台灣跨域治理機制之研究-理論、策略與個案。中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
趙永茂 (2000)。法國區政府等體制對精省後政府組織變革的啟發-區域政府對中間機關等理論的分析。理論與政策,14(1),43-63。劉坤億 (2006)。台灣地方政府間發展夥伴關係之制度障礙與機會。台灣民主季刊,3(3),1-34。鄧怡婷 (2005)。多重組織夥伴治理之研究-以處理嚴重急性呼吸道症候群為例。中華大學經營管理研究所公共管理組碩士論文。
諸葛俊、黃于恬、汪明生 (2010)。高高屏派系政治影響永續發展之社會認知分析。選舉評論,9,1–26。諸葛俊、黃于恬、汪明生(2012)。地下電台傳播行為對台灣高雄地區公民社會影響之研究。傳播與社會學刊,20,115-150。關復勇 (1998)。專業服務接觸互動行銷中關係品質知覺之研究-以護理人員與病患間關係為例。中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。羅正忠 (2000)。從亞洲金融風暴談政府振興景氣措施與社會公平正義。台灣經濟金融月刊,2,1-12。
鐘金玉 (2000)。公務人員績效考核公平與工作態度之研究-以高雄市政府所屬警察、醫療、稅務人員為對象。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
觀光局 (2010)。中華民國99年國人旅遊狀況調查報告。交通部觀光局。
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz(ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 1-101.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of Information Integration Theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1996). A Functional Theory of cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Anderson, N. H. (2005). Unified Theory of cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Benveniste, G. (1977). The politics of expertise. San Francisco: Boyd and Fraser.
Chen, D. Y., Huang, T. Y. & Hsiao, N. Y. (2006). Reinventing government through on-line citizen involvement in the developing world: A case study of Taipei city mayor''s E-mail box in Taiwan. Public Administration and Development, 26(5), 409-423
Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. In C. Scott & F. Susan S. (ed), Readings in planning theory.
deLeon, P. (1998). Models of policy discourse: Insights versus prediction. Policy Studies Journal, 26 (1), 147-161.
DiIulio, J., Garvey, G. & Kettle, D. (1993). Improving government performance: An owner’s manual. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and politicalscience. Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, W. N. (2004). Public policy analysis: An introduction (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Farkas, A. J., & Anderson, N. H. (1975). Integration theory applied to models of inequity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 588-591.
Farkas, A. J. (1991). Cognitive algebra of interpersonal unfairness. In N. H. Anderson (ed), Contributions to Information Integration Theory Volume II : Social (pp. 43-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Farkas, A. J., & Andersion N. H. (1974). Input summation and equity summation in multi-cue equity judgements. CA: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
Farrow, S. (1997). Environmental equity and sustainability: Rejecting the Kaldor-Hicks criteria. Ecological Economics, 27, 183-188.
Friedman, M.(1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frederickson, H. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228-237.
Griffin, J. (1996). Value judgment: Improving our ethical beliefs. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hammond, K. R., McCelland, G. H., and Mumpower, J. (1980). Human judgment and decision making: Theories, methods, and procedures. New York, NY: Praeger Scientific.
Harmon, M. M. (1974). Social equity and organizational man: Motivation and organizational theory. Public Administration Review, 34 (1), 11-18.
Hart, D. K. (1974). Social equity, justice, and the equitable administrator. Public Administration Review, 34 (1), 3-10.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Iannantuono, A., & Eyles, J. (1999). Environmental health metanarratives: An analysis of policy making in Ontario, Canada. Health & Place, 5, 139-156.
Johnson, N. (1990). Reconstructing the welfare state: A decade of change 1980-1990. London, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Krumholz, N.(1982). A retrospective view of equity planning: Cleveland 1969-1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48 (2), 163-174
Marshall, R., & Lee, C. K. C. (1995). Toward the external validity of the information paradigm. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 78-83.
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Patchen, M. (1961). The choice of wage comparisons. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3), 223-251.
Reams, M. A., & Templet P. H. (1996). Political and environmental equity issues related to municipal waste incineration siting. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 47, 313-323.
Rohrbaugh, J., & McClelland, G. (1980). Measuring the relative importance of utilitarian and egalitarian values: A study of individual differences about fair distribution. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 34-49.
Sandel, M. J. (1982). Liberalism and the limit of justice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sayles, L.R. (1958). Behavior of industrial work groups: Prediction and control. New York, NY: Wiley.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis. Oxford University Press.
Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Tobin, J. (1970). On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 263-277.
Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19, 33-59.
Varian, H. R. (1990). Equity, envy and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 9, 63-91.
Wang, M. S. (1987). Addition of a cognitive dimension to the analytical hierarchy process- A land use decision- making example (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Warfield, J. N., & Cárdenas, A. R. (1994). A handbook of interactive management. Iowa State University Press.