臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：課程本位測量寫作測驗之顯著性指標研究
書刊名：東臺灣特殊教育學報
作者：黃瑞珍／黃玉凡
作者(外文)：Huang, Rei-jane／Huang, Yu-fan
出版日期：2001
卷期：3
頁次：頁225-260
主題關鍵詞：課程本位測量；寫作測驗；動態評量；真實性評量；CBM；Curriculum-based measurement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:85
  • 點閱點閱:75
本研究主要目的是以課程本位測量(Curriculum-based Measurement, CBM)理論為基礎，尋找符合CBM精神之穩定、客觀、簡便、跟時間動態、具靈敏性的寫作測驗指標。本研究對象靈108名國小五年級學生;涵蓋三組寫作能力不同之學生(每組各36名)。每位學生共計施測兩份四篇不同故事提示之3分鐘寫作測驗。研究者並發展計分手冊，針對6個可能之測量指標進行寫作樣本分析。 本研究結果指出三組寫作能力不同之學生在連接詞的使用上並沒有顯著差異，但是總數字、錯字出現總數、成語或俗語出現次數、非常用字出現次數及語句基本功能錯誤總數上則均達顯著性，可以用來區辨三組寫作能力不同之學生，作為評量國小兒童寫作能力的指標。但是若要符合CBM之上述精神，本研究建議僅採用『總字數』與『非常用字』作為課程本位測量在寫作測驗方面的顯著性指標。 本研究亦提供寫作總字數之切截分數:50字，作為初步篩選國小五年級學生寫作能力的標準;以及就質的向度，非常用字7字或7字以上也同時當作小學五年級學生寫作非常用字之切截分數。亦即國小五年級學生在兩篇3分鐘之故事提示法寫作測驗若無法達到兩篇總字數與非常用字如上述切截標準之一項者，均應懷疑有書寫困難之可能性，宜作進一步鑑定。
In this study we examined the sensitive indices that can be used for curriculum-based measurement (CMB) in written expression for 5th graders. Participants in the study were 108 students who completed four story-starter writing samples. A scoring manual, developed by the investigator, was explicitly designed for scores in this study. The results indicated that significant differences were found in the following indicators: total characters, incorrect words written, total idioms, mature characters, basic language functions. Considering the validity and reliability of CBM measures in written expression, we selected total characters written and mature characters as two sensitive indicators for school-aged students in Chinese written language. This research also provided a cut-off score to screen out students who may have risk in written language disorders. Two criterion, 50 characters and 7 mature characters, should be meet in two 3-minute written language samples. If any students who fail to pass either one of the cut-off scores are eligible to refer to the assessment of special education.
期刊論文
1.黃瑞珍(19990600)。不同詞彙測量法對評估書寫語言詞彙廣度之研究。教育與心理研究，22(上)，113-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.柯華葳、陳俊文(1992)。小學生說話與作文產品之比較。國立中正大學學報，3(1)，27-46。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tindal, G.、Paker, R.(1989)。Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs。The Journal of Special Education，23，169-183。  new window
4.Deno, S. L.、Fuchs, L. S.(1987)。Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving。Focus on Exceptional Children，19(8)，1-16。  new window
5.葉靖雲(20000600)。以文章寫作和造句測驗評估國小學生作文能力之效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，18，151-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Deno, S. L.、Mirkin, P. K.、Chiang, B.(1982)。Identifying valid measures of reading。Exceptional Children，49，36-45。  new window
7.葉靖雲(19990600)。五種作文能力測驗的效度研究。特殊教育學報，13，331-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fuchs, L. S.、Fuchs, D.、Maxwell, L.(1988)。The validity of informal reading comprehension measures。Remedial and Special Education，9(2)，20-28。  new window
9.Deno, S. L.、Marston, D.、Mirkin, P.(1982)。Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression。Exceptional Children，48(4)，368-371。  new window
10.Graham, S.、Harris, K. R.、MacArthur, C. A.、Schwartz, S.(1991)。Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program。Learning Disability Quarterly，14(2)，89-114。  new window
11.Espin, C.、Shin, J.、Deno, S. L.、Skare, S.、Robinson, S.、Benner, B.(2000)。Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students。Journal of Special Education，34(3)，140-153。  new window
12.Newcomer, P. L.、Barenbaum, E. M.(1991)。The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980-1990。Journal of Learning Disabilities，24(10)，578-593。  new window
13.林寶貴、黃瑞珍(19990600)。國小兒童書寫語言評量指標研究。特殊教育研究學刊，17，163-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Skare, S.、Scierka, B. J.、Espin, C. A.、Halverson, N.(1999)。Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary students。Reading and Writing Quarterly，15(1)，5-27。  new window
15.S. L. Deon(1985)。Curriculm-based measurement: The emerging alternatives。Exceptional Children，52(3)，219-232。  new window
16.Espin, C. A.、Foegen, A.(1996)。Curriculum-based measures at the secondary level: Validity of three general outcome measure for predicting performance on content-area tasks。Exceptional Children，62，497-514。  new window
17.Geva, E.、Ryan, E. B.(1985)。Use of conjunctions in expository texts by silled and less skilled readers。Journal of Reading Behavior，17，311-346。  new window
18.Jenkins, J. R.、Jewel, M.(1993)。Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading and maze。Exceptional Children，59，421-432。  new window
19.Klecan-Aker, J. S.、Hedrick, D. L.(1985)。A study of the syntactic language skills of normal school-age children。Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School，16，187-196。  new window
20.McClure, E. F.、Geva, E.(1983)。The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse。Discourse processes，6，411-432。  new window
21.E. F. McClure、Steffensen, M. S.(1985)。Study of the use of conjunctions across grades and ethnic groups。Research in the Teaching of English，19，217-336。  new window
22.Parker, R.、Tindal, G.、Hasbrouck, J.(1991)。Countable indices writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions。Exceptionality，2，1-17。  new window
23.Rubin, D. L.(1987)。Divergence and convergence between oral and written communication。Topics in Language Disorders，7(4)，1-18。  new window
24.Silliman, E. R.、Jimerson, T. L.、Wilkinson, L.(2000)。A with language learning problems。Topics in Language Disorders，20(4)，45-64。  new window
25.Tindal, G. A.、Parker, G.(1991)。Identifying measures for evaluating written expression。Learning Disabilities and Research Practice，6，211-218。  new window
研究報告
1.張新仁(1992)。「過程導向寫作教學法」對國小學童之訓練成效 (計畫編號：NSC 81-0111-S-017-013)。  延伸查詢new window
2.林寶貴、黃瑞珍、彭千紅(1997)。兒童書寫語言發展評量指標研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.孫麗翎(1988)。國小兒童作文常犯錯誤分析研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玫秀(1990)。學前兒童國語句型結構之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
3.李虹佩(1999)。動態評量在國小六年級寫作教學上應用研究之初探(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡米凌(1997)。國小三年級學童作文句型結構之分析研究--以嘉義地區為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.施錚懿(1997)。國小六年級寫作學習障礙與普通學生在故事與說明文寫作成果之比較(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳錦釵(1997)。兒童寫作修改歷程與教學之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳香如(1997)。國小六年級兒童作文之修辭技巧分析--以嘉義地區為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳鳳如(1999)。閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式驗證及其教學效果之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.葉雪枝(1998)。後設認知寫作策略對國小四年級記敘文寫作能力提昇之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
10.王家珍(1999)。讀寫結合的修辭教學對國小兒童寫作修辭能力之影響(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
11.馬行誼(1997)。國小學童說明文寫作現象分析-班級小組討論教學法之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡銘津(1995)。文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Huang, R. J.(1996)。Indices of written language development in Taiwanese youth: Syntax and semantics(博士論文)。University of Oregon。  new window
圖書
1.國立編譯館(1967)。國民學校常用字彙研究。台北市：中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴慶雄(1989)。認識字詞語。臺北市：國語日報。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯華葳、吳敏而(1990)。國民小學常用字及生字難度研究--六年級。臺北：臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lerner, J. W.(1997)。Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。Boston：Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
5.林素貞(1999)。如何擬定個別化教育計畫。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊坤堂、李水源、吳純純、張世彗(2000)。國小兒童書寫語文能力提升之影響研究。國立臺北師範學院特教育學系印行。  延伸查詢new window
7.A. Mercer(1997)。Teaching students with learning problems。New York：Prentice Hall。  new window
其他
1.林寶貴，錡寶香(2000)。國小學童書寫語言測驗，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系承辦。  延伸查詢new window
2.Marston, D.，Lowrym, L.，Deno, S. L.，Mirkin, P.(1981)。An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study (Research Report No.49)，Minneapolis：University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disbilities。  new window
3.Videen, V J.，Deno, S. L.，Marston, D.(1982)。Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Research Report No.84)，Minneapolis：University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities。  new window
圖書論文
1.Marston, D. B.(1989)。A curriculum--based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it。Curriculum--based measurement: Assessing special children。New York：Guilford。  new window
2.葉靖雲(1999)。作文能力與作文評量。中華民國特殊教育年刊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Espin, C. A.、Tindal, G.(1998)。Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students。Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
4.B. M. Kroll(1981)。Development relationships between speaking and writing。Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts。Champaign IL：National Council of Teachers of English。  new window
5.CScott, M.(1999)。Learning to write。Language and reading disabilities。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：596（臺灣：593，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67975429
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上