臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣發明家的內在動機、思考取向及環境機會--演化論的觀點
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：詹志禹 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chan, Jason Chih-yu
出版日期：2004
卷期：27:4
頁次：頁775-806
主題關鍵詞：技術發明；內在動機；思考取向；演化論；創造力；Technological invention；Creativity；Evolution theory；Intrinsic motivation；Thinking orientation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:152
  • 點閱點閱:125
本研究以「變異－選擇－保存」的演化觀點為基礎，將發明歷程視為一種創造性的問題解決歷程，並結合文獻推測六項有利於發明的變項：內在動機、問題發現、多元主義、內化判準、辯證思考及環境機會，然後發展六個量表以比較臺灣地區發明家與高職教師之間的差異。發明家樣本為1994-1998年在國內與國際各項發明展的得獎者共143位，對照組樣本主要為高職工科教師共149位。研究結果發現：發明家組雖然在學校教育的受教年限方面顯著低於對照組，但在「內在動機」、「問題發現」、「內化判準」、「辯證思考」與「環境機會」五個量表上的得分都顯著高於對照組。整體結果，大致上與演化觀點的預測相符合，並透露了培育發明家的一些重要條件。
In the current study, technological invention is regarded as creative problem-solving process as well as evolutionary process. Based on this variation-selection-and-retention model of evolution, it was predicted that the following six variables are critical for technological invention: internal motivation, problem finding, pluralism, internalized criteria, dialectic thinking, and environmental opportunities. By these six variables, a sample of technological inventors was contrasted with a sample of teachers from vocational high schools. A total of 143 inventors who won famous national and international awards of invention composed the first group, while a total of 149 vocational high school teachers with engineering background composed the second group. The first group was found to gain significantly higher scores on the scales of internal motivation, problem finding, internalized criteria, dialectic thinking, and environmental opportunities than the second group did. In conclusion, most predictions based on the theory of evolution about technological invention were confirmed. A few implications for educational practice and future studies were derived accordingly.
Other
1.Amabile, Teresa M.(1982)。The Social Psychology of Creativity，Springer-Verlag。  new window
期刊論文
1.Amabile, T. M.(1993)。Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace。Human Resoruce Management Review，3(3)，185-201。  new window
2.Cameron, J.(2001)。Negative Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation: A Limited Phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001)。Review of Educational Research，71(1)，29-42。  new window
3.Deci, Edward L.、Koestner, Richard、Ryan, Richard M.(2001)。Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again。Review of Educational Research，71(1)，1-27。  new window
4.Okuda, S. M.、Runco, M. A.、Berger, D. E.(1991)。Creativity and the Finding and Solving of Real-World Problems。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，9(1)，45-53。  new window
5.Runco, M. A.、Walberg, H. J.、Nemiro, J.(1998)。Personal Explicit Theories of Creativity。Journal of Creative Behavior，32(1)，1-17。  new window
6.Campbell, Donald T.(1960)。Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes。Psychological Review，67，380-400。  new window
7.Cizko, G. A.(1998)。From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior，32，192-209。  new window
8.Jehng, Jihn-Chang J.、Johnson, Scott D.、Anderson, Richard C.(1993)。Schooling and students' epistemological beliefs about learning。Contemporary Educational Psychology，18(1)，23-35。  new window
9.Simonton, D. K.(1984)。Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，46(6)，1273-1286。  new window
10.洪榮昭、朱永裕、鄭廉鐙(20020400)。科技創作能力發展分析--以第二屆「POWER TECH：全國少年科技創作競賽」為例。臺灣教育，614，16-23。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kramer, D. A.、Woodruff, D. S.(1986)。Relativistic and dialectical thought in three adult age-groups。Human Development，29(5)，280-290。  new window
12.邱文彬、林美珍(20010600)。後形式思考信念的發展：相對性思考與辯証性思考。教育與心理研究，24(上)，191-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳昭儀(19910600)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，7，211-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Chand, I.、Runco, M. A.(1992)。Problem Finding Skills as Components in the Creative Process。Personality and Individual Differences，14(1)，155-162。  new window
會議論文
1.許娜娜、劉誠(2003)。簡述香港的創造力研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.詹志禹(1994)。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之影響。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊智先(2000)。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林偉文(2002)。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.趙永茂(1987)。台灣省基層政治精英之民主價值取向：鄉鎮（市）長､民意代表之分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gruber, H. E.(1981)。Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.、Davidson, J. E.(1986)。Conceptions of giftedness。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Runco, M. A.(1991)。Divergent thinking。Norwood, NJ：Ablex。  new window
4.Getzels, J.,、Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1976)。The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem-finding in art。New York：Wiley-Interscience。  new window
5.Sober, Elliott(1984)。The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
6.Simonton, D. K.(1988)。Scientific genius: a psychology of science。New York：Harvard University Press。  new window
7.吳明雄(2000)。我國發明人相關能力及性向與發明方法之研究。台北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Siegel, H.(1988)。Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education。New York, NY。  new window
9.Einstein, A.、Infeld, L.(1938)。The evolution of physics。New York：Simon and Schuster。  new window
10.Sternberg, R. J.(1997)。Thinking styles。New York。  new window
11.Amabile, T. M.、Collins, M. A.、Conti, R.、Phillips, E.、Picariello, M.、Ruscio, J.、Whitney, D.(1996)。Creativity in Context: Updates to the Social Psychology of Creativity。Boulder, Co：Westview Press。  new window
12.Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996)。Creativity: Flow and Psychology of Discovery and Invention。New York：Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
13.Gardner, H. E.(1993)。Creating Minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi。New York：Basic Books。  new window
14.Campbell, R. L.、Bickhard, M. H.(1986)。Knowing Levels and Developmental Stages。Basel, Switzerland：New York：Karger。  new window
15.Ihde, D.(1993)。Philosophy of Technology: An introduction。New York, NY：Paragon House Press。  new window
16.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.(1995)。Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity。Free Press。  new window
17.Bickhard, M. H.(1991)。A Pre-Logical Model of Rationality。Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience。New York, NY。  new window
18.Feyerabend, P. K.(1970)。Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge。Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
19.Flatow, I.、蘇清遙(1994)。樂在發明。樂在發明。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.Goertzel, M. G.、Goertzel, V.、Goertzel, T. G.(1978)。Three Hundred Eminent Personalities。Three Hundred Eminent Personalities。San Francisco, CA。  new window
21.Paul, R. W.(1993)。The Logic of Creative and Critical Thinking。Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World。Santa Rosa, CA。  new window
22.Perkins, D. N.(1988)。The Possibility of Invention。The Nature of Creativity。United Kingdom。  new window
23.Vincenti, W. G.(1990)。What Engineers Know and How They Know It。What Engineers Know and How They Know It。Baltimore, MD。  new window
其他
1.詹志禹(2001)。An Evolutionary Approach to General Problem-Solving Process，Bethlehem, PA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Simonton, D. K.(1999)。Creativity from a Historiometric Perspective。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Campbell, D. T.(1974)。Evolutionary Epistemology。Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge。La Salle, IL：Open Court。  new window
3.Csikszentmihalyi, M.、Wolfe, R.(2000)。New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education。International handbook of giftedness and talent。Elsevier。  new window
4.Csikszentmihályi, M.(1990)。The Domain of Creativity。Theories of Creativity。Newbury Park, California：Sage。  new window
5.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1999)。The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigm。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Jay, E. S.、Perkins, D. N.(1997)。Problem Finding: The Search for Mechanism。The Creativity Research Handbook。Hampton press。  new window
7.Collins, M. A.、Amabile, T. M.(1999)。Motivation and creativity。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Brown, R. T.(1989)。Creativity: What are we to measure?。Handbook of Creativity。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
9.Benack, S.、Basseches, M.、Swan, T.(1989)。Dialectical thinking and adult creativity。Handbook of Creativity。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
10.Policastro, E.、Gardner, H.(1999)。From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1999)。Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 國民中小學活化校園指標建構之研究
2. 成人子女作為家庭主要照顧者轉化歷程的後形式思維之研究
3. 南部四縣市國民小學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究-以教師知識管理、組織文化為中介變項
4. 國民小學校長領導行為、教師專業發展與創新教學效能關係之研究－以臺灣北部四市為例
5. 國民小學校長道德領導行為、學校創新、組織溝通與學校效能徑路模式之建構與驗證
6. 國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效關係之研究
7. 小組知識翻新活動中的設計思考與創造力表現：以個案研究為例
8. 我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質及教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力影響之研究—以學校組織創新氣氛為調節變項
9. 少子女趨勢下國民小學教師專業發展評鑑認知、自我效能、專業承諾與創意教學行為關係之研究
10. 親師生信任連結的家校生活：一所台灣另類國民小學教育實踐之個案研究
11. 校長協會會員組織承諾、組織文化與組織效能關係之研究
12. 縣市國教輔導團領域召集人知識領導、學習社群與創新教學效能關係之研究
13. 國民小學校長創新領導之個案研究－以一所Innoschool全國學校經營創新獎獲獎學校為例
14. 以多層次觀點探討影響創造力的個人與脈絡因素: 以觀光餐旅產業為例
15. 高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1040（臺灣：1038，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67770087
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上