課程評鑑，在台灣過去的課程改革裡，長期被忽視。但在此波課程改革中，課程評鑑正式列課程綱要之中。當吾人關心課程評鑑要評鑑什麼，如何評鑑時，是否應關心課程評鑑裡的「人」，尤其是學校教育人員，如何看待與因應，他們的參與攸關台灣課程評鑑的走向。 本研究透過焦點團體訪談，探究學校教育的主角：校長與教師在課程評鑑中的角色、定位與難處，並思考「專家」在課程評鑑中的功能，以及誰可以成為課程評鑑裡的專家。此外，亦分析這些不同的人在課程評鑑裡對彼此的期待。文末，提出課程評鑑自身、校長、教師與專家改善處境的可能性。

Curriculum evaluation was ignored in Taiwan curriculum reform for a period of time. However, in the Nine-Year Joint Curriculum, the curriculum evaluation was listed in the national curriculum. When we care “what did the curriculum evaluate?” and ”how did the curriculum evaluate?”, we should cared about the person that included principals, teachers, and professors. They shall influence the development of curriculum evaluation. This study applied the focus interview to understand the roles, positions, and difficulties when presidents, teachers, and professors working on curriculum evaluation. Moreover, the professors’ functions and inquiry of who should be the professor in the field would be analyzed. Finally, the research would like to propose the reform possibilities for curriculum evaluation, presidents, teachers, and professors.