臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：後設評鑑研究：以2001年大學院校實施自我評鑑計劃成果報告書為例
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：黃曙東／蘇錦麗 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Shu-tung／Su, Jin-li
出版日期：2005
卷期：51:2
頁次：頁31-65
主題關鍵詞：大學評鑑；後設評鑑；評鑑報告；檢核表；內部評鑑；自我評鑑；University evaluation；Metaevaluation；Evaluation report；Checkist；Inter evaluation；Self-evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:136
  • 點閱點閱:78
本研究旨在建構一套具有信度與效度的後設評鑑檢核表，以分析2001年9所實施自我評鑑計畫大學校院的成果報告書，判斷其優缺點，進而推論34所母群體大學的整體報告書品質，並瞭解34所大學實施自我評鑑計畫之現況。 本研究採用文件分析及專家檢核方法。首先，分析七年內國內外22篇後設評鑑研究報告。其次，依據美國線上評鑑資源圖書館（OERL）所建構的品質結論報告準則，並經專家審核與研究者試評，修正完成方案評鑑報告檢核表，包括執行摘要、受評方案描述、評鑑概述、評鑑設計、分析程序及結果與建議共六大項27個品質準則項目、三等量表，以及每項目之量的判斷依據；再者，由兩位研究者據之檢核，以判斷9所大學校院成果報告書的優缺點，進而推論34所大學整體報告書的品質。最後，提出結論與建議。
In 2001, 34 of Taiwan’s colleges and universities participated in a Self-Evaluation Project (SEP), and this study set out to analyze the effectiveness of the SEP. More specifically, it set out to understand the quality (or accuracy) of the self-evaluations reported by these institutions and to determine certain problematic aspects of the current implementation of the SEP. The research methods used include content analysis and experts’ reviews. The authors asked 3 experts to revise the Quality Criteria for Reports checklist developed by the On-Line Evaluation Resource Library and, in order to construct proper validity and reliability for this checklist, randomly selected 9 colleges and universities as samples. This metaevaluation study indicated both the strengths and weaknesses of the system of self-evaluation used by these colleges and universities. In this paper the authors report these findings and also give some suggestions for a more effective self-evaluation process in the future.
期刊論文
1.Scriven, Michael(2001)。Evaluation: Future Tense。American Journal of Evaluation，22(3)，301-307。  new window
2.Sanders, James R.(1999)。Metaevaluation of "The Effectiveness of Comprehensive, Case Management Interventions: Evidence From the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Child Development Program"。American Journal of Evaluation，20(3)，577-582。  new window
3.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2001)。The Metaevaluation Imperative。American Journal of Evaluation，22(2)，183-209。  new window
4.Grasso, Patrick G.(1999)。Meta-evaluation of an Evaluation of Reader Focused Writing for the Veterans Benefits Administration。American Journal of Evaluation，20(2)，355-370。  new window
5.Scott-Little, Catherine、Hamann, Mary Sue、Jurs, Stephen G.(2002)。Evaluations of After-school Programs: A Meta-evaluation of Methodologies and Narrative Synthesis of Findings。American Journal of Evaluation，23(4)，387-419。  new window
6.Stake, Robert、Davis, Rita(1999)。Summary of Evaluation of Reader Focused Writing for the Veterans Benefits Administration。American Journal of Evaluation，20(2)，323-343。  new window
7.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.(2001)。Evaluation Checklists: Practical Tools for Guiding and Judging Evaluations。The American Journal of Evaluation，22(1)，71-79。  new window
會議論文
1.Bjornkilde, T.、Bason, C.(2000)。Metaevaluation of the Evaluations of Higher Education in Denmark。0。  new window
研究報告
1.黃政傑、李隆盛、游家政(1994)。國民小學教育評鑑之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾淑惠(1996)。我國專科學校後設評鑑之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇慧雯(2003)。臺北市幼稚園後設評鑑之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴志峰(1997)。臺北市幼稚園後設評鑑之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.詹惠雪、蘇錦麗、呂鴻德、王偉中、楊瑩(2000)。大學後設評鑑研究。臺北市：揚智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Worthen, B. R.、Sanders, J. R.、Fitzpatrick, J. L.(1997)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。New York：Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
3.Scriven, M.(1991)。The evaluation thesaurus。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
4.The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(1994)。The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
5.曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇錦麗(1995)。大學學門評鑑試辦計畫成效評估之研究。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
7.蘇錦麗(19970000)。高等教育評鑑：理論與實際。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.胡悅倫、陳漢強(1998)。1997學年度大學綜合評鑑之後設評鑑研究。海峽兩岸大學教育評鑑之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chelimsky, E.(1987)。The Politics of Program Evaluation。Evaluation Practice in Review。San Francisco, CA。  new window
10.Schwandt, Thomas A.、Halpern, Edward S.(1988)。Linking Auditing and Metaevaluation: Enhancing Quality in Applied Research。Linking Auditing and Metaevaluation: Enhancing Quality in Applied Research。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
11.Stufflebeam, D. L.(1974)。Metaevaluation。Metaevaluation。Kalamazoo, MI。  new window
其他
1.American Evaluation Association(1994)。Guiding Principles for Evaluators，0。  new window
2.Bustelo, María(2002)。Metaevaluation as a Tool for the Improvement and Development of the Evaluation Function in Public Administrations，0。  new window
3.Gunnarsson, V.，Rupprecht-Hjort, M.(2000)。Metaevaluation of the Structural Funds in Sweden - What Lessons Can be Learnt and How to Utilize This Knowledge in the Future，0。  new window
4.Hartmann, David，Loizides, Georgios(2001)。Metaevaluation of the Web-based ATE Survey Evaluation System，0。  new window
5.McKinley, Kenneth H.(1999)。Metaevaluation Report of the Evaluation of The Michigan Public School Academy Initiative，0。  new window
6.Migotsky, C.，Stake, R.(2001)。An Evaluation of an Evaluation: CIRCE's Metaevaluation of the Site Visits and Issue Papers of the ATE Program Evaluation，0。  new window
7.On-line Evaluation Resources Library(2001)。Quality Criteria for Evaluation Resources，0。  new window
8.Scriven, Michael(2000)。The Logic and Methodology of Checklists，http://preval.org/documentos/2075.pdf。  new window
9.Scriven, Michael(2000)。Metaevaluation of Gang Resistance Education and Training Program，0。  new window
10.Scriven, Michael(2004)。Key Evaluation Checklist，0。  new window
11.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.(1999)。Program Evaluation Models Metaevaluation Checklist (Based on The Program Evaluation Standards)，0。  new window
12.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.，Gullickson, A. R.，Wingate, L.(2002)。The Spirit of Consuelo an Evaluation of KE AKA HO 'ONA，0。  new window
13.Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency(2001)。Report on a Meta-evaluation of the evaluation of Diakonia and Forum Syd's Cooperation with Cambodian NGOs，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.(2000)。The CIPP Model for Evaluation。Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Scriven, M.(1967)。The methodology of evaluation。Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation。Rand McNally。  new window
3.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.(2000)。The Methodology of Metaevaluation。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation。Boston, Massachusetts：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：978（臺灣：937，外國：41） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2475507 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68274896
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上