:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元評量結合情緒輔導對慈輝班學生情緒智力與學校生活適應之效果研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:陳志平孟瑛如 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chih-pingMeng, Ying-ru
出版日期:2005
卷期:28
頁次:頁25-48
主題關鍵詞:多元評量慈輝班中輟生輔導情緒智力學校生活適應Multiple assessmentsEmotional intelligenceAdjustmentDropoutsAlternative
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:222
  • 點閱點閱:35
本研究旨在運用多元評量結合情緒輔導探討:一、慈輝班學生情緒智力(Emotional Intelligence,EI),與學校生活適應(School Adjustment,SA)的現況與關係;二、情緒輔導對實驗組EI與SA之效果。研究方法採「不等組前後測、追蹤測準實驗設計」,以桃園縣某國中XX分校(慈輝班)二年級兩班學生為對象,隨機抽取其中一班12人為實驗組,另一班13人為控制組。 主要研究結果: 一、本研究對象EI與SA均顯著低於一般國二學生,需加強輔導;EI與SA(適應行為,學生自評)具顯著相關,且與WISC-Ⅲ知覺組織能力成反比,尤其是情緒表達部分;本研究對象中以男生、入學較久(二學期)、曾逃學三天以上、家庭經濟困難、家人管教不當者,SA有較多顯著問題。 二、本研究訪談29位師生(6教職員、23學生),顯示慈輝班安置成效可降低學生部分問題行為,但有問題者多是想家、不想被管、被排擠、人際關係不良等問題,衝動與焦慮者易再中輟;本研究對象在情緒表達與情緒調整能力較差;本研究對象在學校生活適應上有較多攻擊、違規及人際問題。 三、本研究情緒輔導將上述多元評量結果融入課程設計,活動後實驗組EI顯著提升,SA雖無顯著效果,但部份行為顯著改善,退縮/膽怯、溝通技巧、學業學習(教師評量),不過也有部分行為顯著退步,如焦慮(學生自評)、適應行為、外向問題(教師評量)、主動行為(同儕評量);本研究對象中高焦慮(學生自評)或主動低(同儕評量)者易再中輟,而留下者,情緒調整若未提升,教師更容易觀察到其不適應行為;實驗組接受情緒輔導後依出席紀錄發現中輟行為減少及減緩,參與活動者皆給予研究者及活動內容正面回饋。
The purposes of this study are to integrate multiple assessments into Emotional Guidance Program (EGP) and to investigate two concerns: 1. The Performance and connections between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and School Adjustment (SA); 2. The EI, SA effects of EGP of junior high school students in an alternative school named Tsyr-huei class. A nonequivalent quasi-experimental design of pre-posttest follow-up test is adopted in this study. Two classes of the second grade junior high school students in Tsyr-huie class in Towyang County are selected as subjects. One class which included 13 students is the experimental group; the other class which included 12 students is the control group. The major findings are as follows: 1. The EI and SA of all subjects are significantly worse than other juveniles of the same second grade. There is a significant connection between EI and SA (adjustment, students' edition). There is a negative significant connection between EI (especially expression of emotion) and perceptual organization of WISC-III; In all subjects, the males, enrolment for second semesters, truant over 3 days, deprived, poor parenting, are dangerous factors of some-mal-SA. 2. Placement of subjects in Tsyr-huei class can help them to improve some behavioral problems; however, can't help some subjects to improve homesick and exclusion form the groups. Impulsive or anxious subjects are easy to drop out. The expression and regulation of emotion are the worse part of EI of the subjects. Attack, violation, and exclusion from the groups are the worse part of SA of the subjects. 3. There are effects of EGP for promoting subjects' EI. There is no effect on SA, but there are effects on withdrawal/timidity, communication skills and studies (teachers' edition). However, some SA are getting worse (anxiety, students' edition; adjustment, extroverted problems, teachers' edition; initiative, peer group's edition). When some SA (anxiety, students' edition; initiative, peer group's edition) are getting worse, subjects are easy to drop out. If subjects' regulations of emotion aren't promoted, teachers will not often think highly of subjects' progressive behaviors but mal-adjustment. According to the attendance records and the feedback of EGP, EGP is helpful to the experimental group.
期刊論文
1.蔡明富、吳武典(2000)。國小資優學生與普通學生人事智能與學校適應之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊,18,257-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪儷瑜(19980600)。多元「社會行為評量表」在鑑定國中情緒障礙學生之可行性研究。特殊教育研究學刊,16,247-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊明貞(19851200)。國中學生學校生活素質與學校適應行為的關係。新竹師專學報,12,498-434。  延伸查詢new window
4.李麗華、包希姮(19980300)。資源教室教學對國中中輟復學生學習成效之研究。學生輔導,55,26-41。  延伸查詢new window
5.Salovey, Peter、Caruso, David R.、Sitarenios, Gill、Mayer, John D.(2001)。Emotional Intelligence as a Standard Intelligence。Emotion,1(3),232-242。  new window
6.Mayer, J. D.、Salovey, P.、Caruso, D. R.、Sitarenios, G.(2003)。Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0。Emotion,3(1),97-105。  new window
7.江文慈(20011000)。青少年情緒智力發展之研究。世新大學學報,11,51-81。  延伸查詢new window
8.Youngman, M. B.(1979)。Assessing behavioral adjustment to school。British Journal of Educational Psychology,49,258-264。  new window
9.Zajonc, R. Bob(1980)。Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences。American Psychologist,35(2),151-175。  new window
10.蔡德輝、吳芝儀(19990600)。中輟學生的輔導與服務方式--美國選替性教育之另類觀點。訓育研究,38(2),34-47。  延伸查詢new window
11.Mayer, John D.、Salovy, Peter(1990)。Emotional intelligence。Imagination, Cognition and Personality,9(3),185-211。  new window
12.周愫嫻(20010900)。愛上學的孩子,不會變壞嗎?論學校因素與青少年偏差行為之關係。應用心理研究,11,93-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Bullis, Michael、Sprague, Jeffrey R.、Walker, Hill M.(2001)。A Promise Unfulfilled: Social Skills Training with At-risk and Antisocial Children and Youth。Exceptionality,9(1/ 2),67-90。  new window
14.Gallagher, Carole J.(2002)。Stories from the Strays: What Dropouts can Teach Us about School。American Secondary Education,30(3),36-60。  new window
15.Demaray, Michelle K.、Malecki, Christine K.、Elliott, Stephen N.(2001)。New Directions in Social Skills Assessment and Intervention for Elementary and Middle School Students。Exceptionality,9(1/ 2),19-32。  new window
16.Scanlon, David、Mellard, Daryl F.(2002)。Academic and Participation Profiles of School-age Dropouts with and Without Disabilities。Exceptional Children,68(2),239-258。  new window
17.Merrell, Kenneth W.(2001)。Assessment of Children's Social Skills: Recent Developments, Best Practices, and New Directions。Exceptionality,9(1/ 2),3-18。  new window
18.Fine, Lisa(2002)。Graduation Rates Up for Spec. Ed. Students, Report Says。Education Week,21(37),24-36。  new window
19.Clanton, Robert、Wells, Don、Miller, Mark、Tobacyk, Jerome(2002)。Using a Psychoeducational Approach to Increase the Self-esteem of Adolescents at High Risk for Dropping Out。Adolescence,37(146),431-434。  new window
20.Zeidner, Moshe、Matthews, Gerald、Roberts, Richard D.(2001)。Does Emotional Intelligence Meet Traditional Standards for an Intelligence? Some New Data and Conclusions。Emotion,1(3),196-231。  new window
21.吳芝儀(2001)。美國中輟學生問題與中輟防治措施。全國中輟防治通訊,3,6-15。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭夙芬(1988)。國中復學學生之學校適應初探--以臺北縣芋國中八位復學學生為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李曉晶(2002)。台灣慈輝班學生在校生活狀況及學校適應之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧奕璇(2003)。情緒管理方案對高中生情緒智力與生活適應之影響(碩士論文)。慈濟大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.莫麗珍(2003)。國中學生情緒智力與生活適應關係之研究---以台灣中部地區為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王財印(2000)。國民中學學生情緒智力、生活適應與學業成就關係之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.張富湖(2002)。情緒教育課程對提昇國中學生情緒智力效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳志平(2004)。「情緒教育輔導方案」對慈輝班學生情緒智力與學校生活適應之影響,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.LeDoux, J. E.(1996)。The Emotional Brain。New York, NY:Weidenfeld & Nicolson.。  new window
2.Harris, Judith Rich、洪蘭(2000)。教養的迷思--父母的教養能不能決定孩子的人格發展。臺北市:商周。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃月霞(2002)。兒童輔導與諮商--了解兒童、諮商服務、技巧訓練。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ellis, A.(1979)。Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy。Secaucus, NJ:Citadel。  new window
5.王淑俐(1995)。青少年情緒的問題、研究與對策。臺北:合記。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳榮華(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄔佩麗、吳嫦娥(1996)。校園暴力行為之預防及處理策略模式研究。行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊坤堂(2000)。情緒障礙與行為異常。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.孟瑛如(1999)。資源教室方案:班級經營與補救教學。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳芝儀(20000000)。中輟學生的危機與轉機。嘉義市:濤石文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.洪儷瑜(2000)。青少年社會行為評量表--指導手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.丹尼爾.高曼、張美惠(1996)。EQ。時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gardner, Howard(1978)。Developmental Psychology。Developmental Psychology。Toronto, Canada。  new window
14.Kauffman, James M.(2001)。Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth。Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
15.Sternberg, Robert J.(1994)。Intelligence。Thinking and Problem Solving。San Diego。  new window
16.Callahan, Carolyn M.(2000)。Intelligence and Giftedness。Handbook of Intelligence。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2003)。教育部推動多元形式「中介教育社設施」專案報告,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, C. A.、Lazarus, R. S.(1990)。Emotion and adaptation。Handbook of personality: theory and research。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.(2000)。The concept of intelligence。Handbook of intelligence。NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Mayer, John D.、Salovey, Peter(1997)。What is emotional intelligence?。Emotional development and emotional intelligence: educational implications。Basic Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE