臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：屏東科技大學學生評鑑教師教學之工具修訂
書刊名：臺東大學教育學報
作者：湯誌龍
作者(外文)：Tang, Jyh-long
出版日期：2006
卷期：17:1
頁次：頁1-33
主題關鍵詞：教師評鑑；學生評鑑教師教學；驗證性因素分析；Teacher evaluation；Student ratings of instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:259
  • 點閱點閱:68
本研究旨在發展大學校院學生評鑑教師教學之工具，以國立屏東科技大學教師教學意見調查表內涵及 3,659份調查表原始得分資 料為基礎，採用內部一致性(Cronbach α)考驗調查表之信度，以驗證性因素分析 (confirmatory factor analysis)驗證調查之 效度，並經歸納文獻資料及參考八所公私立大學校院現有調查工具，以修訂學生評鑑教師教學調查表。本研究先以 581位學生預測之結果修訂初稿，並請八位教師針對預試結果提出個人受評看法，修訂完稿再請學校全面試用獲得13,777筆學生資料，經再次 驗證發展出具信效度之學生評鑑教師教學調查工具。其研究過程可作為大學校院發展或修訂學生評鑑教師教學工具之參考。
This study developed a new instrument for Student Ratings of Instruction (SROI). Based on the original content of SROI and 659 student responses from National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (NPUST), this study used statistical techniques, such as Cronbach α and confirmatory factor analysis to verify the reliability and validity of the instrument. A new draft was then developed after a literature review as well as a review of eight SROI instruments that are currently used by public and private universities in Taiwan. The new draft was again revised according to the opinoons from eight professors and the results of pretest collected from 581 NPUST students. The final draft was verified with a data pool of 13,777 student responses. The methods and procedures in constructing the SROI instrument were described in details.
期刊論文
1.黃德祥(19910600)。大學學生評鑑教師教學效果之研究。彰化師範大學學報，2，177-214。  延伸查詢new window
2.Harrison, P. D.、Ryan, J. M.、Moore, P. S.(1996)。College students´ self-insight and common implicit theories in ratings of teaching effectiveness。Journal of Educational Psychology，88(4)，775-582。  new window
3.Marsh, H. W.(1987)。Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research。International Journal of Educational Research，11(3)，253-388。  new window
4.Mark, M. M.、Shotland, R. L.(1985)。Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments。Evaluation Review，9，605-626。  new window
5.Griffin, B. W.(2004)。Grading leniency, grade discrepancy, and student ratings of instruction。Contemporary Educational Psychology，29，410-425。  new window
6.Feng, C.(1990)。Quantitative evaluation of university teaching quality: An application of fuzzy set and approximate reasoning。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，37(1)，1-11。  new window
7.Centra, J. A.、Gaubatz, N. B.(2000)。Is there gender bias in student evaluation of teaching?。The Journal of Higher Education，72(1)，17-33。  new window
8.McKeachie, W. J.(1997)。Student ratings: The validity of use。American Psychologist，52(11)，1218-1225。  new window
9.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊，1(2)，90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張德勝(20040400)。The Results of Student Ratings: Paper vs. Online。師大學報. 教育類，49(1)，171-185。new window  new window
11.Mesak, H.,、Jauch, L. R.(1991)。Faculty performance evaluation: Modeling to improve personnel decisions。Decision Sciences，22，1142-1157。  new window
12.Olivares, O. J.(2001)。Student interest, grading leniency, and teacher ratings: A conceptual analysis。Contemporary Educational Psychology，26，382-399。  new window
13.湯誌龍(2001)。中小學教師評鑑制度可行性之研究─澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育，51，105 -127。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bedggood, R. E.,、Pollard, R. J.(1999)。Uses and misuses of student opinion survey in eight Australian universities。Australian Journal of Education，43(2)，129-143。  new window
15.Cashin, W. E.(1992)。Student ratings: the need for comparative data。Instructional Evaluation and Faculty Development，12，1-6。  new window
會議論文
1.Purvanova, R. K.(2002)。Empirical examination of factors that influence student ratings of instructors。Chicago, IL。  new window
2.Wollert, M. H.,、West, R. F.(2000)。Differences in student ratings of instructional effectiveness based on the demographic and academic characteristics of instructors15-17。  new window
3.Hampton, S. E.(2000)。A review of literature on formative evaluation of teachers through mid-term student feedback and how the Reiser and Dick Instructional Planning Model can enhance this feedback。The 22nd Association for Educational Communications and Technology(AECT) International Convention，(會議日期: 2000/02/16-02/20)。Long Beach, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.國立屏東技術學院(1997)。國立屏東技術學院教師教學意見調查分析。台灣。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cashin, W. E.(1995)。Student ratings of teaching: the research revisited。  new window
學位論文
1.楊盛輝(2004)。科技大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」意見調查研究(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉重新(1987)。臺灣地區九所大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」期望之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳瑞榮(1995)。工業職業學校教師評鑑模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳政達(1999)。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Elrod, M. R.(2002)。A comparison of institutional factors and student satisfaction: retention implications in a Hispanic-Serving community college。  new window
圖書
1.Baker, L. L.(1993)。Factor analysis of the IDEA student rating instrument for introductory college science and mathematics courses。LA：Mid-South Educational Research Association。  new window
2.教育部(2004)。中華民國教育統計指標。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德勝(2002)。學生評鑑教師教學：理論、實務與態度。臺北：揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Arreola, R. A.(1995)。Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System。Bolton, MA：Anker Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
5.Beerens, D. R.(1999)。Evaluating teachers for professional growth: Creating a culture of motivation and learning。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
6.張德勝(2000)。師範學院師生對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之研究。台北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
8.Lokan, J.,、McKenzie, P.(1989)。Teacher appraisal issues and approaches。Victoria：The Australia Council for Education Research Ltd。  new window
其他
1.Schlenker, D. E.，Mckinnon, N. C.(1994)。Assessing faculty performance using the student evaluation of instruction，New Brunswich, Canada：Atlantic Baptic College。(ED371-667)。  new window
圖書論文
1.詹棟樑(1995)。如何對教師進行評鑑。教育評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：987（臺灣：972，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67886514
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上