:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心學的經典詮釋
書刊名:興大中文學報
作者:楊祖漢 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Cho-Hon
出版日期:2007
卷期:21
頁次:頁59-81
主題關鍵詞:宋明理學心學一系經典詮釋Neo-ConfucianismThe school of idealismInterpretation of classics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:1675
  • 點閱點閱:41
宋明理學的心學一系,歷來被認為由於重視道德心的體證,而較輕視讀書;故他們對於經典的講解是比較自由而隨意的,而朱子系的學者,則比較能理解經典的原義。但其實心學家本著他們對本心的體悟,對經典的詮釋雖常出人意表,但未必不合文義。本文舉陸象山、羅近溪及周海門三家之說為例,以證此義。
The School of the idealism of the Neo Confucianism had been considered as emphasizing more on the actualization of moral mind than on the mere studying of books. As a result their teachings on classics were more freely and flexible. On the other hand, the scholars of Chu Hsi' school could grasp the original meaning of the classics. Nevertheless the interpretation of the classics from the idealists through their realization and experiencing of moral mind actually giving us more satisfaction which is really beyond our expectation, yet their interpretation is still accurate. Futhermore, Lu Hsiang-shan, Luo Chin-hsi, Chou Hai-mun are mentioned in this essay to verify my concepts.
圖書
1.張載。正蒙。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kant, Immanuel(1997)。單純理性限度內的宗教。單純理性限度內的宗教。香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.馮友蘭(1930)。中國哲學史。中國哲學史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅汝芳、曹胤儒(1996)。盱壇直詮。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陸象山(1966)。象山全集。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.程顥、程頤(1983)。河南程氏遺書。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊簡、孔子文化大全編輯部(1991)。慈湖先生遺書。濟南:山東友誼書社。  延伸查詢new window
8.牟宗三(1968)。心體與性體。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳獻章(1986)。陳白沙集。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡仁厚(1982)。新儒家的精神方向。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)丁福保(1987)。六祖壇經箋註。六祖壇經箋註。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1968)。王龍溪先生語錄。王龍溪先生語錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kant, Immanuel(2003)。道德底形上學之基本原則。道德底形上學之基本原則。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)黃宗羲(2005)。明儒學案,杭州。  延伸查詢new window
2.(宋)朱熹。朱子語類,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)王陽明(1985)。傳習錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(南宋)朱熹。孟子集註。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)羅汝芳(1984)。近溪子明道錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE