:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:訊息呈現方式及故事架構對理解之影響
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:吳宜貞
作者(外文):Wu, Yi-chen
出版日期:2007
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁31-55
主題關鍵詞:閱讀理解聽力理解故事架構故事難度訊息呈現Reading comprehensionListening comprehensionStory structureStory difficultyInformation input
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:98
本研究以2×2實驗設計探討訊息呈現方式(聽vs.讀)及故事架構(簡單vs.複雜)對五年級學生理解能力之影響,並以不同故事架構,探討不同閱讀能力者在不同訊息呈現下的理解表現,重要結果如下: 1.聽力組在理解測驗得分及自由回想字數的表現,顯著優於閱讀組。但聽力組的回想錯誤字數顯著高於閱讀組。 2.接收簡單故事者在理解測驗得分及自由回想字數的表現,顯著優於接收複雜故事組。就簡單故事而言,聽力組之錯字數顯著高於閱讀組;但就複雜故事而言,則未達顯著差異。
This study used a 2 (listening vs. reading) X 2 (easy vs. hard) experimental design to estimate the effects of information input and story difficulty on fifth graders’ comprehension performance. This study also investigated the effects of information input and story difficulty on students with different reading abilities. The participants were 141 fifth graders. The results were listed as follows: 1. With regard to the MANOVA result, significant main effects of story difficulty and task presentation were found on the comprehension score. Also, the MANOVA results showed that the listening groups had a better performance on the correct words recalled and comprehension test. On the incorrect words recalled, for the easy story, the listening group recalled more incorrect words than the reading group, but no significant difference was found between reading and listening groups for the difficult story. 2. With regard to story difficulty, students who read/listened to the easy story had a better performance on the comprehension score and the correct words recalled than students who read/listened to the hard story. On the incorrect words recalled, for the easy story, the listening group had more incorrect words recalled than the reading group, but for the hard story no significant difference was found.
期刊論文
1.陳美芳(19980600)。國小學童口語語言理解與閱讀理解能力之關係。特殊教育研究學刊,16,171-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Linderholm, T.、Everson, M. G.、Van den Broek, P.、Mischinski, M.、Crittenden, A.、Samuels, J.(2000)。Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers' comprehension of easy and difficult texts。Cognition and Instruction,18(4),525-556。  new window
3.黃瓊儀(20040800)。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之個案研究。初等教育學刊,18,243-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳宜貞(20040600)。重複閱讀及文章難度對五年級學生閱讀能力影響之探討。教育心理學報,35(4),319-336。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃瑋苓(20040900)。普通學生與閱讀障礙學生之單位詞、識字、詞彙和閱讀理解能力之比較研究。特殊教育與復健學報,12,31-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bell, Timothy(2001)。Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension。The Reading Matrix,1(1),1-13。  new window
7.陳美芳(19990600)。國語文低成就學童口語理解能力的發展。特殊教育研究學刊,17,189-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.O'Brien, E. J.、Myers, J. L.(1987)。The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text。Memory and cognition,15(5),419-427。  new window
9.Trabasso, Tom、Van den Broek, Paul W.(1985)。Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events。Journal of Memory and Language,24(5),612-630。  new window
10.林惠芬、林宏熾(20000700)。國小學習障礙學生聽覺理解錯誤類型分析研究。特殊教育學報,14,233-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃淑津、鄭麗玉(20040300)。電腦化動態評量對國小五年級學生閱讀理解效能之研究。國民教育研究學報,12,167-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳美芳(20030300)。語文理解能力測驗之發展與效度分析。特殊教育研究學刊,24,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳美芳(19970600)。國小學童聽覺理解與聽覺記憶能力之研究--不同國語文程度學生的比較。特殊教育研究學刊,15,293-305。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭麗玉(1999)。英語聽力策略教學研究。嘉義師院學報,13,57-76。  延伸查詢new window
15.錢景甯、高儷華(2004)。後設認知策略訓練、聽力理解以及學習態度之間的關係。中原學報,32(2),241-254。  延伸查詢new window
16.張世彗、楊坤堂(2004)。閱讀理解測驗之編製報告。國小特殊教育,37,1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Wolfe, M. B. W.、Magliano, J. P.、Larsen, B.(2005)。Causal and Semantic Relatedness in Discourse Understanding and Representation。Discourse Processes,39(2/ 3),165-187。  new window
18.Miller, S. D.、Smith, D. P. E.(1985)。Differences in Literal and Inferential Comprehension after Reading Arally and Silently。Journal of Educational Psychology,77(3),341-348。  new window
19.Wolman, C.、Van Den Broek, P.、Lorch, R. E.(1997)。Effects of Causal Structure on Immediate and Delayed Story Recall by Children with Mild Mental Retardation, Children with Learning Disabilities and Children without Disabilities。The Journal of Special Education,30(4),439-455。  new window
20.Royer, J. M.、Sinatra, G. M.、Schumer, H.(1990)。Patterns of individual differences in the development of listening and reading comprehension。Contemporary Educational Psychology,15,183-196。  new window
21.Horowitz, R.、Samuels, S. J.(1985)。Reading and Listening to Expository Text。Journal of Reading Behavior,17(3),185-198。  new window
22.Lynch, D. J.(1988)。Reading Comprehension under Listening, Silent, and Round Robin Reading Conditions as a Function of Text Difficulty。Reading Improvement,25(2),98-104。  new window
23.Rawson, K. A.、Kintsch, W.(2005)。Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test。Journal of Educational Psychology,97(1),70-80。  new window
24.Patching, G. R.、Jordan, T. R.(2005)。Spatial Frequency Sensitivity Differences between Adults of Good and Poor Reading Ability。Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,46(6),2219-2224。  new window
25.Kendeou, P.、Van Den Broek, P.(2005)。The Effects of Readers' Misconceptions on Comprehension of Scientific Text。Journal of Educational Psychology,97(2),235-245。  new window
26.Therriault, D. J.、Raney, G. E.(2002)。The Representation and Comprehension of Place-on-the-page and Text-sequence Memory。Scientific Studies of Reading,6(2),117-134。  new window
27.Royer, J. M.、Kulhavy, R. W.、Lee, J. B.、Peterson, S. E.(1986)。The Sentence Verification Technique as a Measure of Listening and Reading Comprehension。Educational and Psychological Research,6,299-314。  new window
學位論文
1.陳沛嵐(2001)。文章中的因果架構對國小四、六年級學生閱讀表徵之影響(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊宛儒(2006)。故事情緒面向以及其呈現方式對五年級學童在記憶及理解表現上之影響,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳宜貞(2004)。Effects of Repeated Reading on Text Comprehension for College Students,Minneapolis, MN。  new window
圖書
1.Aaron, P. G.、Joshi, R. M.(1992)。Reading Problems: Consultation and Remediation。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Smith, F.(1971)。Understanding Reading。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
3.Linacre, J. M.(2000)。Winsten (Version 3.21)。Winsten (Version 3.21)。Chicago, IL。  new window
4.Sticht, T. G.、James, J. H.(1984)。Listening and Comprehension。Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 1。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
其他
1.(2000)。八十七年常用語詞調查報告書,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯華葳(1997)。中文閱讀歷程成份研究:兒童在閱讀理解上的困境,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Trabasso, T.、Secco, T.、Van den Broek, P. W.(1984)。Causal cohesion and story coherence。Learning and comprehension of text。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE