:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小三年級兒童識字能力與語意關係對中文語意處理的影響
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:翁巧涵陳修元 引用關係周泰立 引用關係李姝慧
作者(外文):Wong, Ciao-hanChen, Shiou-yuanChou, Tai-liLee, Shu-hui
出版日期:2011
卷期:53:3
頁次:頁293-307
主題關鍵詞:語意關係語意處理識字能力關聯強度Association strengthSemantic processingSemantic relationWord recognition ability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:70
小學三年級是識字能力明顯增加的時期,此時語意發展亦處於區辨功能與類別語意關係的階段,但是關於識字能力與語意關係兩者如何影響語意處理,所知不多。過去研究中文兒童語意處理使用的語文材料皆選自成人常模,尚無使用兒童語文常模所進行的研究。因此本研究使用先前建立的「國小兒童中文雙字詞自由聯想常模」(翁巧涵、陳修元、李姝慧、周泰立,2009 ),針對小學三年級學生進行兩個實驗:實驗一比較不同識字能力兒童進行不同語意關聯強度(高語意、低語意)的語意判斷表現。發現隨著識字能力增加,語意判斷的正確率隨之上升;兒童對高語意關聯強度刺激的正確率與反應時間,皆優於低語意關聯強度。實驗二比較不同識字能力兒童進行不同語意關係(功能、類別)的語意判斷表現。結果顯示,高識字能力兒童的語意判斷正確率及反應時間,皆優於低識字能力兒童;兒童對於功能語意關係的正確率,優於類別語意關係。本研究推論:一、高識字能力兒童因為比較瞭解詞彙所包含的不同細緻概念,因此對於語意關係的掌握比低識字能力兒童好。二、高語意關聯強度詞對在語意網路中儲存位置較接近,兒童較易產生正確判斷。三、小學三年級學童以功能語意關係為主要表徵組織方式,尚未轉換到以類別語意關係組織語意表徵。
The ability to recognize words increases rapidly for third graders. This age group also starts to distinguish the functionally and categorically semantic relation of words. This study was aimed at determining whether word recognition ability would affect semantic processing and whether a shift of the semantic relation would occur for third graders. We used the child norms of association strength and selected stimuli from the norms to conduct two experiments. Participants were two groups of third graders with different word recognition abilities. In Experiment 1, participants performed semantic judgments on word pairs with either strong or weak association. Children with the better word recognition ability performed more accurately than those with the poorer recognition ability. Moreover, increased accuracy and faster reaction time were found for strong association pairs as compared to weak association pairs. In Experiment 2, participants performed semantic judgments on word pairs with either the functional or categorical relation. Children with the better word recognition ability performed more accurately and faster than those with the poorer recognition ability. Moreover, increased accuracy was found for word pairs with the functional relation as compared to those with the categorical relation. The findings suggest that word recognition abilities and semantic relation affect semantic processing for third graders. First, with more elaborate semantic representations, third graders with the better word recognition ability performed better semantic judgments than those with the poorer word recognition ability. Second, strong association pairs may correspond to closer conceptual links within semantic representations, resulting in increased accuracy as compared to weak association pairs. Third, the organization of semantic representation may be predominantly based on the functional rather than the categorical relation for third graders.
期刊論文
1.Levelt, William J. M.、Roelofs, Ardi、Meyer, Antje S.(1999)。A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,22(1),1-38。  new window
2.洪國鈞、李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20100900)。語意部件與關聯強度對成人與國小五年級孩童漢字語意處理效應的差異。中華心理學刊,52(3),327-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Booth, James R.、Lu, Dong、Burman, Douglas D.、Chou, Tai-Li、Jin, Zhen、Peng, Danling、Zhang, Lei、Ding, Guo-Sheng、Deng, Yuan、Liu, Li(2006)。Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading。Brain Research,1071(1),197-207。  new window
4.Ehri, Linnea C.(2005)。Learning to Read Words: Theory, Findings, and Issues。Scientific Studies of Reading,9(2),167-188。  new window
5.McClelland, J. L.、Rogers, T. T.(2003)。The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,4(4),310-322。  new window
6.Moss, H. E.、Marslen-Wilson, W. D.、Ostrin, R. R.、Tyler, L. K.(1995)。Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence form priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,21,863-883。  new window
7.Nelson, K.(1974)。Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development。Psychological Review,81,267-285。  new window
8.Nelson, K.(1977)。The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift revisited: A review of research and theory。Psychological Bulletin,84,93-116。  new window
9.Tomasello, M.(2002)。Things are what they do: Katherine Nelson's functional approach to language and cognition。Journal of Cognition and Development,3,5-19。  new window
10.Collins, A. M.、Quillian, M. R.(1969)。Retrieval time form semantic memory。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8,240-247。  new window
11.Cree, G. S.、McNorgan, C.、McRae, K.(2006)。Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,32,643-658。  new window
12.Nation, K.、Snowling, M. J.(1999)。Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence form semantic priming。Cognition,70,1-13。  new window
13.Meyer, D. E.、Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1971)。Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations。Journal of Experimental Psychology,90(2),227-234。  new window
14.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。  new window
15.王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、陳秀芬(20070900)。低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究--馬太效應之可能表現。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20091200)。國小五年級孩童與成人的識字能力對中文字語意處理之效應的差異。中華心理衛生學刊,22(4),345-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(20061000)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬(20080600)。一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報,39(4),555-568。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.錡寶香(20010200)。國小低閱讀能力學童語言能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,20,69-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nelson, K.(1973)。Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk。Structure and Strategy in Learning to Talk。  new window
2.教育部國語推行委員會(2002)。國小學童常用字詞報告書。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2006)。識字量評估測驗(國字測驗)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪儷瑜、陳秀芬、陳慶順、李瑩灼、張郁雯(2003)。某本讀寫字綜合測驗。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.Murphy, Gregory L.(2002)。The Big Book of Concepts。MIT Press。  new window
6.黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表 : 指導手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.翁巧涵、陳修元、李姝慧、周泰立(200909)。兒童中文語意處理與識字能力的關係。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃秀霜(1999)。不同國語成就學生認字能力及與其他認知能力之關。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.魏金財、吳敏而(1993)。小學國語課文字彙數量、次序的安排與比較分析。  延伸查詢new window
4.Booth, J. R, Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Lei, Z., Choy, J., Gitelman, D. R.(2003)。Modality-specific and -independent developmental differences in the neural substrate for lexical processing。  new window
5.Cao, F., Peng, D. L., Liu, L., Jin, Z., Fan, N., Deng, Y.(2009)。Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading。  new window
6.Chwilla, D. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M.(1998)。The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching。  new window
7.Cramer, P.(1974)。Idiodynamic sets as determinants of children’s false recognition errors。  new window
8.Frith, U.(1985)。Beneath the surface of development dyslexia。  new window
9.McGregor, K. K., Friedman, R. M., Reilly, R. M., & Newman, R. M.(2002)。representation and naming in young children. Journal of Speech。  new window
10.McGregor, K. K., Sheng, L., & Ball, T.(2007)。Complexities of expressive word learning over time。  new window
11.McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S.(1997)。On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning。  new window
12.Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J.(1998)。Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence form children with reading comprehension difficulties。  new window
13.Nation, K., Snowling, M. J., & Clarke, P.(2007)。Dissecting the relationship between language skills and learning to read: Semantic and phonological contributions to new vocabulary learning in children with poor reading comprehension。  new window
14.Nelson, K.(1985)。Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning。  new window
15.Perfetti, C. A.(1983)。Individual differences in verbal processes。  new window
16.Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V., & Nation, K.(2008)。Investigating orthographic and semantic aspects of word learning in poor comprehenders。  new window
17.Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C.(1995)。Variation, selection, and cognitive change。  new window
18.Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J.(1974)。Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions。  new window
19.Szaflarski, J. P., Schmithorst, V. J., Altaye, M., Byars, A. W., Ret, J., & Plante, E.(2006)。A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old。  new window
20.Warner, S. K.(1994)。Developmental designs revisited。  new window
21.Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H.(1954)。Experimental psychology。  new window
圖書論文
1.Burgess, C.、Lund, K.(2000)。The dynamics of meaning in memory。Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.萬雲英(19910000)。兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。中國人.中國心:發展與教學篇。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE