英美校園霸凌防制政策：教育法之觀點__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	英美校園霸凌防制政策：教育法之觀點
書刊名：	當代教育研究季刊
作者：	林斌
作者(外文)：	Lin, Bin
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	22:3
頁次：	頁49-89
主題關鍵詞：	校園霸凌；教育法；學校安全；School bullying；Education law；Campus safety
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:1614 點閱:33

近年來先進國家已將中小學校園霸凌之防制，視為重要教育政策議題。但我國校園霸凌之相關研究，主要集中於霸凌行為成因、教職員責任及學校處理霸凌事件之程序，相對忽略校園霸凌防制早已超越學校管理層級。事實上，政府防制校園霸凌不僅需要強化學校教育人員的專業能力，更應重視利害關係人義務及外部機構參與等層面之政策建構。而英、美兩國自廿世紀九○年代初期起，即大力推動學校教育改革，強調校園安全與學習品質之重要，並視校園霸凌防制為中小學校園安全政策之優先內涵，其正向發展經驗值得我國借鏡。因此，本研究擬採用歷史比較法，透過教育法之觀點，針對英、美中小學防制校園霸凌政策之內涵進行分析，以供我國政府部門未來修正相關政策之參考。本研究之結論顯示：英、美校園霸凌防制政策需遵守行政法之原則，能夠回應校園安全之需求，重視對家長之課責，對學生及教師之基本人權亦能予以保障。

以文找文

Anti-bullying in primary and secondary schools has been a vital issue in education policies of developed countries for years. The related researches in Taiwan were mainly focus on the causes of bullying behavior, the obligation of school faculty, and the procedures of dealing with it, comparatively ignoring the fact that school bullying has surpassed the level of school management. To tackle with it, the government should not only strengthen the profession of the school faculty, but also emphasize on the obligation of stakeholders and the involvement of external agencies. From 1990s, the UK and USA have been keen on school education reforms, highlighting the importance of campus safety and learning quality by prioritizing anti-bullying in campus safety policies; their positive experience is worthy for reference. Therefore, this study adopted the historical comparative method to analyse the components of British and American anti-bullying policies in the perspective of education law for the information of modifying related policies in the future. The results suggest the British and American anti-bullying policies follow the principles of administrative law, echo to the call of campus safety, highlight the accountability of parents, and safeguard the human rights of pupils and teachers. Accordingly, implications for related policies adjustments in Taiwan are proposed.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	林斌(20061200)。中英學生管教制度之比較研究--教育法學之觀點。教育研究集刊，52(4)，107-139。延伸查詢
2.	Jacobsen, K. E.、Bauman, S.(2007)。Bullying in schools: School counselors’ responses to three types of bullying incidents。Professional School Counseling，11(1)，1-9。
3.	張文貞(20071200)。跨國憲政主義的合縱與連橫--歐洲人權法院及內國憲法法院關係初探。月旦法學，151，57-70。延伸查詢
4.	Roland, Erling(2002)。Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts。Educational Research，44(1)，55-67。
5.	林斌(20130100)。英國防治校園霸凌法制之研究：教育治理之觀點。教育經營與管理研究集刊，9，1-29。延伸查詢
6.	周志宏(20070400)。學生管教法制之再檢討。國民教育，47(4)，4-14。延伸查詢
7.	謝哲勝(20020100)。英美法和大陸法的融合。國立中正大學法學集刊，6，33-64。延伸查詢
8.	黃德祥、黃麗萍(20090700)。美國各州反欺凌立法及政策分析。教育研究，183，137-149。延伸查詢
9.	Klomek, A. B.、Marracco, F.、Kleinman, M.、Schonfeld, I. S.(2007)。Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolecents。Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry，46(1)，40-49。
10.	Pontzer, D.(2010)。A theoretical test of bullying behavior:Parenting, personality, and the bully/victim relationship。Journal of Family Violence，25，259-273。
11.	Skiba, R.、Peterson, R.(1999)。The Dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools?。Phi Delta Kappan，80，372-376。
12.	Jeffries, John Calvin Jr.(1985)。Legality, vagueness, and the construction of penal statutes。Virginia Law Review，71(2)，189-245。
13.	Olweus, D.(1997)。Bully/victim problems in school: facts and intervention。European Journal of Psychology of Education，12(4)，495-510。
14.	Rivers, I.、Poteat, P. V.、Noret, N.、Ashurst, N.(2009)。Observing bullying at school:The mental health implications of witness status。School Psychology Quarterly，24，211-223。
15.	Gastic, Billie(2008)。School truancy and the disciplinary problems of bullying victims。Educational Review，60(4)，391-404。
16.	陳利銘、鄭英耀、黃正鵠(20100800)。反霸凌政策之分析與改進建議。教育政策論壇，13(3)=35，1-25。延伸查詢
17.	沈姍姍(19950100)。臺灣的教育選拔制度與社會流動之探討。新竹師院學報，8，95-113。延伸查詢
18.	黃舒芃(20041200)。法律保留原則在德國法秩序下的意涵與特徵。中原財經法學，13，1-45。延伸查詢
19.	陳淳文(20120300)。行政保留之比較研究--以半總統制之行政命令權為中心。中研院法學期刊，10，1-80。延伸查詢
20.	O'Brennan, L.、Bradshaw, C. P.、Sawyer, A. L.(2009)。Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, and bully/victitns。Psychology in the Schools，46(2)，100-115。

會議論文
1.	Currie, C.、Zanotti, C.、Morgan, A.、Currie, D.、de Looze, M.、Roberts, C.、Barnekow, V.(2012)。Social determinants of health and well-being among young people。Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey。Copenhagen, Denmark：World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.。

研究報告
1.	周志宏、徐筱菁、薛曉華、蔡志偉(2008)。教育法體系基礎概念之研究。臺北：淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所。延伸查詢
2.	謝慧游(2007)。美國有關校園體罰與小學班級管教實務之研究。教育部。延伸查詢
3.	Department for Education(2012)。Pupil behaviour in schools in England。London：Department for Education。

圖書
1.	陳志華、趙達瑜、劉華美(2010)。行政法基本理論。臺北：國立空中大學。延伸查詢
2.	Sullivan, Keith(2011)。The anti-bullying handbook。Los Angeles：Sage。
3.	Department of Education and Science、The Welsh Office(1989)。Discipline in Schools: Report of the Committee of Enquiry chaired by Lord Elton。London：Her Majesty's Stationery Office。
4.	Moore, K.、Jones, N.、Broadbent, E.(2008)。School violence in OECD countries。Surrey, UK：Plan Limited。
5.	Stewart, J.、Hedge, D.、Lester, J. P.(2008)。Public policy: An evolutionary approach。Wadsworth Thomson Learning。
6.	王澤鑑、林利芝、許忠信、楊秀儀、黃國昌、張文貞、李筱苹、陳肇鴻、廖元豪、簡資修、劉宏恩、呂紹凡(2010)。英美法導論。元照出版有限公司。延伸查詢
7.	Blandford, S.(1998)。Managing discipline in schools。London, UK：Routledge。
8.	Carver, P. R.、Lewis, L.(2010)。Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure:2007-08。Washington, DC：Government Printing Office。
9.	Chamberlain, T.、George, N.、Golden, S.、Walker, F.(2010)。Tellus 4 national report。London, UK：Department for Children, Schools and Families。
10.	Conn, K.(2004)。Bullying and harassment: A legal guide for educators。Alexandria, VA：Assoc, for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
11.	De Smith, S. A.、Woolf, H. Sir.、Jowell, J. L.(1999)。De Smith, Woolf, and Jowell’s principles of judicial review。London, UK：Sweet & Maxwell。
12.	Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007)。School discipline and pupil behaviour policies: Guidance for schools。Nottingham, UK：Department for Children, Schools and Families。
13.	Department for Education(2012)。Preventing and tackling bullying: Advice for head teachers, staff and governing bodies。London, UK：Department for Education。
14.	Department for Education(2012)。Statutory guidance and regulations on exclusion: The head teacher’s power to exclude。London, UK：Department for Education。
15.	Department for Education(2012)。Permanent and fixed-period exclusions from schools in England: academic year 2010 to 2011。London, UK：Department for Education。
16.	Department for Education(2013)。Behaviour and discipline in schools: A guide for head teachers and school staff。London, UK：Department for Education。
17.	Essex, Nathan L.(2012)。School law and the public schools: A practical guide for educational leaders。Pearson。
18.	Ford, J.、Hughes, M.、May, K.(2010)。Education law and practice。Bristol, UK：Jordans。
19.	Haselgrove-Spurin, C.(2004)。Constitutional and administrative law (public law)。Pontypridd, UK：Nationwide Mediation Academy for NADR。
20.	Hoare, J.、Scribbins, M.、Britton, A.(2011)。Children’s experience and attitudes towards the police, personal safety and public spaces: Findings from the 2009/10 British crime survey interviews with children aged 10 to 15。London, UK：Home Office Responsible Statistician。
21.	Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007)。Providing full-time education from the sixth day of any fixed period exclusion: Implementation and good practice guidance for schools, including PRUs。London, UK：Department for Children, Schools and Families。
22.	Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007)。Providing full-time education from day six of a permanent exclusion: Implementation and good practice guidance for local authorities。London, UK：Department for Children, Schools and Families。
23.	Department for Education(2011)。Preventing and tackling bullying: Advice for head teachers, staff and governing bodies。London, UK：Department for Education。
24.	Department for Education and Skills(2006)。School teachers' pay and condition document 2006 & guidance on school teacher’pay and conditions。London：TSO。
25.	Leyland, P.、Anthony, G.(2013)。Textbook on administrative law。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
26.	Martin, N.、Brand, B.(2006)。Federal, state, and local roles supporting alternative education。Washington, DC：National Center on Education and the Economy。
27.	Office of the Children's Commissioner(2006)。Bullying today: A report by the office of the children S commissioner, with recommendations and links to practitioner tools。London, UK：Office of the Children's Commissioner。
28.	Robers, S.、Zhang, J.、Truman, J.(2010)。Indicators of school crime and safety。Washington, DC：U.S. Department of Justice。
29.	Robers, S.、Zhang, J.、Truman, J.(2012)。Indicators of school crime and safety。Washington, DC：U.S. Department of Justice。
30.	Rosen, L.(2005)。School discipline: Best practices for administration。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。
31.	Stuart-Cassel, V.、Bell, A.、Springer, J. F.(2011)。Analysis of state bullying laws and policies。Washington, DC：Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education。
32.	Thomas, S. B.、McCarthy, M. M.(2009)。Public school law:Teacher’s and student’s rights。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。
33.	Townley, A. J.、Schmieder-Ramirez, J. H.(2010)。School law: A California perspective。Dubuque, IA：Kendall Hunt。
34.	Starling, Grover(2011)。Managing the public sector。Boston：Thomson Wadsworth。
35.	Imber, M.、Van Geel, T.(2010)。Education law。New York：Routledge。
36.	Olweus, D.(1993)。Bullying at school: What we know and what can we do。Blackewll。
37.	Babbie, Earl R.(2012)。The practice of social research。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Cengage Learning。
38.	吳庚(2003)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北：元照出版社。延伸查詢
39.	Rosenbloom, David H.、Kravchuk, Robert S.、Rosenbloora, Deborah G.(2002)。Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector。McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.。
40.	吳定(1998)。公共政策辭典。臺北：五南。延伸查詢
41.	李惠宗(2007)。行政罰法之理論與案例。臺北：元照出版公司。延伸查詢
42.	陳新民(20010000)。法治國家論。臺北：學林文化。延伸查詢
43.	李惠宗(2004)。教育行政法要義。元照。延伸查詢
44.	許育典(2007)。教育法。五南。延伸查詢

單篇論文
1.	Sacco, Dena T.，Silbaugh, Katharine Baird，Corredor, Felipe，Casey, June，Doherty, Davis(2012)。An overview of state anti-bullying legislation and other related laws，http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2012/stateantibullyinglegislation_overview。

其他
1.	Center for Effective Discipline(2010)。U.S.: Corporal punishment and paddling statistics by state and race，http://www.stophitting.com/index.php?page=statesbanning， 2013/02/25。
2.	Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007)。School discipline and pupil behaviour policies: Guidance for schools，http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank， 2011/12/19。
3.	Department for Children, Schools and Families(2009)。School discipline and pupil-behaviour policies: Guidance for schools，http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/earlyyears/， 2012/12/20。
4.	Department for Education(2012)。Statutory guidance and regulations on exclusion: The head teacher’s power to exclude，http://www.education.gov.uk/aboutdfe/statutory/g00210521/statutory-guidance-regs-2012/guidance/heads-power-to-exclude， 2013/07/25。
5.	Department for Education(2012)。Permanent and fixed-period exclusions from schools in England: academic year 2010 to 2011，http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001080/index.shtml， 2013/08/21。
6.	Department for Education(2013)。Behaviour and discipline in schools: A guide for head teachers and school staff，http://education.gov.uk/aboutdfe/advice/f0076803/guide-for-heads-and-school-staff-on-behaviour-and-discipline， 2013/08/18。
7.	Department for Education and Skills(2008)。Behavior and education support teams，http://www.dfes.gov.uk/best/about_BEST/index.cfm， 2011/09/12。
8.	Hoare, J.，Scribbins, M.(2011)。Children’s experience and attitudes towards the police, personal safety and public spaces: Findings from the 2009/10 British crime survey interviews with children aged 10 to 15，https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmentdata/file/116447/hosb0811.pdf， 2013/03/20。
9.	Jeffries, J. Jr.(1985)。Legality, vagueness, and the construction of penal statutes，http://www.law.virginia.edu/pdf/faculty/hein/jeffries/71va_l_rev189_1985.pdf， 2013/06/03。
10.	New York City Department of Education(2013)。Alternate learning center，http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/ALC/default.htm， 2013/05/11。
11.	Office for National Statistics(2012)。Census:Population estimates for the United Kingdom，http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_292378.pdf， 2013/04/12。
12.	Office for Standards in Education, Children's Service and Skills(2012)。The framework for school inspection，http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/090019， 2013/03/19。
13.	Office for Standards in Education, Children's Service and Skills(2012)。No place for bullying: How schools create a positive culture and prevent and tackle bullying，http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/110179， 2013/03/19。
14.	U.S. Department of Health & Human Services(2012)。Policies & laws，http://www.stopbullying.gov/laws/index.html， 2012/11/12。
15.	U.S. Department of Health & Human Services(2012)。Bullying definition，http://www.stopbullying.gov/what-is-bullying/definition/index.html， 2012/11/12。

圖書論文
1.	Olweus, Dan(2010)。Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues。Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective。New York：Routledge。
2.	Olweus, D.(1999)。Sweden。The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective。Routledge。
3.	江愛華、高家彬(2011)。全球化趨勢與臺灣中小學教育改革分析。我國百年教育回顧舆展望。臺北市：國家教育研究院。延伸查詢
4.	Duncan, R. C.(2011)。Family relationships of bullies and victims。Bullying in North American schools。New York：Routledge。
5.	Jimerson, S. R.、Swearer, S. M.、Espelage, D. L.(2010)。International scholarship advances science and practice addressing bullying in schools。Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective。New York：Routledge。
6.	Schwartz, R.、Rieser, L.(2001)。Zero tolerance as mandatory sentencing。Zero tolerance:Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools: A handbook for parents, students, educators, and citizens。New York：The New Press。
7.	許宗力(200608)。論法律保留原則。法與國家權力。臺北：元照。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	論法院作為法治例外狀態的守門人--以Covid-19防疫措施下的司法審查為中心
2.	1970年代之前中華民國赦免實踐的傳統色彩--以「復仇」、「官蔭」與「留養」為主的討論
3.	銓敘審定之審查權界限--評析最高行政法院一○七年判字第五二二號判決
4.	牴觸法律授權目的、忽視行政罰原理的一般裁量規則--綜評「食品安全衛生管理法第44條第1項罰鍰裁罰標準」
5.	從數位憲政與數位信任看我國健保資料庫的爭議與使用
6.	警察處理妨害他人身體財產違序案件之探討
7.	新修正警械使用條例之評析
8.	例外與常態的悖論--美國與我國因應COVID-19緊急法制之比較研究
9.	兒童及少年委託安置法制的合憲性初探
10.	校園霸凌防制政策成效評估指標之建構：政策工具之觀點
11.	大學自治下國立大學校長遴選的爭議：以2018年臺大校長遴選事件為例
12.	行爲或不行為義務之強制執行
13.	行政法學之迷霧森林--行政處分效力之體系
14.	租稅核課處分存續力之突破與退稅請求權
15.	論行政法院在暫時權利保護程序中聲請法規範憲法審查

1.	稅務調查正當行政程序之研究
2.	當公職社工師遇到政府社政科層：保護性社工職業社會化
3.	我國高雄市執行長照法制之興革
4.	兩岸經濟行政法制之比較研究-以攤販管理行政為中心
5.	債務清理行政法制之研究
6.	員工股權獎酬計畫之研究－從法域競爭的觀點出發
7.	我國不動產登記制度之再檢視
8.	營造業者關於公共工程契約的權利義務
9.	論稅捐法源之理論及其實踐
10.	一所公立托兒所改制為幼兒園之組織文化研究
11.	兩岸違憲審查制度之比較研究-從行政法五大架構分析
12.	政府政策為干擾效果對綠色創新產品購買行為之影響 – 以計畫行為理論分析台灣住宅屋頂型太陽能光電系統
13.	教育的存有向度: 梅洛龐蒂存在現象學的人文意涵及教育蘊義
14.	焦點事件與政策停頓:以核四封存為例
15.	兩岸締結協議監督機制之研究～第九屆立法院六個提案版本的比較分析

1.	大學校園人權：理論與實際
2.	臺灣法律現代化歷程：從「內地延長」到「自主繼受」
3.	罪與罰：臺灣戰後小說中的疾病書寫
4.	全民健保之給付法律關係析論
5.	農業與環境：臺灣問題與歐盟對策
6.	我國勞資協議法制研究
7.	臺灣入出國及移民法有關驅逐出國機制之現況、問題與未來可行之發展方向
8.	民主憲政與法學知識
9.	法律倫理學
10.	行政訴訟權保障之現代意義：以2004年日本行政事件訴訟法修正為中心
11.	臺灣民主治理：政務官與官僚體系的磨合
12.	併校的美麗與哀愁：以臺南總爺國小為例
13.	社會政策與社會立法新論
14.	行政法裁判精研
15.	科技定位追蹤監視與基本人權保障

無相關著作

1.	國中臺灣史教科書政治意識型態之批判論述分析--以翰林(2013版)教材內容為例
2.	誰來主導學校？現代家長與學校互動關係及啟示
3.	北部新移民與非新移民學童國語科學習路徑之探究：智力固定觀的影響
4.	不同模型教學對學童方位概念學習與模型認知之研究
5.	漫畫融入國中讀寫障礙學生的中文寫作學習之探究
6.	意義化識字教學法對國小學習障礙學生識字成效探討
7.	自我教導策略對國小中年級學習障礙學生在多位數乘法運算題的學習成效
8.	可預測性圖畫書在語文學習應用成效之探討：文獻回顧
9.	探討同儕中介教學與介入的相關策略與實證
10.	從目睹家暴個案輔導實務來談特殊生教育鑑定的寬鬆問題
11.	交互教學法在資源班閱讀理解教學的調整與應用
12.	國民中小學特教教師性別平等教育專業能力與培訓需求初探--從三位特教教師訪談出發
13.	專業標準觀點之特教系師資生對資賦優異類師資培育課程成效覺知之研究--以國立嘉義大學特教系為例
14.	智能障礙兒童社交技巧教學之探討
15.	資賦優異類科師資生科學教學知能現況之探討--以科學教育專家觀點為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫